Eriogonum pelinophilum

Reveal

Clay-loving Wild Buckwheat

G1Critically Imperiled (G1G2) Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G1Critically ImperiledGlobal Rank
Very high - highThreat Impact
Clay-Loving wild buckwheat (Eriogonum pelinophilum). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.157709
Element CodePDPGN084P0
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicendemic to a single state or province
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderPolygonales
FamilyPolygonaceae
GenusEriogonum
Concept Reference
Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2005. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 5. Magnoliophyta: Caryophyllidae: Caryophyllales, Polygonales, and Plumbaginales. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. vii + 656 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Considered distinct by Kartesz in his 1994 checklist, by USFWS (federally listed), and by Colorado Heritage; included in the species Eriogonum clavellatum by Kartesz in his 1999 Floristic Synthesis, following the recommendation of Jim Reveal. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (2005) and USDA PLANTS (2008) recognize E. pelinophilum and E. clavellatum as distinct. Weber states that E. clavellatum is known from the Four Corners area, while E. pelinophilum occurs in the vicinity of Delta, Colorado.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2022-08-25
Change Date2022-08-25
Edition Date2022-08-25
Edition AuthorsJ. Handwerk (2004), rev. K. Neuhaus, J. Handwerk, and S. Panjabi (2006), rev. J. Handwerk (2009, 2012), rev. J. Handwerk and J.P. Smith (2022)
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent250-1000 square km (about 100-400 square miles)
Number of Occurrences6 - 80
Rank Reasons
Eriogonum pelinophilum is known from less than 500 sq km within two counties in western Colorado, USA. It is threatened by a variety of anthropogenic disturbances including housing and urban development, power lines, canals and roads, and off highway vehicle use. Prolonged drought and habitat alteration due to climate change within the species range also threaten Eriogonum pelinophilum.
Range Extent Comments
Eriogonum pelinophilum is endemic to Delta and Montrose counties, Colorado, USA. The estimated range extent in Colorado of 421 square kilometers was calculated in GeoCAT using occurrence data provided by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program (2022).
Occurrences Comments
As of 2022 there are 22 known occurrences documented in the Colorado Natural Heritage Program database. Three of the occurrences have not been observed in over 20 years.
Threat Impact Comments
Fragmentation of Eriogonum pelinophilum habitat into small units of possibly nonviable population size is the greatest threat at this time (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1988). Habitats are being destroyed by rapid encroachment of irrigated agricultural land and residential development. Known occurrences are reported to be extirpated or have undergone recent degradation due to residential development (Reveal 2003). Subsequent impacts such as road building and off-road vehicle use are also significant threats. A large portion of the critical habitat type is on public land and is not in danger of being developed. However, due to the close proximity of human development, many of these sites suffer from right-of-way access, off-road vehicle use and overgrazing. These activities not only endanger known populations, but also damage or destroy potential habitat recovery areas. Other threats include gas and oil exploration, pipelines and new irrigation canals, which often skirt the bases of the adobe hills, potentially interfering with E. pelinophilum habitats (Neeley 1985, O'Kane 1985, USFWS 1988).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Low rounded heavily branched pulvinate subshrubs 5-10 cm high and 8-15 cm across; lower stems light brown, woody, bark exfoliating in long loose strips or wide plates; leafless, upper branches herbaceous, slender, floccose to glabrous; leaves solitary, scattered along entire length of herbaceous stems, except for the last 5-10 mm, somewhat closely placed and congested to widely spaced, leaf blades oblanceolate, 5-12 mm long, 1-1.5 mm wide, densely white-tomentose below, midveins totally obscured by the tomentum, subglabrous to glabrous and green above, margins entire, revolute and completely enclosing the lower surface, apices and bases acute, leaves persistent, petioles 1 mm long, light yellowish-brown to tan and thinly pubescent when young, becoming glabrous; flowering stems slender, 5-10 mm long, floccose to glabrous; inflorescence cymose, +/- compact and congested, 1-2 cm long and wide, trichotomous, rays 2-5 mm long, floccose to glabrous without, thinly tormentose within, connate at base; peduncles, when present, 1-1.5 mm long, floccose to glabrous, erect; involucres solitary, narrowly turbinate, 3-3.5 mm long, 1-1.5 mm wide, floccose to glabrous without, glabrous within, 5 acute lobes 0.3-0.4 mm long, bractlets oblanceolate, 1.8-2.5 mm long, minutely fringed with capitate gland-shaped cells, pedicels 2.5-4.5 mm long, glabrous; flowers white with reddish-brown midribs and brownish-red bases, 3-3.5 mm long, glabrous within and without except for microscopic glands along the midribs within, tepals similar; achenes 3-3.5 mm long (Peterson 1982).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Eriogonum pelinophilum differs from the similar E. clavellatum in that the latter is larger (10-20 cm vs. 5-10 cm high) and has glabrous stems with involucres 4.0-4.5 mm long vs. floccose to glabrous stems and involucres 3.0-3.5 mm long (Weber 1987).

