Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.105517
Element CodeAFCJB52010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderCypriniformes
FamilyLeuciscidae
GenusLythrurus
SynonymsNotropis ardens(Cope, 1868)
Concept ReferenceDimmick, W. W., K. L. Fiorino, and B. M. Burr. 1996. Reevaluation of the Lythrurus ardens (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) complex with recognition of three evolutionary species. Copeia 1996:813-823.
Taxonomic CommentsRemoved from genus Notropis and placed in genus (formerly subgenus) Lythrurus by Mayden (1989) and Coburn and Cavender (1992); this change was adopted in the 1991 AFS checklist (Robins et al. 1991). Lythrurus was retained as a subgenus by Snelson (1990).
Two subspecies were recognized by Snelson (1990): ardens from Atlantic slope drainages and New River system of Kanawha drainage, and fasciolaris from the remainder of the Ohio basin. Snelson (1990) found no strong support for the recognition of the Tar and Neuse populations ("matutinus") as a distinct subspecies or species. Dimmick et al. (1996) examined morphological and allozymic variation and concluded that L. ardens should be divided into three species, L. ardens, L. fasciolaris, and L. matutinus.
Conservation Status
Review Date2001-01-30
Change Date2000-01-20
Edition Date2001-01-30
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Rank ReasonsSmall range in Atlantic Slope drainages in Virginia, West Virginia, and North Carolina; a 1996 taxonomic revision reduced the range of this species; many occurrences; considered stable.
Range Extent CommentsUpland regions from York River drainage (introduced), Virginia, to Roanoke River drainage of Virginia and North Carolina; also upper New River drainage, above Kanawha Falls in Virginia and West Virginia, where there is some question as to whether the species is native or recently introduced (Snelson 1990, Jenkins and Burkhead 1994, Dimmick et al. 1996). A record of the L. ardens species complex from the Savannah River drainage is erroneous (based on Notropis atherinoides), and a record from the Shenandoah River system of Virginia probably is erroneous or may represent a recent introduction. A report of the L. ardens species complex from the Big Sandy drainage of the Ohio basin, West Virginia, is erroneous (based on Notropis umbratilis); a 1945 report from the Yadkin River system of North Carolina is based on N. chlorocephalus, and another 1945 record from the Tennessee drainage of North Carolina is suspect (no voucher specimens) (Snelson 1990).
Occurrences CommentsJenkins and Burkhead (1994) mapped many dozens of collecting sites, representing probably at least several dozen distinct occurrences.
Threat Impact CommentsLocalized threats may exist, but on a range-wide scale no major threats are known.