Catostomus warnerensis

Snyder, 1908

Warner Sucker

G1Critically Imperiled Found in 4 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G1Critically ImperiledGlobal Rank
EndangeredIUCN
Very high - highThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.100954
Element CodeAFCJC02220
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNEndangered
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderCypriniformes
FamilyCatostomidae
GenusCatostomus
Concept Reference
Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
See Smith (1992) for a study of the phylogeny and biogeography of the Catostomidae.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2011-11-01
Change Date1996-09-19
Edition Date2011-11-01
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G., and B. Qureshi
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent250-1000 square km (about 100-400 square miles)
Number of Occurrences1 - 5
Rank Reasons
Restricted to one small hydrologic basin in Oregon and very small areas in Nevada and California; threatened by habitat alteration (caused mainly by dams and diversions) and by predation by exotic fishes; these factors are exacerbated by drought.
Range Extent Comments
This fish is endemic to the Warner Lake Basin in south-central Oregon, extreme northeastern California, and extreme northwestern Nevada (USFWS 2010). This range includes three permanent lakes, Hart, Crump, and Pelican; the ephemeral Anderson, Swamp, Mugwump, Flagstaff, Upper Campbell, Campbell, Stone Coral, and Bluejoint lakes; and all the sloughs and canals connecting these lakes; and three major stream basins that are tributaries to these lakes (Deep Creek, Twentymile Creek, and Honey Creek) (USFWS 2010).

Current distribution: When adequate water is present, Warner suckers may inhabit all the lakes, sloughs, and potholes in the Warner Valley (USFWS 1998). The documented range extended as far north into the ephemeral lakes as Flagstaff Lake during high water in the early 1980s and again in the 1990s (Allen et al. 1996). Stream resident populations are found in Honey Creek, Snyder Creek (tributary to Honey Creek), Twentymile Creek, and Twelvemile Creek. Intermittent streams in these drainages may support small numbers of migratory suckers in high water years (USFWS 1998). In the lower Twentymile Slough area on the east side of the Warner Valley, White et al. (1990) collected adult and young suckers throughout the slough and Greaser Reservoir. This area dried up in 1991. However, because of its marshy character, this area may be important sucker habitat during high flows. Larval, young-of-the-year, juvenile and adult suckers captured immediately below Greaser Dam suggest either a slough resident population or lake resident suckers migrating up the Twentymile Slough channel from Crump Lake to spawn (White et al. 1990, Allen et al. 1996). [Source: USFWS 1998]
Occurrences Comments
This species is represented by essentially one metapopulation, the subpopulations of which fluctuate with water availability.
Threat Impact Comments
The major threats to the continued existence of the Warner sucker and other native fishes in the Warner Basin and Alkali Subbasin are human-induced stream channel and watershed degradation, irrigation diversion practices, and predation and competition from introduced fishes (USFWS 1998, 2010).

Irrigation dams and canals block access to some spawning streams, which may be negatively affected by water pollution and siltation. Natural decreases in water levels periodically reduce the sucker population during periods of drought, which are aggravated by irrigation demands for water. The introduction of exotic predaceous fishes to the Warner Valley in the early 1970s evidently led to large reductions in the numbers of Warner suckers, which previously had more extensive availability of safe rearing habitat, even with degraded stream conditions and blockages of migration corridors (USFWS 1998). Exotic fishes may also threaten the sucker through competitive interactions (USFWS 1998). Drying of the lakes in the early 1990s reduced but did not eliminate populations of exotic fishes (they persist in sloughs and ditches) (USFWS 1998).

This species remains vulnerable to predation by exotic fishes and is negatively affected by modification of habitat through the continued operation of water diversions and barriers that restrict movement and migration. Prolonged drought, particularly desiccation of lakes from drought and irrigation use and the drying or reduced stream flow of stream channels from irrigation water removal, greatly impact the species' viability and recovery (USFWS 2010).

The Warner sucker exists as two morphs, lake morph and stream morph. These face somewhat different threats. The lake morph suckers normally spawn in the streams, but they are often blocked from doing so by irrigation diversion structures or during low water years. Large lake-dwelling populations of introduced fishes have probably reduced recruitment by preying on young suckers. Stream habitat degradation has reduced suitable habitat and probably reduced the ability of stream morph suckers to withstand floods and droughts (USFWS 1998).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Habitat includes lakes, ephemeral bodies of water, streams, beaver ponds, and pools and runs of streams and large irrigation canals (Lee et al. 1980, Page and Burr 2011). Adults in streams tend to be in pools. In lakes, suckers are generally found in the deepest available water (generally less than 3.4 meters deep) where food is plentiful (USFWS 1998).

Spawning occurs over silt-free sand or gravel substrates in slow pools in low gradient streams (White et al. 1990, Kennedy and North 1993). At least some young move immediately into lakes (Lee et al. 1980). In years when access to stream spawning areas is limited by low flow or by physical in-stream blockages (such as beaver dams or diversion structures), suckers may attempt to spawn on gravel beds along the lake shorelines (White et al. 1990).

Larvae occupy shallow backwater pools or on stream margins where there is no current, often among or near macrophytes. Young-of-the-year are often found over deep, still water from midwater to the surface, but also move into faster flowing areas near the heads of pools (Coombs et al. 1979). Juvenile suckers (1-2 years old) are usually found at the bottom of deep pools or in other habitats that are relatively cool and permanent such as near springs. As with adults, juveniles prefer areas of the streams which are protected from the main flow (Coombs et al. 1979).

