Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.104396
Element CodeAAABH01220
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAmphibia
OrderAnura
FamilyRanidae
GenusLithobates
SynonymsRana pipiens sphenocephalaCope, 1886Rana sphenocephalaCope, 1889
Other Common Namessouthern leopard frog (EN)
Concept ReferenceFrost, D. R. 1985. Amphibian species of the world. A taxonomic and geographical reference. Allen Press, Inc., and The Association of Systematics Collections, Lawrence, Kansas. v + 732 pp.
Taxonomic CommentsAn older name, Rana utricularia (unjustifiably changed from the original Rana utricularius Harlan), was applied to this species by Pace (1974), and subsequently by various other authors, upsetting the long-standing use of the name sphenocephala; there is substantial doubt that Harlan meant to apply the name utricularius to this species and not to what is now known as Rana pipiens. In 1992, the ICZN ruled that sphenocephala has precedence over utricularius whenever the two names are considered to be synonyms. See Brown et al. (1990) and references cited therein for a detailed account of this issue.
The generic taxonomy of American ranids is controversial, with three nomenclatural arrangements being consistent with current understandings of phylogeny: The single-genus arrangement of Yuan et al. (2016) which placed all Eurasian Rana and Pseudorana as well as all American ranids into Rana; the three-genus model of Che et al. (2007), largely in agreement with the earlier arrangement by Frost et al. (2006), which recognizes Pseudorana in Asia, Rana in Eurasia and western North America, and Lithobates in the Americas; and a seven-genus model of Dubois et al. (2021) which recognizes Pseudorana, Rana, and Liuhurana in Eurasia and Amerana (the Pacific Coast ranids of North America), Aquarana (for the bullfrogs and allies), Boreorana (a monotypic genus for Wood Frog, L. sylvaticus), and Lithobates (for the leopard frogs and allies). Here we follow Nicholson (2025) who defer from recognizing Amerana, Aquarana, or Boreorana at this time pending achievement of more phylogenetic stability, especially with respect to the position of the taxon sylvaticus which inconsistently is recovered as sister to the proposed Aquarana or as sister to Lithobates.
Conservation Status
Review Date2002-12-31
Change Date2001-11-26
Edition Date2010-01-26
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Range Extent200,000 to >2,500,000 square km (about 80,000 to >1,000,000 square miles)
Range Extent CommentsRange includes the lowlands of the southeastern United States, from southern New York to the Florida Keys, and west to eastern Kansas, central Oklahoma, and eastern Texas (Conant and Collins 1991). Introduced on Little Bahama Bank (Schwartz and Henderson 1991). Hybridizes with Rana blairi along the Missouri River floodplain in Missouri (Parris 1999).
Occurrences CommentsRepresented by many and/or large occurrences throughout most of the range.
Threat Impact CommentsTraffic on roads near ponds may be a local threat. Palis (1994, Herpetol. Rev. 25:119) reported large numbers of road-killed individuals adjacent to a pond in Florida. Within a single population, families of leopard frogs vary in their tolerance to the insecticide carbaryl (Bridges and Semlitsch 2001).