Morone saxatilis

(Walbaum, 1792)

Striped Bass

G3Vulnerable (G3G4) Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
High - mediumThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.104731
Element CodeAFCQA01040
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderPerciformes
FamilyMoronidae
GenusMorone
COSEWICPS: X,E,SC
Other Common Names
Bar rayé (FR)
Concept Reference
Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Formerly placed in the genus Roccus. Distinct populations occur within Chesapeake Bay and in other areas (Chapman 1990). Wirgin et al. (1989) found unique mtDNA genotypes in the Apalachicola River system, suggesting the continued existence there of a maternal lineage of Gulf ancestry. The family Percichthyidae was recognized by Robins et al. (1991) as possibly polyphyletic but was retained for convenience.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-03-12
Change Date2025-03-12
Edition Date2025-01-22
Edition AuthorsGundy, R. L. (2025)
Threat ImpactHigh - medium
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences6 - 80
Rank Reasons
The population suffered steep historical declines during the mid-20th century due to habitat loss and degradation, and fishing-related mortality. All Gulf of Mexico populations were lost except one population whose continued existence depends on fish stocking. The Atlantic population began to rebound during the last decades of the 20th century, but Atlantic populations are declining again due to the continued impacts of habitat degradation and fishing-related mortality.
Range Extent Comments
Historically, this species was found in two separate populations occupying the drainages of the western Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico. The Atlantic population is found in drainages from the St. Lawrence River, Canada, south to the St. Johns River, Florida, United States. The Gulf of Mexico population was historically found in drainages from the Suwannee River, Florida to Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana, and peripherally to coastal areas of eastern Texas (Crance 1984, Hill et al. 1989). The only population in the historical Gulf of Mexico range with Gulf of Mexico genotypes remaining is in the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River system, which is augmented by annual stocking and not considered self-sustaining (Long et al. 2013). All other populations in the Gulf of Mexico are composed of Atlantic genetic stock from fish stocking (Long et al. 2013), and are not considered for the purpose of this assessment.

This species has also been introduced to inland areas of the United States, along the Pacific Coast of North America, and in Eurasia (Crance 1984, Hill et al. 1989). This non-native portion of the range was not considered as part of this assessment.
Occurrences Comments
This species is represented by several large subpopulations.
Threat Impact Comments
Mortality from fishing-related activities in the Atlantic is one of the greatest contemporary threats to this species. Habitat destruction and fishing-related mortality contributed to the decline along the U.S. east coast in the late 1970s and early 1980s until hatchery production and restrictions on the harvest resulted in population increases in the Chesapeake Bay region by the early 1990s (Hill et al. 1989, Diamond 1990). However, the ongoing impacts of habitat destruction and fishing pressure remain. Fishing-related activities removed an average of 6.3 million fish from the Atlantic annually from 2013-2023 (ASMFC 2024). Of those fish removed from the Atlantic population in 2022-2023 by fishing-related activities, 49% were harvested by recreational fishing, 40% perished after being released by recreational fishing, 10% were harvested by commercial fishing, and 0.5% were bycatch/discards in commercial fishing (ASMFC 2024).

The Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River population is primarily threatened by the reduction of natural cool water sources and reduced river flow rates due to groundwater extraction by humans, and by reduced river flow rates due to dams and reservoirs (Long et al. 2013). The invasive aquatic plant (Hydrilla verticillata) contributes to hampered recovery of the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint population by contributing to reduced food supply, slow growth, decreased habitat, increased predation, and lower overall survival (Long et al. 2013). Harvest from recreational fishing accounts for the loss of several hundred fish per year from this population (Long et al. 2013).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Striped bass are deep bodied and compressed from side to side. They have two dorsal fins, the first with several spines and the second with one spine and several rays. The anal fin has 3 spines. The mouth is large, and there are two sharp points on each gill cover. The silvery sides are marked with 6-9 dark gray stripes. Very small young lack the dark stripes but have dusky bars on the sides. Maximum length is about 79 inches (2 meters).

