Chasmistes cujus

Cope, 1883

Cui-ui

G1Critically Imperiled Found in 15 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G1Critically ImperiledGlobal Rank
EndangeredIUCN
MediumThreat Impact
Cui-ui (Chasmistes cujus). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.106051
Element CodeAFCJC03020
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNEndangered
CITESAppendix I
Endemicendemic to a single state or province
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderCypriniformes
FamilyCatostomidae
GenusChasmistes
Concept Reference
Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Buth et al. (1992) found that Chasmistes cujus and Catostomus tahoensis were diagnostically different for 20 genetic characters; they found no genetic evidence of hybridization in a sample of suspected, on the basis of morphology, to be of hybrid origin. Chasmistes and Deltistes are closely related to the older, more diverse, widespread genus Catostomus; Chasmistes species are distinctive in having branched gill rakers and a terminal mouth (Scoppettone and Vinyard 1991).

Harris and Mayden (2001) used molecular data to examine phylogenetic relationships of major clades of Catostomidae. In all trees, Scartomyzon was paraphyletic and embedded in Moxostoma, and Catostomus was never recovered as monophyletic (Xyrauchen was embedded within Catostomus). They concluded that the phylogenetic relationships and taxonomic composition of taxa presently included in Moxostoma and Scartomyzon are in need of further study, as are the relationships and composition of the genera Catostomus, Chasmistes, Deltistes, and Xyrauchen, and the phylogenetic affinites of Erimyzon and Minytrema.

See Smith (1992) for a study of the phylogeny and biogeography of the Catostomidae.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2011-11-02
Change Date1996-09-19
Edition Date2011-01-05
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G. (2011)
Threat ImpactMedium
Range Extent250-1000 square km (about 100-400 square miles)
Number of Occurrences1 - 5
Rank Reasons
Occurs only in Pyramid Lake and Truckee River, Nevada; major problem is reduced flow and water quality of the Truckee River, the only spawning area.
Range Extent Comments
This species is endemic to Pyramid Lake (490 square kilometers), Nevada. Formerly it occurred in Winnemucca Lake (dried up in the 1930s). It migrates up the tributary Truckee River to spawn; historically it spawned as far as 40 km upstream in the Truckee River (USFWS 1992). Currently, adults use the lower 19 km (12 miles) of the Truckee River only during the spawning season and only in years in which there is sufficient attraction flow and passage above or around the delta (Scoppettone et al. 1986); most spawners use the 16-km (10-mile) reach between Marble Bluff and Numana dams; the fish ladder at Numana Dam is not conducive to passage of cui-ui (USFWS 1992). Previously the species also occurred in Winnemucca Lake, which went dry in the 1930s due to water diversion.
Occurrences Comments
This species is represented by only one occurrence.
Threat Impact Comments
Endangered status is due to habitat alteration (siltation, pollution) and declining flow in the Truckee River (dam construction and water diversion). For many years access to the spawning habitat was difficult or impossible due to low water level in the lake and low flow in the river.

Current threats include loss of adequate water flow in the Truckee River, declining water quality resulting from the expanding urban population, and increased salinity in the lake that could result from mass water diversions (Scoppettone and Vinyard 1991). Inflow to Pyramid Lake is often insufficient to attract spawners or to stimulate fish movement into the river or Pyramid Lake Fishway (USFWS 1992). Sediment loads in the river, in conjunction with declining lake elevation, have created an extensive delta across the mouth that is frequently a barrier to upstream passage of cui-ui spawners (USFWS 1992).

Pollutants from point and nonpoint sources enter the entire Truckee River from municipal, agricultural, and industrial sources; this results in high levels of nutrient loading to the river and Pyramid Lake (USFWS 1992). Increased temperatures and sediment loading, decreased dissolved oxygen and wetted perimeter, and other parameters have ll reduced habitat quality for cui-ui (USFWS 1992).