Habitat

Eriogonum pelinophilum is found in substrates derived from the Mancos Formation shales. The entire area is typified by rolling adobe (clay) hills and flats. Generally, the plants are found in a sharply defined soil microhabitat with shadscale (Atriplex confertifolia), on mid to lower slopes of the hills. The soil types are part of the Billings Series, known for its fine texture and weak and unstable structure. These soils are calcareous throughout and in some places have visible accumulations of calcium carbonate or calcium sulfate (Cline et al. 1967). Steeper barren slopes (badlands) are above, with flatlands below dominated by mat saltbush (A. corrugata) (Cline et al. 1967, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1988). The change from the lower slope soils to the flatland soils is characterized by a jump in soil sulfate level (from <100 ppm to 1650 ppm) and sodium level (Potter et. al. 1985). Clay soils have a high water holding capacity, but this moisture is not readily available to plants (Barbour et. al. 1980, cit. in O'Kane 1985). Rainfall in the E. pelinophilum habitat averages 7-10 inches annually, further contributing to the low moisture availability (Colorado Climate Center 1984). Eriogonum pelinophilum generally prefers swales and bottoms where useable moisture is more available (O'Kane 1985). Because of the low moisture availability, communities in which E. pelinophilum occur are characterized by low species diversity, low productivity and minimal canopy cover. Eriogonum pelinophilum is codominant with other xerophytic shrubs or subshrubs such as shadscale, the rare Penstemon retrorsus, Castle Valley clover (Atriplex cuneata), mat saltbush, black sagebrush (Artemisia nova) and Xylorhiza venusta (Neely 1985, O'Kane 1985). The communities are apparently stable, climax associations, judging from the lack of invading species capable of dominating the sites. Field observations indicate that the species is most abundant where biological soil crust cover is not extensive (Ferguson 2007).

Ecology

Results from the Colorado Natural Areas Program (CNAP) monitoring program on Eriogonum pelinophilum (1987, 1988) provide previously unknown information about Eriogonum pelinophilum biology and ecology. The program is in its 3rd of 12 years, so data collected thus far may not accurately portray the species' life characteristics over time. Preliminary conclusions are: i) Eriogonum pelinophilum is a long-lived perennial with a probable population turnover rate of approximately 20-50 years, ii) flowering, and therefore reproduction, does not occur until an individual plant reaches a critical size of approximately 100 cm2, iii) plant density does not appear to be limiting the success of Eriogonum pelinophilum (i.e. plants with close neighbors have life characteristics comparable to solitary plants), iv) Eriogonum pelinophilum appears to be distributed randomly among its associated species, v) after 2 years, the average mortality rate per year was 2.7 percent, and the average recruitment rate per year was 4.6 percent.

Unless otherwise noted, the following is from O'Kane (1985). Densities of Eriogonum pelinophilum range from 75-500 individuals per acre (180 per acre average). Because the plants prefer swales and lower slopes, those smaller areas have a considerably higher density than the per acre densities calculated above. Pollination agents are not precisely known, though ants have been observed pollinating other Eriogonum species. Flowers are proandrous, with the androecium maturing 1-2 days before the stigma is receptive. Seed dispersal is usually passive, either being consumed or carried by animals, windblown, or moved by gravity or water. Flowering occurs in June-July, fruiting in late June-early August. All Eriogonum species studied thus far have seeds that require a cold period to break dormancy (not necessarily a freeze), and some Eriogonum species have seeds with a 5 year shelf life (Reveal undated, cit. in O'Kane 1985).

