Ambystoma cingulatum

Cope, 1867 [1868]

Frosted Flatwoods Salamander

G1Critically Imperiled Found in 5 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G1Critically ImperiledGlobal Rank
EndangeredIUCN
Very high - highThreat Impact
Frosted Flatwoods salamander (Ambystoma cingulatum). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.802301
Element CodeAAAAA01030
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNEndangered
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAmphibia
OrderCaudata
FamilyAmbystomatidae
GenusAmbystoma
Other Common Names
Flatwoods Salamander (EN) frosted flatwoods salamander (EN)
Concept Reference
Pauly, G. B., O. Piskurek, and H. B. Shaffer. 2007. Phylogeographic concordance in the southeastern United States: the flatwoods salamander, Ambystoma cingulatum, as a test case. Molecular Ecology 16:415-429. [Note: Two errors were inadvertently introduced into the paragraph on pages 424-425. The common names attributed to each flatwoods salamander species are reversed. Similarly, the previously published color pattern descriptions are incorrectly attributed to each species.]
Taxonomic Comments
Based on patterns of genetic and morphological variation, Pauly et al. (2007) concluded that Ambystoma cingulatum should be split into two species, A. bishopi west of the Apalachicola-Flint rivers and A. cingulatum east of those rivers.

Based on mtDNA evidence, A. cingulatum (sensu stricto) inhabiting the eastern Gulf Coastal Plain and the Atlantic Coastal Plain in northern Florida are distinct lineages; the Suwannee River and a large distributional gap separate them (Pauly et al. 2007). Further data are needed to determine whether these two lineages warrant recognition as different species (Pauly et al. 2007).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-05-13
Change Date2025-05-13
Edition Date2025-05-13
Edition AuthorsGundy, R. L. (2025)
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent5000-20,000 square km (about 2000-8000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences6 - 20
Rank Reasons
This species is endemic to the Coastal Plain of the southeastern United States. The population suffered steep declines of over 80% during the 20th century due to habitat loss and degradation, and continues to decline. It continues to be threatened by habitat degradation due to prescribed fires set in winter, increasing frequency of drought due to climate change, and the lack of connectivity between extant occurrences.
Range Extent Comments
This species is endemic to the southeastern United States. The range extends along the Coastal Plain from the Florida Panhandle west of the Apalachicola River into Georgia as far north as southeastern South Carolina (Pauly et al. 2007, Pauly et al. 2012, Semlitsch et al. 2017). Range extent is estimated to be around 15,000 km² (Semlitsch et al. 2017, Walls et al. 2019, RARECAT 2025).

The historical range included peninsular Florida as far south as Marion County, and much more of the current range within eastern Georgia and southern South Carolina (Semlitsch et al. 2017).
Occurrences Comments
There are approximately eight extant occurrences (Semlitsch et al. 2017, Walls et al. 2019). There is one occurrence in South Carolina, one occurrence in Georgia, and several occurrences spread across two conservation lands in the Florida Panhandle (Semlitsch et al. 2017, Walls et a. 2019).
Threat Impact Comments
The greatest remaining threats to this species are incompatible habitat management activities, climate change-induced droughts, reduced gene flow between occurrences, and potential introduction of predatory fishes to breeding ponds. Prescribed fires carried out during the winter months have contributed to local extirpations due to the encroachment of woody plants and the loss of grass-like plants growing in breeding ponds, reducing egg deposition sites (Ashton 1992, Bishop and Haas 2005, Gorman et al. 2009, Gorman et al. 2013). There have also been multiple informal reports of damaging forestry activities in the immediate vicinity of active breeding ponds on conservation lands in Florida. Ponds drying out during the winter breeding season is a threat projected to become more common with climate change (Palis et al. 2006, Chandler et al. 2024). One study found that a reduction in rainfall of 20% or more would cause this species to be lost at Fort Stewart, Georgia (Westervelt et al. 2013). Storm surge from hurricanes is an increasing threat at St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge, which are the lowest elevation ponds within the range. After Hurricane Michael in October 2018, at least 17 occupied breeding ponds were overwashed with saltwater to varying degrees, and reproduction the following breeding season was reduced by 98% compared to the previous year (Walls et al. 2019). Studies in the closely-related A. bishopi show this species currently shows little to no gene flow beyond a distance of 400 m (Williams et al. 2021, Gaupp 2022). Because of their nearly identical life histories, the same is almost certainly true for this species (USFWS 2020).

