Faxonius virilis

(Hagen, 1870)

Virile Crayfish

G5Secure Found in 77 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
LowThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.112669
Element CodeICMAL11670
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryInvertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumArthropoda
ClassMalacostraca
OrderDecapoda
FamilyCambaridae
GenusFaxonius
Synonyms
Orconectes virilis(Hagen, 1870)
Other Common Names
Écrevisse à pinces bleues (FR) Northern Crayfish (EN)
Concept Reference
Hobbs, H. H., Jr. 1989. An Illustrated Checklist of the American Crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidae, Cambaridae, and Parastacidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 480:1-236.
Taxonomic Comments
Based on Crandall and De Grave (2017), the representatives of Orconectes form at least two distinct groups. The nominal group (the "cave Orconectes") form a monophyletic group that is more closely related to members of Cambarus, while the remaining "Orconectes" are more closely related to Barbicambarus, Creaserinus, and other species of Cambarus (Crandall and Fitzpatrick 1996, Fetzner 1996). As the type species of Orconectes, Orconectes inermis Cope, 1872, belongs to the cave-dwelling group, the genus is herein restricted to just those taxa. The surface-dwelling taxa now excluded from Orconectes sensu stricto are herein placed in the resurrected genus Faxonius Ortmann, 1905a, the oldest available name previously considered to be a synonym of Orconectes Cope, 1872.

As a widespread species, with considerable question of its relationship to the morphologically close O. nais, and O.causeyi, there is the possibility that they all represent a single species. Genetic analysis of European populations in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands revealed individuals did not belong to any mitochondrial lineage yet recorded in North America but formed a separate clade and a sequenced population from Iowa also represented a new clade (Filipova et al. 2009). Also, the species is very closely related to the newly described Orconectes quinebaugensis (Matthews et al. 2008, Matthews and Warren 2008), and they may be synonymous.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2015-05-26
Change Date1996-02-19
Edition Date2009-07-01
Edition AuthorsCordeiro, J.
Threat ImpactLow
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
This species is extremely wide ranging and common throughout North America and has been introduced widely, as well.
Range Extent Comments
This species ranges very widely, occurring farther north in Canada than any other crayfish species. Its native range extends as far north as the southern tip of Hudson Bay; southward it occurs from New England to western Montana and through the Missouri, Mississippi and Ohio River basins to Oklahoma and northern Arkansas; and it has also been widely introduced outside its native range (Pflieger, 1996). Recently it was discovered in the United Kingdom for the first time in the River Lee system of North London (Ahern et al., 2008).
Occurrences Comments
Horowitz and Flinders (2004) found it to be uncommon (2 of 15 stations) in the Piedmont, Ridge and Valley and Highlands regions of New Jersey. In New York's Hudson River drainage, Smith (1979) added Columbia and Rensselaer Cos., New York. In Maryland, it was first introduced intothe Patapsco River and from five locations near Woodstock (Meredith and Schwartz, 1960), but later expanded throughout the entire Patapsco basin displacing native species (Schwartz et al., 1963), and in the Piedmont where it is the most common species in larger Potomac River and Chesapeake Bay tributaries as well as man-made impoundments in western Maryland (Kilian et al., 2010) with it most recently in the vicinity of Plummers Island (bank of Potomac River), Montgomery Co. (Norden, 2008). It has recently expanded into Idaho (Clark and Lester, 2005). It occurs sympatrically with O. propinquus (introduced) in North Lake, Las Animas Co., Colorado (C. Taylor, pers. comm., August 2010). In Ohio, it is confined to the East Branch of the Chagrin River and a population was recently established at the Hebron Fish Hatchery in Licking Co. (Thoma and Jezerinac, 2000). Jezerinac (1986) lists Geauga and Lakel Cos., Ohio. In West Virginia, it is introduced to the eastern panhandle and southern New River in Summers Co. and Point Pleasant and Ohio River bacwaters, Pleasant Co. plus Summerville Lake in Nicholas Co. and Moncove Lake in Monroe Co. (Loughman and Welsh, 2010). In Missouri, it is the most widely distributed crayfish, occurring over all fo the state except the southeastern Lowlands and parts of the central Ozarks (Pflieger, 1996). In Kansas, it occurs throughout the state (Ghedotti, 1998). In the Neosho River drainage in Kansas, O. neglectus occurs in the eastern one-half of the Spring River drainage whereas O. virilis occurs in the western part outside of the Ozark Plateau (Durbian et al., 1994). Reports for this species in Mississippi are in error (T. Mann, MS NHP, pers. comm., January 2008). Recently it was found at several sites in the Catawba River and tributaries in North Carolina but not extending into South Carolina (Alderman, 2005). It is introduced in North Carolina in Long and Mauney Creeks in Gaston Co., Linville River and White Creek (Lake James tributaries) in Burke Co. (all Caatawba basin) (Simmons and Fraley, 2010). In the Cumberland Plateau it occurs in tributaries of Locust Fork of Black Warrior River and Guntersville Lake (Tennessee River) in Alabama (Bouchard, 1974). In Alabama, it occurs in the Black Warrior, Cahaba, Coosa, Tallapoosa, and Tennessee River drainages (Schuster et al., 2008). In Texas, it occurs in pockets of introduction in the San Gabriel River in Williamson Co.; and is also introduced to Chihuahua, Mexico (Johnson and Johnson, 2008). Based on museum records, it has been known in southern New England since about 1935 and has been widely introduced throughout the region to such an extent that today only the southeastern coastal drainage areas (South Shore, Buzzards Bay, Cape Cod and the Islands) are still free of it (Smith, 2000). It was recently documented in New Brunswick in the Black River, Kent Co., 300 km east across four watersheds from the nearest western population in the region (McAlpine et al., 2007).It also occurs in the northern portion Lake of the Woods, Ontario, Canada (Jansen et al., 2009), where it is believed to be native.
Threat Impact Comments
There are no threats. In Canada, it is being outcompeted at some sites by invasive crayfish, such as O. rusticus and O. immunis (Jansen et al., 2009).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Rostrum acuminate, acarinate, margins slightly converging and terminating in spines or sharply angular shoulders; cervical spines present; areola narrow with 2-3 punctations in narrowest part; male with hooks on ischia of 3rd pereiopods; male 1st pleopod terminating in 2 somewhat divergent slighly curved elements constituting <50% of total length of pleopod, central projection longer and with distal third smoothly curved so that apex directed caudally, lacking shoulder on cephalic margin of pleopod (Hobbs, 1976). [LENGTH: to 70 TCL; to 150 TL] [WIDTH: to 30]

