Sedecula pulvinata

Zeller

a fungus

G3Vulnerable Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
High - mediumThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.637160
Element CodeNFFUN6L010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryFungus
KingdomFungi
PhylumBasidiomycota
ClassBasidiomycetes
OrderAgaricales
FamilyIncertae sedis (Order: Agaricales)
GenusSedecula
Concept Reference
Zeller, S.M. 1941. Further notes on Fungi. Mycologia 33: 196-214.
Conservation Status
Review Date2006-06-30
Change Date2002-12-12
Edition Date2002-11-11
Edition AuthorsNancy S. Weber
Threat ImpactHigh - medium
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 300
Rank Reasons
Sedecula is a monospecific genus known only from relatvely dry forests of the American West where it apparently fruits irregularly and seldom in quantity. It is reported from about a dozen sites and roughly 20 collections. This is a small harvest for a species that has been known since the early 1940s (Zeller 1941). Within the range of the northern spotted owl, only one site has been located; elsewhere it occurs in the front range of the Rocky Mts., and in the Great Basin and neighboring states. The fruiting bodies are large enough to be easily found, but colored much like some rocks thus complicating the search process. It is deserving of further study and conservation.
Range Extent Comments
Its range extends from one site near Boulder, CO to Coconino Co., AZ, Fresno and Shasta Cos. in California and Valley Co., ID.
Occurrences Comments
One site is known within the range of the northern spotted owl; most of the known sites are in the Great Basin and adjacent states (Castellano et al. 1999, Fogel n.d., Fogel and States n.d.). Only about a dozen total sites are known for it. It appears to be rare throughout its range and to be restricted to relatively dry habitats.
Threat Impact Comments
This species is widely distributed and thus unlikely to be wiped out by local events; however, it is very patchy in its occurrence within its range. Logging and development are the main threats as this species is likely mycorrhizal and dependent on associated trees for many of its nutritional needs.
Ecology & Habitat
Other Nations (1)
United StatesNNR
ProvinceRankNative
OregonS2Yes
Plant Characteristics
DurationEPHEMERAL FRUITING BODY
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (1)
California (1)
AreaForestAcres
Duncan CanyonTahoe National Forest8,621
References (6)
  1. Castellano, M.A., Smith, J.A., O'Dell, T., Cazares, E., and Nugent, S. 1999. Handbook to Strategy 1 Fungal Species in the Northwest Forest Plan. Portland, Oregon: USDA Forest Service, PNWRS PNW-GTR-476.
  2. Fogel, R. n.d. MICH Fungal Bioinformatics Project. Retrieved 2002.11.06 from http://www.herb.lsa.umich.edu/Bioinformatics.htm. Fogel, R., and States, J. n.d. Provisional Checklist of hypogeous fungi occurring in the Great Basin and Arizona. Retrieved 2002.11 from http://www.herb.lsa.umich.edu/gbsurvey/checklist.htm.
  3. Index Fungorum and Species Fungorum. 2018. <i>In</i> Index Fungorum-Species Fungorum (<a href="https://indexfungorum.org" target="_blank">https://indexfungorum.org</a> and <a href="https://speciesfungorum.org" target="_blank">https://speciesfungorum.org</a>) database export on 16 June 2018. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
  4. Index Fungorum and Species Fungorum. 2025. <i>In</i> Index Fungorum-Species Fungorum (<a href="https://indexfungorum.org" target="_blank">https://indexfungorum.org</a> and <a href="https://speciesfungorum.org" target="_blank">https://speciesfungorum.org</a>) database export on 29 September 2025. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
  5. MycoBank. 2025. MycoBank database download, export date January 2025. International Mycological Association. [http://www.mycobank.org]
  6. Zeller, S.M. 1941. Further notes on Fungi. Mycologia 33: 196-214.