Past threats that have already taken their toll on this species include habitat destruction as a result of agriculture, silviculture, and residential and commercial development; crayfish harvesting by recreational fisherman causing incidental mortality; road mortality along highways near breeding ponds; algal blooms in breeding ponds due to fertilization of pine plantations; the release of predatory fishes into occupied breeding ponds; and overzealous scientific collection (Marois and Ewel 1983, Ashton 1992, Means et al. 1994, Means et al. 1996, USFWS 1999, USFWS 2020, Palis et al. 2022, J. Palis, pers. obs.).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

The following information pertains to the Ambystoma cingulatum-bishopi complex as a whole.

A black salamander with variable gray or grayish dorsal markings that may form a "frosted" or netlike pattern or narrow light rings. Belly is black with scattered or many small gray spots. Total length 9-13 cm (Conant and Collins 1991). Larvae are long and slender, with very slender legs and fragile tail fins; body is black to brown with white to yellow stripes (Ashton 1992).

A moderately-sized (up to 76 mm snout-vent length, 135 mm total length; Palis unpubl. data), slender salamander with a relatively small, pointed head and stout tail, weighing from 4.5 - 10.5 grams (adult male and gravid female, respectively (Palis unpubl. data)). The body is black to chocolate-black with fine, irregular, light gray lines that form a net-like or cross-banded pattern across the back. In some individuals the gray pigment is widely scattered and "lichen-like." Melanistic, uniformly black individuals are occasionally encountered (Carr 1940). The belly is black to chocolate-black with a scattering of gray spots or flecks.

The broad-headed, boldly striped pond-type larva can attain a snout-vent length of 47 mm and total length of 96 mm before metamorphosis (Palis unpubl. data). The striping pattern, from mid-dorsum down the sides, is as follows: pale tan mid-dorsal stripe, grayish-black dorsolateral stripe, pale cream mid-lateral stripe, blue-black lateral stripe, and pale yellow ventrolateral stripe. A black stripe extends from the snout, through the eyes, to the base of the gills. A second dark stripe, extending along the upper jaw, is typically present, as well.

Although sexual dimorphism is not pronounced, males can be distinguished from females during the breeding season by their slightly swollen cloaca (pers. obs.). In addition, mature gravid females are heavier and more robust than males at this time (pers. obs.).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Adults may be confused with the slimy salamander (Plethodon grobmani), small-mouthed salamander (Ambystoma texanum), or Mabee's salamander (Ambystoma mabeei). Slimy salamanders are readily distinguished by the presence of a small groove (nasolabial groove) from the nostril to upper lip (absent in all Ambystoma). Ambystoma texanum (smallmouth salamander) overlaps the range of Ambystoma cingulatum in extreme southwestern Alabama. Small-mouthed salamanders have a very short, rounded snout and, in Alabama, are brown or dark gray with lichen-like light blotches (Mount 1975). In South Carolina, Ambystoma cingulatum has been observed breeding in the same wetland as Ambystoma mabeei (Anderson and Williamson 1976). The body of Mabee's salamander is dark brown or black with pale specks that are concentrated along the sides.

Although the flatwoods salamander larval pattern is distinctive, two other Ambystoma larvae may appear similar to the untrained eye. Like Ambystoma cingulatum, Ambystoma mabeei larvae have a light mid-lateral stripe between two dark lateral stripes. However, unlike the continuous lateral stripes of Ambystoma cingulatum, those of Ambystoma mabeei are broken into blotches (Hardy and Olmon 1974). In addition, the stripe extending from the snout to the gills in Ambystoma mabeei is diffuse and indistinct, and the upper lip stripe is replaced by a series of spots (Hardy and Olmon 1974). Larval mole salamanders (Ambystoma talpoideum) may have an indistinct, light mid-lateral stripe, but are readily distinguished from Ambystoma cingulatum larvae by the presence of a dark mid-ventral stripe and dark dorsal crossbands (pers. obs.). The light mid-lateral stripe of larval Ambystoma cingulatum is retained by metamorphs through their first year (pers. obs.). It is best observed by shining a bright light through the body.

Habitat

The following information pertains to the Ambystoma cingulatum-bishopi complex as a whole. Post-larval individuals inhabit mesic longleaf pine (Pinus palustris)-wiregrass (Aristida stricta) flatwoods and savannas. The terrestrial habitat is best described as a topographically flat or slightly rolling wiregrass-dominated grassland having little to no midstory and an open overstory of widely scattered longleaf pine. Low-growing shrubs, such as saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), gallberry (Ilex glabra) and blueberries (Vaccinium spp.), co-exist with grasses and forbs in the groundcover. Groundcover plant diversity is usually very high. The underlying soil is typically poorly drained sand that becomes seasonally inundated.

