Phacelia argillacea

Atwood

Clay Phacelia

G1Critically Imperiled Found in 13 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G1Critically ImperiledGlobal Rank
Very high - highThreat Impact
Clay phacelia (Phacelia argillacea). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.133894
Element CodePDHYD0C080
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicendemic to a single state or province
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderSolanales
FamilyHydrophyllaceae
GenusPhacelia
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2021-12-06
Change Date1983-07-15
Edition Date2021-12-06
Edition AuthorsGreene, L., rev. D. Atwood, rev. B. Franklin (1996), rev. M. McCormick (2021)
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent<100 square km (less than about 40 square miles)
Number of Occurrences1 - 5
Rank Reasons
A narrow endemic of Utah County, Utah. There are only two known populations. Since this species is a winter annual and is extremely restricted by climatic and edaphic factors, it is vulnerable to extinction. Neither population is on pristine habitat - the larger population is bisected by railroad tracks and a main highway - and both populations have been subject to sheep grazing.
Range Extent Comments
Only found in Utah along the Douglas Creek and Gordon Gulch members of the Green River formation in the Wasatch Mountains in Pleasant Valley. This plant was first discovered in 1883.

An intensive search in 1980 by the Utah Native Plant Society (UNPS) revealed a significant number of mature P. argillacea plants (Smith et al. 1989). For purposes of this text, Atwood's find in 1971 will be referred to as the Clear Creek site, and the UNPS-located occurrence will be referred to as the Tucker site, or main site. Collectively, they will be referred to as the Tucker population.

While searching for more P. ARGILLACEA sites in 1989, Ben Franklin (Botanist, Utah Natural Heritage Program) discovered a new population which consists of two subpopulations on open slopes, approximately five miles west-northwest of the Tucker population. For purposes of this text, Franklin's find will be referred to as the Water Hollow-Garner Canyon population.

Clay phacelia occurs in four known sites. Probably only two populations exist, however, due to the close proximity of both pairs of occurrences (Franklin and Tuhy 1989). Harper (1990) suggests that the micro-habitat differences between the Clear Creek and Tucker sites may have effectively "molded" these subpopulations into distinct populations. He believes that the Clear Creek location is both cooler in the winter and warmer in the summer than the Tucker site. His visceral feeling is that the two sites encompass only one population, but he indicates that they may be in the process of diverging.
Occurrences Comments
Occurs in two known sites.
Threat Impact Comments
SMALL POPULATION SIZE AND NUMBER: Numerous threats exist for Clay phacelia. Probably the most significant current threat is the species' inherent vulnerability due to small population size and number. In populations with less than 1000 individuals, demographic uncertainties can play a significant role in extinction probability (Shaffer 1987). This may be mitigated by a presumably large soil seed bank. However, the 1987 sheep staging episode significantly impacted the habitat, and the little soil that had accumulated in the area was partly washed away in subsequent thunderstorms. In spite of this, England still suspects a sizeable seed bank (England 1989).

MODIFICATION OR LOSS OF LIMITED HABITAT: Human land-use activities in and near the critical habitats have played the largest role in Clay phacelia's recent dramatic decline. Livestock and sheep have grazed and trampled the plants and their surrounding habitat. The Denver and Rio Grande Western (D&RGW) railroad is adjacent to the Clear Creek site. Construction activities have already modified the neighboring habitat through stabilization of cuts and fills, runoff control, and material storage (Gill et al. 1982). In addition, Highway 6 bisects the Tucker population. Highway maintenance and construction activities such as burning and shoulder stabilization may also impact both potential and existing Clay phacelia and accompanying bee (pollen vector) habitats.

GRAZING BY ENDEMIC SPECIES: Grazing from endemic ungulates and herbivory from small native herbivores has collectively impacted Clay phacelia. Specific threats include mule deer, elk, and occasional moose that frequent the area of critical habitat in the winter. The exposed south- and west-facing slopes provide a welcome winter home with food and relatively warm areas for bedding down. Rock squirrels have also been sighted nibbling on the herbage (Gill et al. 1982).

INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION: Long-term monitoring of exotic and native species which grow in association with Clay phacelia has not been conducted. However, this should be looked at closely, especially in the absence of grazing. Both Marubium vulagare and Cynoglossum officinlate could pose significant competition to P. argillacea (England 1989).

