Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.104852
Element CodeAAAAD03030
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAmphibia
OrderCaudata
FamilyPlethodontidae
GenusDesmognathus
Concept ReferenceFrost, D. R. 1985. Amphibian species of the world. A taxonomic and geographical reference. Allen Press, Inc., and The Association of Systematics Collections, Lawrence, Kansas. v + 732 pp.
Taxonomic CommentsMeans (1999) discussed taxonomic history.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-07-02
Change Date2025-06-25
Edition Date2025-06-25
Edition AuthorsClausen, M. K., and G. Hammerson (2003); rev. R. L. Gundy (2025)
Threat ImpactMedium
Range Extent20,000-200,000 square km (about 8000-80,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 80
Rank ReasonsOccurs in the Ouachita Mountains of Oklahoma and Arkansas; stable to slightly declining; siltation from logging and urbanization are the primary potential threats.
Range Extent CommentsThis species is endemic to the southern United States. It is found in the Ouachita Mountains in southeastern Oklahoma and west-central Arkansas (Means 1999). The elevational range is 120-790 m (Petranka 1998). Using Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) (2025) and NatureServe (2025) occurrence records from 2005-2025, range extent is estimated to be 32,362 km² (RARECAT 2025).
Occurrences CommentsIn Oklahoma, 19 sites were documented from 1993-1995 (M. Lomolino, pers. comm., 1997). Karlin et al. (1993) documented 49 collection sites from 1977-1984, including 11 locations in Oklahoma and 38 locations in Arkansas. Karlin (pers. comm., 1997) recently documented two additional locations near Little Rock, Arkansas, in the Arkansas River. Using GBIF (2025) and NatureServe (2025) occurrence records from 2005-2025, 71 occurrences are estimated (RARECAT 2025).
Threat Impact CommentsThe greatest potential threat is stream siltation resulting from timbering activities (A. Karlin, pers. comm., 1997; S. Trauth, pers. comm., 1997; Petranka 1998). Clearcuts away from stream corridors may not cause immediate population declines, although clearcut sections are likely abandoned in favor of the forested corridors (Guzy et al. 2019, Halloran et al. 2021). In Oklahoma, a population declined in abundance after removal of riparian vegetation done in conjunction with "renovation" of a natural spring (Williams et al. 2002). Populations near Little Rock and Hot Springs, Arkansas, may be threatened by future urban development (A. Karlin and S. Trauth, pers. comm., 1997).