Gila elegans

Baird and Girard, 1853

Bonytail

G1Critically Imperiled Found in 99 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G1Critically ImperiledGlobal Rank
Critically endangeredIUCN
Very high - highThreat Impact
Bonytail (Gila elegans). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.105598
Element CodeAFCJB13100
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNCritically endangered
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderCypriniformes
FamilyLeuciscidae
GenusGila
Concept Reference
Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
In and below Grand Canyon, individuals of Gila elegans, G. cypha, and G. robusta robusta are readily identified by diagnostic morphological and genetic characters (see Gerber et al. 2001). In the upper Colorado River basin, several studies have yielded evidence of hybridization among these taxa in the mainstem Colorado River above Grand Canyon (see Gerber et al. 2001).

Gerber et al. (2001) found that lower Colorado River basin populations of G. cypha exhibit distinct mtDNAs, with only limited introgression of G. elegans into G. cypha, but most sampled upper basin fishes exhibited only G. cypha haplotypes, with some individuals exhibiting mtDNA from G. elegans. The complete absence of G. robusta mtDNA, even in populations of morphologically pure G. robusta, indicates extensive introgression that predates human influence (Gerber et al. 2001).

Hybridization may be a result of a breakdown in reproductive isolating mechanisms caused by habitat and streamflow changes in the basin (Valdez and Clemmer 1982), but it also can be viewed as playing a significant role in generating the great morphological diversity in the genus Gila and enhancing genetic variability and adaptability to the rigorous physical habitats present in the Colorado River Basin (Dowling and DeMarais 1993).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2012-02-08
Change Date1996-09-25
Edition Date2012-02-08
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent20,000-200,000 square km (about 8000-80,000 square miles)
Rank Reasons
Formerly widespread and common in much of the Colorado River basin; now widely extirpated and very rare, with no known self-sustaining populations; decline apparently has been caused mainly by the effects of dams and exotic fishes, and these continue to threaten the species with extinction.
Range Extent Comments
Bonytails were formerly abundant throughout the Colorado River and its larger tributaries, including the Green River north to the reach now inundated by Flaming Gorge Reservoir in Wyoming and Utah, the Yampa and Gunnison rivers in Colorado, and the Colorado River in Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, and California), and likely also the San Juan River in New Mexico and the Gila and Salt rivers in Arizona (Lee et al. 1980, USFWS 1990, Muth et al. 2000). Documented records exist for Lake Havasu, Lake Mohave, and Grand Canyon in the Lower Colorado River Basin; and Lake Powell, the Colorado River (Cataract Canyon, Green River confluence, Utah; Black Rocks, Colorado), Gunnison River near Delta, Colorado, Green River (Gray Canyon, Utah; Dinosaur National Monument, Colorado and Utah; Hideout Canyon, Utah), and lower Yampa River, Dinosaur National Monument, Colorado), in the Upper Colorado River Basin (USFWS 2002).

An unknown but small number of wild adults exist in Lake Mohave on the mainstem Colorado River of the Lower Colorado River Basin (i.e., downstream of Glen Canyon Dam, Arizona), and there are small numbers of wild individuals in the Green River and upper Colorado River subbasins of the Upper Colorado River Basin (USFWS 2002). USFWS (2002) listed only two locations (Lake Mohave on the Arizona-Nevada border and Lake Havasu along the Arizona-California border) where wild bonytails have been documented since 1990.

As of the early 1990s, populations were being established in urban lakes in Tempe, on the Buenos Aires NWR, and at TNC's Hassayampa Reserve, all in Arizona; plans called for stocking of experimental populations into Arizona streams (Minckley and Deacon 1991).
Occurrences Comments
Currently no self-sustaining populations of bonytail exist in the wild (USFWS 2002).
Threat Impact Comments
Threats to the species include habitat modifications resulting from streamflow regulation, dams that function as movement barriers on main-stem rivers, competition with and predation by nonnative fish species, hybridization (possibly), and pesticides and pollutants (USFWS 2002). The significance of, and factors leading to, hybridization with other Gila species are unclear, and this factor is not regarded as an important threat at the present time (USFWS 2002). However, hybridization should be evaluated as bonytails are released into the wild and populations become established (USFWS 2002). Low population size and lack of recruitment are major obstacles to recovery.
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Gila elegans is a warm-water species that appears to favor main-stem rivers regardless of turbidity, usually in or near deep swift water, in flowing pools and eddies just outside the main current. It also has been found in reservoirs. Available data suggest that habitats required for conservation include river channels and flooded, ponded, or inundated riverine habitats, especially those where competition from non-native fishes is absent or reduced (USFWS, Federal Register, 21 March 1994).

