Chaenotheca furfuracea

(L.) Tibell

Sulphur Stubble Lichen

G4Apparently Secure (G4G5) Found in 2 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
HighThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.126209
Element CodeNLCAL33040
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryFungus
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomFungi
PhylumAscomycota
ClassAscomycetes
OrderCaliciales
FamilyConiocybaceae
GenusChaenotheca
Synonyms
Coniocybe furfuracea(L.) Ach.
Concept Reference
Esslinger, T.L. and R.S. Egan. 1995. A sixth checklist of the lichen-forming, lichenicolous, and allied fungi of the continental United States and Canada. The Bryologist 98(4): 467-549.
Conservation Status
Review Date2006-06-30
Change Date2002-05-30
Edition Date2002-11-22
Edition AuthorsEric B. Peteson
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
This lichen grows in shaded forests, usually on trees and stumps, and less often on rocks. It is located throughout North America in disparate areas: southern California Coast, from Arizona to Colorado, in southern Alaska, from British Columbia to Montana, across southern Yukon and Mackenzie, from the Great Lakes region east to Nova Scotia, and in central Georgia. It is also found widely in Eurasia. Although the distribution and population sizes of this species are large enough to qualify for G5, the significant decline of the species since pre-industrial times may justify slightly reducing the rank to G4G5.
Range Extent Comments
Global distribution "Common both in Finland, Norway and Sweden. Less common in Denmark [...] has a very wide distribution in cool temperate to temerate areas of the Northern Hemisphere (Eurasia, North America)." (Tibell 1999). Within North America, widespread in temperate and boreal regions.
Occurrences Comments
Number of known occurences worldwide is probably > 500 (including many historic); Number of known occurrences in North America is probably > 300; Number of known occurrences in California = 1+ (see Hale & Cole 1988); Number of known occurrences in Oregon = 25+; Number of known occurrences in Washington = 3+; Number of known occurrences in British Columbia = ca. 47. Rikkinen (2003?) reports on 43 locations from the region. Although the number of extant occurrences worldwide is unknown, the North American occurrences (collections) are recent and are mostly extant. (Jouko has 43 locations across all states)
Threat Impact Comments
Worldwide, the species has gone through drastic declines since pre-industrial times. The Pacific Northwest, due to logging, has been no exception. However, the rate of loss in the Pacific Northwest has slowed. Although little is known about the reproductive and dispersal biology of this species, it is thought that the species can overcome some habitat fragmentation and, at this point, is fairly secure from extirpation or extinction. However, given the general old-growth association of this species, it should not be ignored in conservation actions.
Ecology & Habitat
Other Nations (2)
United StatesNNR
ProvinceRankNative
MinnesotaSNRYes
PennsylvaniaSNRYes
KentuckySHYes
MontanaSNRYes
WyomingSNRYes
OregonS3Yes
WashingtonS3Yes
ColoradoSNRYes
CanadaN5
ProvinceRankNative
Nova ScotiaS5Yes
British ColumbiaS5Yes
LabradorSNRYes
Yukon TerritorySUYes
Prince Edward IslandS5Yes
Island of NewfoundlandSNRYes
OntarioS4Yes
QuebecSNRYes
Northwest TerritoriesSUYes
AlbertaS3Yes
New BrunswickS5Yes
Plant Characteristics
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (2)
Oregon (1)
AreaForestAcres
CornpatchWillamette National Forest7,346
West Virginia (1)
AreaForestAcres
Falls Of Hills CreekMonongahela National Forest6,925
References (10)
  1. Brodo, I. M., S. D. Sharnoff and S. Sharnoff. 2001. Lichens of North America. Yale University Press. New Haven and London. 795 pp.
  2. Esslinger, T. L. 2018. A cumulative checklist for the lichen-forming, lichenicolous and allied fungi of the continental United States and Canada, Version 22. Opuscula Philolichenum 17:6-268. [http://sweetgum.nybg.org/philolichenum/]
  3. Esslinger, T.L. and R.S. Egan. 1995. A sixth checklist of the lichen-forming, lichenicolous, and allied fungi of the continental United States and Canada. The Bryologist 98(4): 467-549.
  4. Hale, M.E., Jr., and M. Cole. 1988. Lichens of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. 254 pp.
  5. Hutten, M., U. Arup, O. Breuss, T. L. Esslinger, A. M. Fryday, K. Knudsen, J. C. Lendemer, C. Printzen, H. T. Root, M. Schultz, J. Sheard, T. Tønsberg, and B. McCune. 2013. Lichens and Lichenicolous Fungi of Yosemite National Park, California. North American Fungi 8(11): 1-47. doi: http://dx.doi:10.2509/naf2013.008.011
  6. Peterson, E. B., and B. McCune. 2000. Enviornmental Relations of Calicioid Lichens and Fungi in a Temperate Landscape. In: Peterson, E. B. Analysis and prediction of patterns in lichen communities over the western Oregon landscape. Ph.D. dissertation, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
  7. Peterson, E. B. (Search of personal herbarium on 1 November, 2002). Address: Nevada Natural Heritage Program, 1550 E. College Parkway, Carson City, NV
  8. Tibell, L. 1975. The Caliciales of boreal North America. Symbolae Botanicae Upsalienses 21(2): 1-128.
  9. Tibell, L. 1999. Caliciales. Nordic Lichen Flora 1: 20-93.
  10. USDA Forest Service, USDI Bureau of Land Management, USDI Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Interagency Species Management System [ISMS] database. Portland, Oregon.