POTENTIAL THREATS: If pollination is wind-vectored, dust from heavy use of nearby dirt roads could foul the stigma (Harper 1990). The dirt road near the main Tucker site is most frequently traveled during hunting season or late fall. This is well after pollination occurs in Clay phacelia, so it may not be a problem. Large or persistent clouds of fugitive dust have never been observed right near the hillside plants.

Disease or parasitism could also force the extirpation of any of the two remaining populations. Also, a large landslide occurred near Soldier Summit, within miles of the Clay phacelia populations, in the mid-1980s. Obviously, an unforeseen natural disaster of this magnitude could cause extirpation of this taxon from any one of its sites.
Ecology & Habitat

Diagnostic Characteristics

Clay phacelia is very closely related to PHACELIA GLANDULOSA Nutt., a west slope Idaho, Wyoming, and Montana native. In fact, the original collection of clay phacelia in 1883 by Marcus E. Jones, in the vicinity of Pleasant Valley Junction, Utah, was identified P. GLANDULOSA. In 1894, Jones again collected the species; this time at Clear Creek near Soldier Summit in Utah County, Utah. When N.D. Atwood rediscovered the Clear Creek population in 1971, he found it to differ substantially from P. GLANDULOSA. He subsequently described and named it P. ARGILLACEA in 1973 (Gill et al. 1982).

Two plants which grow in association with Clay phacelia, the frequent adventive, CYNOGLOSSUM OFFICINALE (Hound's tongue), and the less frequent native, MENTZELIA LAEVICAULIS, are most readily confused with P. ARGILLACEA. Like Clay phacelia, they both produce basal rosettes. Hound's tongue's leaves, however, are entire and pubescent. MENTZELIA can also be distinguished by its leaves which are lobed with retorse or "velcro-like" hairs (England 1989).

Habitat

BIOLOGICAL HABITAT: Clay phacelia occurs on steep slopes in sparse juniper-pinyon and mountain brush communities (Welsh 1987). The dominant species at the site of the largest element occurrence are RHUS TRILOBATA and AMELANCHIER ALNIFOLIA. At the base of the main slope is a degraded sagebrush steppe. Large and probably influential ungulates are deer, elk, and domestic sheep. Probably the most significant component is mule deer (England 1989). There is mainly wintertime use by big game, and (before a fence was built) transient but heavy spring and fall use by domestic sheep.

Specific plants which grow in the community surrounding the largest Clay phacelia occurrence are: STIPA HYMENOIDES, ELYMUS SIMPLEX, ERIOGONUM BREVICAULE, MENTZELIA LAEVICAULIS, MAHONIA REPENS, OENOTHERA CAESPITOSA, MARRUBIUM VULGARE, CYNOGLOSSUM OFFICINALE, AMELANCHIER ALNIFOLIA, RHUS TRILOBATA, ATRIPLEX CANESCENS, ARTEMESIA TRIDENTATA, CHRYSOTHAMNUS NAUSEOSUS, CERCOCARPUS MONTANUS, ROSA WOODSII, PINUS EDULIS, and JUNIPERUS OSTEOSPERMA. Less frequent plants which also occur in the community are: BROMUS TECTORUM, IVA AXILLARIS, CHENOPODIUM FREMONTII, SYMPHORICARPOS OREOPHILUS, QUERCUS GAMBELLII, CARDUUS NUTANS, AND JUNIPERUS SCOPULORUM (Gill et al. 1982, England 1989, Harper 1990).

PHYSICAL HABITAT: Climate: No long-term weather data exist for the area of the extant populations of this element. Climatological data from a nearby mountain area would represent that of a significantly higher elevation. Similarly, data from a different nearby station would reflect that of a lower valley elevation. The general climate for all of the element occurrence sites can, however, be classified as cool and subhumid (England 1989). A university study (see below) has had instruments nearby.

EXPOSURE: The majority of plants grow on slopes facing west through southeast. The exposure at one site is south and southeast (Gill et al. 1982, Armstrong 1990). The aspect at the other site is also southeast (England 1989). Both sites are free of snow, at least once during the winter, and are typically dry in early spring (Gill et al. 1982). Finally, one subpopulation faces south, and the western subpopulation's aspect is west (Franklin and Tuhy 1989).

