Fouquieria splendens

Engelm.

Ocotillo

G5Secure Found in 46 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.137277
Element CodePDFOU01010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderViolales
FamilyFouquieriaceae
GenusFouquieria
Other Common Names
ocotillo (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Conservation Status
Review Date1999-12-15
Change Date2000-02-07
Edition Date1999-12-15
Edition AuthorsJuanita A. R. Ladyman (12/99); rev. Eric Nielsen (1/00)
Range Extent20,000-2,500,000 square km (about 8000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank Reasons
Fouquieria splendens is a common species throughout its relatively wide range in the southwestern United States and northern Mexico. It is slow-growing and has multiple uses, some of which involve wild-collection. It is also locally threatened by urbanization and development. Despite this, it appears to be relatively robust and not generally threatened at this time. However, land use management practices (e.g., use of fire) may impact populations in the future. At the present time Fouquieria splendens appears to be sufficiently common to be secure.
Range Extent Comments
Fouquieria splendens occurs in the United States in Arizona, southern California, New Mexico, Nevada and Texas. In Mexico it occurs in Sonora, Cohuila, Chihuahua, Durango, Zacatecas, San Luis Potosi, Hidalgo (Mason and Mason 1987) and northern Baja California (Juanita Ladyman, personal observation).
Occurrences Comments
More than 100. Arizona: >20; New Mexico: >20; California: >20; Texas: >20; Nevada: unknown. Also in Mexico.
Threat Impact Comments
Fouquieria splendens is primarily used for landscaping and does not appear to be grown for its medicinal value. Plants sold in reputable nurseries are obtained from private land (e.g., ranches) under permit. There are typically two types of products: smaller plants in one gallon pots and large bare-root "belt and burlapped" individuals. Although the plants transplant well if there are sufficient roots attached, many that are dug are not treated well and two thirds or more of those dug up are likely not to survive. The commercial volume is unknown but is estimated by a person knowledgeable within the trade to be several thousand per year around the Van Horn and Presidio regions in western Texas. Whole plants are always sold. Propagation has been reported using cuttings although conversations with horticulturists indicate that this is less easy than the literature indicates. The plant can also be grown from seed but is a relatively slow grower.

In Mexico, F. splendens is used as fencing, and extracted resin from harvested plants may be exported to other countries (Tull 1987).

Urban and agricultural development and mineral extraction are significant threats to some populations.

Wildfires may be a threat to Fouquieria splendens. Although it can sprout from the root crown following damage from fire, its sprouting ability is probably dependent on fire severity (White 1969). Seedlings are not known to establish in recently burned areas (Mathews 1994) and its seeds are unlikely survive for long in the soil (Zedler 1981). In fact, burning has been suggested as a control method for woody species, such as Fouquieria splendens, in desert grasslands (Mathews 1994).

The endangered Lucifer hummingbird's habitat in New Mexico centers on slopes and adjacent canyons in arid montane areas dominated by Fouquieria splendens and agave species (New Mexico Department of Game and Fish 1991)
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Fouquieria splendens grows in shallow soils on mesas, outwash plains, and rocky slopes from sea level to as high as 6,700 feet (2,050m) elevation in the Guadalupe and Del Norte mountains of the Trans-Pecos region of Texas. Soils are generally rocky, shallow, and of limestone or granitic origin and are often underlain by caliche (Mathews 1994). The plan is often found on south-facing slopes. In Mexico it occurs in the Sonoran and Chihuahuan deserts and in mesquite-grasslands (Mason and Mason 1987).

