Cryptotis parvus

(Say, 1823)

North American Least Shrew

G5Secure Found in 4 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
LowThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.1375544
Element CodeAMABA04050
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassMammalia
OrderEulipotyphla
FamilySoricidae
GenusCryptotis
Synonyms
Cryptotis parva(Say, 1823)
Concept Reference
Galfano, T. M., T. M. Herrera, J. B. Bulger, J. N. Stuart, J. K. Frey, and A. G. Hope. 2025. Phylogenomic analysis of wide-ranging least shrews refines conservation priorities and supports a paradigm for evolution of biota spanning eastern North America and Mesoamerica. Ecology and Evolution 15(5):e71263.
Taxonomic Comments
This species previously included C. berlandieri, C. pueblensis, C. soricinus, and C. floridanus (ASM 2025, Galfano et al. 2025, Woodman 2018). Galfano et al. (2025) recognize geographically discrete lineages as subspecies, C. p. parvus west of the Mississippi, and C. p. harlani east of the Mississippi. An additional subspecies, C. p. neomexicanus is recognized from New Mexico (Galfano et al. 2025). Following ASM (2025), the ending is changed from -a to -us through all of Cryptotis per ICZN (2006).

Formerly included, as subspecies, Central American Cryptotis orophilus and C. tropicalis, which were listed as distinct species by Hutterer (in Wilson and Reeder 2005).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2026-02-12
Change Date1996-11-04
Edition Date2026-02-12
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G. (2016), N. Sears (2026)
Threat ImpactLow
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank Reasons
This is a widespread species found in many suitable habitats. Threats are believed to be low, although some populations may be experiencing localized declines. The species has been lost from parts of its historical range, but has expanded its range westward in the central United States and Mexico.
Range Extent Comments
This species occurs throughout much of eastern U.S. north (at least formerly) to extreme southeastern Canada (Hutterer, in Wilson and Reeder 1993), southern New York and southern Connecticut, southern Michigan (Evers 1992), South Dakota (Backlund 2002), Nebraska (Benedict et al. 2000, Geluso et al. 2004, Merlino et al. 2012) and eastern Wyoming (Marquardt et al. 2006); also south through Mexico and into the Central American countries of Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama (Hutterer, in Wilson and Reeder 2005, Barnes and Hoffman 2023). All samples of putative C. parvus from south of the Rio Grande along the U.S. Mexico border appear to represent C. berlandieri or other species of the C. parvus group (Galfano et al. 2025).
Occurrences Comments
This species is widespread and known from a large number of occurrences (GBIF 2026, RARECAT 2025). The species is locally rare, although it may be sampled in high densities in certain habitats or conditions (Whitaker 1974).
Threat Impact Comments
Given the large geographic distribution of this species, it is unlikely that any major threat is impacting its global population. However, sub-populations are threatened by habitat loss and degradation due to development and agricultural practices such as intensive farming and pesticide application.
Ecology & Habitat

Diagnostic Characteristics

See Carraway (1995) for a key to western North American soricids based primarily on dentaries.

Habitat

Generally occurs in open country with dense herbaceous vegetation. Also brushy areas, forest edges, and sometimes salt and freshwater marshes. Sometimes in scrubby live oak, pine-oak, dense humid tropical forest, and cloud forest, and near water in Mexico and Central America. Nest site may be underground or under log, stump, rock, board.

Ecology

Populations may occur in small colonies. Nest is center of activity. Home range may be 3 acres (Choate and Fleharty 1973). Usually more abundant than snaptrap surveys show. Density may be 10-15 per acre (Hoffmeister and Mohr 1957, Kale 1972). Appears in owl pellets much more frequently than in traps of collectors.