Reproduction

Flowers are protandrous. Each individual flower is short-lived (about 30-42 hours), but the bloom period at the plant and population level is relatively long: individual plants have open flowers for 3-6 weeks, and one large population near Montrose, Colorado had open flowers from late May through early September (Bowlin et al. 1993).

E. pelinophilum requires an insect pollinator in order to set seed (Bowlin et al. 1993). Experimental study showed that the species is self-compatible (sets viable seed when pollen is transferred between flowers on the same plant); the authors believe that "pollinators moving from male-stage to female-stage flowers on the same plant will occasionally effect pollination" (Bowlin et al. 1993). Pollinators also frequently move between plants, resulting in a mixed breeding system with some pollination from other flowers on the same plant and some from flowers on different plants (Bowlin et al. 1993).

A wide variety of insects visit and probably pollinate the flowers. Over 50 species of insects, about half of them native bees, were recorded foraging on E. pelinophilium in one large population near Montrose, Colorado (Bowlin et al. 1993). 18 species of ants were observed foraging; most were either harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex occidentalis) or aphid-tending ants (Formica spp., most often F. obtusipilosa), with the aphid-tending ants generally carrying pollen more often and further than the harvester ants, especially early in the season (Bowlin et al. 1993). Both ants and flying insects appear to be effective pollinators, with a field experiment showing no significant difference in seed set among flowers visited only by ants, only by flying insects, or by both groups (Bowlin et al. 1993).