Ecology

Seedlings are rarely found on disturbed soils (Yeaton et al. 1977) but are found under the canopy of mature plants (McAuliffe 1988, Young and Young 1986). Fouquieria splendens is a long-lived stable element of desert vegetation but with apparently specialized requirements for seed germination that limit its capacity to exploit opportunities for population expansion (Zedler 1981). Estimates of its life span range from less than 60 to greater than 72 years (Mathews 1994). It is likely that life span is related to its latitude and substrate.
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN4
ProvinceRankNative
New MexicoSNRYes
TexasSNRYes
ArizonaSNRYes
NevadaS2Yes
CaliforniaSNRYes
Plant Characteristics
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (46)
Arizona (33)
AreaForestAcres
Black CrossTonto National Forest5,966
BoulderTonto National Forest40,359
Butterfly Roadless AreaCoronado National Forest42,296
Catalina St. Pk. Roadless AreaCoronado National Forest951
Cdo WsaCoronado National Forest1,955
ChiricahuaCoronado National Forest76,876
Cimarron HillsCoconino National Forest5,303
GaliuroCoronado National Forest28,333
GoldfieldTonto National Forest15,257
Happy ValleyCoronado National Forest7,972
Hell HoleApache-Sitgreaves National Forests15,512
HellsgateTonto National Forest6,171
Horse MesaTonto National Forest9,146
Lime CreekTonto National Forest42,568
Lower RinconCoronado National Forest3,278
Lower Romero WSRCoronado National Forest10
Lower San FranciscoApache-Sitgreaves National Forests59,310
MazatzalTonto National Forest16,942
Middle Dragoon RoadlessCoronado National Forest10,543
Middle Romero WSRCoronado National Forest60
Oracle RoadlessCoronado National Forest22,365
PicachoTonto National Forest4,969
PinalenoCoronado National Forest130,920
Pine Mountain Wilderness ContiguousTonto National Forest6,518
Santa RitaCoronado National Forest6,078
Santa TeresaCoronado National Forest8,929
Sierra Ancha Wilderness ContiguousTonto National Forest7,787
SunsetApache-Sitgreaves National Forests28,948
TumacacoriCoronado National Forest44,594
Upper Dragoon RoadlessCoronado National Forest2,533
Upper Rincon RoadlessCoronado National Forest2,991
Upper Romero WsrCoronado National Forest150
WhetstoneCoronado National Forest20,728
California (1)
AreaForestAcres
CalienteCleveland National Forest5,953
Idaho (1)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekCaribou-Targhee National Forest118,582
New Mexico (9)
AreaForestAcres
Apache Kid ContiguousCibola National Forest67,542
Hell HoleGila National Forest19,553
Last Chance CanyonLincoln National Forest8,934
Little Dog And Pup CanyonsLincoln National Forest25,412
Ortega PeakLincoln National Forest11,545
Peloncillo (NM)Coronado National Forest43,339
San JoseCibola National Forest16,950
South Guadalupe MountainsLincoln National Forest20,930
West Face Sacramento MountainsLincoln National Forest41,176
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
Texas (1)
AreaForestAcres
Big CreekNational Forests in Texas1,447
References (17)
  1. Carter, J.L. 1997c. Trees and shrubs of New Mexico. Mimbres Publishing Co., Silver City, New Mexico. 534 pp.
  2. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  3. Krochmal, A., S. Paur, and P. Duisberg. 1954. Useful native plants in the American southwestern deserts. Economic Botany 8: 3-20.
  4. Matthews, R.F. 1994. Fouquieria splendens. In W.C. Fischer. Fire effects information system (database). U.S. Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Intermountain Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, Montana.
  5. McAuliffe, J.R. 1988. Markovian dynamics of simple and complex desert plant communities. American Naturalist 131(4): 459-490.
  6. McGuffin, Michael. Personal communication. American Herbal Products Association, Silver Spring MD
  7. New Mexico Department of Game and Fish. 1991. Handbook of species endangered in New Mexico. Santa Fe. 185pp.
  8. Powell, A.M. 1988. Trees and shrubs of Trans-Pecos Texas, including Big Bend and Guadalupe Mountains National Parks. Big Bend Natural History Association, Big Bend National Park, Texas. 536 pp.
  9. Powell, A.M. 1998. Trees and shrubs of the Trans-Pecos and adjacent areas. Univ. Texas Press, Austin. 498 pp.
  10. Rathcke, B., and E.P. Lacey. 1985. Phenological patterns of terrestrial plants. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 16: 179-214.
  11. Tull, D. 1998. Edible and useful plants of Texas and the southwest. University of Texas Press, Austin.
  12. Vines, R.A. 1960. Trees, Shrubs and Woody Vines of the Southwest. University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas. xii + 1104 pp.
  13. Waser, N.M. 1979. Pollinator availability as a determinant of flowering time in ocotillo (Fouquieria splendens). Oecologia 39(1): 107-121.
  14. White, L.D. 1969. Effects of a wildfire on several desert grassland shrub species. Journal of Range Management 22: 284-285.
  15. Yeaton, R.I., J. Travis, and E. Gilinsky. 1977. Competition and spacing in plant communities: The Arizona upland association. Journal of Ecology 65: 587-595.
  16. Young, J.A., and C.G. Young. 1986. Collecting, processing and germinating seeds of wildland plants. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon. 236 pp.
  17. Zedler, P.H. 1981. Vegetation change in chaparral and desert communities in San Diego county, California. In D.C. West, H.H. Shugart, and D.B. Botkin (eds.). Forest succession: Concepts and application. Springer-Verlag, New York.