Habitat

This is a marine and estuarine coastal species that moves far upstream in channels of medium to large rivers during spawning migrations. In coastal areas, it occurs typically within 6 km of shore. Adults in inshore areas occur over a wide range of substrates. The species has been widely introduced in lakes and impoundments. Some populations complete the life cycle in freshwater. In colder months, striped bass tend to seek the warmest water available at depths greater than 1.5 meters.

Striped bass use rivers, tidally influenced fresh waters, and estuaries for spawning and nursery areas. Preferred spawning areas often are shallow (1-20 feet, 0.3-6.1 meters) and turbid and range from the tidal zone to a few hundred kilometers upstream (usually within 38 miles or 60 km of coast). Spawners often seek areas with strong turbulent flow and substrates of rock and/or fine gravel. At Powell Reservoir, Utah, spawning occurred over a rocky shoal in or near the mixing zone of river water and reservoir water.

Eggs are semibuoyant, drift and sink slowly; in riverine populations, current of about 30 cm/sec reportedly is required to keep eggs afloat and prevent death due to settling on bottom (though this may vary with differences in egg buoyancy in different regions). Juveniles apparently prefer clean sandy bottom but have been found over gravel, rock, and (rarely) soft mud; may or may not move to areas of higher salinity in first summer/fall (varies with locality).

See Hill et al. (1989) and Crance (1984) for habitat suitability index model and details on various environmental requirements and tolerances (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, salinity, toxicants).

Ecology

Gregarious. Year-class success appears to be determined during fist 2 months of life, may be correlated with environmental conditions during larval stages (Hill et al. 1989). Growth and development rates vary widely, depending on conditions. Parasitic infection rarely cause mortalities in wild populations unless fishes are under stress (Hill et al. 1989). Summer die-offs are common in reservoirs (Sublette et al. 1990).

Reproduction

Spawning occurs as early as mid-February in Florida, as late as June-July in the St. Lawrence River; see Hill et al. (1989) for more detail on specific areas, and Crance (1984) for spawning in relation to temperature in various areas. Eggs hatch in about 2-3 days. Males usually become sexually mature in 1-3 years, females in 4-6 years (Middle Atlantic region). Spawning occurs in large aggregations (Moyle 1976).