Ownership of water rights in the Truckee basin has been in dispute and subject to litigation for many years (Scoppettone and Vinyard 1991).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Habitat includes inshore lakes areas with extensive shoals and shallow bars. Generally this species avoids deep-water areas and inshore areas with steep dropoffs (though Page and Burr [2011] described the habitat as "deep water"). Usually it occurs at depths of less than 46 meters (Sigler and Sigler 1987).

Spawning occurs in the Truckee River over gravel beds in relatively shallow water (21-140 cm) where flow is rapid. When runs are disturbed by low water levels, spawning may occur at the river mouth. Spawning may occur in Pyramid Lake, but extreme alkalinity and elevated salinity preclude successful reproduction there (Scoppettone and Vinyard 1991). Newly emerged young remain in the spawning stream for a few days or weeks .

Ecology

Most adult mortality probably occurs during spawning runs (Sigler et al. 1985). Direct predation by humans was a significant cause of mortality until the 1970s; in recent years white pelicans have become a significant source of mortality (Scoppettone and Vinyard 1991).

Reproduction

Spawning occurs from mid-April or May through June (rarely July), completed in 3-5 days, though adults remain in the river 4-16.5 days. Eggs hatch in 10 days at fluctuating temperatures of 14-17 C. Larvae swim up after an additional 4 days. Larval density is highest about 4 weeks after the peak of adult upstream migration. Larvae move downstream and enter the lake about 16 days after hatching. Spawning is successful only in occasional years. Best reproductive success occurs when temperature is less than 14 C. Individuals may first spawn at six years, though most do not reproduce until 8-12 years old. Maximum longevity is 40 years or more. Sources: Sigler and Sigler (1987), Sigler et al. (1985), Scoppettone and Vinyard (1991).
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN1
ProvinceRankNative
NevadaS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
7 - Natural system modificationsPervasive (71-100%)Extreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/usePervasive (71-100%)Extreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionPervasive (71-100%)Extreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
9.1 - Domestic & urban waste waterPervasive (71-100%)Extreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
9.2 - Industrial & military effluentsPervasive (71-100%)Extreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsPervasive (71-100%)Extreme - moderateHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (15)
Nevada (15)
AreaForestAcres
Mystic (NV)Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest5,644
Rose - Alum CreekHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest853
Rose - Big MeadowsHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest311
Rose - Davis Mdw.Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest2,361
Rose - Dutch LouieHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest363
Rose - EvansHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest4,782
Rose - Hunter EastHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest54
Rose - Hunter Lk NoHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest149
Rose - Hunter Lk. WestHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest14
Rose - Hunter WestHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest80
Rose - North NotchHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest141
Rose - NortheastHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest550
Rose - Thomas Mdw.Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest358
Rose - VerdiHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest1,155
Rose - Whites CanyonHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest2,568
References (26)
  1. Buth, D. G., T. R. Haglund, and W. L. Minckley. 1992. Duplicate gene expression and allozyme divergence diagnostic for <i>Catostomus tahoensis</i> and the endangered <i>Chasmistes cujus</i> in Pyramid Lake, Nevada. Copeia 1992:935-941.
  2. Clemmer, Glenn (Nevada Natural Heritage Program). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. 1997.
  3. Harris, P. M., and R. L. Mayden. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships of major clades of Catostomidae (Teleostei: Cypriniformes) as inferred from mitchondrial SSU and LSU rDNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 20:225-237.
  4. Jelks, H. L., S. J. Walsh, N. M. Burkhead, S. Contreras-Balderas, E. Díaz-Pardo, D. A. Hendrickson, J. Lyons, N. E. Mandrak, F. McCormick, J. S. Nelson, S. P. Platania, B. A. Porter, C. B. Renaud, J. Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, E. B. Taylor, and M.L. Warren, Jr. 2008. Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33(8):372-407.
