Lepidomeda vittata

Cope, 1874

Little Colorado Spinedace

G1Critically Imperiled (G1G2) Found in 3 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G1Critically ImperiledGlobal Rank
EndangeredIUCN
MediumThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.104457
Element CodeAFCJB20040
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNEndangered
Endemicendemic to a single state or province
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderCypriniformes
FamilyLeuciscidae
GenusLepidomeda
Concept Reference
Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Tibbets et al. (2001) examined mtDNA and allozyme variation in remaining populations of L. vittata and found that "genetic diversity was low, but population structure was high because of partitioning of genotypes among samples. Similarity of genotypes suggest[s] current populations are relics from a single, large population that was once continuously distributed throughout the [Lower Colorado River] drainage."
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2012-02-29
Change Date1996-09-25
Edition Date2012-02-29
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Threat ImpactMedium
Range Extent5000-20,000 square km (about 2000-8000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences6 - 20
Rank Reasons
Small range in north-flowing tributaries of the Little Colorado River in eastern Arizona; has declined due to habitat alteration and loss from human activities and drought, introduction and spread of exotic predatory and competitive fishes, and chemical manipulation of fish populations in native streams.
Range Extent Comments
This species formerly occurred throughout the upper sections of the Little Colorado River system in eastern Arizona, (Minckley 1973, Lee et al. 1980, Page and Burr 2011). Currently the range of the species is confined to disjunct locations within the East Clear Creek Watershed, Chevelon Creek, the upper Little Colorado River (including Nutrioso and Rudd Creeks), and Silver Creek (USFWS 2008). Recent surveys did not locate this species in Silver Creek, and very few were found in Nutrioso and Rudd creeks; this species is considered rare in the East Clear Creek watershed, Chevelon Creek, and the mainstem Little Colorado River (USFWS, Arizona Ecological Services Field Office; USFWS 2008).
Occurrences Comments
This species is represented by several (not more than 10) extant occurrences (subpopulations). Number of locations (as defined by IUCN) may not exceed five.
Threat Impact Comments
Decline has been due to habitat alteration and loss, introduction and spread of exotic predatory and competitive animals (Blinn et al. 1993), and chemical manipulation of fish populations in native streams (USFWS 1987, Sweetser et al. 2002).

Long-term drought and current and planned water acquisitions are limiting the amount of water available for the fish. Additionally, non-native fishes (rainbow trout, green sunfish) and crayfish compete with spinedace and are predators upon them (USFWS, Arizona Ecological Services Field Office).

Habitat loss and fragmentation continue to be serious threats to the fish's existence. Human activities, such as riparian modification and destruction, urban growth, mining, timber harvest, road construction, livestock grazing, and other watershed disturbances (e.g., road construction and maintenance, recreational development and usage, fire management, and inter-basin water diversions) have also had detrimental effects to spinedace habitat. These activities have affected watershed function, runoff patterns, peak flows, seasonal flows, riparian vegetation, wet meadow functions, bank erosion, siltation, and water quality. Introduction of non-native trout, baitfish, and crayfish at recreational lakes and reservoirs have increased competition for available resources and predation on spinedace. In addition, extended drought cycles and increased development of groundwater resources are impacting habitat for spinedace within their historical range. It has become more difficult to find spinedace because drought conditions have reduced available habitat. Source: USFWS (2009).

USFWS (2008) stated that "continued invasion of non-native aquatic species into spinedace habitat and the on-going and future reductions in surface water (due to both drought and surface and groundwater pumping) are threats that are increasing in magnitude, extend to existing spinedace populations, and are contributing factors to the spinedace's continuing decline throughout its range. Within the foreseeable future (50 years) the complete loss of baseflow to the area that supports the largest population of spinedace has been predicted by two different hydrologic models based upon current groundwater pumping; we expect the rate of groundwater pumping to increase in the future as the human population in the area increases. There are very few habitats within the range of the species that are currently able to be occupied due to lack of water or presence of multiple predators, so at this time, recovery options are limited. Areas that are currently able to support spinedace are relatively small, fragmented habitats that frequently have no connection to other habitats due to lack of water."
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Habitat includes rocky and sandy runs and pools of creeks and small rivers (Page and Burr 2011); water ranges from clear to turbid, often cold enough for trout; substrate often sand, gravel, and silt with rock and bedrock (Minckley 1973; Rohde, in Lee et al. 1980). This fish is most common in slow to moderate water currents, over fine gravel bottoms; it often inhabits unshaded pools with rocks or undercut banks and avoids deep, heavily shaded pools and shallow, open areas (Hill et al. 1989, Minckley 1984). During dry periods, these fishes retreat to springs and pools in intermittent streambeds.

Ecology

Individuals tend to be solitary (Lee et al. 1980).

