Percina rex

(Jordan and Evermann, 1889)

Roanoke Logperch

G2Imperiled (G2G3) Found in 2 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
VulnerableIUCN
High - mediumThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.102785
Element CodeAFCQC04240
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNVulnerable
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderPerciformes
FamilyPercidae
GenusPercina
Concept Reference
Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2024-09-26
Change Date2024-09-26
Edition Date2024-09-26
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G., and R. Jennings (2012); rev. R. L. Gundy (2024)
Threat ImpactHigh - medium
Range Extent5000-200,000 square km (about 2000-80,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences6 - 20
Rank Reasons
This species has a limited range in the southeastern United States. It is known from approximately 11 occurrences. While restoration efforts have aided the population, the threats of siltation, chemical pollution, dams forming gene flow barriers, and climate change are ongoing.
Range Extent Comments
This species is found in the Roanake River and Chowan River drainages in Virginia and adjacent North Carolina in the southeastern United States. Within the Roanake River drainage, it is found in Roanoke River, Big Otter River, Dan River (including tributaries Mayo River and Smith River), Goose Creek, and Pigg River (Rosenberger 2007, Roberts et al. 2009, George et al. 2010, Roberts et al. 2016b). Within the Chowan River drainage, it is found in Nottoway River (George et al. 2010, Roberts et al. 2013). Using Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF 2024) records, range extent is estimated to be 20,374 km².
Occurrences Comments
USFWS (2024) recognized 10 discrete populations: Pigg, Otter, Middle Roanoke, Upper Smith, Middle Smith, Lower Smith, Lower Mayo, Middle Dan, and Nottoway rivers, and Goose Creek. Roberts et al. (2013) recognized 7 discrete populations: Roanoke River, Pigg River, Upper Smith River, Lower Smith River, Goose Creek, Nottoway River, and Otter River. USFWS (2007) recognized 8 discrete populations. Rosenberger (2007) recognized 6 discrete populations.
Threat Impact Comments
Decline over the long term likely resulted from reservoir creation and widespread siltation caused by land development and agricultural activities (USFWS 2007, George et al. 2010). There are eight dams preventing dispersal and genetic connectivity throughout the range (Roberts et al. 2013). The upper Roanoke River population is threatened by ongoing urbanization, industrial development, water supply and flood control projects, and agricultural runoff in the upper basin (USFWS 1991, USFWS 2007, Roberts et al. 2013, USFWS 2024). The Smith River population is threatened by operation of Philpott Dam and by continued siltation from upstream agriculture (USFWS 2007, Roberts and Angermeier 2012, Roberts et al. 2013). The creation of Smith Mountain Reservoir and Leesville Reservoir on the Pigg River have reduced immigration, resulting in low genetic diversity in that waterway (George et al. 2010, Roberts et al. 2013). Threats (mainly siltation) in the Nottoway River decreased in the early 2000s (USFWS 2007). Other populations are subject to siltation from agricultural and other human activities and to potential chemical spills. Multiple fish kill events occurred on the Roanoke River due to different pollutants (Roberts et al. 2016b). The invasive Ozark crayfish (Faxonius ozarkae) may pose a threat in the Roanoke River drainage (Foltz et al. 2022). Increased river flow from increased rainfall due to climate change is expected to reduce juvenile survival (USFWS 2024).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

See Jenkins and Burkhead (1994).

Habitat

Habitat includes gravel and boulder runs of small to medium rivers (Page and Burr 2011). Typically this species occurs in warm, usually clear, small to medium rivers of moderate or somewhat low gradient; in riffles, runs, and pools with sandy to boulder-strewn bottoms. Rarely it has been found in impoundments. It inhabits streams that are mainly sandy or silty, and may occur only in gravelly or rocky areas (Burkhead and Jenkins 1991). Males are associated with shallow riffles during the reproductive period; females are common in deep runs over gravel and small cobble, where they spawn (USFWS 1991). Eggs are adhesive and demersal (Jenkins and Burkhead 1994). Except in winter, all age classes are intolerant of moderately to heavily silted substrates (USFWS 1991). Young and juveniles usually occupy slow runs and pools with clean sand bottoms (USFWS 1991). In winter, presumably occurs under boulders in deep pools.

Ecology

Genetic diversity is high, especially in the upper Roanoke and Smith rivers (George et al. 2010). The invasive Ozark crayfish (Faxonius ozarkae) has been shown to prey on this species in the Roanoke River (Foltz et al. 2022). Hybridization with chainback darter (Percina navisense) may occur (Roberts 2011). It has been shown to disperse as far as 55 km (Roberts et al. 2016a).

