Heloderma suspectum

Cope, 1869

Gila Monster

G4Apparently Secure Found in 37 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
Near threatenedIUCN
MediumThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.103164
Element CodeARACE01010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNNear threatened
CITESAppendix II
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassReptilia
OrderSquamata
FamilyHelodermatidae
GenusHeloderma
Other Common Names
Gila monster (EN)
Concept Reference
Bogert, C. M., and R. M. del Campo. 1956. The Gila monster and its allies: the relationships, habits, and behavior of the lizards of the family Helodermatidae. Bulletin of the America Museum of Natural History 109(1):1-238.
Taxonomic Comments
Douglas et al. (2010) stated that they found no mtDNA evidence for the two subspecies of H. suspectum; however, their results are difficult to evaluate because little information is provided on the collection localities of the sampled specimens. Further study is needed (Crother 2017).
Conservation Status
Review Date2005-06-24
Change Date1996-10-23
Edition Date2005-06-24
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Threat ImpactMedium
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 300
Rank Reasons
Occurs in the southwestern U.S. and northwestern Mexico; fairly common in some areas; some habitat has been lost to agriculture and urbanization, and illegal collecting may limit certain local populations, but the species is apparently secure at the present time.
Range Extent Comments
The Gila monster ranges from extreme southwestern Utah, southern Nevada, and adjacent southeastern California south through southern Arizona, southwestern New Mexico, and much of Sonora to Sinaloa, Mexico (Stebbins 2003). The core of the range is in Arizona and Sonora. Elevational range extends from near sea level in Sonora and 30 m in Arizona to at least 1,545 m in southeastern Arizona (Lowe et al. 1986); 1,180-1,950 meters in New Mexico (Degenhardt et al. 1996).
Occurrences Comments
This species is represented by well over 100 collection/observation sites that are well distributed throughout the range (e.g., see Campbell and Lamar 2004). Degenhardt et al. (1996) mapped approximately 17 collection sites in New Mexico (Campbell and Lamar 2004 mapped only 5); these represent several relatively distinct occurrences. The easternmost locations may represent displaced, released, or escaped captive individuals (Degenhardt et al. 1996).
Threat Impact Comments
Populations have been exploited (illegally) by commercial and private collectors, and they have suffered from habitat destruction due to urbanization and agricultural development (New Mexico Department of Fish and Game 1985). Concrete-lined canals are barriers to movement (Brown and Carmony 1999), as are busy highways. Mortality on roads likely is increasing as traffic volume increases on established highways and new roads are built. The most important reason for the decline is habitat loss resulting from development (Campbell and Lamar 2004).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

A large, heavy-bodied lizard with a massive head, short thick tail (thin in emaciated individuals), beadlike dorsal scales, short limbs with strong claws, and loose folds of skin on the neck; dorsal coloration gaudy, black and pink, orange, or yellow; adult snout-vent length 22-35 cm (Stebbins 1985). Occasionally exceeds 50 cm in total length (Campbell and Lamar 1989, which see for further description details).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Differs from other U.S. lizards in large size and bulk, beadlike dorsal scales, and bold dorsal pattern of black and yellow, orange, or pink. Differs from the similar H. HORRIDUM of Mexico as follows: tail length less than 55% of snout-vent length (vs. at least 65%); 48-62 scales in longitudinal midline from vent to tip of tail (vs. 74-87); dorsal coloration includes yellowish, orange, or pink (vs. black with or without yellow). See Campbell and Lamar (1989) for further details.

Habitat

Occupied vegetation types include desert grassland, Mohave and Sonoran desert scrub, and thorn scrub (Sonora); less often oak or pine-oak woodland. In Mexico, it occurs on lower mountain slopes and adjacent plains and beaches (Stebbins 2003), sometimes in irrigated areas. Canyon bottoms, arroyos, and rocky slopes may support relatively dense populations in some parts of Arizona and Sonora. In southern Arizona, the Gila monster is more abundant in wetter and rockier palo verde-sahuaro desert than in drier and sandier creosote-bursage desert, where it occurs mainly in or near rocky buttes or mountains (Lowe et al. 1986). In New Mexico, the species is most commonly associated with desert scrub vegetation in rocky regions of mountain foothills and canyons; sometimes it is found along the lower fringes of pinyon-juniper woodland or oak woodland; rarely encountered in agricultural areas (Degenhardt et al. 1996). Gila monsters are mainly terrestrial but infrequently climb into vegetation. Refuges include spaces under rock, dense shrubs, burrows, or woodrat nests. Sub-surface shelters are important components of the habitat, and certain ones are used with a high degree of fidelity (particularly in winter), sometimes by multiple individuals concurrently (Beck and Jennings 2003). In Arizona, Gila monsters spend about 98% of the year under cover (Lowe et al. 1986). In Utah, individuals spent over 95% of active season underground; occasionally they basked near shelters in spring; shelters were burrows or crevices in rocky areas; hibernacula faced south (Beck 1990).

Ecology

Basically solitary but may use communal overwintering sites.

