Rhinichthys gabrielino

Moyle, Buckmaster, and Su, 2023

Santa Ana Speckled Dace

G1Critically Imperiled Found in 23 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G1Critically ImperiledGlobal Rank
Very highThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.103524
Element CodeAFCJB3705K
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
Endemicendemic to a single state or province
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderCypriniformes
FamilyLeuciscidae
GenusRhinichthys
Synonyms
Rhinichthys osculus ssp. 8
Concept Reference
Moyle, P.B., N. Buckmaster, N. and Y. Su. 2023. Taxonomy of the speckled dace species complex (Cypriniformes: Leuciscidae, Rhinichthys) in California, USA. Zootaxa 5249(5): 501-539.
Taxonomic Comments
The Santa Ana Speckled Dace has long been recognized as distinct (Swift et al. 1993, Moyle 2002, Oakey et al. 2004) and was formerly described as a full species in 2023 (Moyle et al. 2023). Su et al. (2022) showed that the Santa Ana Speckled Dace is the most distinct genetically of all other dace populations in California, indicating a long history without gene flow from other dace populations. It was previously called Rhinichthys osculus ssp. 8 in this database.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2021-10-12
Change Date1997-09-23
Edition Date2021-10-12
Edition AuthorsHopkins, T., P. Moyle, and G. Hammerson (1997), K. Hunting (2021)
Threat ImpactVery high
Range Extent5000-20,000 square km (about 2000-8000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences1 - 5
Rank Reasons
The Santa Aa speckled dace has a very limited range and its populations remain depressed from a variety of anthropogenic threats.
Range Extent Comments
This species was once widespread in the upland areas of three river systems of the Los Angeles Region in southern California: the Los Angeles, San Gabriel, and Santa Ana rivers. The current distribution is restricted to the headwaters of the Santa Ana and San Gabriel rivers and in Big Tujunga Creek (Los Angeles River drainage) (Moyle et al. 1995, Moyle et al. 2015, 2023). Attempts to establish additional populations of Santa Ana speckled dace have been made through introductions into the Santa Clara and Cuyama rivers and into River Springs, Mono County (Moyle et al. 2015)
Occurrences Comments
Based on analysis of Element Occurrences in the California Natural Diversity Database and distribution descriptions in Moyle et al (2015) and Miller (2020), there are likely 4 occurrences of the Santa Ana speckled dace.
Threat Impact Comments
Remaining Santa Ana Speckled Dace habitat is in rivers adjacent to heavily populated areas resulting relatively high pollution loads and recreational uses. Historical dams continue to prevent access to suitable habitat for the taxon. Concentrated recreational use continue to have negative impacts on speckled dace in the West, East, and North Forks of the San Gabriel River, Santa Ana River, Lytle Creek, Mill Creek, and Big Tujunga Creek (Miller 2020; Moyle et al. 2015). Recreational uses introduce pollutants and often result in small impoundments used for swimming and fishing that reduce or eliminate down stream flows the impacts of which have been documented in occupied Santa Ana speckled dace streams (Miller 2020). Surface water diversions and impoundments are the primary threat to the Santa Ana speckled dace. Diversions and dams eliminate or modify in-stream flows, degrade former wetland and in-stream habitat quality and availability, and can eliminate access to upstream habitat. Over half of the historical habitat of the Santa Ana speckled dace has been eliminated because of diversions and dams (Miller 2020; Moyle et al 2015). Conversion of lands adjacent to streams occupied by Santa Ana speckled dace to agriculture and urban uses is a serious threat to this taxon. Agricultural operations introduce pesticides and fertilizers into streams that can create toxic conditions fish and aquatic life. Urban uses introduce pollutants from run-off from housing developments and roads resulting in decreased water quality rendering habitat in some areas unsuitable.
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Shallow gravel and cobble riffles of permanent flowing streams with summer temperatures of 17-20 C; overhanging riparian plants provide cover (Moyle et al. 1989). In the West Fork of the San Gabriel River, most common where other native fishes also are common (Moyle et al. 1989).