Spawning occurs probably in spring over rocky substrates; spawning in reservoirs has been observed over rocky shoals and shorelines (USFWS 2002). Flooded bottomland habitats appear to be important growth and
conditioning areas, particularly as nursery habitats for young (USFWS 2002).

Reproduction

Natural reproduction of bonytail was last documented in the Green River in Dinosaur National Monument in the 1960s (Vanicek and Kramer 1969). Bonytails in reproductive condition were captured from mid-June to early July at a water temperature of 18°C. Spawning in Lake Mohave was observed in May (Jonez and Sumner 1954). Hamman (1985) found that hatchery-reared bonytails began to sexually mature at age 2. Bonytails can mature within one year in artificial ponds (Minckley and Marsh 2009). Examination of otoliths from four bonytails from Lake Mohave indicated ages of 34, 40, 42, and 49 years (Rinne et al. 1986).
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN1
ProvinceRankNative
WyomingSXYes
UtahS1Yes
ArizonaS1Yes
New MexicoSXYes
NevadaS1Yes
ColoradoSXYes
CaliforniaS1Yes
Navajo NationSXYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
7 - Natural system modificationsPervasive (71-100%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/usePervasive (71-100%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive (71-100%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesPervasive (71-100%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionPervasive (71-100%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsPervasive (71-100%)UnknownHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (99)
Colorado (11)
AreaForestAcres
Bristol HeadRio Grande NF46,087
Dome PeakRoutt NF35,716
HermosaSan Juan NF148,103
Long ParkRoutt NF42,100
Pagoda PeakRoutt NF57,676
Pole Mountain / Finger MesaRio Grande NF43,863
Red TableWhite River NF39,122
San MiguelSan Juan NF64,263
Storm PeakSan Juan NF57,617
Troublesome SouthRoutt NF47,359
Williams Fork Ptarmingan AdjacentArapaho & Roosevelt NFs36,351
Idaho (1)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekCaribou-Targhee National Forest118,582
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
Texas (1)
AreaForestAcres
Big CreekNational Forests in Texas1,447
Utah (57)
AreaForestAcres
0401001Ashley National Forest11,705
0401002Ashley National Forest36,113
0401003Ashley National Forest5,034
0401004Ashley National Forest10,510
0401005Ashley National Forest38,930
0401006Ashley National Forest7,645
0401007Ashley National Forest16,483
0401008Ashley National Forest15,616
0401009Ashley National Forest30,378
0401010Ashley National Forest21,886
0401011Ashley National Forest30,062
0401012Ashley National Forest46,400
0401013Ashley National Forest11,909
0401014Ashley National Forest26,903
0401016Ashley National Forest5,695
0401023Ashley National Forest8,352
0401024Ashley National Forest12,882
0401025Ashley National Forest1,471
0401026Ashley National Forest398
0401027Ashley National Forest7,312
0401028Ashley National Forest446
0401029Ashley National Forest6,718
0401030Ashley National Forest531
0401031Ashley National Forest7,110
0401032Ashley National Forest6,471
0401034Ashley National Forest967
0401037Ashley National Forest1,166
0418033Ashley National Forest24,909
0419020Ashley National Forest355,684
0419022Ashley National Forest2,232
418003Uinta National Forest10,912
418004Uinta National Forest16,661
418006Uinta National Forest11,714
418007Uinta National Forest6,816
418008Uinta National Forest9,367
418009Uinta National Forest18,064
418013Uinta National Forest14,643
418015Uinta National Forest17,289
418017Uinta National Forest19,631
418018Uinta National Forest11,218
418019Uinta National Forest6,854
418034Uinta National Forest6,170
418037Uinta National Forest9,694
418042Uinta National Forest7,313
418043Uinta National Forest9,493
418044Uinta National Forest5,495
Big Bear CreekManti-Lasal National Forest28,440
Boulger - Black CanyonManti-Lasal National Forest23,286
Dairy ForkManti-Lasal National Forest30,222
East MountainManti-Lasal National Forest30,705
High Uintas (UT)Wasatch-Cache National Forest102,398
Horse Mountain - Mans PeakManti-Lasal National Forest22,159
LakesWasatch-Cache National Forest121,967
Little West Fork BlacksWasatch-Cache National Forest8,209
Muddy Creek - Nelson Mt.Manti-Lasal National Forest59,034
Price RiverManti-Lasal National Forest24,349
Widdop MountainWasatch-Cache National Forest8,011
Wyoming (28)
AreaForestAcres
0401018Ashley National Forest6,157
0401019Ashley National Forest6,202
0401021Ashley National Forest5,152
0401035Ashley National Forest5,465
0401036Ashley National Forest6,309
Battle CreekMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest5,890
Big SandstoneMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest7,180
Bridger PeakMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest6,697
Deep CreekMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest6,411
Grayback RidgeBridger-Teton National Forest295,113
Gros Ventre MountainsBridger-Teton National Forest106,418
High Uintas (WY)Wasatch-Cache National Forest664
Lake Alice - Commissary RidgeBridger-Teton National Forest166,707