SLOPE: At each site, the plants occur on a xeric, exposed slope of the Green River Formation, somewhere between 6000 and 7000 feet elevation (Franklin and Tuhy 1989). The slope at the site which holds the largest number of plants was measured at 70 percent (Armstrong 1990). One occurrence is easily and frequently disturbed by both biotic and abiotic influences. As a result the loose shale on the surface almost continually sloughs down the face of the platey slopes.

SUBSTRATE: The phase of the Green River Formation differs between sites. In each case it is described as a "shaley clay colluvium" (Gill et al. 1982). One occurrence is on a "fine-textured clay derived from a poorly consolidated shale member of the formation" (Gill et al. 1982). The platey shale at one site appears reddish-brown. However, Gill et al. (1982) indicate that the roots of the plants at this site penetrate a buff-to-gray-colored substrate.

One population occurs principally on "a narrow band of fine-textured reddish-brown clay from weathered faces of the Green River Formation" (Franklin and Tuhy 1989). However, further exploration resulted in the location of additional plants growing in a "grey-white, small fragmented shale occurring above the reddish-brown clay layer" (Franklin and Tuhy 1989).

Analysis of a soil sample from one site revealed a pH greater than eight. Further, greenhouse cultivation of the seedlings in native and artificial soils indicates that the clay composition of the native soil enhances its ability to hold moisture, even under conditions of high solar radiation (Kobler 1989).

Ecology

GERMINATION REQUIREMENTS: Little is known about the germination requirements for Clay phacelia, but steps are being taken to increase our knowledge. Embryo viability of seed collected in June 1988 was tested by means of a tetrazolium (TZ) test. The TZ equaled 95% or 19 viable seeds out of the 20 tested (Matheson 1989). Additional seeds have been collected in June 1989 and on August 21, 1989, but they have not been cleaned or tested yet. Mary Alyce Kobler (Botany, University of Utah), conducted germination studies on PHACELIA LINEARIS and found that seed germination was cued by day length and temperature relationships. She initiated studies on seed germination requirements for P. ARGILLACEA in the fall of 1989 (Matheson 1989). To date seed germination EX SITU has been difficult.

ESTABLISHMENT: Dispersed seeds lodge in cracks or crevices on the shale-covered slopes and germinate when the right (unknown) set of conditions exist. Initial foliage leaves are small, but basal rosettes are formed by early to mid-October. They then over-winter, growing slowly underneath the snow pack. The plants begin to bolt, when the snow melts and the soil temperatures reach sufficient levels in the spring. This usually occurs in May. By late May, the first flowers begin to appear. The plants continually produce more flowers and increase in size, until late June or early July. Prolonged flowering seems to be related to moisture availability. In 1979, flowers were observed as late as mid-October (Gill et al. 1982).

Rosettes which have been dug and removed for EX SITU research and captive propagation in cooperation with the Center for Plant Conservation revealed unexpectedly shallow roots (Matheson 1989). These same plants, which are now in six-inch pots, are being grown in different soil mixes, including native soil, to gain insight into cultural requirements. To date, no significant observations can be reported; however, the rosettes in the vermiculite/perlite soil mix seem to be doing the best (Kobler 1989).

MAINTENANCE: No formal studies have been undertaken to determine basic maintenance requirements for Clay phacelia. However, it is England's (1990) observation that P. ARGILLACEA is dependent upon available, disturbed ground, with little or no competition. He speculates that if the Tucker site were somehow stabilized, P. ARGILLACEA would probably be extirpated. Harper (1990) further theorizes that, if site stabilization did occur, ELYMUS SIMPLEX would tend to dominate, which in the absence of grazing could force extirpation of the species from the Tucker site.

P. ARGILLACEA brings to mind the "chicken or egg" paradox. With the current limitation of knowledge regarding population variances, it is difficult to ascertain the importance of observed population variations in rosette-to-mature-plant ratios (England 1989).

DENSITY AND SUCCESSIONAL STATUS: Extant populations of Clay phacelia cover only three to five percent of the slope's surface area in the patches where they occur. Overall vegetative cover is about ten percent in these same areas of critical habitat (England 1989).

Due to recurrent natural disturbances which erode the surface of the four sites where the plants grow, P. ARGILLACEA can be categorized as a specialized micro-disturbance niche plant (Harper 1990). He notes that some 100 to 125 species have adapted this strategy along the Wasatch Front. The strategy Harper (1990) explains is one of opportunism. Micro-disturbance species are the first to germinate and establish themselves in new areas which have been exposed through some form of natural disturbance (e.g., hooves along the edge of a deer trail or wind and water erosion down a gravelly bank).

