Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.135255
Element CodePDFAB0FBK0
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicendemic to a single state or province
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderFabales
FamilyFabaceae
GenusAstragalus
SynonymsAstragalus eremiticus var. ampullarioidesWelsh
Concept ReferenceWelsh, S.L., N.D. Atwood, S. Goodrich, and L.C. Higgins (eds.) 1993. A Utah flora. 2nd edition. Brigham Young Univ., Provo, Utah. 986 pp.
Taxonomic CommentsWelsh (1993), USFWS (e.g., 2006), and FNA (2023, vol. 11) recognize at the full species level: Astragalus ampullarioides (Great Basin Naturalist 58(1):51). In contrast, Kartesz (1994, 1999), Isely (1998), and Barneby (1989) do not recognize this entity, at either the species or infraspecific levels, instead including A. ampullarioides (also known as A. eremiticus var. ampullarioides) in A. eremiticus, with no varieties recognized.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodLegacy Rank calculation - Excel v3.1x
Review Date2015-11-10
Change Date1991-07-19
Edition Date2015-11-10
Edition AuthorsJ. Snyder (1997), rev. L. Morse (2001), rev. A. Treher (2015)
Threat ImpactVery high
Range Extent250-1000 square km (about 100-400 square miles)
Number of Occurrences6 - 20
Rank ReasonsEdaphic endemic with a very small range that occurs on one geological formation in Washington Co., Utah. There are seven extant populations with most of the potential habitat previously destroyed by urban development. More than 50 percent of known populations has been destroyed (from about 2000 to less than 1000 individuals). (Armstrong and Harper 1991, VanBuren 1992). Threats include development, trampling, grazing, and pollinator declines.
Range Extent CommentsEndemic to a single geological formation in one area of Washington Co., Utah.
Occurrences CommentsBetween 6 and 8 populations (USFWS 2006, SEINET 2015).
Threat Impact CommentsUrban and agricultural development and grazing (species is extremely palatable to both wildlife and livestock). Development around some sites may impact pollinator abundance and although this species can self fertilize, seed set is much lower than when cross pollinated (Breinholt et al. 2009).