See Hassler (1988) for a review of life history in Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California. See also Crance (1984).
Other Nations (2)
United StatesN4
ProvinceRankNative
Navajo NationSNANo
New JerseyS4Yes
New HampshireS4Yes
ArkansasSNANo
MarylandS5Yes
OklahomaSNANo
DelawareS5Yes
New YorkS3Yes
KentuckySNANo
West VirginiaSNANo
District of ColumbiaS4Yes
LouisianaS1Yes
Rhode IslandSNRYes
PennsylvaniaS4Yes
North CarolinaS4Yes
MassachusettsS5Yes
IndianaSNANo
IllinoisSNANo
CaliforniaSNANo
TennesseeSNANo
TexasSNANo
ColoradoSNANo
FloridaSNRYes
AlabamaS5Yes
New MexicoSNANo
ConnecticutS3Yes
VirginiaS4Yes
ArizonaSNANo
WashingtonSNANo
UtahSNANo
KansasSNANo
MaineS5Yes
OregonSNANo
North DakotaSNANo
South CarolinaS1Yes
MissouriSNANo
OhioS5Yes
NebraskaSNANo
GeorgiaS5Yes
NevadaSNANo
CanadaN4B,N4N
ProvinceRankNative
Nova ScotiaS2B,S2NYes
Prince Edward IslandS4NYes
New BrunswickS3B,S3NYes
QuebecS4BYes
British ColumbiaSNRYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
5 - Biological resource usePervasive (71-100%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
5.4 - Fishing & harvesting aquatic resourcesPervasive (71-100%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
5.4.1 - Intentional use: subsistence/small scale (species being assessed is the target) [harvest]Pervasive (71-100%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
5.4.2 - Intentional use: large scale (species being assessed is the target) [harvest]Large (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.4.4 - Unintentional effects: large scale (species being assessed is not the target) [harvest]Large (31-70%)Negligible or <1% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsPervasive (71-100%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/usePervasive (71-100%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesLarge (31-70%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesLarge (31-70%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (1)
California (1)
AreaForestAcres
Sespe - FrazierAngeles National Forest4,254
References (46)
  1. Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC). 2024. Atlantic Striped Bass Stock Assessment Update. Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA20NMF4740012. 37 pp.
  2. Baker, B. 1994. Striped bass success spawns new legislation. BioScience 44(8):520-522.
  3. Bart, Henry L. (Tulane Museum of Natural History, Tulane University). 2001. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Anthony E. Zammit, ABI in February 2000.
  4. Boschung, H. T., and R. L. Mayden. 2004. Fishes of Alabama. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. 960 pp.
  5. Chapman, R. W. 1990. Mitochondrial DNA analysis of striped bass populations in Chesapeake Bay. Copeia 1990:355-366.
  6. Cooper, E. L. 1983. Fishes of Pennsylvania and the northeastern United States. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park. 243 pp.
  7. Craig, Scott. U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Maine Fisheries Resource Office. East Orland, ME
  8. Crance, J. H. 1984. Habitat suitability index models and instream flow suitability curves: inland stocks of striped bass. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-82/10.85. 61 pp.
  9. Diamond, G. 1990. <i>Morone saxatilis</i> returns! (The rock are back!). Maryland Magazine, Autumn 1990, pp. 53-54.
  10. Douglas, N. H. 1974. Freshwater fishes of Louisiana. Claitor's Publishing Division, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. 443 pp.
  11. Halliwell, David B. (Maine Department of Environmental Protection). 2000. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Anthony E. Zammit, ABI. June 2000.
  12. Harrell, R.M., J.H. Kerby and R.V. Minton. 1990. Culture and propagation of striped bass and its hybrids. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. 323 pp.
  13. Hassler, T. J. 1988. Species profiles: life histories and environmental requirements of caostal fishes and inverte- brates (Pacific Southwest)--striped bass. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 83(11.82). US Army Corps of Engineers, TR EL-82-4. 29 pp.
  14. Hill, J., J. W. Evans, and M. J. Van Den Avyle. 1989. Species profiles: life histories and environmental requirements of coastal fishes and invertebrates (South Atlantic)--striped bass. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 82(11.118). 35 pp.
  15. Hoehn, Theodore S. and D. Gray Bass (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC)). 2000a. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Anthony E. Zammit, TNC. March 2000.
  16. Houston, R., K. Chadbourne, S. Lary and B. Charry. 2007. Geographic Distribution of Diadromous Fish in Maine [CD-ROM v1.0]. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and Maine Audubon Society, Falmouth, Maine.
  17. Jenkins, R. E., and N. M. Burkhead. 1994. Freshwater fishes of Virginia. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. xxiii + 1079 pp.
  18. Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, North Carolina. i-x + 854 pp.