HEDYSARUM BOREALE, CLARKIA RHOMBOIDIA, and many PENSTEMONS are examples of plants which are specialized to survive under such conditions. Large disturbances, which are often caused by man's impact on a natural area, can create serious difficulties for some specialized micro-disturbance niche plants. In particular, native annuals frequently "fall apart" on large sites due to increased wind and solar radiation (Harper 1990).

Reproduction

REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES: Clay phacelia reproduces sexually. It is unknown whether this species is an obligate selfer, a facultative selfer, or an obligate out-crosser (Harper 1990). England (1989) surmises that apomixis is not part of this taxon's reproductive strategy.

The clay phacelia is considered a winter annual (Atwood 1975), but recent observations suggest that some of the plants in at least one of the extant populations might be simulating the life cycle of a true biennial (England 1989). In addition, observations in the fall of 1988 and the following growing season of 1989 imply that some of the individuals have also simulated the life cycle of a summer annual (Franklin and Tuhy 1989).

Seeds typically germinate in spring and fall, although they sometimes germinate in mid-summer if there is enough available moisture (England 1989). The plant blooms in late July, but non-flowering rosettes have been observed in both June and August (Matheson 1989).

England (1990) speculates that some plants which germinate early in the growing season have insufficient food reserves to initiate flowering the same year. These juvenile or vegetative plants must then over-winter before floral initiation and seed production are possible the following spring. England (1989) verifies that advanced plants have been observed in the spring with early flowering in late May or early June.

Since qualitative monitoring began in the early 1980s, the majority of the Tucker plants have reproduced as winter annuals (England 1989). In this case, the seeds germinate in the fall. Enough biomass is then generated in the fall and subsequent spring, provided they survive the winter, to initiate flowering in late June.

POLLINATION: The pollen vector is unknown; however, a 1988 Bee Biology and Systematics Lab field collection at the Tucker site "yielded the largest series of specimens recorded of a rare species of colletid bee, HYLAEUS GRANULATUS" (Tepedino 1989). Although the very first observed females of this rare bee were among the specimens collected, Harper (1990) surmises that this bee species is far too rare to be the primary pollinator for Clay phacelia. He further speculates that wind, or the more common ground-nesting bees in the area, could prove to be the major pollinators for Clay phacelia. Wind-pollinated species, he adds, tend to have greater genetic diversity.

SEED BIOLOGY/ECOLOGY: As indicated in the technical description, Clay phacelia has the capacity of developing four mature seeds per fruit. In the summer of 1987, England (1989) estimated that as many as 8000 seeds were produced on one adult winter annual. The plant held 200 cymes, with ten flowers per cyme and four seeds per fruit. Needless to say, Clay phacelia can be a very prolific seeder. The seed is produced sequentially over time. Cymes last for about ten days to two weeks. Flowers open daily along the cymes and persist for days before developing into fruit (England 1989).

GENETIC LOAD: Harper (1990) emphasizes the need to gain an understanding of the genetic load ("those genes which are lethal or sublethal in a homozygous state") that this rare plant is carrying. He indicates that studies are necessary to determine the ovule-to-seed ratio within the various populations. This should provide clues to whether the plant is an obligate selfer, facultative selfer or an obligate out-crosser. Obligate selfers, he says, have approximately 90% flower-to-fruit conversion rates, and out-crossed plants have approximately 50% flower-to-fruit conversion rates. By knowing the average number of ovules per flower and the average number of viable seeds produced per number of ovules, one can calculate the approximate number of lethal alleles per ovule, or "conversely determine the efficiency of the pollen vectors" (Harper 1990).