Diagnostic Characteristics

Hooks only on male 3rd pereiopods; rostrum acuminate and acarinate; narrow areola; male 1st pelopod as described above.

Habitat

It occurs primarily in streams and is most abundant in those that are fertile, warm, moderately turbid, without strong base flows and with abundant cover in teh form of slab rock, logs and organic debris. It can be abundant in some artificial ponds with relatively stable water levels, but lacking large populations of bass or other predatory fish. In prairie creeks and sloughs having intermittent flow, deep mud bottoms and wide seasonal fluctuations in area and depth, it is often replaced by O. immunis (Pflieger, 1996). Usually not in riffles; occupied by other species.

Reproduction

Amplexus in fall; brooding mid-Mar - Jul; females do not breed until 2nd yr, amles perhaps late in 1st yr. In North Carolina, a Form I male and a female were collected in copulation in late March in the Linville River and an ovigerous female was also collected (Simmons and Fraley, 2010).
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN5
ProvinceRankNative
OntarioS4Yes
ManitobaS4Yes
New BrunswickSNANo
British ColumbiaSNANo
SaskatchewanS4Yes
QuebecS4Yes
AlbertaSNANo
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
UtahSNANo
PennsylvaniaSNANo
IowaSNRYes
ConnecticutSNANo
VirginiaSNANo
ArkansasS4Yes
Navajo NationS3Yes
AlabamaSNANo
MassachusettsSNANo
TexasSNANo
MarylandSNANo
MissouriSNRYes
WashingtonSNANo
West VirginiaSNANo
WyomingSNRYes
IndianaS5Yes
ArizonaSNANo
North DakotaS3Yes
MaineSNANo
Rhode IslandSNANo
New HampshireSNANo
VermontSNANo
CaliforniaSNANo
MinnesotaSNRYes
MichiganS4Yes
ColoradoS4Yes
NebraskaSNRYes
IdahoSNANo
TennesseeS5Yes
IllinoisS5Yes
OhioSNANo
OklahomaSNRYes
WisconsinS5Yes
MontanaS5Yes
KansasS5Yes
North CarolinaSNANo
New YorkSNANo
New MexicoSNANo
South DakotaSNRYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesLarge - smallSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesLarge - smallSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionPervasive - largeModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9.2 - Industrial & military effluentsPervasive - largeModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsPervasive - largeModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (77)
Arizona (17)
AreaForestAcres
Ash CreekPrescott National Forest7,663
Barbershop CanyonCoconino National Forest1,311
Black CrossTonto National Forest5,966
Black River CanyonApache-Sitgreaves National Forests11,817
BoulderTonto National Forest40,359
CenterfireApache-Sitgreaves National Forests13,130
Cherry CreekTonto National Forest11,371
East Clear CreekCoconino National Forest1,613
GoldfieldTonto National Forest15,257
HellsgateTonto National Forest6,171
Lime CreekTonto National Forest42,568
Lower San FranciscoApache-Sitgreaves National Forests59,310
MazatzalTonto National Forest16,942
NolanApache-Sitgreaves National Forests6,780
PipestemApache-Sitgreaves National Forests34,598
Sierra Ancha Wilderness ContiguousTonto National Forest7,787
TumacacoriCoronado National Forest44,594
California (6)
AreaForestAcres
Black ButteMendocino National Forest15,461
Bucks LakePlumas National Forest680
Devil's Gate (CA)Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest9,946
Middle ForkPlumas National Forest29,278
Mt. JacksonHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest20,721
ThatcherMendocino National Forest16,652
Colorado (2)
AreaForestAcres
Dome PeakRoutt NF35,716
HermosaSan Juan NF148,103
Minnesota (2)
AreaForestAcres
Baker - Homer - Brule LakesSuperior National Forest6,712
Kawishiwi Lake To SawbillSuperior National Forest15,305
