Gila nigrescens

(Girard, 1856)

Chihuahua Chub

G1Critically Imperiled (G1G2) Found in 4 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G1Critically ImperiledGlobal Rank
VulnerableIUCN
Very high - highThreat Impact
Chihuahua chub (Gila nigrescens). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.100986
Element CodeAFCJB13110
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNVulnerable
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderCypriniformes
FamilyLeuciscidae
GenusGila
Concept Reference
Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
The taxonomic status and relationships among isolated chub populations in the Laguna Bustillos and Guzmán basins and the Mimbres River need further study (Propst and Stefferud 1994).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2012-02-09
Change Date2012-02-09
Edition Date2012-02-09
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent5000-20,000 square km (about 2000-8000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences6 - 20
Rank Reasons
Small range in Chihuahua and New Mexico; has declined dramatically in both range and abundance; declines in Mexico probably are continuing; threatened by habitat loss/degradation (e.g., dewatering, channelization, pollution of streams) and effects of non-native fishes.
Range Extent Comments
This species is restricted to tributaries of the endorheic Guzmán basin, including the Mimbres River (Sublette et al. 1990) in New Mexico and the Guzmán and Laguna Bustillos basins in Chihuahua, Mexico (Propst and Stefferud 1994, Page and Burr 2011).

Surveys throughout the historical range by Propst and Stefferud (1994) yielded the following results:

LAGUNA BUSTILLOS BASIN (CHIHUAHUA): At 10 sampled sites, Chihuahua chub was common at only two sites.

GUZMAN BASIN (CHIHUAHUA): At nine sampled sites in the Río Santa Clara, Chihuahua chub was moderately common in the upper portion of the river but uncommon or rare downstream. In the Río de Santa Maria, Chihuahua chub was present at all riverine sites upstream of Presa el Tintero, and moderately common at 2 of 12 sampled sites. In the Río Casas Grande, G. nigrescens was present at three stream sites and a spring system (of a total of 8 sampled sites), and moderately common near Zaragoza and El Rusio. In the Río Piedras Verdes, the species was present at two of four sampled sites (common only near Hernández Jovales). In the Río San Pedro, Chihuahua chub was present at three of four sampled sites (moderately common at one site).

MIMBRES RIVER (NEW MEXICO): Sampling in 21 locations in the Mimbres River and four tributaries yielded Chihuahua chubs in the Mimbres River from the confluence of Allie Canyon downstream for about 12 km and in Archuleta/Moreno Spring; the species was not collected at all sites in the occupied reach nor was it common where found; Archuleta/Moreno Spring supported the greatest number of individuals.
Occurrences Comments
This species is represented by one occurrence (subpopulation) in New Mexico and several in Chihuahua (Propst and Stefferud 1994).

In a range-wide survey, Propst and Stefferud (1994) found Chihuahua chubs at 28 of 40 stream sites having fish, in one of nine spring sites, and at neither of two lakes sampled in Chihuahua. It was moderately common at 12 of the stream sites, but fewer than 30 chubs were collected at six of these. In the Mimbres Drainage, the Chihuahua chub was regularly found only in Archuleta/Moreno Spring and was not common there. [Note: a distinct occurrence or subpopulation may comprise multiple "sites."]
Threat Impact Comments
Development of water resources for agricultural and municipal uses has dewatered the downstream ends of streams, and surface flow is now seasonally diminished where water was historically permanent (Brand 1937). By the 1950s, upland streams in the range of the Chihuahua chub were severely damaged by the effects of uncontrolled logging and pollution from sawmills; harvest of fish with dynamite depleted surviving fish populations (Needham and Gard 1959).

Currently, the Chihuahua chub is limited to stream reaches where modification (e.g., channelization and dewatering) and human-induced habitat degradation (e.g., livestock overgrazing, municipal and agricultural pollution) are minimal; such areas are uncommon (Miller and Chernoff 1979, Propst and Stefferud 1994). The presence and abundance of pools associated with root masses of uprooted or standing large trees appeared to be the best predictor of the occurrence and abundance of Chihuahua chubs (Propst and Stefferud 1994). Chubs were moderately common only in remote and relatively unmodified portions of the rios Santa Clara, Santa Maria, and Casas Grandes where mature stands of cottonwood were fairly common. Where cultivated fields bordered the stream or where towns were nearby, large riparian trees were uncommon and no snags or root masses were in the stream; in these areas Chihuahua chubs were uncommon or absent and individuals were small (Propst and Stefferud 1994). Additionally, Chihuahua chubs were also uncommon where non-native fishes were present, even if habitat was not degraded.