Most seed is dispersed locally (Bowlin et al. 1993).
Terrestrial Habitats
Barrens
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN1
ProvinceRankNative
ColoradoS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4.2 - Utility & service linesRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceLarge - restrictedModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
6.1 - Recreational activitiesLarge - restrictedModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge (31-70%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useLarge (31-70%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11.2 - DroughtsPervasive (71-100%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL, Long-lived
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (1)
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
References (37)
  1. Barbour, M.G., J.H. Burke, and W.D. Pitts. 1980. Terrestrial Plant Ecology. Benjamin/Cummings Pub. Co., Inc. Menlo Park, CA.
  2. Bowlin, W.R.,V.J. Tepedino, and T.L. Griswold. 1993. The reproductive biology of <i>Eriogonum pelinophilum</i> (Polygonaceae). Pages 296-302 in R. Sivinski and K. Lightfoot, editors. Southwestern rare and endangered plants. New Mexico Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department, Forestry and Resources Conservation Division, Miscellaneous Publication Number 2.
  3. Bureau of Land Management. 2003. Environmental Assessment Record for <i>Eriogonum pelinophilum</i>.
  4. Bureau of Land Management (BLM). 1988. Uncompahgre Basin Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement. Department of the Interior, Colorado State Office, Montrose District. 195pp.
  5. Bureau of Land Management (BLM). 1989. Uncompahgre Basin Resource Management Plan and Record of Decision. U.S. Department of the Interior, Colorado State Office, Montrose District. 56pp.
  6. Carpenter, A. and T. Schultz. 1994. Population Dynamics, Growth and Reproduction of the Clay-loving Wild Buckwheat (<i>Eriogonum pelinophilum</i>) at Wacker Ranch in Montrose County, Colorado.
  7. Cline, A.J., Spears, F. Mehaffey, E. Kubin, R. Franklin and C. Pachek. 1967. Soil Survey of the Delta-Montrose Area, Colorado. U.S. Department of Agriculture - Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 73pp.
  8. Coles, J. 2003. Personal communication with Colorado Natural Heritage Program.
  9. Colorado Climate Center. 1984. Colorado Average Annual Precipitation 1951-1980. Colorado State University, Ft. Collins.
  10. Colorado Native Plant Society. 1989. Rare plants of Colorado. Rocky Mountain Nature Association, Colorado Native Plant Society, Estes Park, Colorado. 73 pp.
  11. Colorado Natural Areas Program (CNAP). Life History Characterisitics and Habitat Requirements for ERIOGONUM PELINOPHILUM and Protection of Known Populations; 3 reports: i) Program Narrative, Undated ii) Performance Report 1987 iii) Performance Report 1988. All unpublished.
  12. Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP). 2022. Biodiversity Tracking and Conservation System (Biotics 5). Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
  13. Ferguson, J. 2003. Personal communication with CNHP staff.
  14. Ferguson, J. 2007. Summer 2007 Clay-Loving Wild Buckwheat (<i>Eriogonum pelinophilum</i>) Field Surveys, Including an Assessment of the Potential Effects of Livestock Grazing on this Species within the Colona LHA.
  15. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2005. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 5. Magnoliophyta: Caryophyllidae: Caryophyllales, Polygonales, and Plumbaginales. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. vii + 656 pp.
  16. Graham, S. 1984 July 18. Delta plant declared endangered. Rocky Mountain News.
  17. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  18. Kartesz, J.T. 1999. A synonymized checklist and atlas with biological attributes for the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. First edition. In: Kartesz, J.T., and C.A. Meacham. Synthesis of the North American Flora, Version 1.0. North Carolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill, N.C.
  19. Kartesz, J. T. 1999. Comments regarding taxa 1-187 [of list supplied by TNC]. Unpublished, Biota of North America Program, North Carolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill, N.C., Nov. 25, 1999.
  20. Krening, P., K. Holsinger, and C. Dawson. 2021. Clay-loving buckwheat (<i>Eriogonum pelinophilum</i>) 2021 Monitoring Summary and Status Report. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Department of the Interior.
  21. Lyon, P. 2003. Personal communication with Colorado Natural Heritage Program.
  22. Lyon, P. 2008. Monitoring of <i>Eriogonum pelinophilum</i> at the Wacker Ranch, Montrose, Colorado.
  23. Mueller-Dumbois, D. and H. Ellenberg. 1974. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  24. NatureServe. Unpublished. Concept reference for taxa for which no reference which describes the circumscription has been recorded; to be used as a placeholder until such a citation is identified.
  25. Neely, E.E. 1985. Site Conservation Summary for Wacker's Ranch. Unpublished report for the Nature Conservancy, Boulder, Colorado.
  26. O'Kane, S.L. 1988. Colorado's rare flora. Great Basin Naturalist 48(4): 434-484.
  27. O'Kane, S. L., Jr. 1985. Endangered Species Information System, Species Biology Workbook for ERIOGONUM PELINOPHILUM. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
  28. Potter, L. D., R. C. Reynolds, and E. T. Louderbough. 1985b. Mancos shale and plant community relationships: Analysis of shale, soil, and vegetation transects. Journal of Arid Environments 9:147-165.
  29. Potter, L.D., R.C. Reynolds Jr., and E.T. Louderbaugh. 1985a. Mancos Shale and plant community relationships: field observations. Journal of Arid Environments 9:137-145.
  30. Reveal, J. 2003. Personal communiction with Colorado Natural Heritage Program.
  31. Reveal, J.L. 1973. A new subfruticose <i>Eriogonum </i>(Polygonaceae) from western Colorado. Great Basin Naturalist 33:120-2.
  32. Reveal, J.L. 2006. On the Status of <i>Eriogonum pelinophilum</i> Reveal (<i>Polygonaceae</i> Juss.: subf.<i> Eriogonoideae</i> Arn.)
  33. Rondeau, R., K. Decker, J. Handwerk, J. Siemers, L. Grunau, and C. Pague. 2011. The state of Colorado's biodiversity 2011. Prepared for The Nature Conservancy. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
  34. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1984. Final rule to determine <i>Eriogonum pelinophilum</i> to be an endangered species. Federal Register 49(136): 28562-28565.
  35. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1988. Clay-loving Wild-buckwheat Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, Colorado.
  36. Weber, W.A. 1987. Colorado flora: Western slope. Colorado Associated University Press. Boulder. 530 pp.
  37. West, R. 2003. Personal commuication with CNHP staff.