Slash pine flatwoods is often cited as the preferred terrestrial habitat of the flatwoods salamander (e.g., Conant and Collins 1991). This may be the result of an error made by Martof (1968) in which he referred to longleaf pine as slash pine (Pinus elliottii). In addition, slash pine now dominates or co-occurs with longleaf pine in many pine flatwoods communities as a result of fire suppression and preferential harvest of longleaf pine (Avers and Bracy 1975). Historically, however, fire-tolerant longleaf pine dominated the flatwoods, whereas slash pine was confined principally to wetlands (Harper 1914, Avers and Bracy 1975). Post-larval individuals are fossorial (live underground) and occupy burrows (Goin 1950, Neill 1951, Mount 1975, Ashton 1992). Presumably, they remain underground during the lightning-season (May through September). Adults are rarely encountered under cover objects at or near breeding sites (J. Palis, pers. obs.).

Breeding occurs in acidic (pH 3.6-5.6 (Palis, unpubl. data)), tannin-stained ephemeral wetlands (swamps or graminoid-dominated depressions) that range in size from 0.02 to 9.5 ha, and are usually not more than 0.5 m deep (Palis, unpubl. data). The overstory is typically dominated by pond cypress (Taxodium ascendens), blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica var. biflora) and slash pine, but can also include red maple (Acer rubrum), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), sweetbay (Magnolia virginiana), and loblolly bay (Gordonia lasianthus). Canopy coverage ranges from near zero to almost 100% (Palis, unpubl. data). The midstory, which is often very dense, is most often composed of young of the aforementioned species, myrtle-leaved holly (Ilex myrtifolia), Chapman's St. John's-wort (Hypericum chapmanii), sandweed (Hypericum fasciculatum), titi (Cyrilla racemiflora), storax (Styrax americana), popash (Fraxinus caroliniana), sweet pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia), fetterbush (Lyonia lucida), vine-wicky (Pieris phillyreifolia), and bamboo-vine (Smilax laurifolia). Depending on closure of the canopy and midstory, the herbaceous groundcover of breeding sites can range from about 5% to nearly 100% (Palis, unpubl. data). The groundcover is dominated by graminaceous species, including beakrushes (Rhynchospora spp.), sedges (Carex spp.), panic grasses (Panicum spp.), bluestems (Andropogon spp.), jointtails (Manisurus spp.), three-awned grass (Aristida affinis), plumegrass (Erianthus giganteus), nutrush (Sclera baldwinii) and yellow-eyed grasses (Xyris spp.). The floor of breeding sites is riddled with the burrows of crayfish (genus Procambarus). Breeding sites are typically encircled by a wiregrass-dominated graminaceous ecotone. Breeding sites can include roadside ditches (Anderson and Williamson 1976; Palis, pers. obs.) and borrow pits (D. Stevenson, pers. comm.). Breeding sites often harbor fishes, the most typical species include pygmy sunfishes (Elassoma spp.), mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrookii), and banded sunfish (Enneacanthus obesus) (Palis, unpubl. data). Favorable breeding habitat lacks large predatory fishes.

Before breeding sites fill with water, eggs are deposited singly or in small groups on the ground beneath leaf litter, under logs and Sphagnum mats, at the base of grasses, shrubs or trees, or at the entrance to crayfish burrows (Anderson and Williamson 1976). In wetlands that fill incrementally, eggs are deposited amid graminaceous vegetation at the edge (J. Palis, pers. obs.). Egg deposition in shallow water also has been reported (Ashton 1992). Larvae hide amid inundated graminaceous vegetation by day, but will enter the water column at night (J. Palis, pers. obs.).

Reproduction

The following information pertains to the Ambystoma cingulatum-bishopi complex as a whole.