Montana (17)
AreaForestAcres
Bear - Marshall - Scapegoat - SwanLewis and Clark National Forest344,022
Bear - Marshall - Scapegoat - SwanLolo National Forest118,485
Big LogHelena National Forest8,954
Bmss Ra 1485Flathead National Forest334,275
Buckhorn Ridge (MT)Kootenai National Forest34,716
Cabin Creek Wildlife Management Area OcdGallatin National Forest35,048
Cabinet Face East #671Kootenai National Forest50,326
Devils TowerHelena National Forest7,144
Freezeout MountainBeaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest97,305
LionheadGallatin National Forest33,549
MadisonGallatin National Forest127,859
Mt. Gmt Area HCuster National Forest1,335
North SiegelLolo National Forest9,208
Scotchman Peaks (MT)Kootenai National Forest53,909
Silver KingLolo National Forest12,816
Tenderfoot - Deep CreekLewis and Clark National Forest85,614
Willard Estelle #173Kootenai National Forest3,714
New Hampshire (2)
AreaForestAcres
Carr MountainWhite Mountain National Forest17,110
Sandwich RangeWhite Mountain National Forest16,797
New Mexico (6)
AreaForestAcres
Apache MountainGila National Forest17,506
Candian RiverCibola National Forest7,149
Frisco BoxGila National Forest38,979
NolanGila National Forest13,051
Virgin CanyonSanta Fe National Forest6,068
Wagon TongueGila National Forest11,411
Utah (23)
AreaForestAcres
0401001Ashley National Forest11,705
0401002Ashley National Forest36,113
0401024Ashley National Forest12,882
0418033Ashley National Forest24,909
0419020Ashley National Forest355,684
418009Uinta National Forest18,064
418013Uinta National Forest14,643
418018Uinta National Forest11,218
418022Uinta National Forest17,289
Cave CanyonDixie National Forest5,657
Circleville MountainFishlake National Forest24,142
CottonwoodDixie National Forest6,754
East MountainManti-Lasal National Forest30,705
Joe LottFishlake National Forest19,826
MogotsuDixie National Forest16,762
Moody WashDixie National Forest31,835
North FrancisWasatch-Cache National Forest8,148
Pine Valley MountainsDixie National Forest57,673
Price RiverManti-Lasal National Forest24,349
Rock CanyonDixie National Forest16,457
South FrancisWasatch-Cache National Forest3,374
Stansbury MountainsWasatch-Cache National Forest39,696
Upper South ForkWasatch-Cache National Forest16,811
Washington (1)
AreaForestAcres
Slide RidgeWenatchee National Forest11,430
Wyoming (1)
AreaForestAcres
0401036Ashley National Forest6,309
References (37)
  1. Adams, S. B., C. Roghair, C. Krause, M. L. Warren Jr, J. A. Cochran, A. Dolloff, J. Moran, S. W. McGregor, G. A. Schuster, M. Gangloff, D. R. DeVries, M. R. Kendrick, G. L. Grove, and R. A. Wright. 2015. New crayfish species records from the Sipsey Fork Drainage, including Lewis Smith Reservoir (Alabama, USA): native or introduced species? Freshwater Crayfish 21(1):17–32.
  2. Ahern, D., J. England, and A. Ellis. 2008. The virile crayfish, <i>Orconectes virilis</i> (Hagen, 1870) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Cambaridae), identified in the UK. Aquatic Invasions 3(1):102-104.
  3. Alderman, J.M. 2005. Crayfish surveys for Catawba-Waterlee relicensing. Unpublished report prepared for Duke Power Company, Charlotte, North Carolina, 17 July 2005. 18 pp.
  4. Bouchard, R.W. 1974. Geography and ecology of crayfishes of the Cumberland Plateau and Cumberland Mountains, Kentucky, Virginia, Tennessee, Georgia and Alabama. Part I. The genera <i>Procambarus </i>and <i>Orconectes</i>. Freshwater Crayfish 2:563-584.
  5. Burskey, J.L. and T.P. Simon. 2010. Reach- and watershed-scale associations of crayfish within an area of varying agricultural impact on west-central Indiana. Southeastern Naturalist 9 (special issue 3):199-216.
