Trifolium amoenum

Greene

Showy Indian Clover

G1Critically Imperiled Found in 6 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G1Critically ImperiledGlobal Rank
Very high - highThreat Impact
showy Indian clover (Trifolium amoenum). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.135645
Element CodePDFAB40040
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicendemic to a single state or province
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderFabales
FamilyFabaceae
GenusTrifolium
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
A distinct species in a genus of about 300 species, most abundant in north temperate regions.
Conservation Status
Review Date2015-09-16
Change Date1994-03-16
Edition Date1989-08-14
Edition AuthorsGardner, P.A., rev. Maybury (1997), rev. Maybury 2003, rev. K. Gravuer (2009)
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent<100-20,000 square km (less than about 40-8000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences1 - 5
Rank Reasons
Formerly known from about 25 sites in 7 counties along the central California coast, this species was believed extinct until 1993, when a single plant was rediscovered in Sonoma County. That site has now been developed and the species is considered extirpated there. Another population, the only native population currently extant, was discovered in 1996 in Marin County. Seeds from both of these sites were used (separately) to establish experimental populations between 1997 and 2006; the long-term fate of those sowings is uncertain. The Sonoma and Marin plants differ in their morphology, so establishment/conservation of both forms is important. After stability/increase 1997-2005, the native Marin population declined sharply in 2006; it is unclear whether and when it may recover its former numbers. Some experimental sites sown with seed of the Sonoma plant appear to have failed, but others have apparently established and are increasing. Loss of habitat to urbanization and agriculture was likely the primary reason for the extirpation of so many populations, and this habitat loss in continuing within the species' historic range, limiting the number of potential reintroduction sites. The extant native population is on private land, where threats include development, gopher grazing, potential erosion and trampling, and non-native plants.
Range Extent Comments
Historically in Alameda, Mendocino, Marin, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma, Napa counties, California; currently believed extant only in Marin (native) and Sonoma (reintroduced) counties.
Occurrences Comments
Had been thought extinct until the early 1990s. A single plant was found in 1993 at a site in Sonoma County, but that site has now been developed and the species is considered extirpated there. However, seeds were collected from the plant prior to its extirpation and were subsequently multiplied. In 2006, some of those seeds were used to establish experimental populations at two sites in Sonoma County and at several sites at Point Reyes National Seashore (Marin County). It is as yet unknown whether any of the experimental sowings will persist (USFWS 2007). Another population, the only native population currently extant, was discovered in 1996 in Marin County. In 1997, seed from those plants was used to establish a small experimental population (approximately 20 seedlings) at Bodega Marine Laboratory (Sonoma County) (USFWS 2007). The Bodega experimental population had persisted as of 2007, but its long term fate is unknown (USFWS 2007).
Threat Impact Comments
Threats in the past were obviously very high, with habitat being lost to urbanization, agriculture, and (possibly) cattle grazing and/or competition from weedy non-native plants. Widespread urbanization continues throughout this species' historic range, and its current extreme rarity makes it precarious. Urbanization and agriculture may be preventing re-establishment of the plant from seed banks at historically-occupied sites (USFWS 2007). The single native population is located on private property in a developed area, and a house has recently been constructed within 100 feet of it. Future development plans on this property are not known. Gopher grazing is also a threat at this site and appears to have caused substantial recent mortality (USFWS 2007). This population is somewhat threatened by erosion because of its proximity to a coastal bluff, and could also be impacted by any potential expansion or increase in use of a small trail that runs through it to provide local homeowners with bluff access (USFWS 2007). Several non-native invasive plants, including Carpobrotus edulis, Lolium multiflorum, and Plantago lanceolata, are also present at this site and pose a potential threat (USFWS 2007). The Bodega Marine Laboratory experimental population is still very small and is located near heavily used buildings, although it is signed to prohibit unauthorized entry and reduce unnecessary foot traffic (USFWS 2007). Non-native plants including Medicago polymortha, Plantago coronopus, and Plantago lanceolata also occur in close proximity; laboratory staff currently mitigate this threat by weeding (USFWS 2007).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Typically in low, wet swales in grasslands. Also on grassy hillsides at up to about 400 m elevation. Per the California Dept. of Fish and Game (2000): Open, sunny sites, sometimes on serpentine soil in coastal bluff scrub and valley and foothill grassland; most recently seen on a roadside that had been graded and on an eroding cliff face. Possibly requires disturbance-created openings for germination.

Reproduction

Mating system appears to include both cross-and self-pollination, as extant plants were found to have a higher level of heterozygosity than would be expected in a predominantly self-pollinating species (Knapp and Connors 1999 cited in USFWS 2007).
Terrestrial Habitats
Shrubland/chaparralGrassland/herbaceousBarrensCliff
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN1
ProvinceRankNative
CaliforniaS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentPervasive - largeSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh - moderate
1.1 - Housing & urban areasPervasive - largeSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh - moderate
2 - Agriculture & aquaculturePervasive - largeSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh - moderate
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsPervasive - largeSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh - moderate
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingPervasive - largeSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
6 - Human intrusions & disturbancePervasive - largeSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
6.1 - Recreational activitiesPervasive - largeSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive - largeSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesPervasive - largeSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesPervasive - largeSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Plant Characteristics
Economic Value (Genus)Yes
Roadless Areas (6)
California (6)
AreaForestAcres
Big Butte ShinboneMendocino National Forest4,265
Black ButteMendocino National Forest15,461
Elk CreekMendocino National Forest23,182
Snow MountainMendocino National Forest14,457
ThatcherMendocino National Forest16,652
Wilderness ContiguousMendocino National Forest3,606
References (6)
  1. California Department of Fish and Game. 2000. Natural Diversity Database (RareFind 2), Version 2.1.2, January 25, 2000. Downloaded in 2003.
  2. California Native Plant Society (CNPS). 2001. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California (sixth edition). Rare Plant Scientific Advisory Committee, David P. Tibor, Convening Editor. California Native Plant Society. Sacramento, CA. x + 388pp.
  3. Hickman, J. C., ed. 1993. The Jepson manual: Higher plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. 1400 pp.
  4. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  5. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1995. Proposed endangered status for nine plants from the grasslands or mesic areas of the central coast of California. Federal Register 60(148): 39314-39326.
  6. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2007. Showy Indian Clover <i>(Trifolium amoenum) </i>5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation. Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, Sacramento, California. December 2007. Online. Available: http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc1876.pdf (Accessed 2009).