Viola novae-angliae

House

New England Violet

G4Apparently Secure Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.153623
Element CodePDVIO04180
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderViolales
FamilyViolaceae
GenusViola
Synonyms
Viola sororia var. novae-angliae(House) L.E. McKinney
Other Common Names
New England blue violet (EN) New England Blue Violet (EN) Violette de Nouvelle-Angleterre (FR)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
This record is for Viola novae-angliae in the narrow sense, excluding V. septentrionalis var. grisea (syn. V. grisea). FNA (vol. 6, 2015) expands the concept of Viola novae-angliae to include V. septentrionalis var. grisea, while Kartesz (1994) treats them as distinct.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2015-07-16
Change Date1995-03-09
Edition Date1995-03-09
Edition AuthorsRussell, C.; rev. by W. Ostlie (1995) (1990), S.L.Neid (1998) (1991, MRO); rev. L. Morse (1994) and S. Gottlieb; rev. K. Crowley (1995)
Range Extent20,000-2,500,000 square km (about 8000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank Reasons
Viola novae-angliae populations have been verified at 106 locations. Population sizes are usually stable and have <100 plants. Viola novae-angliae has two centers of distribution: northwestern Great Lakes region--Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ontario, and Manitoba, and northeastern New England and adjacent Canada--Maine and New Brunswick with a disjunct location in New York. Found on undisturbed acidic, xeric or xero-mesic rock or sand substrates, under partially or totally closed-canopy dry northern forest of mixed hardwoods and conifers.
Range Extent Comments
Viola novae-angliae has two centers of distribution: northwestern Great Lakes region--Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ontario, and Manitoba, and northeastern New England and adjacent Canada--Maine and New Brunswick with a disjunct location in New York.
Occurrences Comments
Occurrences in Michigan (5), Wisconsin (32), Minnesota (64), Ontario (18), Manitoba (1), New Brunswick (2), Maine (14), and New York (1).
Threat Impact Comments


Viola novae-angliae is a species of open, xeric-mesic sites, yet there appear to be few threats to its occurrence at a site containing suitable habitat. In fact, destructive activities that would tend to eliminate other rare plant species (disturbed fields, road building, etc.) tend to enhance the species survival. The natural habitat of V. novae-angliae, as explained above, is mimicked by such disturbance regimes (opening of the canopy and reduction of soil thickness and fertility). Such action reduces competition by other plant species.

Quarry activities within the granite outcrops could ultimately lead to the extirpation of extant occurrences. This activity should be monitored over the long run in order to properly assess its significance with respect to the New England violet.

In New England, the species appears to be largely restricted to open sandy areas along rivers (Mitchell and Sheviak 1981). These areas tend to overgrow quickly with shrubs and other vegetation and may require renewal by frequent flooding or ice scouring. It is interesting to point out that Mitchell and Sheviak list ice rafting as a threat to the species in the state. In fact, this type of action may very well sustain the open habitat that is required of the species. Alterations of stream flow by damming may prove harmful to sites containing this species through the elimination of flooding and ice rafting.
Ecology & Habitat

Diagnostic Characteristics



According to Ballard (1988), V. novae-angliae can be distinguished from other violets with which it shares its range, by its stemless, non-stoloniferous habit, blue flowers with bearded lateral and spurred petals, lance-ovate, rounded sepals, and villous, long-triangular, unlobed leaves.

Habitat



There was a belief in the past that V. novae-angliae grew best in rock crevices along the shores of the lakes or beside cold, rapidly flowing streams (Smith 1988; McGuire 1985; Alverson and Iltis 1979; Russell 1965, 1957-1958), indicating a requirement of cool clear water (Cook, et al. 1987) or humid conditions for growth. It is probable that this conception was entirely based on Russell's (1957-1958) monograph on the violets of Minnesota.