  6. Cooper, J.E. 2010. Annotated checklist of the crayfishes of North Carolina, and correlations of distributions with hydrologic units and physiographic provinces. Journal of the North Carolina Academy of Science 126(3):69-76.
  7. Crandall, K. A., and S. De Grave. 2017. An updated classification of the freshwater crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidea) of the world, with a complete species list. Journal of Crustacean Biology 37(5):615-653.
  8. Dube, J. et J.-F. Desroches. 2007. Les ecrevisses du Quebec. Ministere des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune, Direction de l'amenagement de la faune de l'Estrie, de Montreal et de la Monteregie, Longueuil. v + 51 pp.
  9. Durbian III, F.E., B.J. Frey, and D.W. Moore. 1994. Crayfish species from creeks and rivers of Cherokee County, Kansas. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 97(102):13-17.
  10. Filipova, L., D.M. Holdich, J. Lesobre, F. Grandjean, and A. Petrusek. 2009. Cryptic diversity within the invasive virile crayfish Orconectes virilis (Hagen, 1870) species complex: New lineages recorded in both native and introduced ranges. Biological Invasions, in press.
  11. Ghedotti, M.J. 1998. An annotated list of the crayfishes of Kansas with first records of <i>Orconectes macrus</i> and <i>Procambarus acutus</i> in Kansas. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 101(1-2):54-57.
  12. Hasiotis, S.T. 1993. Evaluation of the burrowing behaviour of stream and pond dwelling species of <i>Orconectes </i>in the Front Range of Boulder, Colorado USA: their ethological and geological implications. Freshwater Crayfish, 9: 399-406.
  13. Hobbs, H. H., Jr. 1989. An Illustrated Checklist of the American Crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidae, Cambaridae, and Parastacidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 480:1-236.
  14. Hobbs, Jr., H. H. 1976a. Crayfishes (Astacidae) of North and Middle America. Biological Methods Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio. 173 pp.
  15. Horowitz, R.and C. Flinders. 2004. Development of a Headwater IBI for New Jersey Upland Streams. Final Report Patrick Center Project #869, prepared for the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton, New Jersey; and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Edison, New Jersy, 30 November 2004.
  16. Jansen, W., N. Geard, T. Mosindy, G. Olson, and M. Turner. 2009. Relative abundance and habitat association of three crayfish (<i>Orconectes virilis</i>, <i>O. rusticus</i>, and <i>O. immunis</i>) near an invasion front of O. rusticus, and long-term changes in their distribution in Lake of the Woods, Canada. Aquatic Invasions 4(4):627-649.
  17. Jezerinac, R.F. 1986. Endangered and threatened crayfishes ( Decapoda: Cambaridae) of Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science 86: 177-180.
  18. Johnson, S.K. and N.K. Johnson. 2008. Texas Crawdads. Crawdad Club Designs: College Station, Texas. 160 pp.
  19. Kilian, J.V., A.J. Becker, S.A. Stranko, M. Ashton, R.J. Klauda, J. Gerber, and M. Hurd. 2010. The status and distribution of Maryland crayfishes. Southeastern Naturalist 9 (special issue 3):11-32.
  20. Loughman, Z.J. and S.A. Welsh. 2010. Distribution and conservation standing of West Virginia crayfishes. Southeastern Naturalist 9 (special issue 3):63-78.
  21. Mathews, L.M. and A.H. Warren. 2008. A new crayfish of the genus Orconectes Cope, 1872 from southern New England (Crustacea: Decapoda: Cambariidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 121(3):374-381.