Reproduction

Most spawning takes place in early summer, but it continues sporadically through early fall. Females carry from 650-5000 eggs depending on their size (Lee et al. 1980).
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN1
ProvinceRankNative
ArizonaS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
2 - Agriculture & aquaculture
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranching
3 - Energy production & mining
3.2 - Mining & quarrying
4 - Transportation & service corridorsUnknownSerious - slightHigh - low
4.1 - Roads & railroadsUnknownSerious - slightHigh - low
4.3 - Shipping lanesUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource use
5.3 - Logging & wood harvesting
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge - smallExtreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useLarge - smallExtreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive - largeSerious - slightHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesPervasive - largeSerious - slightHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionUnknownSerious - slightHigh - low
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)Extreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
11.2 - DroughtsPervasive (71-100%)Extreme - moderateHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (3)
Arizona (3)
AreaForestAcres
Barbershop CanyonCoconino National Forest1,311
East Clear CreekCoconino National Forest1,613
Jacks CanyonCoconino National Forest2,858
References (23)
  1. Blinn, D. W., C. Runck, D. A. Clark, and J. N. Rinne. 1993. Effects of rainbow trout predation on Little Colorado spinedace. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 122:139-143.
  2. Hill, J., O. E. Maughan, and L. Thompson. 1989. Endangered species information system: Little Colorado River spinedace (<i>Lepidomeda vittata</i>). Arizona Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Unit, University of Arizona, Tucson. 13 pp.
  3. Jelks, H. L., S. J. Walsh, N. M. Burkhead, S. Contreras-Balderas, E. Díaz-Pardo, D. A. Hendrickson, J. Lyons, N. E. Mandrak, F. McCormick, J. S. Nelson, S. P. Platania, B. A. Porter, C. B. Renaud, J. Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, E. B. Taylor, and M.L. Warren, Jr. 2008. Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33(8):372-407.
  4. Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, North Carolina. i-x + 854 pp.
  5. Marsh, Paul C. (Center for Environmental Studies, Arizona State University). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC.
  6. Matthews, J.R. and C.J. Moseley (eds.). 1990. The Official World Wildlife Fund Guide to Endangered Species of North America. Volume 1. Plants, Mammals. xxiii + pp 1-560 + 33 pp. appendix + 6 pp. glossary + 16 pp. index. Volume 2. Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians, Fishes, Mussels, Crustaceans, Snails, Insects, and Arachnids. xiii + pp. 561-1180. Beacham Publications, Inc., Washington, D.C.
  7. Miller, R. R. 1963. Distribution, variation and ecology of <i>Lepidomeda vittata</i>, a rare cyprinid fish endemic to eastern Arizona. Copeia 1963:1-5.
  8. Minckley, C.O. 1984. Current distribution and status of <i>Lepidomeda vittata</i> (the Little Colorado Spinedace) in Arizona. Submitted to Arizona Game and Fish Department by Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.
  9. Minckley, W. L. 1973. Fishes of Arizona. Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix, Arizona. 293 pp.
  10. Nelson, J. S., E. J. Crossman, H. Espinosa-Perez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, and J. D. Williams. 2004. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 29, Bethesda, Maryland. 386 pp.
  11. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 1991. A field guide to freshwater fishes: North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. 432 pp.
  12. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston. xix + 663 pp.
  13. Page, L. M., H. Espinosa-Pérez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, R. L. Mayden, and J. S. Nelson. 2013. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Seventh edition. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 34, Bethesda, Maryland.
  14. Page, L. M., K. E. Bemis, T. E. Dowling, H.S. Espinosa-Pérez, L.T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, K. E. Hartel, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, M. A. Neigbors, J. J. Schmitter-Soto, and H. J. Walker, Jr. 2023. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Eighth edition. American Fisheries Society (AFS), Special Publication 37, Bethesda, Maryland, 439 pp.
  15. Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
  16. State Natural Heritage Data Centers. 1996a. Aggregated element occurrence data from all U.S. state natural heritage programs, including the Tennessee Valley Authority, Navajo Nation and the District of Columbia. Science Division, The Nature Conservancy.
  17. State Natural Heritage Data Centers. 1996b. Aggregated element occurrence data from all U.S. state natural heritage programs, including the Tennessee Valley Authority, Navajo Nation and the District of Columbia: Export of freshwater fish and mussel records west of the Mississippi River in 1997. Science Division, The Nature Conservancy.
  18. Sweetser, M. G., S. D. Bryan, and A. T. Robinson. 2002. Movement, distribution, and predation: <i>Lepidomeda vittata</i> and nonnative salmonids in eastern Arizona. Western North American Naturalist 62:197-205.
  19. Tibbets, C. A., A. C. Weibel, and T. E. Dowling. 2001. Population genetics of <i>Lepidomeda vittata</i>, the Little Colorado River spinedace. Copeia 2001:813-819.
  20. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1987. Final rule to determine <i>Lepidomeda vittata</i> (Little Colorado spinedace) to be a threatened species with critical habitat. Federal Register 52:35034-35041.
  21. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1990. Endangered and threatened species recovery program: report to Congress. 406 pp.
  22. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2008. Little Colorado spinedace (<i>Lepidomeda vittata</i>) 5-year review: summary and evaluation. USFWS, Arizona Ecological Services Field Office, Phoenix, Arizona.
  23. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2009. Little Colorado spinedace spotlight species action plan. USFWS, Arizona Ecological Services Field Office. Phoenix, Arizona.