Reasons for its decline in New Mexico include modification of habitat by agricultural and flood control practices, and establishment of non-native fish species (USFWS 1983, Propst and Stefferud 1994). Severe modification and destruction of riverine habitats (dewatering, channelizing, and removal of woody riparian vegetation) are the greatest threats and impediments to recovery in the Mimbres River. Sections of the Mimbres River that historically contained pools and flowing water are now usually dry. Severe flooding caused by degradation of the watershed (e.g., deforestation and consequent erosion, siltation, and water temperature alteration), and loss of riparian vegetation have contributed to the decline. Nonnative fishes such as rainbow trout usurp Chihuahua chub habitat and may prey upon them. Longfin dace (Agosia chrysogaster) may displace young Chihuahua chub from shoreline habitats. The yellow grub infestation of chubs in Moreno Spring presents a severe health threat to this population (New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, September 2000 Biennial Review and Recommendations).

In Chihuahua, water quality degradation (pollution), surface water diversion for irrigation, groundwater pumping (and subsequent drying up of springs), stream channelization, and introduction of non-native fishes have contributed to the decline (Miller and Chernoff 1979, Propst and Stefferud 1994). Miller and Chernoff (1979) reported habitat conditions in Chihuahua, Mexico, as follows. The Rio Casas Grandes about 21 km southwest of Ascension was badly polluted; the pools were stagnant and choked with Spirogyra and other algae; flow was minimal and riffles were absent (this leads to reduced dissolved oxygen). In the Rio Casas Grandes just east of Casas Grandes proper, the river was sluggish, murky, strewn with trash, and choked with Spirogyra and narrow-leafed Potamogeton. In the Rio San Miguel at Ignacio Zaragoza, the river channel has been dredged and levees built. The water at this site was murky, less than 5 cm deep, and without noticeable current. The Rio Santa Maria at Bachiniva was, in places, used as a garbage dump. Water in the Rio del Carmen near Ahumada has been diverted for irrigation and no longer flows in the river channel. The Rio del Carmen near Ricardo Flores Magon was dry due to the presence, about ten kilometers upstream, of an earthen dam and hydroelectric power plant. In the Laguna Bustillos Basin, Arroya Miguel Chiquito was dry and the waters in Arroyo San Antonio were polluted.

A number of exotic fishes have been introduced within the range of Gila nigrescens, including Agosia chrysogaster and Oncorhynchus mykiss in the Mimbres River (USFWS 1986), Cyprinus carpio and Ictalurus melas in Rio Casas Grandes, Ictalurus melas and Ambloplites rupestris in Rio Piedras, Gambusia affinis in Rio Santa Maria near Buenaventura, and Cyprinus carpio in Rio Santa Maria at Santa Ana de Bavicora (Miller and Chernoff 1979). Specific effects of these fishes are not well documented but likely they are detrimental.
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

"Pristine conditions were clear, flowing streams with riffles, deep pools, sand and gravel substrates with algae-covered rocks, large boulders, and crevices in canyon walls" (Miller 2005). These fishes are most often in flowing pools of shallow creeks and small rivers in canyons, but they can survive and reproduce in isolated pools. Typically they occur in association with cover such as submerged or overhanging trees, boulders, or undercut banks, over a substrate of sand, gravel, and cobble with some occasional fine mud or silt. Habitat is subject to extreme drying in summer and flash floods in rainy season. Spawning occurs over beds of aquatic vegetation in deep quiet pools (Matthews and Moseley 1990). Juveniles tend to occupy shallower habitats with or without cover.

Propst and Stefferud (1994) found Chihuahua chubs most commonly over gravel substrates in lateral scour pools where flow was against and along a stream bank or a partial channel obstruction (boulder, cliff, or root wad). These scour pools were usually 4-7 m long, 1-2 m wide, and about 1 m deep. Water velocity was usually not more than 15 cm/s; although immediately adjacent velocity was often not more than 60 cm/s. Corner and backwater pools, both with woody material, yielded most of the remaining specimens. Larger specimens (at least 100 mm) were almost exclusively in lateral-scour pools, particularly those formed by root masses of uprooted and standing trees. Smaller individuals were in corner pools and backwaters only when chubs were abundant at a site. Almost all macrohabitats having chubs were characterized by extensive cover composed of snags and organic debris or root masses of large trees. Chihuahua chubs were rare or absent where non-native fishes (particularly potential predators) were common.