Movements to breeding ponds occur usually between early October and January during rainy evenings when the barometric pressure is falling (Ashton 1992). In Florida, salamanders that entered and exited the breeding site only once remained in the basin an average of 38 days (range 3-117 days) (Palis 1997). Individual females lay up to 225 eggs (Ashton 1992) singly or in small clusters, with larger individuals producing more eggs than smaller ones (Anderson and Williamson 1976). Eggs are laid terrestrially before depressions fill with water; The eggs develop to hatching size within three weeks, but do not hatch until inundated (Anderson and Williamson 1976). The larval period lasts three to four months (11-18 weeks) (Means 1986, Palis and Jensen 1995). Metamorphs emigrate from their natal ponds during the months of March and April (J. Palis, pers. obs.). In captivity, adult size can be reached within one year (Means 1972). Preliminary field data, however, suggest that full size is not attained until the third or fourth year in the wild (Palis, unpubl. data). Although not much bigger than metamorphs, males attain sexual maturity in their first year (Palis 1997). Females, however, do not sexually mature until at least two years old (Palis and Jensen 1995, Palis 1997). Generation length is presumed to be about 8 years.
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest/WoodlandForest - ConiferWoodland - ConiferSavanna
Palustrine Habitats
TEMPORARY POOLHERBACEOUS WETLANDSCRUB-SHRUB WETLANDFORESTED WETLANDRiparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN2
ProvinceRankNative
South CarolinaS1Yes
GeorgiaS1Yes
FloridaS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureLarge - restrictedModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
2.2 - Wood & pulp plantationsLarge - restrictedModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useLarge (31-70%)Extreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingLarge (31-70%)Extreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
5.3.4 - Unintentional effects: large scale (species being assessed is not the target) [harvest]Large (31-70%)Extreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
5.4 - Fishing & harvesting aquatic resourcesLarge (31-70%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsPervasive (71-100%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionPervasive (71-100%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive - largeUnknownHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesPervasive - largeUnknownHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionUnknownModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsUnknownModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherSmall (1-10%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
11.4 - Storms & floodingSmall (1-10%)UnknownHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (5)
Florida (5)
AreaForestAcres
Gum BayApalachicola National Forest11,645
Gum BayApalachicola National Forest11,645
Long BayApalachicola National Forest5,726
Natural Area WsaOsceola National Forest2,543
SavannahApalachicola National Forest1,927
References (70)
  1. Anderson, J. D., and G. K. Williamson. 1976. Terrestrial mode of reproduction in <i>Ambystoma cingulatum</i>. Herpetologica 32(2):214-21.
  2. Ashton, R. E., Jr. 1992. Flatwoods salamander <i>Ambystoma cingulatum</i> (Cope). Pages 39-43 in P. E. Moler (editor). Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida. Volume III. Amphibians and Reptiles. University Press of Florida.
  3. Ashton, R. E., Jr. 1998. Letter to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service addressing the proposal to list the flatwoods salamander as a threatened species. Dated 16 October 1998.
  4. Ashton, R. E., Jr., and P. S. Ashton. 1988. Handbook of reptiles and amphibians of Florida. Part Three. The amphibians. Windward Publ. Co., Miami.
  5. Avers, P. E., and K. C. Bracy. 1975. Soils and physiography of the Osceola National Forest. Unpublished report submitted to the U.S. Forest Service.
  6. Bartlett, R. D., and P. P. Bartlett. 1999b. A field guide to Florida reptiles and amphibians. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, Texas. xvi + 278 pp.
  7. Behler, J. L., and F. W. King. 1979. The Audubon Society field guide to North American reptiles and amphibians. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 719 pp.
  8. Bishop, D. C., and C. A. Haas. 2005. Burning trends and potential negative effects of suppressing wetland fires on flatwoods salamanders. Conservation Issues 25(3): 290-294.
  9. Blackburn, L., P. Nanjappa, and M. J. Lannoo. 2001. An Atlas of the Distribution of U.S. Amphibians. Copyright, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana, USA.
  10. Bury, R. B., C. K. Dodd, Jr., and G. M. Fellers. 1980. Conservation of the Amphibia of the United States: a review. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C., Resource Publication 134. 34 pp.