Little CottonwoodBridger-Teton National Forest5,468
Little SandstoneMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest5,483
Little Sheep MountainBridger-Teton National Forest14,192
Little SnakeMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest9,920
Mosquito Lake - Seven LakesBridger-Teton National Forest51,950
Mowry PeakMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest6,244
North MountainBridger-Teton National Forest9,798
Nugent Park - Hams Fork RidgeBridger-Teton National Forest21,241
Riley RidgeBridger-Teton National Forest4,765
Salt River RangeBridger-Teton National Forest235,661
Singer PeakMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest10,498
Solomon CreekMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest5,756
South Wyoming RangeBridger-Teton National Forest85,776
Strawberry CreekMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest5,880
West Slope WindsBridger-Teton National Forest143,252
References (44)
  1. Behnke, Robert J. (Department of Fish and Wildlife Biology. Colorado State University). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC.
  2. California Department of Fish and Game (CDF&G). 1990. 1989 annual report on the status of California's state listed threatened and endangered plants and animals. 188 pp.
  3. Chart, T. E., and J. S. Cranney. 1991. Radio-telemetered monitoring of stocked bonytail chubs (<i>Gila elegans</i>) in the Green River, Utah, 1988-1989. Draft Final Report, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Salt Lake City.
  4. Clemmer, Glenn (Nevada Natural Heritage Program). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. 1997.
  5. Dowling, T. E., and B. D. DeMarais. 1993. Evolutionary significance of introgressive hybridization in cyprinid fishes. Nature 362:444-446.
  6. Fertig, Walter (Wyoming Natural Diversity Database). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. August 1997.
  7. Gerber, A. S., C. A. Tibbets, and T. E. Dowling. 2001. The role of introgressive hybridization in the evolution of the <i>Gila robusta</i> complex (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Evolution 55:2028-2039.
  8. Hamman, R. L. 1985. Induced spawning of hatchery-reared bonytail. Progressive Fish-Culturist 47:239-241.
  9. Holden, Paul B. (Bio/West, Utah). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. April 1997.
  10. Jelks, H. L., S. J. Walsh, N. M. Burkhead, S. Contreras-Balderas, E. Díaz-Pardo, D. A. Hendrickson, J. Lyons, N. E. Mandrak, F. McCormick, J. S. Nelson, S. P. Platania, B. A. Porter, C. B. Renaud, J. Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, E. B. Taylor, and M.L. Warren, Jr. 2008. Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33(8):372-407.
  11. Jonez, A., and R. C. Sumner. 1954. Lakes Mead and Mohave investigations: a comparative study of an established reservoir as related to a newly created impoundment. Final Report. Federal Aid Wildlife Restoration (Dingell-Johnson) Project F-l-R, Nevada Game and Fish Commission, Carson City.
  12. Kaeding, L. R., B. D. Burdick, P. A. Schrader and W. R. Noonan. 1986. Recent capture of a bonytail (<i>Gila elegans</i>) and observations on this nearly extinct cyprinid from the Colorado River. Copeia 1986(4):1021-1023.
  13. Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, North Carolina. i-x + 854 pp.
  14. Lenon, N., K. Stave, T. Burke, and J. E. Deacon. 2002. Bonytail (<i>Gila elegans</i>) may enhance survival of razorback suckers (<i>Xyrauchen texanus</i>) in rearing ponds by preying on exotic crayfish. Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science 34(1):46-52.
  15. Marsh, Paul C. (Center for Environmental Studies, Arizona State University). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC.
  16. Matthews, J.R. and C.J. Moseley (eds.). 1990. The Official World Wildlife Fund Guide to Endangered Species of North America. Volume 1. Plants, Mammals. xxiii + pp 1-560 + 33 pp. appendix + 6 pp. glossary + 16 pp. index. Volume 2. Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians, Fishes, Mussels, Crustaceans, Snails, Insects, and Arachnids. xiii + pp. 561-1180. Beacham Publications, Inc., Washington, D.C.
  17. Miller, R. R. (with the collaboration of W. L. Minckley and S. M. Norris). 2005 [actually published in 2006]. Freshwater fishes of Mexico. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois. 490 pp.
  18. Miller, W. H., H. M. Tyus, and C. A. Carlson. 1982. Fishes of the upper Colorado system: present and future. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. 131 pp.
  19. Minckley, W. L. 1973. Fishes of Arizona. Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix, Arizona. 293 pp.
  20. Minckley, W. L., and J. E. Deacon. 1991. Battle Against Extinction: Native Fish Management in the American West. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. xviii + 517 pp.
  21. Minckley, W. L., and P. C. Marsh. 2009. Inland fishes of the greater Southwest: chronicle of a vanishing biota. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona, 426 pp.