Reproduction

Breeds March-November in north, all year in south (mainly spring-summer). Gestation lasts about 2 weeks. Litter size is 2-7, average 4-5. young are weaned in 3 weeks. Two to three litters per year. Sexually mature after 5 weeks.
Terrestrial Habitats
Woodland - HardwoodWoodland - MixedShrubland/chaparralSavannaGrassland/herbaceousOld fieldCropland/hedgerowSuburban/orchard
Palustrine Habitats
HERBACEOUS WETLANDSCRUB-SHRUB WETLANDFORESTED WETLANDRiparian
Other Nations (2)
CanadaNH
ProvinceRankNative
OntarioSHYes
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
IllinoisS5Yes
WisconsinSXYes
TennesseeS5Yes
New YorkSHYes
MichiganS1Yes
MinnesotaS3Yes
MissouriS4Yes
KansasS5Yes
TexasS4Yes
MississippiSNRYes
AlabamaS5Yes
LouisianaS4Yes
South DakotaS2Yes
VirginiaS5Yes
New JerseySUYes
South CarolinaS5Yes
ConnecticutS1Yes
MarylandS4Yes
FloridaSNRYes
IowaS2Yes
KentuckyS5Yes
OklahomaSNRYes
ColoradoS5Yes
New MexicoS2Yes
IndianaS4Yes
NebraskaS4Yes
District of ColumbiaS4Yes
OhioSNRYes
GeorgiaS5Yes
West VirginiaS2Yes
North CarolinaS5Yes
DelawareSNRYes
PennsylvaniaS1Yes
ArkansasS5Yes
Roadless Areas (4)
Arkansas (1)
AreaForestAcres
Dismal CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest9,160
North Carolina (2)
AreaForestAcres
Pond Pine BCroatan National Forest2,961
Sheep Ridge AdditionCroatan National Forest5,808
Virginia (1)
AreaForestAcres
Adams PeakGeorge Washington National Forest7,135
References (34)
  1. American Society of Mammalogists (ASM). 2025. Mammal Diversity Database (Version 1.13) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10595931. Online. Available: https://www.mammaldiversity.org/
  2. Backlund, D. C. 2002. The expanding distribution of the Least Shrew, <i>Cryptotis parva</i>, in South Dakota. Proceedings of the South Dakota Academy of Science 81:153–159.
  3. Baker, R. H. 1983. Michigan mammals. Michigan State University Press. 642 pp.
  4. Barnes, E. F., and J. D. Hoffman. 2023. Significant range expansions in eight species of North American mammals. Museum of Texas Tech University, Occasional Papers 385:1–29.
  5. Benedict, R. A., H. H. Genoways, and P. W. Freeman. 2000. Shifting distributional patterns of mammals in Nebraska. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences 26:55-84.
  6. Carraway, L. N. 1995. A key to Recent Soricidae of the western United States and Canada based primarily on dentaries. Occasional Papers of the Natural History Museum, University of Kansas (175):1-49.
  7. Choate, J. R. 1970. Systematics and zoogeography of Middle American shrews of the genus Cryptotis. Univ. Kansas Pub. Mus. Nat. Hist. 19:195-317.
  8. Choate, J.R. and E.D. Fleharty. 1973. Habitat preference and spatial relations of shrews in a mixed grassland in Kansas. Southwestern Nat. 18(1): 110-112.
  9. Eichelberger C., and J. Wisgo. 2013. Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program. Element Subnational Ranking Form: <i>Cryptotis parva</i> in Biotics 5 database. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia (accessed 2026).
  10. Evers, D. C. 1992. A guide to Michigan's endangered wildlife. Univ. Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. viii + 103 pp.
  11. Felbaum, F., B. Mitchell, K. McKenna, J. Hassinger, A. Shiels, J. Hart and D. Brauning. 1995. Endangered and threatened species of Pennsylvania. Wildlife Conservation Resource Fund, Harrisburg, PA, 80 pp
  12. Galfano, T. M., T. M. Herrera, J. B. Bulger, J. N. Stuart, J. K. Frey, and A. G. Hope. 2025. Phylogenomic analysis of wide-ranging least shrews refines conservation priorities and supports a paradigm for evolution of biota spanning eastern North America and Mesoamerica. Ecology and Evolution 15(5):e71263.
  13. Geluso, K., J. A. White, and M. A. Bogan. 2004. Least Shrew (<i>Cryptotis parva</i>) in extreme west-central Nebraska. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences 29:29–32.
