Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.105699
Element CodeAFCJB28630
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderCypriniformes
FamilyLeuciscidae
GenusHydrophlox
SynonymsNotropis lutipinnis(Jordan and Brayton, 1878)
Concept ReferenceRobins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
Taxonomic CommentsBased on phylogenomic analyses, Stout et al. (2022) elevate the subgenus Hydrophlox. This generic change is accepted by Page et al. (2023).
Wood and Mayden (1992) hypothesized that Notropis (Hydrophlox) lutipinnis is a paraphyletic composite of three forms: 1) true lutipinnis in the Savannah River drainage; 2) an undescribed form in the Pee Dee River drainage, and 3) an undescribed form in the Broad River drainage. Warren et al (2000) treat the latter two as the Piedmont Shiner, Notropis cf. chlorocephalus (Rohde et al. 2009).
Conservation Status
Review Date1996-09-16
Change Date1996-09-16
Range Extent CommentsAtlantic and Gulf slopes from the Pee Dee River (Wood and Mayden 1992) to the Altamaha River, extreme headwaters of Chattahoochee River system (Apalachicola River drainage), and upper Coosa River drainage, Georgia; Little Tennessee River system, North Carolina; common to abundant in mountain and upper Piedmont streams, less common on lower Piedmont (Page and Burr 1991). Edisto, Santee-Broad, Pee Dee, Savannah, Ogeechee, Chattahoochee, and Altamaha river drainages (Wood and Mayden 1992).
Occurrences CommentsThis species is represented by a large number of subpopulations and locations.
Threat Impact CommentsLocalized threats may exist, but on a range-wide scale no major threats are known.