Reproduction

Reaches maturity at 3-4 years of age. Spawns in the spring when stream flows are relatively high (USFWS 1998).
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN1
ProvinceRankNative
NevadaS1Yes
OregonS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
7 - Natural system modificationsPervasive - largeExtreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/usePervasive - largeExtreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive - largeExtreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesPervasive - largeExtreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionPervasive - restrictedExtreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsPervasive - restrictedExtreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive - restrictedExtreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
11.2 - DroughtsPervasive - restrictedExtreme - moderateHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (4)
California (1)
AreaForestAcres
Mt. BidwellModoc National Forest11,687
Oregon (2)
AreaForestAcres
Drake - McdowellFremont National Forest5,767
Mt. BidwellFremont National Forest4,449
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
References (26)
  1. Allen, C., K. Hartzell, and M. Stern. 1996. Warner sucker progress report - 1996 findings. Unpublished report to the Bureau of Land Management. 55 pp.
  2. Clemmer, Glenn (Nevada Natural Heritage Program). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. 1997.
  3. Coombs, C. I., C. E. Bond, and S. F. Drohan. 1979. Spawning and early life history of the Warner sucker (<i>Catostomus warnerensis</i>). Unpublished report to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 52 pp.
  4. Gaines, Eleanor (Oregon Natural Heritage Program). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. August 1997.
  5. Jelks, H. L., S. J. Walsh, N. M. Burkhead, S. Contreras-Balderas, E. Díaz-Pardo, D. A. Hendrickson, J. Lyons, N. E. Mandrak, F. McCormick, J. S. Nelson, S. P. Platania, B. A. Porter, C. B. Renaud, J. Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, E. B. Taylor, and M.L. Warren, Jr. 2008. Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33(8):372-407.
  6. Kennedy, T. B., and G. L. Vinyard. 1997. Drift ecology of western catostomid larvae with emphasis on Warner suckers, <i>Catostomus warnerensis</i> (Teloestei). Environmental Biology of Fishes 49:187-195.
  7. Kennedy, T. B., and G. L. Vinyard. 2006. Ecology of young stream resident Warner sucker (Catostomus warnerensis) in Warner Basin, Oregon. American Midland Naturalist 156:400-404.
  8. Kennedy, T B., and J. F. North. 1993. 1992 Report: Drift behavior and distribution ofWarner sucker (<i>Catostomus warnerensis</i>) and preliminary assessment of stream habitat conditions in the Warner Valley, Oregon. Unpublished report to the Bureau of Land Management and Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. 25 pp.
  9. Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, North Carolina. i-x + 854 pp.
  10. Master, L. L. 1996. Synoptic national assessment of comparative risks to biological diversity and landscape types: species distributions. Summary Progress Report submitted to Environmental Protection Agency. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia. 60 pp.
  11. Matthews, J.R. and C.J. Moseley (eds.). 1990. The Official World Wildlife Fund Guide to Endangered Species of North America. Volume 1. Plants, Mammals. xxiii + pp 1-560 + 33 pp. appendix + 6 pp. glossary + 16 pp. index. Volume 2. Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians, Fishes, Mussels, Crustaceans, Snails, Insects, and Arachnids. xiii + pp. 561-1180. Beacham Publications, Inc., Washington, D.C.
  12. Nelson, J. S., E. J. Crossman, H. Espinosa-Perez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, and J. D. Williams. 2004. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 29, Bethesda, Maryland. 386 pp.
  13. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 1991. A field guide to freshwater fishes: North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. 432 pp.
  14. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston. xix + 663 pp.
  15. Page, L. M., H. Espinosa-Pérez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, R. L. Mayden, and J. S. Nelson. 2013. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Seventh edition. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 34, Bethesda, Maryland.
  16. Page, L. M., K. E. Bemis, T. E. Dowling, H.S. Espinosa-Pérez, L.T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, K. E. Hartel, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, M. A. Neigbors, J. J. Schmitter-Soto, and H. J. Walker, Jr. 2023. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Eighth edition. American Fisheries Society (AFS), Special Publication 37, Bethesda, Maryland, 439 pp.
  17. Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
  18. Sigler, W. F., and J. W. Sigler. 1987. Fishes of the Great Basin: a natural history. University of Nevada Press, Reno, Nevada. xvi + 425 pp.
  19. Smith, G. R. 1992. Phylogeny and biogeography of the Catostomidae, freshwater fishes of North America and Asia. Pages 778-826 in R.L. Mayden, editor. Systematics, historical ecology, and North American freshwater fishes. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. xxvi + 969 pp.
  20. State Natural Heritage Data Centers. 1996b. Aggregated element occurrence data from all U.S. state natural heritage programs, including the Tennessee Valley Authority, Navajo Nation and the District of Columbia: Export of freshwater fish and mussel records west of the Mississippi River in 1997. Science Division, The Nature Conservancy.
  21. Tait, C. K., and E. J. Mulkey. 1993. Estimation of stream-resident Warner sucker abundance and total habitat area in two basins using a statistically valid sampling design. Unpublished report to the Bureau of Land Management and Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. 40 pp.
  22. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1990. Endangered and threatened species recovery program: report to Congress. 406 pp.
  23. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1998. Recovery plan for the native fishes of the Warner Basin and Alkali Subbasin. USFWS, Portland, Oregon. x + 86 pp.
  24. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2010. Warner sucker (<i>Catostomus warnerensis</i>) 5-year review: summary and evaluation. USFWS, Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office, Portland, Oregon.
  25. White, R. K., T. R. Hoitsma, M. A. Stern, and A. V. Munhall. 1990. Final report on investigations of the range and status of the Warner sucker, <i>Catostomus warnerensis</i>, during spring and summer 1990. Unpublished report to the Bureau of Land Management, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 66 pp.
  26. Williams, J. E., M. A. Stern, A. V. Munhall, and G. A. Anderson. 1990. Conservation status of threatened fishes in Warner Basin, Oregon. Great Basin Naturalist 50(3):243-8.