  5. La Rivers, I. 1962. Fishes and Fisheries of Nevada. Nevada State Fish and Game Commission, Carson City, Nevada. 782 pp.
  6. Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, North Carolina. i-x + 854 pp.
  7. Master, Lawrence L. (Chief Zoologist, TNC). 1997a. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Reviews coordinated by Larry Master and Ruth Mathews, TNC.
  8. Matthews, J.R. and C.J. Moseley (eds.). 1990. The Official World Wildlife Fund Guide to Endangered Species of North America. Volume 1. Plants, Mammals. xxiii + pp 1-560 + 33 pp. appendix + 6 pp. glossary + 16 pp. index. Volume 2. Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians, Fishes, Mussels, Crustaceans, Snails, Insects, and Arachnids. xiii + pp. 561-1180. Beacham Publications, Inc., Washington, D.C.
  9. Nelson, J. S., E. J. Crossman, H. Espinosa-Perez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, and J. D. Williams. 2004. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 29, Bethesda, Maryland. 386 pp.
  10. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 1991. A field guide to freshwater fishes: North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. 432 pp.
  11. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston. xix + 663 pp.
  12. Page, L. M., H. Espinosa-Pérez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, R. L. Mayden, and J. S. Nelson. 2013. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Seventh edition. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 34, Bethesda, Maryland.
  13. Page, L. M., K. E. Bemis, T. E. Dowling, H.S. Espinosa-Pérez, L.T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, K. E. Hartel, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, M. A. Neigbors, J. J. Schmitter-Soto, and H. J. Walker, Jr. 2023. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Eighth edition. American Fisheries Society (AFS), Special Publication 37, Bethesda, Maryland, 439 pp.
  14. Pyle, E., J. Frazier, D. King, K. Johnson, D. Lockard, and T. J. Trelease. 1978. Cui-ui recovery plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Endangered Species Program, Region 1, Portland, Oregon. 58 pp
  15. Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
  16. Rood, S. B., C. R. Gourley, E. M. Ammon, L. G. Heki, J. R. Klotz, M. L. Morrison, D. Mosley, G. G. Scoppettone, S. Swanson, and P. L. Wagner. 2003. Flows for floodplain forests: a successful riparian restoration. BioScience 53:647-656.
  17. Scoppettone, G. G., and G. Vinyard. 1991. Life history and management of four endangered lacustrine suckers. Pages 359-377 in W. L. Minckley and J. E. Deacon (editors). Battle Against Extinction: Native Fish Management in the American West. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona.
  18. Scoppettone, G. G., and P. H. Rissler, 1995. Endangered cui-ui of Pyramid Lake, Nevada. Pages 323-324 in LaRoe et al., editors. Our living resources: a report to the nation on the distribution, abundance, and health of U.S. plants, animals, and ecosystems. Washington, D.C.: US Department of the Interior, National Biological Service.
  19. Scoppettone, G. G., M. Coleman, and G. A. Wedemeyer. 1986. Life history and status of the endangered cui-ui of Pyramid Lake, Nevada. Fish and Wildlife Research 1. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.
  20. Sigler, W. F., and J. W. Sigler. 1987. Fishes of the Great Basin: a natural history. University of Nevada Press, Reno, Nevada. xvi + 425 pp.
  21. Sigler, W. F., S. Vigg, and M. Bres. 1985. Life history of the cui-ui, <i>Chasmistes cujus</i> Cope, in Pyramid Lake, Nevada: a review. Great Basin Naturalist 45(4):571-603.
  22. Smith, G. R. 1992. Phylogeny and biogeography of the Catostomidae, freshwater fishes of North America and Asia. Pages 778-826 in R.L. Mayden, editor. Systematics, historical ecology, and North American freshwater fishes. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. xxvi + 969 pp.
  23. State Natural Heritage Data Centers. 1996b. Aggregated element occurrence data from all U.S. state natural heritage programs, including the Tennessee Valley Authority, Navajo Nation and the District of Columbia: Export of freshwater fish and mussel records west of the Mississippi River in 1997. Science Division, The Nature Conservancy.
  24. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1967. Native fish and wildlife: endangered species. Federal Register 32(48):4001.
  25. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1990. Endangered and threatened species recovery program: report to Congress. 406 pp.
  26. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1992. Cui-ui (<i>Chasmistes cujus</i>) recovery plan. Second revision. Portland, Oregon. 47 pp.