  19. Long, E. A., C. L. Mesing, K. J. Herrington, R. R. Weller, and I. I. Wirgin. 2013. Restoration of Gulf striped bass: lessons and management implications. American Fisheries Society Symposium 80: 25–63.
  20. Marcy, B. C., Jr., D. E. Fletcher, F. D. Martin, M. H. Paller, and M.J.M. Reichert. 2005. Fishes of the middle Savannah River basin. University of Georgia Press, Athens. xiv + 460 pp.
  21. Menhinick, E. F. 1991. The freshwater fishes of North Carolina. North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. 227 pp.
  22. Merriman, D. 1941. Studies on the striped bass, <i>Roccus saxatilis</i>, of the Atlantic coast. Fishery Bulletin 50(35):1-77.
  23. Mettee, Maurice. F. "Scott" (Icthyologist, Geological Survey of Alabama). 2000. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Anthony E. Zammit, TNC. April 2000.
  24. Mettee, M. F., P. E. O'Neil, and J. M. Pierson. 1996. Fishes of Alabama and the Mobile Basin. Oxmoor House, Birmingham, Alabama. 820 pp.
  25. Moyle, P. B. 1976a. Inland fishes of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. 405 pp.
  26. Moyle, P. B. 2002. Inland fishes of California. Revised and expanded. University of California Press, Berkeley. xv + 502 pp.
  27. Nelson, J. S., E. J. Crossman, H. Espinosa-Perez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, and J. D. Williams. 2004. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 29, Bethesda, Maryland. 386 pp.
  28. Odom, M.C., R.J. Neves, and J.J. Ney. 1986. An assessment of anadromous fish migrations in the Chowan River drainage, Virginia. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Information Transfer, Fort Collins, CO.
  29. Odom, Michael (Supervisory Fish Biologist, USFWS). No Date. Review of anadromous fish watershed distribution maps for Virginia.
  30. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 1991. A field guide to freshwater fishes: North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. 432 pp.
  31. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston. xix + 663 pp.
  32. Page, L. M., H. Espinosa-Pérez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, R. L. Mayden, and J. S. Nelson. 2013. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Seventh edition. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 34, Bethesda, Maryland.
  33. Page, L. M., K. E. Bemis, T. E. Dowling, H.S. Espinosa-Pérez, L.T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, K. E. Hartel, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, M. A. Neigbors, J. J. Schmitter-Soto, and H. J. Walker, Jr. 2023. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Eighth edition. American Fisheries Society (AFS), Special Publication 37, Bethesda, Maryland, 439 pp.
  34. Raney, E.C., W.S. Woolcott, and A.G. Mehring. 1954. Migratory patterns and racial structure of Atlantic coast striped bass. Page 376-396 in J. Trefethen (editor), Transactions of the Nineteenth North American Wildlife Conference, March 8, 9, 10, 1954.
  35. Rathjen, W.F. and L.C. Miller. 1957. Aspects of the early life history of the striped bass, <i>Roccus saxatilis</i>, in the Hudson River. New York Fish and Game Journal 4: 43-60.
  36. Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
  37. Rodriguez, M. A. 2002. Restricted movement in stream fish: the paradigm is complete, not lost. Ecology 83(1):1-13.
  38. Rohde, Fritz (Icthyologist, North Carolina Division of Marine Fishes). 2000. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Anthony E. Zammit, ABI.
  39. Ross, S. T., and W. M. Brenneman. 1991. Distribution of freshwater fishes in Mississippi. Freshwater Fisheries Report No. 108. D-J Project Completion Report F-69. Mississippi Department of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries and Parks. Jackson, Mississippi. 548 pp.
  40. Ross, Stephen T. (University of Southern Mississippi, Department of Biological Sciences). 2001. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Anthony E. Zammit, ABI.
  41. Smith, C. L. 1983. Fishes of New York (maps and printout of a draft section on scarce fishes of New York). Unpublished draft.
  42. Sublette, J. E., M. D Hatch, and M. Sublette. 1990. The fishes of New Mexico. University New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, New Mexico. 393 pp.
  43. Thomson, K. S., W. H. Weed III, A. G. Taruski, and D. E. Simanek. 1978. Saltwater fishes of Connecticut. 2nd edition. State Geological and Natural History Survey of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Conservation, Bulletin 105. viii + 186 pp.
  44. Whitworth, W. R., P. L. Berrien, and W. T. Keller. 1976. Freshwater fishes of Connecticut. Bulletin of the Connecticut Geological and Natural History Survey 101. vi + 134 pp.
  45. Wirgin, I. I., R. Proenca, and J. Grossfield. 1989. Mitochondrial DNA diversity among populations of striped bass in the southeastern United States. Canadian Journal of Zoology 67:891-907.
  46. Wooley, C. M., and E. J. Crateau. 1983. Biology, population estimates, and movement of native and introduced striped bass, Apalachicola River, Florida. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 3: 383–394.