Reproduction

In southern Arizona, sperm formation occurs in May-June; females have oviductal eggs from late June into August (Goldberg and Lowe 1997). Eggs are laid primarily in July-August. Clutch size averages about 6, ranges up to 13 (Goldberg and Lowe 1997). In Arizona, eggs reportedly overwinter underground and hatch the following late April-early June, after an incubation period of about 10 months (Lowe et al. 1986, Goldberg and Lowe 1997). Females are sexually mature at about 24 cm SVL; mature females evidently reproduce every year (Goldberg and Lowe 1997).
Terrestrial Habitats
Woodland - HardwoodShrubland/chaparralDesert
Palustrine Habitats
Riparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN4
ProvinceRankNative
Navajo NationSHYes
New MexicoS2Yes
CaliforniaSNRYes
ArizonaS4Yes
UtahS2Yes
NevadaS2Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesInsignificant/negligible or past
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesInsignificant/negligible or past

Roadless Areas (37)
Arizona (27)
AreaForestAcres
Black CrossTonto National Forest5,966
BoulderTonto National Forest40,359
Boulder CanyonCoconino National Forest4,554
Butterfly Roadless AreaCoronado National Forest42,296
Catalina St. Pk. Roadless AreaCoronado National Forest951
Cdo WsaCoronado National Forest1,955
ChiricahuaCoronado National Forest76,876
Cimarron HillsCoconino National Forest5,303
GaliuroCoronado National Forest28,333
GoldfieldTonto National Forest15,257
HackberryCoconino National Forest17,885
Happy ValleyCoronado National Forest7,972
Hell HoleApache-Sitgreaves National Forests15,512
Horse MesaTonto National Forest9,146
Lime CreekTonto National Forest42,568
Lower Dragoon RoadlessCoronado National Forest1,165
Lower RinconCoronado National Forest3,278
MazatzalTonto National Forest16,942
Middle Dragoon RoadlessCoronado National Forest10,543
Middle Romero WSRCoronado National Forest60
Oracle RoadlessCoronado National Forest22,365
PinalenoCoronado National Forest130,920
Pine Mountain Wilderness ContiguousTonto National Forest6,518
Santa RitaCoronado National Forest6,078
Santa TeresaCoronado National Forest8,929
TumacacoriCoronado National Forest44,594
WhetstoneCoronado National Forest20,728
Nevada (2)
AreaForestAcres
Lovell Summit SouthHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest28,455
PotosiHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest5,145
New Mexico (3)
AreaForestAcres
Gila BoxGila National Forest23,759
Hell HoleGila National Forest19,553
Peloncillo (NM)Coronado National Forest43,339
Utah (5)
AreaForestAcres
Bull ValleyDixie National Forest10,911
Cedar BenchDixie National Forest8,915
CottonwoodDixie National Forest6,754
Moody WashDixie National Forest31,835
Pine Valley MountainsDixie National Forest57,673
References (24)
  1. Beck, D. D. 1985. The natural history, distribution, and present status of the gila monster in Utah. Department of Biology and Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, Utah. Report submitted to Utah Division of Wildlife Resources.
  2. Beck, D. D. 1990. Ecology and behavior of the Gila monster in southwestern Utah. J. Herpetol. 24:54-68.
  3. Beck, D. D. 2005. Biology of Gila monsters and beaded lizards. University of California Press, Berkeley. 256 pp.
  4. Beck, D. D., and R. D. Jennings. 2003. Habitat use by Gila monsters: the importance of shelters. Herpetological Monographs 17:111-129.
  5. Behler, J. L., and F. W. King. 1979. The Audubon Society field guide to North American reptiles and amphibians. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 719 pp.
  6. Bogert, C. M., and R. M. del Campo. 1956. The Gila monster and its allies: the relationships, habits, and behavior of the lizards of the family Helodermatidae. Bulletin of the America Museum of Natural History 109(1):1-238.
  7. Brown, D. E., and N. B. Carmony. 1999. Gila monster: facts and folklore of America's Aztec lizard. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City. 129 pp.
  8. Campbell, J. A., and W. W. Lamar. 1989. The venomous reptiles of Latin America. Comstock Publ. Associates, Division of Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York. xii + 425 pp.
  9. Campbell, J. A., and W. W. Lamar. 2004. The venomous reptiles of the Western Hemisphere. 2 volumes. Cornell University Press.
  10. Collins, J. T. 1990. Standard common and current scientific names for North American amphibians and reptiles. 3rd ed. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. Herpetological Circular No. 19. 41 pp.
  11. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2008. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. Sixth edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Herpetological Circular 37:1-84. Online with updates at: http://www.ssarherps.org/pages/comm_names/Index.php
  12. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2012. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 7th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 39:1-92.
  13. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  14. Degenhardt, W. G., C. W. Painter, and A. H. Price. 1996. Amphibians and reptiles of New Mexico. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. xix + 431 pp.
  15. Douglas, M. E., M. R. Douglas, G. W. Schuett, D. D. Beck, and B. K. Sullivan. 2010. Conservation phylogenetics of helodermatid lizards using multiple molecular markers and a supertree approach. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution 55(1):153-167.
  16. Ernst, C. H. 1992. Venomous reptiles of North America. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. ix + 236 pp.
  17. Goldberg, S. R., and C. H. Lowe. 1997. Reproductive cycle of the Gila monster, <i>Heloderma suspectum</i>, in southern Arizona. Journal of Herpetology 31:161-166.
  18. Jones, K. B. 1983. Movement patterns and foraging ecology of Gila monsters (<i>Heloderma suspectum</i> Cope) in northwestern Arizona. Herpetologica 39:247-253.
  19. Lowe, C. H., C. R. Schwalbe, and T. B. Johnson. 1986. The venomous reptiles of Arizona. Arizona Game and Fish Department. ix + 115 pp.
  20. McGurty, B. M. 2002. <i>Heloderma suspectum</i>: egg predation by juveniles. Herpetological Review 33:205.
  21. New Mexico Department of Game and Fish. 1985. Handbook of species endangered in New Mexico.
  22. Stebbins, R. C. 1985a. A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. xiv + 336 pp.
  23. Stebbins, R. C. 2003. A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians. Third edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
  24. Sullivan, B. K., M. A. Kwiatkowski, and G. W. Schuett. 2004. Translocation of urban Gila monsters: a problematic conservation tool. Biological Conservation 117:235-242.