  22. Mathews, L.M., L. Adams, E. Anderson, M. Basile, E. Gottardi, and M.A. Buckholt. 2008. Genetic and morphological evidence for substantial hidden biodiversity in a freshwater crayfish species complex. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 48:126-135.
  23. McAlpine, D.F., A.H.E. McAlpine, and A. Madden. 2007. Occurrence of the potentially invasive crayfish, <i>Orconectes virilis</i> (Decapoda, Cambaridae) in eastern New Brunswick, Canada. Crustaceana, 80(4): 509-511.
  24. McLaughlin, P. A., D. K. Camp, M. V. Angel, E. L. Bousfield, P. Brunel, R. C. Brusca, D. Cadien, A. C. Cohen, K. Conlan, L. G. Eldredge, D. L. Felder, J. W. Goy, T. Haney, B. Hann, R. W. Heard, E. A. Hendrycks, H. H. Hobbs III, J. R. Holsinger, B. Kensley, D. R. Laubitz, S. E. LeCroy, R. Lemaitre, R. F. Maddocks, J. W. Martin, P. Mikkelsen, E. Nelson, W. A. Newman, R. M. Overstreet, W. J. Poly, W. W. Price, J. W. Reid, A. Robertson, D. C. Rogers, A. Ross, M. Schotte, F. Schram, C. Shih, L. Watling, G. D. F. Wilson, and D. D. Turgeon. 2005. Common and Scientific Names of Aquatic Invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Crustaceans. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 31. 545 pp.
  25. Meredith, W.G. and F.J. Schwartz. 1960. Maryland crayfishes. Maryland Department of Research and Education, Educational Series 46:1-32.
  26. Norden, A.W. 2008. Biological diversity of Plummers Isalnd, Maryland: the crayfishes and their entocytherid ostracod associates. Bulletin of the Biological Society of Washington, 15: 49-51.
  27. Pflieger, W.L. [B. Dryden, editor]. 1996. The Crayfishes of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, Missouri. 152 pp.
  28. Schuster, G.A., C.A. Taylor, and J. Johansen. 2008. An annotated checklist and preliminary designation of drainage distributions of the crayfishes of Alabama. Southeastern Naturalist, 7(3): 493-504.
  29. Schwartz, F.J., R. Rubelmann, and J. Allison. 1963. Ecological population expansion of the introduced crayfish, <i>Orconectes virilis</i>. The Ohio Journal of Science, 63(6): 266-273.
  30. Simmons, J.W. and S.J. Fraley. 2010. Distribution, status, and life-history observations of crayfishes in western North Carolina. Southeastern Naturalist 9 (special issue 3):79-126.
  31. Smith, D.G. 1979. New locality records of crayfishes from the middle Hudson River system. Ohio Journal of Science, 79(3): 133-135.
  32. Smith, D.G. 2000a. Keys to the Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Southern New England. Douglas G. Smith: Sunderland, Massachusetts. 243 pp.
  33. Taylor, C. A., G. A. Schuster, J. E. Cooper, R. J. DiStefano, A. G. Eversole, P. Hamr, H. H. Hobbs III, H. W. Robison, C. E. Skelton, and R. F. Thoma. 2007. A reassessment of the conservation status of crayfishes of the United States and Canada after 10+ years of increased awareness. Fisheries 32(8):371-389.
  34. Thoma, R.F. and R.E. Jezerinac. 2000. Ohio crayfish and shrimp atlas. Ohio Biological Survey Miscellaneous Contribution 7:1-28.
  35. Unger, P. A. 1978. The Crayfishes (Crustacea: Cambaridae) of Colorado. Natural History Inventory of Colorado 3: 1-19.
  36. Westhoff, J.T., F.A. Guyot, and R.J. DiStefano. 2006. Distribution of the imperiled Williams' crayfish (<i>Orconectes williamsi</i>) in the White River drainage of Missouri: associations with multiscale environmental variables. American Midland Naturalist, 156: 273-288.
  37. Wetzel, J.E., W.J. Poly, and J.W. Fetzner, Jr. 2004. Morphological and genetic comparisons of golden crayfish, <i>Orconectes luteus</i>, and rusty crayfish, <i>O. rusticus</i>, with range corrections in Iowa and Minnesota. Journal of Crustacean Biology 24(4): 603-617.