Reproduction

Probably lives up to three years (Moyle et al. 1989).
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN1
ProvinceRankNative
CaliforniaS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
6.1 - Recreational activitiesLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionPervasive (71-100%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9.1 - Domestic & urban waste waterPervasive (71-100%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9.1.2 - Run-offPervasive (71-100%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (23)
California (23)
AreaForestAcres
Arroyo SecoAngeles National Forest4,703
Cahuilla MountainSan Bernardino National Forest6,952
CajonSan Bernardino National Forest7,548
Circle MountainSan Bernardino National Forest6,375
City CreekSan Bernardino National Forest9,997
Crystal CreekSan Bernardino National Forest6,783
Cucamonga BSan Bernardino National Forest11,933
Cucamonga BSan Bernardino National Forest11,933
Hixon FlatSan Bernardino National Forest8,095
Horse Creek RidgeSan Bernardino National Forest8,969
Mill PeakSan Bernardino National Forest7,884
Pleasant ViewAngeles National Forest26,395
Pyramid Peak BSan Bernardino National Forest7,194
Raywood Flat BSan Bernardino National Forest11,373
Rouse HillSan Bernardino National Forest13,745
San Gabriel AddAngeles National Forest2,527
San Gabriel AddAngeles National Forest2,527
San SevaineSan Bernardino National Forest6,866
Sheep MountainAngeles National Forest21,098
Strawberry PeakAngeles National Forest7,245
West ForkAngeles National Forest1,169
WestforkAngeles National Forest4,407
WestforkAngeles National Forest4,407
References (17)
  1. Cornelius, R. H. 1969. The systematics and zoogeography of <i>Rhinichthys osculus</i> (Girard) in southern California. M. A. thesis, California State Univ., Fullerton. 194 pp.
  2. Jelks, H. L., S. J. Walsh, N. M. Burkhead, S. Contreras-Balderas, E. Díaz-Pardo, D. A. Hendrickson, J. Lyons, N. E. Mandrak, F. McCormick, J. S. Nelson, S. P. Platania, B. A. Porter, C. B. Renaud, J. Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, E. B. Taylor, and M.L. Warren, Jr. 2008. Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33(8):372-407.
  3. Miller, J. 2020. Petition to List the Santa Ana Speckled Dace (<i>Rhinichthys osculus</i> subspecies) as Endangered or Threatened under the Endangered Species Act. Center for Biological Diversity, Oakland, California, 57 pp.
  4. Moyle, P. B. 2002. Inland fishes of California. Revised and expanded. University of California Press, Berkeley. xv + 502 pp.
  5. Moyle, P. B., J. D. Kiernan, P. K. Crain, and R. M. Quiñones. 2013. Climate change vulnerability of native and alien freshwater fishes of California: a systematic assessment approach. PLoS ONE 8(5):e63883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063883
  6. Moyle, P. B., J. E. Williams, and E. D. Wikramanayake. 1989. Fish species of special concern of California. Final report submitted to California Dept. of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Division, Rancho Cordova. 222 pp.
  7. Moyle, P.B., N. Buckmaster, N. and Y. Su. 2023. Taxonomy of the speckled dace species complex (Cypriniformes: Leuciscidae, <i>Rhinichthys</i>) in California, USA. Zootaxa 5249(5): 501-539.
  8. Moyle, P.B., R. M. Quiñones, J. V. Katz and J. Weaver. 2015. Fish Species of Special Concern in California. 3rd Edition. Sacramento, California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Available from: https://wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/SSC/Fishes (accessed 2024).
  9. Moyle, P. B., R. M. Yoshiyama, J. E. Williams, and E. D. Wikramanayake. 1995. Fish species of special concern in California. Second edition. California Department of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Division, Rancho Cordova, California. iv + 272 pp.
  10. Oakey, D. D., M. E. Douglas, and M. R. Douglas. 2004. Small fish in a large landscape: diversification of <i>Rhinichthys osculus</i> (Cyprinidae) in western North America. Copeia 2004:207-221. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1448559?refreqid=excelsior%3Ac3f75581aab14f7dd9053fef030d3b91&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
  11. Santos, N. 2015. Species Range Layer for the Santa Ana Speckled Dace. Univ. of Cal. Davis. GIS data depicting HUC 12 watersheds occupied by Santa Ana Speckled Dace (expert opinion). California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Biological Information and Observation System (BIOS), ds 1314. https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios/?bookmark=326
  12. Smith, G.R. and T.E. Dowling. 2008. Correlating Hydrograhphic Events and Divergence Times of Speckled Dace (<i>Rhinichthys</i>: Teleostei: Cyprinidae) in the Colorado River drainage. Pages 301-317 in Reheis, M.C., R. Hershler, and D.M. Miller, eds., Late Cenozoic Drainage History of the Southwestern Great Basin and Lower Colorado River Region: Geologic and Biotic Perspective. Geologic Society of America Special Paper 439. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/books/book/609/Late-Cenozoic-Drainage-History-of-the-Southwestern
  13. Su, Y., P.B. Moyle, M.A. Campbell, A.J. Finger, S. O’Rourke, J. Baumsteiger, and M.R. Miller. 2022. Population genomic analysis of the Speckled Dace species complex identifies three distinct lineages in California. Transactions of American Fisheries Society 151: 695-710.
  14. Swift, C. C., T. R. Haglund, M. Ruiz, and R. N. Fisher. 1993. The status and distribution of the freshwater fishes of southern California. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Science 92(3):101-167.
  15. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2021. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Findings for Two Species. Federal Register 86(115):32241-32243.
  16. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2024. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Threatened Species Status With Section 4(d) Rule for the Santa Ana Speckled Dace. Proposed rule. Federal Register 89(156):65816-65835.
  17. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2025. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notification of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions. Candidate notice of review (CNOR). Federal Register 90(209):48912-48937.