Gasterosteus aculeatus williamsoni

Girard, 1854

Unarmored Threespine Stickleback

T1T1 (G5T1) Found in 10 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
T1T1Global Rank
Not evaluatedIUCN
HighThreat Impact
unarmored threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus williamsoni). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.100966
Element CodeAFCPA03011
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSubspecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNNot evaluated
Endemicendemic to a single state or province
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderPerciformes
FamilyGasterosteidae
GenusGasterosteus
Synonyms
Gasterosteus williamsoniGirard, 1854
Concept Reference
Moyle, P. B. 2002. Inland fishes of California. Revised and expanded. University of California Press, Berkeley. xv + 502 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Fricke et al. (2024) treat Gasterosteus aculeatus williamsoni as a full species that includes G. aculeatus microcephalus as a synonym. A plateless form occurring in Shay Creek, San Bernardino County, California, has been identified as G. a. santaeannae (or santa-annae) but is recognized as synonymous with G. a. williamsoni (Ross 1973; Moyle et al. 1989).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2023-05-24
Change Date2014-09-22
Edition Date2023-05-24
Edition AuthorsT. Hopkins, P. Moyle, and G. Hammerson (2010), Hunting, K. (2023)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent1000-20,000 square km (about 400-8000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences6 - 20
Rank Reasons
This taxon's range and abundance have been significantly reduced relative to historical levels. Many of the threats that precipitated steep declines continue today.
Range Extent Comments
This taxon occurs in isolated locations within three separate watersheds in California: the upper Santa Clara River and its tributaries in Los Angeles County; San Antonio Creek on Vandenberg Air Force Base in Santa Barbara County; the Shay Creek vicinity, in San Bernardino County; and San Felipe and Pine Valley Creeks in San Diego County (USFWS 2009, 2021). Based on analysis of element occurrences by HUC 8 watershed and considering the discontinuous distribution of this taxon within these watersheds, the range extent of this taxon is between about 10,000 and 20,000 km2.
Occurrences Comments
The California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) identifies 13 element occurrences of this taxon and, when combined with two occurrences in San Diego County not identified by CNDDB, there are 15 occurrences of this taxon.
Threat Impact Comments
USFWS (2009, 2021) identify threats as stream and river channelization, loss and fragmentation to urban development, indirect impacts of agricultural run-off, excessive groundwater extraction, invasive, non-native plant species, introduction of non-native predators, and toxic spills and discharges into waters supporting this taxon. Channelization of rivers and stream has occurred extensively throughout the current and historical range of this taxon. Channelization generally renders waterways unsuitable by reducing or eliminating nesting substrate. Extensive urban development in south coastal watersheds occupied by this taxon have reduced populations by introduction of pollutants and stormwater run-off containing pesticides and herbicides. Similarly, siltation and potentially toxic run-off from agricultural adjacent to some occupied streams may reduce available prey and adversely affect water quality. Many of the basins in southern California have experienced lowered water tables from long-term extraction of groundwater without sufficient recharge thereby reducing, or in some cases eliminating surface flows. Non-native plants, especially giant reed (Arundo donax), dominate the water profile in many areas reducing availability for this taxon and other fish and wildlife. The potential for accidental toxic chemical spills from railways and roadways exists throughout this taxon’s range. Many of the rivers and streams occupied by this taxon now harbor non-native predators including African clawed frogs, bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana), red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii), signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus), and various species of fishes, especially bass (Micropterus spp.), catfish (Ictalurus spp.), sunfish (Lepomis spp.), and mosquito fish that feed on various life stages of this taxon. Finally, impacts from a changing climate change include changes in water quality (especially water temperature), changes in timing and duration of flows, and extended drought. Increased temperatures and variable water availability from uncertain precipitation and snow run-off patterns may be primary factors effecting this species (USFWS 2019b). In a comprehensive review of climate vulnerability of at-risk freshwater fish, Moyle et al (2013) assessed 164 taxa against exposure and sensitivity criteria within four generally accepted and relevant climate scenarios. This taxon was classified as “moderately vulnerable”.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

A small (to 10 cm), laterally compressed, scaleless fish with a very narrow caudal peduncle, 3 (rarely 2 or 4) dorsal spines (the last very short) followed by a soft dorsal fin with 14-16 rays, and large eyes; pelvic fin small, with 1 spine (1 cusp at base) and 1 ray; bony keel along each side of caudal peduncle; no bony plates on sides; silver-green to brown above, sides silver, often with dark mottling; large males are black and may have red on fins; breeding males have blue sides, red belly and lower sides, and blue or green eyes; large females have a pink throat and belly (Page and Burr 1991, Moyle 1976).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Differs from other nominal subspecies in lacking bony plates (occasionally has tiny ones) and having shorter, weaker spines and more rounded pectoral and caudal fins (Moyle 1976).

Habitat

Clear, slow-flowing streams with sand or mud substrate, water temperature less than 24 C, and abundant aquatic vegetation; occurs in deeper pools with slow current or, in stronger currents, behind obstructions. Lack of turbidity is a requirement. Juveniles congregate in backwaters among aquatic plants (Matthews and Moseley 1990).

Eggs are laid in nests constructed on stream bottoms in shallow water by males; nest consists of aquatic vegetation.