  22. Moyle, P. B. 2002. Inland fishes of California. Revised and expanded. University of California Press, Berkeley. xv + 502 pp.
  23. Muth, R. T., L. W. Crist, K. E. LaGory, J. W. Hayse, K. R. Bestgen, T. P. Ryan, J. K. Lyons, and R. A. Valdez. 2000. Flow and temperature recommendations for endangered fishes in the Green River downstream of Flaming Gorge Dam. Final Report. Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program Project FG-53.
  24. Nelson, J. S., E. J. Crossman, H. Espinosa-Perez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, and J. D. Williams. 2004. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 29, Bethesda, Maryland. 386 pp.
  25. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 1991. A field guide to freshwater fishes: North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. 432 pp.
  26. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston. xix + 663 pp.
  27. Page, L. M., H. Espinosa-Pérez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, R. L. Mayden, and J. S. Nelson. 2013. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Seventh edition. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 34, Bethesda, Maryland.
  28. Page, L. M., K. E. Bemis, T. E. Dowling, H.S. Espinosa-Pérez, L.T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, K. E. Hartel, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, M. A. Neigbors, J. J. Schmitter-Soto, and H. J. Walker, Jr. 2023. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Eighth edition. American Fisheries Society (AFS), Special Publication 37, Bethesda, Maryland, 439 pp.
  29. Patton, Tim M. (University of Wyoming). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  30. Platania, Steven P. 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC, April 1997.
  31. Rinne, J. N., J. E. Johnson, B. L. Jensen, A. W. Ruger, and R. Sorenson. 1986. The role of hatcheries in the management and recovery of threatened and endangered fishes. Pages 271-285 in R.H. Stroud (editor.). Fish culture in fisheries management. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
  32. Rinne, John N. (Rocky Mountain Research Station, USFS). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. May 1997.
  33. Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
  34. Rosenfeld, M. J., and J. A. Wilkinson. 1989. Biochemical genetics of the Colorado River <i>Gila</i> complex (Pisces: Cyprinidae). Southwestern Naturalist 34(2):232-244.
  35. Smith, G. R., R. R. Miller, and W. D. Sable. 1979. Species relationships among fishes of the genus <i>Gila</i> in the Upper Colorado River drainage. Pages 613-623 In R.M Linn, ed. Proceedings of the First Conference on Scientific Research in the National Parks, 9-12 November 1976, New Orleans, Louisiana. USDI National Park Service Transactions and Proceedings Series No. 5.
  36. State Natural Heritage Data Centers. 1996a. Aggregated element occurrence data from all U.S. state natural heritage programs, including the Tennessee Valley Authority, Navajo Nation and the District of Columbia. Science Division, The Nature Conservancy.
  37. State Natural Heritage Data Centers. 1996b. Aggregated element occurrence data from all U.S. state natural heritage programs, including the Tennessee Valley Authority, Navajo Nation and the District of Columbia: Export of freshwater fish and mussel records west of the Mississippi River in 1997. Science Division, The Nature Conservancy.
  38. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1990. Bonytail chub recovery plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, Colorado.
  39. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1990. Endangered and threatened species recovery program: report to Congress. 406 pp.
  40. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1993. Notice of availability of draft agreement regarding Section 7 consultation, sufficient progress and historic projects, recovery implementation program for the endangered fish species in the upper Colorado River basin, and the draft recovery implementation program recovery action plan. Federal Register 58(159):44188-44189. 19 August 1993.
  41. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2002. Bonytail (<i>Gila elegans</i>) recovery goals: amendment and supplement to the bonytail chub recovery plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Mountain-Prairie Region (6), Denver, Colorado.
  42. Valdez, R. A., and G. H. Clemmer. 1982. Life history and prospects for recovery of the humpback and bonytail chub. Pages 109-119 in Miller, W. H., ed. Fishes of the Upper Colorado River System: present and future. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
  43. Vanicek, C. D. 1967. Ecological studies of native Green River fishes below Flaming Gorge Dam, 1964-1966. Doctoral Dissertation. Utah State University, Logan, Utah.
  44. Vanicek, C. D., and R. H. Kramer. 1969. Life history of the Colorado squawfish, <i>Ptychocheilus lucius</i>, and the Colorado chub, <i>Gila robusta</i>, in the Green River in Dinosaur National Monument, 1964-1966. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 98(2):193-208