Hesperoleucus mitrulus

Snyder, 1913

Northern Roach

G1Critically Imperiled Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G1Critically ImperiledGlobal Rank
MediumThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.101067
Element CodeAFCJB19027
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderCypriniformes
FamilyLeuciscidae
GenusHesperoleucus
Synonyms
Hesperoleucus symmetricus mitrulusSnyder, 1913Lavinia symmetricus mitrulus(Snyder, 1913)
Other Common Names
Pit Roach (EN)
Concept Reference
Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, North Carolina. i-x + 854 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
In a comprehensive genetic analysis of Hesperoleucus and Lavinia, Baumsteiger and Moyle (2019) found the Pit River, California and Goose Lake, Oregon, populations to be genetically distinct "at the species-level in every analysis" and assigned them to Hesperoleucus mitrulus.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2020-11-19
Change Date2020-11-19
Edition Date2020-11-13
Edition AuthorsK. Hunting
Threat ImpactMedium
Range Extent250-1000 square km (about 100-400 square miles)
Number of Occurrences1 - 5
Rank Reasons
The Pit roach has disappeared from much of its former range in the Pit River drainage in California and Oregon, due to habitat degradation (resulting from human activities) and is now confined to a few scattered populations.
Range Extent Comments
The Pit roach is found in southeastern Oregon (primarily in Dry, Drews, Hay, Dent, Muddy, and Augur Creeks in the Goose Lake Watershed, Lake County, Oregon) and in several tributaries of the upper Pit River (above Pit River Falls) in Shasta, Lassen, and possibly Modoc Counties, California, USA (Moyle et al 2015). In comprehensive sampling of the upper Pit River system in 1981, Pit roach were found in only 8% of 261 tributaries and streams primarily in three drainages: Ash-Rush-Willow Creek (Lassen and Modoc Counties), Bear Creek tributary to the Fall River (Shasta County), and Beaver Creek (Lassen County) (Moyle et al 2015).
Occurrences Comments
Confined to southeastern Oregon and Northeastern California with few unique occurrences.
Threat Impact Comments
Principal threats include habitat loss from conversion to agricultural uses and habitat degradation from unrestricted and, in places, heavy grazing in riparian areas (Moyle et al 2015). The Pit roach is susceptible to the effects of climate change particularly expected variable water availability and degraded water quality (Moyle et al 2013). Pit roach populations are also vulnerable to stochastic events (e.g., fire, flooding) due to small, isolated populations that may lack the capacity for recolonization (Moyle 2002).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

The Pit roach occurs in deep mud/rock bottomed pools in permanent 2nd to 3rd order streams, and in the Pit River itself; mostly in sections with low flow, moderate gradient, warm temperatures, and edge mats of duckweed and water ferns; positive correlation between roach abundance and the abundance of other native fishes (Moyle and Daniels 1982).
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN1
ProvinceRankNative
CaliforniaS2Yes
OregonS2Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11.1 - Habitat shifting & alterationPervasive (71-100%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (1)
Oregon (1)
AreaForestAcres
Drake - McdowellFremont National Forest5,767
References (12)
  1. Baird, S. F., and C. F. Girard. 1854. Descriptions of new species of fishes collected in Texas, New Mexico and Sonora, by Mr. John H. Clark, on the US and Mexican boundary survey and in Texas by Capt. Stewart Van Vliet, Proceedings, Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 7:24-29.
  2. Baumsteiger, J. and P. M. Moyle. 2019. A reappraisal of the California Roach/Hitch (Cypriniformes, Cyprinidae, <i>Hesperoleucus</i>/<i>Lavinia</i>) species complex. Zootaxa 4543(2):221-240.
  3. Eschmeyer, W. N. and R. Fricke (editors). 2011. Catalog of Fishes electronic version (30 November 2011). http://research.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp
  4. Hubbs, C. L., W. I. Follett, and L. J. Dempster. 1979. List of the fishes of California. Occasional Papers of the California Academy of Sciences 133:1-51.
  5. Jelks, H. L., S. J. Walsh, N. M. Burkhead, S. Contreras-Balderas, E. Díaz-Pardo, D. A. Hendrickson, J. Lyons, N. E. Mandrak, F. McCormick, J. S. Nelson, S. P. Platania, B. A. Porter, C. B. Renaud, J. Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, E. B. Taylor, and M.L. Warren, Jr. 2008. Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33(8):372-407.
  6. Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, North Carolina. i-x + 854 pp.
  7. Moyle, P. B. 2002. Inland fishes of California. Revised and expanded. University of California Press, Berkeley. xv + 502 pp.
  8. Moyle, P. B., and R. A. Daniels. 1982. Fishes of the Pit River system, and Surprise Valley region. Univ. California Publ. Zool. 115:1-82.
  9. Moyle, P. B., J. D. Kiernan, P. K. Crain, and R. M. Quiñones. 2013. Climate change vulnerability of native and alien freshwater fishes of California: a systematic assessment approach. PLoS ONE 8(5):e63883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063883
  10. Moyle, P. B., J. E. Williams, and E. D. Wikramanayake. 1989. Fish species of special concern of California. Final report submitted to California Dept. of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Division, Rancho Cordova. 222 pp.
  11. Moyle, P. B., R. M. Quiñones, J. V. Katz and J. Weaver. 2015. Northern Roach (<i>Lavinia mitrulus</i>) Account in Fish Species of Special Concern in California. Sacramento: California Department of Fish and Wildlife. https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=104357&inline
  12. Page, L. M., K. E. Bemis, T. E. Dowling, H.S. Espinosa-Pérez, L.T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, K. E. Hartel, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, M. A. Neigbors, J. J. Schmitter-Soto, and H. J. Walker, Jr. 2023. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Eighth edition. American Fisheries Society (AFS), Special Publication 37, Bethesda, Maryland, 439 pp.