Reproduction

Breeds throughout the year, with a peak in March; male guards eggs in nest; lives usually only about one year at the most (Matthews and Moseley 1990).
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN1
ProvinceRankNative
CaliforniaS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsPervasive (71-100%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/usePervasive (71-100%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
7.2.5 - Abstraction of ground water (domestic use)Pervasive (71-100%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionPervasive (71-100%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsPervasive (71-100%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
9.3.3 - Herbicides and pesticidesPervasive (71-100%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
11.2 - DroughtsPervasive (71-100%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (10)
California (10)
AreaForestAcres
Crystal CreekSan Bernardino National Forest6,783
Fish CanyonAngeles National Forest29,886
Granite PeakSan Bernardino National Forest450
Heartbreak RidgeSan Bernardino National Forest4,455
Magic MountainAngeles National Forest15,542
Mill PeakSan Bernardino National Forest7,884
Pine CreekCleveland National Forest503
Red MountainAngeles National Forest8,034
SugarloafSan Bernardino National Forest8,206
TuleAngeles National Forest9,861
References (21)
  1. California Department of Fish and Game (CDF&G). 1990. 1989 annual report on the status of California's state listed threatened and endangered plants and animals. 188 pp.
  2. Fricke, R., M.A. Reséndiz López and A.S. Oseguera Rodríguez. 2024. Fishes and Lampreys of Mexico. An annotated checklist. CONABIO, Ciudad de México: 1-863.
  3. Hendrickson, D. A., and J. E. Brooks. 1991. Transplanting short-lived fishes in North American deserts: review, assessment, and recommendations. Pages 283-98 in W. L. Minckley and J. E. Deacon (editors). Battle Against Extinction: Native Fish Management in the American West. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona.
  4. Irwin, J. F., and D. L. Soltz. 1982. The distribution and natural history of the unarmored threespine stickleback in San Antonio Creek, California. Report, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento.
  5. Jelks, H. L., S. J. Walsh, N. M. Burkhead, S. Contreras-Balderas, E. Díaz-Pardo, D. A. Hendrickson, J. Lyons, N. E. Mandrak, F. McCormick, J. S. Nelson, S. P. Platania, B. A. Porter, C. B. Renaud, J. Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, E. B. Taylor, and M.L. Warren, Jr. 2008. Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33(8):372-407.
  6. Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, North Carolina. i-x + 854 pp.
  7. Matthews, J.R. and C.J. Moseley (eds.). 1990. The Official World Wildlife Fund Guide to Endangered Species of North America. Volume 1. Plants, Mammals. xxiii + pp 1-560 + 33 pp. appendix + 6 pp. glossary + 16 pp. index. Volume 2. Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians, Fishes, Mussels, Crustaceans, Snails, Insects, and Arachnids. xiii + pp. 561-1180. Beacham Publications, Inc., Washington, D.C.
  8. Miller, R.R., and C.L. Hubbs. 1969. Systematics of Gasterosteus aculeatus with particular reference to intergradation and introgression along the Pacific Coast of North American: a commentary on a recent contribution. Copeia 1969(1):52-69.
  9. Moyle, P. B. 1976a. Inland fishes of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. 405 pp.
  10. Moyle, P. B. 2002. Inland fishes of California. Revised and expanded. University of California Press, Berkeley. xv + 502 pp.
  11. Moyle, P. B., J. D. Kiernan, P. K. Crain, and R. M. Quiñones. 2013. Climate change vulnerability of native and alien freshwater fishes of California: a systematic assessment approach. PLoS ONE 8(5):e63883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063883
  12. Moyle, P. B., J. E. Williams, and E. D. Wikramanayake. 1989. Fish species of special concern of California. Final report submitted to California Dept. of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Division, Rancho Cordova. 222 pp.
  13. Moyle, P. B., J. V. E. Katz, and R. M. Quiñones. 2011. Rapid decline of California's native inland fishes: a status assessment. Biological Conservation 144:2414-2423. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.06.002
  14. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston. xix + 663 pp.
  15. Ross, S.T. 1973. The systematics of <i>Gasterosteus aculeatus </i>(Pisces: Gasterosteidae) in central and southern California. Contributions in Science 243. Los Angeles Natural History Museum, Los Angeles, CA.
  16. Scharpf, C. 2009. Annotated checklist of North American freshwater fishes, including subspecies and undescribed forms, Part V: Sciaenidae through Achiridae (plus supplementary material). Native Fishes Association 35(1):1-34.
  17. Swift, C. C., T. R. Haglund, M. Ruiz, and R. N. Fisher. 1993. The status and distribution of the freshwater fishes of southern California. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Science 92(3):101-167.
  18. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1990. Endangered and threatened species recovery program: report to Congress. 406 pp.
  19. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1996. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants: 90-day Finding on a Petition to List the Santa Ana Speckled Dace, Santa Ana Sucker, and the Shay Creek Threespine Stickleback as Endangered. Federal Register 61(132):36021-36023.
  20. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2009. Unarmored Threespine Stickleback (<i>Gasterosteus aculeatus williamsoni</i>) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, Ventura, CA. 37 pp. https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/tess/species_nonpublish/1506.pdf
  21. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2021. Unarmored Threespine Stickleback (<i>Gasterosteus aculeatus williamsoni</i>). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, Ventura, CA. 21 pp. https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/tess/species_nonpublish/944.pdf