  14. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). 2026. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) data portal. Online. Available: https://www.gbif.org/ (accessed 2026).
  15. Godin, A. J. 1977. Wild mammals of New England. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. 304 pp.
  16. Hafner, D. J., and C. J. Shuster. 1996. Historical biogeography of western peripheral isolates of the least shrew, CRYPTOTIS PARVA. Journal of Mammalogy 77:536-545.
  17. Hall, E. R. 1981a. The Mammals of North America, second edition. Vols. I &amp; II. John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, New York. 1181 pp.
  18. Hamilton, W. J., Jr., and J. O. Whitaker, Jr. 1979. Mammals of the eastern United States. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York. 346 pp.
  19. Hoffmeister, D.F., and C.O. Mohr. 1957. Fieldbook of Illinois mammals. Illionis Nat. Hist. Surv. Div., Manual 4. 233 pp.
  20. International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN). 2006. Opinion 2164 (Case 3328). Didelphis Linnaeus, 1758 (Mammalia, Didelphidae): Gender Corrected to Feminine, and Cryptotis Pomel, 1848 (Mammalia, Soricidae): Gender Fixed as Masculine. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 63:282–283.
  21. Jones, J. K., Jr., R. S. Hoffman, D. W. Rice, C. Jones, R. J. Baker, and M. D. Engstrom. 1992a. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 1991. Occasional Papers, The Museum, Texas Tech University, 146:1-23.
  22. Kale, H.W. 1972. A high concentration of Cryptotis parva in a forest in Florida. Jour. Mamm. 53(1):216-218.
  23. Marquardt, S. R., B. C. Bartels, and C. A. Schmidt. 2006. First record of the Least Shrew in Wyoming. Prairie Naturalist 38:195–196.
  24. Merlino, J. N., A. R. Frohberg, J. Harmon, and K. Geluso. 2012. Least and Merriam’s shrews from Banner County, Nebraska. Prairie Naturalist 44:60–62.
  25. Mock, O.B. 1970. Reproduction of the least shrew (Cryptotis parva) in captivity. Univ. Missouri, unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, 132 pp.
  26. NatureServe. 2026. NatureServe Network Biodiversity Location Data. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.
  27. <p>NatureServe's Rapid Analysis of Rarity and Endangerment Conservation Assessment Tool (RARECAT). 2025. Version: 2.1.1 (released April 04, 2025).</p>
  28. Schwartz, C. W., and E. R. Schwartz. 1981. The wild mammals of Missouri. University of Missouri Press, Columbia. 356 pp.
  29. Vanek, J. 2024. Species Status Assessment, North American least shrew, <i>Cryptotis parva</i>.Updated: January 16, 2024. 12 pp. Online: https://extapps.dec.ny.gov/fs/programs/dfw/SWAP2025/Mammals/North%20American%20least%20shrew.pdf
  30. van Zyll de Jong, C.G. 1983. Handbook of Canadian mammals. 1. Marsupials and insectivores. National Museum of Natural Sciences, National Museums of Canada, Ottawa, Canada. 210 pp.
  31. Whitaker, J. O., Jr. 1974. <i>Cryptotis parva</i>. American Society of Mammalogists, Mammalian Species 43:1-8.
  32. Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 1993. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Second edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. xviii + 1206 pp. Available online at: http://www.nmnh.si.edu/msw/.
  33. Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 2005. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Third edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Two volumes. 2,142 pp. [As modified by ASM the Mammal Diversity Database (MDD) at https://www.mammaldiversity.org/index.html]
  34. Woodman, N. 2018. American Recent Eulipotyphla: Nesophontids, Solenodons, Moles, and Shrews in the New World. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, No. 650. 107 pp.