Ulmus americana

L.

American Elm

G4Apparently Secure Found in 10 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
EndangeredIUCN
HighThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.136896
Element CodePDULM04020
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
IUCNEndangered
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderUrticales
FamilyUlmaceae
GenusUlmus
Other Common Names
American elm (EN) Orme d'Amérique (FR) White Elm (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2019-07-26
Change Date2019-07-26
Edition Date2019-07-23
Edition AuthorsMorse, Larry E. (1996), rev. Treher (2019)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
American Elm is a widespread and common tree species of floodplain forest, but it is far less common than several decades ago due to depletion by an exotic fungus (Dutch elm disease). Some forests impacted by this disease regenerate by individuals not yet infected, but older trees succumb to the disease: this cycle is causing a demographic shift in populations towards younger and smaller trees. Other forests have seen steady declines of the species. The iconic large, arching elms that create a cathedral like effect in nature are quite rare. There are efforts to introduce dutch elm resistant plant material at some sites and there is evidence of some disease resistance among certain populations. The development of disease resistant material was largely driven by the loss of this species as a beloved ornamental tree. The Conservation Status of this species should be reviewed frequently to detect changes in the impact of the pest.
Range Extent Comments
Ulmus americana occurs throughout the eastern U.S.A., and along riparian habitat in the Great Plains, and northward into southern Newfoundland, southern Quebec and Ontario, Manitoba and eastern Saskatchewan (FNA 1997).
Occurrences Comments
The number of sites for this species is not quantified. It was once a codominant or dominant species of floodplain forests, but is still very common (Marks 2017).
Threat Impact Comments
The primary threat to this species is Dutch Elm Disease, a fungal pathogen that is spread by elm bark beetles. American Elm trees reach sexual maturity around the age of 15, around the same age that the risk of morality from Dutch Elm Disease also increases. Trees of this age are sometimes able to produce seeds before succumbing to the disease, even if they don't have resistant to the pathogen. Interestingly, the die off of larger trees allows physical space for more smaller trees, not yet killed off by Dutch Elm Disease. It is possible that at some sites, the number of individuals has increased but shifted towards smaller individuals. Isolated trees are less vulnerable than those in dense stands and represent some of the remaining specimens with the mature cathedral like form. Some impacts of the disease are a demographic shift in the population structure, loss of dominance in floodplain forests, and a shift in the forest structure. There are efforts to introduce dutch elm resistant plant material at some sites and there is evidence of some disease resistance among certain populations (Marks 2017).
Ecology & Habitat

Reproduction

Samaras are wind dispersed, typically within 90 m of the tree but some can be dispersed up to 0.4 km. Waterways can carry seeds for many kilometers (Coladonato 1992).
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN5
ProvinceRankNative
ManitobaS4Yes
AlbertaSNANo
Nova ScotiaS3Yes
SaskatchewanS4Yes
QuebecS4Yes
Prince Edward IslandS3Yes
British ColumbiaSNANo
OntarioS5Yes
New BrunswickS3Yes
United StatesN4
ProvinceRankNative
AlabamaSNRYes
TennesseeSNRYes
IowaS5Yes
MissouriSNRYes
MarylandSNRYes
South CarolinaSNRYes
WisconsinSNRYes
West VirginiaS3Yes
IndianaSNRYes
WyomingS3Yes
New JerseyS4Yes
North DakotaSNRYes
GeorgiaSNRYes
MississippiSNRYes
District of ColumbiaSNRYes
North CarolinaS5Yes
MassachusettsSNRYes
MontanaS3Yes
DelawareS4Yes
VermontS5Yes
MinnesotaSNRYes
KentuckySNRYes
NebraskaSNRYes
TexasSNRYes
ConnecticutSNRYes
New YorkS5Yes
PennsylvaniaS5Yes
South DakotaSNRYes
FloridaS4Yes
Rhode IslandSNRYes
New HampshireSNRYes
MaineSNRYes
KansasS5Yes
OhioSNRYes
VirginiaS5Yes
LouisianaSNRYes
OklahomaSNRYes
MichiganSNRYes
IllinoisS5Yes
ArkansasSNRYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive - largeSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesPervasive - largeSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1.2 - Named speciesPervasive - largeSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Plant Characteristics
DurationDECIDUOUS
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (10)
Florida (1)
AreaForestAcres
Alexander Springs CreekOcala National Forest2,954
Minnesota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Elmwood IslandChippewa National Forest42
North Carolina (1)
AreaForestAcres
Yellowhammer Branch (add.)Nantahala National Forest1,255
North Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Long X DivideDakota Prairie Grasslands10,099
Vermont (2)
AreaForestAcres
Bread LoafGreen Mountain and Finger Lakes National Forests1,768
Griffith Lake 09084Green Mountain and Finger Lakes National Forests1,833
Virginia (2)
AreaForestAcres
Beards MountainGeorge Washington National Forest7,505
SkidmoreGeorge Washington National Forest5,641
West Virginia (1)
AreaForestAcres
Dry River (WV)George Washington National Forest7,331
Wisconsin (1)
AreaForestAcres
09154 - St. Peters DomeChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest4,002
References (8)
  1. Coladonato, M. 1992b. <i>Ulmus americana</i>. In: Fire Effects Information System. USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Available online: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ (Accessed 14 November 2011).
  2. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 1997. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 3. Magnoliophyta: Magnoliidae and Hamamelidae. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. xxiii + 590 pp.
  3. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  4. Kartesz, J.T. 1999. A synonymized checklist and atlas with biological attributes for the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. First edition. In: Kartesz, J.T., and C.A. Meacham. Synthesis of the North American Flora, Version 1.0. North Carolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill, N.C.
  5. Little, E.L., Jr. 1979. Checklist of United States trees (native and naturalized). Agriculture Handbook No. 541. U.S. Forest Service, Washington, D.C. 375 pp.
  6. Marks, C.O. 2017. The Ecological Role of American Elm (<i>Ulmus americana</i> L.) in Floodplain Forests of Northeastern North America. In: Pinchot, C.C., K.S. Knight, L.M. Haugen, C.E. Flower, and J.M. Slavicek, eds. Proceedings of the American elm restoration workshop 2016; 2016 October 25-27; Lewis Center, OH. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-174. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station: 74-98.
  7. Southern Appalachian Species Viability Project. 2002. A partnership between the U.S. Forest Service-Region 8, Natural Heritage Programs in the Southeast, NatureServe, and independent scientists to develop and review data on 1300+ regionally and locally rare species in the Southern Appalachian and Alabama region. Database (Access 97) provided to the U.S. Forest Service by NatureServe, Durham, North Carolina.
  8. Wheeler, N.C., K.C. Steiner, S.E. Schlarbaum, and D.B. Neale. 2015. The Evolution of Forest Genetics and Tree Improvement Research in the United States. <em>Journal of Forestry </em>113(5): 500–510.