Recent work by Ballard (1989a) in the Great Lakes region suggested a different scenario. Ballard (1989a) stated:

"The natural, undisturbed habitat for the taxon was clearly acidic, xeric or xero-mesic rock or sand substrates, under partially or totally closed-canopy dry northern forest of mixed hardwoods and conifers. Soil moisture varied slightly in natural situations but was virtually always low over most of the growing season. Plant density was low in natural settings, with plants scattered singly throughout an area of uniform habitat. Plant density and frequency was found to be high only in sites where extensive natural or artificial disturbance opened the canopy, and more so where lichens and other native ground-layer species were largely scraped away or mowed. The taxon reached its greatest abundance in such sites as fallow meadows and roadside clearings adjacent to granitic outcrops. Interestingly, the taxon was always found to be virtually absent (or not vigorous or in high frequency where found) in otherwise similar situations where timber management had favored high percentages of acidic, long-leaved pines (Pinus resinosa in particular). The taxon's presence in a number of unmanaged areas adjacent to such managed areas, where it was conspicuously absent, suggests that V. novae-angliae does not grow well either in strongly acidic soils or soils heavily covered with pine needle duff.

Published accounts of its habitat notwithstanding, the taxon was found near bodies of water not due to strong moisture preference, but evidently due to greater exposure of xeric rock and sand substrates, less shading, and less competition from native ground-layer species. The apparently acidic nature of the substrate occupied by the taxon is dramatically different in pH than the strongly calcareous rock substrates it has been found on in Maine. Presumably, pH is not the limiting factor; but shade levels, substrate moisture, and competition from native ground-layer species are."

Ballard (1988) stated that the species is only found where forest openings have been maintained, either naturally or artificially. Areas with seemingly appropriate habitat, but managed for pine regeneration, were found to never possess the plant. Apparently, V. novae-angliae is not able to withstand the pine needle duff accumulation brought on by the forestry practice favoring monocultural pine regeneration (Ballard 1988).

In conditions where the optimal natural conditions are exaggerated (as in a road cut enlarging a natural clearing), the New England violet is able to invade the areas at densities, numbers of individuals and fecundity rates far exceeding those found in all natural conditions (Ballard 1989a, 1988). Apparently, this is a rather common phenomenon throughout the genus Viola. Ballard (1988) additionally stated that the largest populations were located within a shrub-free, upland, power-line clearing across the top of large bedrock domes, and in gravelly, grassy ditches adjacent to bedrock knobs cleaved by county roads or campground entrance trails.

V. novae-angliae is a dry-land plant which apparently prefers dry to mesic-dry, circumneutral or slightly acidic substrates, being partial to very thin soil over bedrock (Ballard 1988), particularly on top of or around the bases of granite knobs (Ballard 1989a). Such habitats are typical of Upper Midwestern sites. In Wisconsin, the species is found occurring along rivers, in cold, boggy soils, dry sandy soils in upland woods and on gravelly or sandy stream banks (WI DNR 1981). For a detailed list of historical and new sites found by Ballard (which includes most of the sites outside of Maine), see Ballard (1989a).

In New York State (Mitchell and Sheviak 1981) and other New England states (Cook 1982), the plant is apparently restricted to sandy and gravelly pockets among cobbles along water courses. Since the species is apparently restricted to open areas, which are rare along water courses, available habitat is scarce.

Maine populations are restricted to calcareous slate ledges of the lower Penobscot, St. John and Allagash Rivers. At one site, the plants occur well-below the spring high-water mark, although they are above water during the entire growing season (Gawler 1982). Seasonal flooding via intense summer rains may periodically immerse plants, however.

Ecology



Very little is known with respect to the biology or ecology of V. novae-angliae. This taxon has never been studied to any large extent and even its distribution and habitat preferences were largely unknown prior to 1988.

