Acris blanchardi

Harper, 1947

Blanchard's Cricket Frog

G5Secure Found in 14 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
MediumThreat Impact
Blanchard's Cricket Frog (Acris blanchardi). Photo by Sam Kieschnick, CC BY 4.0, via iNaturalist.
Sam Kieschnick, CC BY 4.0
Blanchard's Cricket Frog (Acris blanchardi). Photo by Jay Pruett, CC BY 4.0, via iNaturalist.
Jay Pruett, CC BY 4.0
Blanchard's Cricket Frog (Acris blanchardi). Photo by Northcut, CC BY 4.0, via iNaturalist.
Northcut, CC BY 4.0
Blanchard's Cricket Frog (Acris blanchardi). Photo by Etienne Falquet, CC0 1.0, via iNaturalist.
Etienne Falquet, CC0 1.0
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.828458
Element CodeAAABC01040
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAmphibia
OrderAnura
FamilyHylidae
GenusAcris
Synonyms
Acris crepitans blanchardiHarper, 1947
Other Common Names
Blanchard's cricket frog (EN) Rainette grillon de Blanchard (FR)
Concept Reference
Gamble, T., P. B. Berendzen, H. B. Shaffer, D. E. Starkey, and A. M. Simons. 2008. Species limits and phylogeography of North American cricket frogs (Acris: Hylidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 48:112-125.
Taxonomic Comments
Gamble et al. (2008) revised the distributions of blanchardi and crepitans in the south-central part of their combined ranges and recognized A. blanchardi and A. crepitans as distinct species. This change was adopted by Frost (Amphibian Species of the World website), Collins and Taggart (2009) and Crother (2012, 2017). The morphological distinctiveness of Acris crepitans blanchardi from Acris crepitans crepitans had been rejected by McCallum and Trauth (2006).
Conservation Status
Review Date2016-01-22
Change Date1996-10-18
Edition Date2010-08-24
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Threat ImpactMedium
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank Reasons
Widespread and common in much of range in central United States, but major declines have occurred in northern part of range; cause of declines is uncertain, may involve differnet factors in different areas.
Range Extent Comments
Range extends from southwestern South Dakota, southern Minnesota, central Wisconsin, southern Michigan, extreme southwestern Ontario (formerly), and northern Ohio south to southern Texas, part of immediately adjacent extreme northeastern Mexico, and southern Louisiana; west to northeastern Colorado (at least formerly) and eastern New Mexico (Gamble et al. 2008). Documented range is west of the Mississippi River and north of the Ohio River, except for small areas along the east side of the lower Mississippi River and south of the Ohio River in northern Kentucky.
Occurrences Comments
This species is represented by many and/or large occurrences throughout most of the range. Recently found at only 19 of 44 historical sites in southwestern Wisconsin (Jung 1992).
Threat Impact Comments
This species appears to be significantly threatened primarily in the northern portion of its range. The reasons for the declines remain speculative but vegetation succession, climatic fluctuations, predation by native and exotic species, competition from other frog species, and water pollution caused by pesticides and/or other chemicals associated with agriculture are possibly significant (Harding 1997, Lannoo 1998, Hammerson 1999, Hammerson and Livo 1999).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

This species inhabits the edges of sunny marshes, marshy ponds, and small slow-moving streams in open country. It may periodically range into adjacent nonwetland habitats in some regions. Eggs and larvae develop in the shallow water of ponds, marshes, ditches, slow streams, springs, or rain pools. Hibernation sites are underground on land near water; may hibernate communally (e.g., McCallum and Trauth 2003).