Reproduction

Spawns probably from mid-April to early May (Jenkins and Burkhead 1994). Spawning has been observed at 12-14° C. No parental care is given subsequent to egg laying. Males mature in two years. Some age group II females are sexually mature; most age III females are mature, all are mature by age IV (Lee et al. 1980, Burkhead and Jenkins 1991). Commonly lives 5-6 years (USFWS 1991).
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN1
ProvinceRankNative
North CarolinaS1Yes
VirginiaS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
1.2 - Commercial & industrial areasRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionPervasive - largeModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
9.1 - Domestic & urban waste waterLarge - restrictedModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
9.2 - Industrial & military effluentsRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsPervasive - largeModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
11.4 - Storms & floodingPervasive (71-100%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (2)
Virginia (2)
AreaForestAcres
Brush MountainJefferson National Forest6,002
Brush Mountain EastJefferson National Forest4,916
References (30)
  1. Burkhead, N. M., and R. E. Jenkins. 1991. Fishes. Pages 321-409 in K. Terwilliger (coordinator). Virginia's Endangered Species: Proceedings of a Symposium. McDonald and Woodward Publishing Company, Blacksburg, Virginia.
  2. Foltz, D. A., II, J. A. Studio, D. F. Ford, and A. M. Prewitt. 2022. Predation of the federally endangered Roanoke logperch (<i>Percina rex</i>) by the invasive Ozark crayfish (<i>Faxonius ozarkae</i>).
  3. George, A. L., D. A. Neely, and R. L. Mayden. 2010. Comparative conservation genetics of two endangered darters, <i>Percina rex</i> and <i>Percina jenkinsi</i>. Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings 1(52.
  4. Jelks, H. L., S. J. Walsh, N. M. Burkhead, S. Contreras-Balderas, E. Díaz-Pardo, D. A. Hendrickson, J. Lyons, N. E. Mandrak, F. McCormick, J. S. Nelson, S. P. Platania, B. A. Porter, C. B. Renaud, J. Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, E. B. Taylor, and M.L. Warren, Jr. 2008. Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33(8):372-407.
  5. Jenkins, R. E., and N. M. Burkhead. 1994. Freshwater fishes of Virginia. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. xxiii + 1079 pp.
  6. Kuehne, R. A., and R. W. Barbour. 1983. The American Darters. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky. 177 pp.
  7. Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, North Carolina. i-x + 854 pp.
  8. LeGrand, Harry (North Carolina Natural Heritage Program). 2000. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Larry Master, ABI. July 2000.
  9. Nelson, J. S., E. J. Crossman, H. Espinosa-Perez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, and J. D. Williams. 2004. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 29, Bethesda, Maryland. 386 pp.
  10. Ono, R.D., J.D. Williams, and A. Wagner. 1983. Vanishing Fishes of North America. Stone Wall Press, Washington, DC. 257 pp
  11. Page, L. M. 1983a. Handbook of Darters. T. F. H. Publications, Inc., Neptune City, New Jersey. 271 pp.
  12. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 1991. A field guide to freshwater fishes: North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. 432 pp.
  13. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston. xix + 663 pp.
  14. Page, L. M., H. Espinosa-Pérez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, R. L. Mayden, and J. S. Nelson. 2013. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Seventh edition. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 34, Bethesda, Maryland.
  15. Page, L. M., K. E. Bemis, T. E. Dowling, H.S. Espinosa-Pérez, L.T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, K. E. Hartel, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, M. A. Neigbors, J. J. Schmitter-Soto, and H. J. Walker, Jr. 2023. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Eighth edition. American Fisheries Society (AFS), Special Publication 37, Bethesda, Maryland, 439 pp.
  16. Roberts, J. H. 2011. First observation of a natural hybrid between endangered Roanoke logperch (<i>Percina rex</i>) and chainback darter (<i>Percina navisense</i>). Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings: No. 53.
  17. Roberts, J. H., and P. L. Angermeier. 2012. Monitoring of endangered Roanoke logperch (<i>Percina rex</i>) in Smith River upstream from the Philpott Reservoir on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers property near Martinsville, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2012–1221, 11 pp.
  18. Roberts, J. H., G. B. Anderson, and P. L. Angermeier. 2016. A long-term study of ecological impacts of river channelization on the population of an endangered fish: lessons learned for assessment and restoration. Water 8: 240. doi:10.3390/w8060240
  19. Roberts, J. H., P. L. Angermeier, and E. M. Hollerman. 2016. Extensive dispersal of Roanoke logperch (<i>Percina rex</i>) inferred from genetic marker data. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 25: 1-16.
  20. Roberts, J. H., P. L. Angermeier, and G. B. Anderson. 2016. Population viability analysis for endangered Roanoke Logperch. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management 7(1): 46-64. doi: 10.3996/ 032015-JFWM-026
  21. Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
  22. State Natural Heritage Data Centers. 1996a. Aggregated element occurrence data from all U.S. state natural heritage programs, including the Tennessee Valley Authority, Navajo Nation and the District of Columbia. Science Division, The Nature Conservancy.
  23. Strickland, G. J., and J. H. Roberts. 2019. Utility of eDNA and occupancy models for monitoring an endangered fish across diverse riverine habitats. Hydrobiologia 826: 129–144. doi: 10.1007/s10750-018-3723-8
  24. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1989. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; Endangered status for the Roanoke logperch. Federal Register 54(159):34468-34472
  25. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1990. Endangered and threatened species recovery program: report to Congress. 406 pp.
  26. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1991. Roanoke logperch (<i>Percina rex</i>) recovery plan. Agency draft. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Newton Corner, Massachusetts. 31 pp.
  27. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2007. Roanoke logperch <i>Percina rex</i>: 5-year review: summary and evaluation. USFWS, Virginia Field Office, Gloucester, Virginia.
  28. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2022. Species status assessment report for the Roanoke logperch (<i>Percina rex</i>), Version 1.1. April 2022. Gloucester, VA.
  29. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2024. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Removal of Roanoke Logperch From the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife. Proposed rule. Federal Register 89(64):22649-22662.
  30. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2025. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Removal of Roanoke Logperch From the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife. Final rule. Federal Register 90(138):34372-34384.