DISPERSAL MECHANISMS: No formal studies have been conducted on dispersal mechanisms. It is surmised by England (1989) that short distant seed dispersal is achieved primarily by wind, water, and gravity. Rosettes are generally located below or in association with mature adult plants. Some long-distance dispersal may be achieved through grazing and defecation, but the plants are probably grazed prior to seed set (England 1989).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest/WoodlandWoodland - ConiferShrubland/chaparralSavanna
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN1
ProvinceRankNative
UtahS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineInsignificant/negligible or past
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineInsignificant/negligible or past
4 - Transportation & service corridorsRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive (71-100%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesPervasive (71-100%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesPervasive (71-100%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
10 - Geological eventsPervasive (71-100%)Serious - slightHigh (continuing)
10.3 - Avalanches/landslidesPervasive (71-100%)Serious - slightHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
11.2 - DroughtsPervasive (71-100%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)

Plant Characteristics
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (13)
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
Utah (12)
AreaForestAcres
0401013Ashley National Forest11,909
418009Uinta National Forest18,064
418015Uinta National Forest17,289
418016Uinta National Forest35,240
418016Uinta National Forest35,240
418017Uinta National Forest19,631
418018Uinta National Forest11,218
418019Uinta National Forest6,854
Cedar KnollManti-Lasal National Forest22,502
Dairy ForkManti-Lasal National Forest30,222
Dairy ForkManti-Lasal National Forest30,222
Price RiverManti-Lasal National Forest24,349
References (19)
  1. Armstrong, L. 1990. "PHACELIA ARGILLACEA 1990-1992 Study Objectives". Unpublished typescript, 3 pages.
  2. Atwood, N.D. 1975a. A revision of the Phacelia Crenulatae group (Hydrophyllaceae) for North America. The Great Basin Naturalist 35(2): 127-244.
  3. Cronquist, A., A.H. Holmgren, N.H. Holmgren, J.L. Reveal, and P.K. Holmgren. 1984. Intermountain Flora: Vascular Plants of the Intermountain West, U.S.A. Vol. 4, Subclass Asteridae (except Asteraceae). New York Botanical Garden, Bronx. 573 pp.
  4. Franklin, M.A., and J.S. Tuhy. 1989. Report for 1989 Challenge Cost Share Project, Uinta National Forest. Target species: Phacelia argillacea Atwood (clay phacelia). Utah Natural Heritage Program, Salt Lake City. 7 pp + appendices.
  5. Gill, J., D. Atwood, A.W. Heggen, J.L. Miller, Sr., S.L. Welsh, and J. Palmer. 1982. <i>Phacelia argillacea</i> Atwood recovery plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, Colorado. 13 pp.
  6. Harper, K. Dept. of Botany, Brigham Young University.
  7. Harvey, H.J. 1985. Population biology and the conservation of rare species. In J. White. Studies on plant demography. John L. Harper, Academic Press. Orlando, FL. pages 111-123.
  8. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  9. Kobler, M.A. Botanist, Univ. of Utah.
  10. Matheson, M.P. Director of Horticulture, Univ. of Utah.
  11. Menges, E.S. 1986. Predicting the future of rare plant populations: Demographic monitoring and modeling. Natural Areas Journal 6: 13-25.
  12. Shaffer, M. 1987. Minimum viable populations: Coping with uncertainty. In M.E. Soule (ed.). Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Great Britain.
  13. Smith, F.J., K.D. Heil, and J.M. Porter. 1989. Clay phacelia, PHACELIA ARGILLACEA Atwood recovery plan. Unpublished report prepared under contract with USFWS. Denver, CO. 17 pp.
  14. Tepedino, V.J. 1989. Bee Biology & Systematics Lab, Utah State University. Unpublished letter to Chris Montague of The Nature Conservancy, Salt Lake City, UT. Mar 27, 1989.
  15. The Nature Conservancy. 1990. Element stewardship abstract (ESA) on RANUNCULUS ACRIFORMIS var. AESTIVALIS. Unpublished report prepared by D.C. Callister under contract with The Nature Conservancy, Salt Lake City, UT. 23 pp.
  16. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1978. Determination of five plants as endangered species. Federal Register 43(189): 44810-44812.
  17. Welsh, S.L. 1979. Illustrated manual of proposed endangered and threatened plants of Utah. Brigham Young Univ., Provo, UT. 318 pp.
  18. Welsh, S.L., N.D. Atwood, L.C. Higgins, and S. Goodrich, eds. 1987. A Utah Flora. Great Basin Naturalist Memoir 9: 1- 894. Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah. 894 pp.
  19. Welsh, S.L., N.D. Atwood, S. Goodrich, and L.C. Higgins (eds.) 1993. A Utah flora. 2nd edition. Brigham Young Univ., Provo, Utah. 986 pp.