Reproduction

Spawning may occur over a protracted period (early spring through early autumn) or may be bimodal in spring and summer (Propst and Stefferud 1994, Miller 2005). Sexually mature probably in about 1 year (see Sublette et al. 1990).
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN1
ProvinceRankNative
New MexicoS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureUnknownSerious - slightHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingUnknownSerious - slightHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsPervasive - restrictedExtreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/usePervasive - restrictedExtreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive - restrictedExtreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesPervasive - restrictedExtreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionPervasive - restrictedExtreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
9.1 - Domestic & urban waste waterPervasive - restrictedExtreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsPervasive - restrictedExtreme - moderateHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (4)
New Mexico (4)
AreaForestAcres
Contiguous To Black & Aldo Leopold WildernessGila National Forest111,883
Contiguous To Black & Aldo Leopold WildernessGila National Forest111,883
Meadow CreekGila National Forest34,167
Sawyers PeakGila National Forest59,743
References (22)
  1. Brand, D. D. 1937. The natural landscape of northwestern Chihuahua. University of New Mexico Bulletin, Geological Series 5(2):1-74.
  2. Hatch, M. D. 1980. Management plan for the Chihuahua chub, <i>Gila nigrescens</i> (Girard, 1856), in New Mexico. New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Santa Fe.
  3. Jelks, H. L., S. J. Walsh, N. M. Burkhead, S. Contreras-Balderas, E. Díaz-Pardo, D. A. Hendrickson, J. Lyons, N. E. Mandrak, F. McCormick, J. S. Nelson, S. P. Platania, B. A. Porter, C. B. Renaud, J. Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, E. B. Taylor, and M.L. Warren, Jr. 2008. Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33(8):372-407.
  4. Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, North Carolina. i-x + 854 pp.
  5. Matthews, J.R. and C.J. Moseley (eds.). 1990. The Official World Wildlife Fund Guide to Endangered Species of North America. Volume 1. Plants, Mammals. xxiii + pp 1-560 + 33 pp. appendix + 6 pp. glossary + 16 pp. index. Volume 2. Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians, Fishes, Mussels, Crustaceans, Snails, Insects, and Arachnids. xiii + pp. 561-1180. Beacham Publications, Inc., Washington, D.C.
  6. Miller, R. R., and B. Chernoff. 1979. Status of populations of the endangered Chihuahua chub, <i>Gila nigrescens</i>, in New Mexico and Mexico. Proceedings of the Desert Fishes Council 11:74-84.
  7. Miller, R. R. (with the collaboration of W. L. Minckley and S. M. Norris). 2005 [actually published in 2006]. Freshwater fishes of Mexico. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois. 490 pp.
  8. Minckley, W. L., and J. E. Deacon. 1991. Battle Against Extinction: Native Fish Management in the American West. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. xviii + 517 pp.
  9. Needham, P. R., and R. Gard. 1959. Rainbow trout in Mexico and California, with notes on the cutthroat series. University of California Publications in Zoology 67: 1-124.
  10. Nelson, J. S., E. J. Crossman, H. Espinosa-Perez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, and J. D. Williams. 2004. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 29, Bethesda, Maryland. 386 pp.
  11. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 1991. A field guide to freshwater fishes: North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. 432 pp.
  12. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston. xix + 663 pp.
  13. Page, L. M., H. Espinosa-Pérez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, R. L. Mayden, and J. S. Nelson. 2013. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Seventh edition. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 34, Bethesda, Maryland.
  14. Page, L. M., K. E. Bemis, T. E. Dowling, H.S. Espinosa-Pérez, L.T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, K. E. Hartel, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, M. A. Neigbors, J. J. Schmitter-Soto, and H. J. Walker, Jr. 2023. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Eighth edition. American Fisheries Society (AFS), Special Publication 37, Bethesda, Maryland, 439 pp.
  15. Propst, David. L. 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Endangered Species Biologist. New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Sante Fe, NM.
  16. Propst, D. L. 1999. Threatened and endangered fishes of New Mexico. Technical Report No. 1. New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Santa Fe, New Mexico.
  17. Propst, D. L., and J. A. Stefferud. 1994. Distribution and status of the Chihuahua chub (Teleostei: Cyprinidae: <i>Gila nigrescens</i>), with notes on its ecology and associated species. Southwestern Naturalist 39:224-234.
  18. Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
  19. Sublette, J. E., M. D Hatch, and M. Sublette. 1990. The fishes of New Mexico. University New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, New Mexico. 393 pp.
  20. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1983. Threatened status for <i>Gila nigrescens</i> (Chihuahua chub). Federal Register 48(197):46053-46057.
  21. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1986. Chihuahua chub recovery plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuqerque, NM. 47 pp.
  22. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1990. Endangered and threatened species recovery program: report to Congress. 406 pp.