Ballard (pers. comm., 1989a) stated that he has reduced the status of V. novae-angliae to a subspecific rank under Viola sororia Willd. The taxon should be listed as V. sororia ssp. novae-angliae (House) H. E. Ballard, Jr. (Ballard pers. comm.).
Other Nations (2)
United StatesNNR
ProvinceRankNative
WisconsinS4Yes
MaineS2Yes
MinnesotaS4Yes
VermontSNRYes
MichiganS2Yes
New HampshireSNRYes
New YorkS1Yes
CanadaNNR
ProvinceRankNative
New BrunswickSNRYes
ManitobaSNRYes
OntarioSNRYes
Plant Characteristics
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (1)
Minnesota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Phantom LakeSuperior National Forest6,521
References (22)
  1. Alverson, W. S. and H. H. Iltis. 1979. Unpublished report on Viola novae-angliae submitted for public hearings in April, 1979, to support the proposal of this species for state threatened status. Scientific Areas Section, Wisconsin DNR, Madison. 2 pp.
  2. Ballard, H. E. 1988. Spring observations on Midwestern Viola novae-angliae. Unpublished notes to the Minnesota Heritage Program, Minneapolis. 6 pp.
  3. Ballard, H. E. 1989a. Status survey and taxonomic study of <i>Viola novae-angliae</i> (Violaceae). Unpublished. 36 pp. + figs.
  4. Ballard, H.E. 1989b. Field notes from MNA's 1989 Appalachia search. Unpublished notes. The Nature Conservancy Element File for Appalachia arcana.
  5. Ballard, H.E. 1994. Violets of Michigan. Michigan Botanist 33(4): 131-199.
  6. Ballard, H.E. and S.C. Gawler. 1994. Distribution, habitat, and conservation of Viola novae-angliae. Michigan Botanist 33(1): 35-52.
  7. Ballard, H. E. Preserve Design Ecologist, Michigan field Office, The Nature Conservancy.
  8. Ballard, H.E. Preserve Design Ecologist, Michigan Field Office, The Nature Conservancy. Personal communication with W.Ostilie (MRO), 6 Sept 1990.
  9. Coffin, B. and L. Pfannmuller (eds.). 1988. Minnesota's endangered flora and fauna. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
  10. Cook, J. G., R. P. Lansky, J. L. Henszey, M. L. Nieghburs, K. H. Dueholm, K. D. Kozie and S. H. Anderson. 1987. Section V: literature review of rare species known to occur on National Park Service lands, Midwest region. National Park Service, Omaha, NE 193 pp.
  11. Crow, G.E. 1982. New England's Rare, Threatened and Endangered Plants. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Region 5, Newton Corner, MA).
  12. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2015. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 6. Magnoliophyta: Cucurbitaceae to Droserceae. Oxford University Press, New York. 496 pp + xxiv.
  13. Gawler, S. 1982. Critical Areas Program botanical fact sheet number 70: Viola novae-angliae. Maine Critical Areas Program, Augusta. 2 pp.
  14. House, H. D. 1904. A new violet from New England. Rhodora 6: 226-227.
  15. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  16. Mcguire, S. 1985. Viola novae-angliae House: A report submitted for BIOL 5775, University of Minnesota-Duluth.
  17. McKinney, L.E. 1992. A taxonomic revision of the acaulescent blue violets (<i>Viola</i>) of North America. Sida Bot. Misc. 7: 1-60.
  18. Mitchell, R. S., and C. J. Sheviak. 1981. Rare Plants of New York State. Bull. No. 445. New York State Museum. University of the State of New York, Albany, N.Y. 96 pp.
  19. Russell, N.H. 1957-1958. The violets of Minnesota. Proc. Minn. Acad. Sci. 25-26. 191pp.
  20. Russell, N.H. 1965. Violets (Violaceae) of central and eastern United States: an introductory survey. SIDA 2(1): 1-113.
  21. Smith, W. 1988. Vascular plants. Pp. 33-217, in Coffin, B. and L. Pfannmuller (eds.), Minnesota's endangered flora and fauna. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
  22. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WI DNR). 1981. Endangered and non-game species handbook. Madison. Pp. 18-20.