Reproduction

Lays clutch of up to a few hundred eggs in spring or summer, breeding earlier in south than in north. Aquatic larvae metamorphose in summer. Sexually mature in first year.
Terrestrial Habitats
Grassland/herbaceous
Palustrine Habitats
TEMPORARY POOLHERBACEOUS WETLANDSCRUB-SHRUB WETLANDBog/fenRiparian
Other Nations (2)
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
KentuckyS5Yes
New MexicoS3Yes
IowaS3Yes
South DakotaS2Yes
NebraskaS3Yes
MississippiSNRYes
MinnesotaS1Yes
OklahomaSNRYes
WisconsinS1Yes
MissouriS5Yes
IndianaS4Yes
KansasS4Yes
LouisianaSNRYes
ArkansasS5Yes
OhioS3Yes
ColoradoSXYes
IllinoisS5Yes
West VirginiaSHYes
TexasS5Yes
MichiganS2Yes
CanadaNX
ProvinceRankNative
OntarioSXYes
Roadless Areas (14)
Arkansas (7)
AreaForestAcres
Bear MountainOuachita National Forest1,910
Blue MountainOuachita National Forest9,755
Clifty CanyonOzark-St. Francis National Forest1,963
Devils CanyonOzark-St. Francis National Forest1,877
Dismal CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest9,160
East ForkOzark-St. Francis National Forest13,037
Little BlakelyOuachita National Forest3,342
Idaho (1)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekCaribou-Targhee National Forest118,582
Louisiana (1)
AreaForestAcres
Saline Bayou W & S River CorridorKisatchie National Forest5,355
Missouri (2)
AreaForestAcres
Irish Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest1,226
Spring Creek Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest4,899
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
Texas (2)
AreaForestAcres
Big CreekNational Forests in Texas1,447
Little Lake CreekNational Forests in Texas596
References (31)
  1. Brodman, R., S. Cortwright, and A. Resetar. 2002. Historical changes of reptiles and amphibians of northwest Indiana fish and wildlife properties. American Midland Naturalist 147:135-144.
  2. Collins, J. T. 1990. Standard common and current scientific names for North American amphibians and reptiles. 3rd ed. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. Herpetological Circular No. 19. 41 pp.
  3. Collins, J. T. 1993. Amphibians and reptiles in Kansas. Third edition, revised. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History, Public Education Series No. 13. xx + 397 pp.
  4. Collins, J. T., and T. W. Taggart. 2009. Standard common and current scientific names for North American amphibians, turtles, reptiles, and crocodilians. Sixth edition. The Center for North American Herpetology, Lawrance, Kansas. iv + 44 pp.
  5. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2008. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. Sixth edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Herpetological Circular 37:1-84. Online with updates at: http://www.ssarherps.org/pages/comm_names/Index.php
  6. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2012. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 7th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 39:1-92.
  7. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  8. Degenhardt, W. G., C. W. Painter, and A. H. Price. 1996. Amphibians and reptiles of New Mexico. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. xix + 431 pp.
  9. Dixon, J. R. 2000. Amphibians and reptiles of Texas. Second edition. Texas A & M University Press, College Station. 421 pp.
  10. Dodd, C. K., Jr. 2013. Frogs of the United States and Canada. Volume 1. Frogs of the United States and Canada. Volume 1 :xxxi + 460.
  11. Dundee, H. A., and D. A. Rossman. 1989. The amphibians and reptiles of Louisiana. Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge.
  12. Frost, D. R. 2008. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 5.2 (15 July 2008). Electronic Database accessible at http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.php. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA.
  13. Frost, D. R. 2011. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 5.5 (31 January 2011). Electronic Database accessible at http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.php. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA.
  14. Frost, D.R. 2020. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. Online: http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html
  15. Gamble, T., P. B. Berendzen, H. B. Shaffer, D. E. Starkey, and A. M. Simons. 2008. Species limits and phylogeography of North American cricket frogs (<i>Acris</i>: Hylidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 48:112-125.
  16. Green, N. B., and T. K. Pauley. 1987. Amphibians and reptiles in West Virginia. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. xi + 241 pp.
  17. Hammerson, G. A. 1999. Amphibians and reptiles in Colorado. Second edition. University Press of Colorado, Boulder. xxvi + 484 pp.
  18. Hammerson, G. A., and L. J. Livo. 1999. Conservation status of the northern cricket frog (Acris crepitans) in Colorado and adjacent areas at the northwestern extent of the range. Herpetological Review 30:78-80.
  19. Harding, J. H. 1997. Amphibians and reptiles of the Great Lakes region. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. xvi + 378 pp.
  20. Hay, R. 1998. Blanchard's Cricket Frogs in Wisconsin: a staus report. Pages 79-82 in: M. J. Lannoo, editor. Status and conservation of Midwestern amphibians. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City, Iowa.
  21. Johnson, Bruce K. and James L. Christiansen. 1976. The food and food habits of Blanchard's cricket frog, Acris crepitans blanchardi (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae), in Iowa. J. Herpetologica. 10(2):63-74.
  22. Johnson, T. R. 2000. The amphibians and reptiles of Missouri. Second edition. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City. 400 pp.
  23. Jung, R. E. 1992. Blanchard's cricket frogs (<i>Acris crepitans blanchardi</i>) in southwest Wisconsin. Abstract, 6th Annual Meeting of the Society for Conservation Biology, p. 140.
  24. Lannoo, M. J., editor. 1998. Status and conservation of Midwestern amphibians. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City.
  25. Lehtinen, R. M. 2002. A historical study of the distribution of Blanchard's crickets frog (<i>Acris creptians blanchardi</i>) in southeastern Michigan. Herpetological Review 33:194-197.
  26. McCallum, M. L., and S. E. Trauth. 2006. An evaluation of the subspecies <i>Acris crepitans blanchardi</i> (Anura, Hylidae). Zootaxa (1104):1-21.
  27. Minton, S. A., Jr. 2001. Amphibians & reptiles of Indiana. Revised second edition. Indiana Academy of Science, Indianapolis. xiv + 404 pp.
  28. Oldfield, B., and J. J. Moriarty. 1994. Amphibians & reptiles native to Minnesota. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. xv + 237 pp.
  29. Phillips, C. A., R. A. Brandon, and E. O. Moll. 1999. Field guide to amphibians and reptiles of Illinois. Illinois Natural History Survey Manual 8. xv + 282 pp.
  30. Trauth, S. E., H. W. Robison, and M. V. Plummer. 2004. The amphibians and reptiles of Arkansas. University of Arkansas Press.
  31. Vogt, R. C. 1981c. Natural history of amphibians and reptiles of Wisconsin. Milwaukee Public Museum. 205 pp.