  11. Carr, A., and C. J. Goin. 1955. Guide to the reptiles, amphibians and fresh-water fishes of Florida. Univ. Florida Press, Gainesville.
  12. Carr, A. F., Jr. 1940. A contribution to the herpetology of Florida. Univ. Florida Biol. Sci. Ser. 3:1.118.
  13. Chandler, H. C., N. M. Caruso, G. C. Brooks, and C. A. Haas. 2024. Wetland hydrology, not altered phenology, challenges reticulated flatwoods salamander (<i>Ambystoma bishopi</i>) management under future climate change. Ichthyology & Herpetology 112(4): 531-543.
  14. Conant, R. and J. T. Collins. 1991. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Third edition. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts. 450 pp.
  15. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  16. Frost, D. R. 1985. Amphibian species of the world. A taxonomic and geographical reference. Allen Press, Inc., and The Association of Systematics Collections, Lawrence, Kansas. v + 732 pp.
  17. Frost, D.R. 2020. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. Online: http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html
  18. Gaupp, M. 2022. Applying conservation genomic techniques to guide management of the reticulated flatwoods salamander (<i>Ambystoma bishopi</i>). M.S. thesis. Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA. 147 pp.
  19. Gibbons, J.W. and R.D. Semlitsch. 1981. Terrestrial drift fences with pitfall traps: an effective technique for quantitative sampling of animal populations. Brimleyana. 7:1-16.
  20. Goin, C. J. 1950. A study of the salamander, <i>Ambystoma cingulatum</i>, with the description of a new subspecies. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 31:229-321.
  21. Gorman, T. A., C. A. Haas, and D. C. Bishop. 2009. Factors related to occupancy of breeding wetlands by flatwoods salamander larvae. Wetlands 29(1): 323-329.
  22. Gorman, T. A., C. A. Haas, and J. G. Himes. 2013. Evaluating methods to restore amphibian habitat in fire-suppressed pine flatwoods wetlands. Fire Ecology 9(1): 96-109.
  23. Hardy, J. D., Jr., and J. Olmon. 1974. Restriction of the range of the frosted salamander, <i>Ambystoma cingulatum</i> based on a comparison of the larvae of <i>Ambystoma cingulatum</i> and <i>Ambystoma mabeei</i>. Herpetologica 30(2):156-60.
  24. Harper,R. M. 1914. Geography and vegetation of northern Florida. Florida Geology Survey Sixth Annual Report. 163-451.
  25. Huffman, J. M. and S. W. Blanchard. 1990. Changes in woody vegetation in Florida dry prarie and wetlands during a period of fire exclusion, and after dry-growing-season fire. Pp. 75-83 in Fire and the Environment: Ecological and Cultural Perspectives, Gen. Tech. Report SE-69. USDA Forest Service, SE For. Exp. Sta., Asherville, NC.
  26. Jensen, J. B., C. D. Camp, W. Gibbons, and M. J. Elliot, editors. 2008. Amphibians and reptiles of Georgia. University of Georgia Press, Athens. xvii + 575 pp.
  27. Jensen, John. Georgia Dept. of Natural Resources, Nongame Wildlife Program, Forsythe, GA
  28. Jones, T. R., A. G. Kluge, and A. J. Wolf. 1993. When theories and methodologies clash: a phylogenetic reanalysis of the North American ambystomatid salamanders (Caudata: Ambystomatidae). Systematic Biology 42:92-102.
  29. Kraus, F. 1988. An empirical evaluation of the use of the ontogeny polarization criterion in phylogenetic inference. Systematic Zoology 37:106-141.
  30. Marios, K. C., and K. C. Ewel. 1983. Natural and management-related variation in cypress domes. For. Sci. 29(3):627-40.
  31. Martof, B.S. 1968. Ambystoma cingulatum. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. 57:1-2.
  32. Martof, B. S., W. M. Palmer, J. R. Bailey, and J. R. Harrison, III. 1980. Amphibians and reptiles of the Carolinas and Virginia. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 264 pp.
  33. Means, D. B. 1972. Notes on the autumn breeding biology of <i>Ambystoma cingulatum</i> (Cope) (Amphibia: Urodela: Ambystomatidae). ASB Bull. 19(2): 84.
  34. Means, D. B. 1986. Special Concern: Flatwoods Salamander. Pp. 42-3 in R. H. Mount (ed.). Verterate Animals of Alabama in Need of Special Attention. Alabama Agricul. Exp. Sta. Auburn University, Auburn, AL.
  35. Means, D. B., J. G. Palis, and M. Baggett. 1994c. Effects of slash pine silviculture on Florida panhandle populations of the flatwoods salamander (<i>Ambystoma cingulatum</i>). HL/SSAR Joint Annual Meeting, University of Georgia, Athens (Abstract).
  36. Means, D. B., J. G. Palis, and M. Baggett. 1996. Effects of slash pine silviculture on a Florida salamander. Conserv. Biol. 10(2): 426-437.
  37. Means, D. B., T. E. Ostertag, and D. Printiss. 1994a. Distribution, habitat ecology and management of the striped newt (<i>Notophthalmus perstriatus</i>) in the Apalachicola National Forest, Florida. Report submitted to U.S. Forest Service National Forest in Florida, Tallahassee, Florida. 30 pp.
  38. Moler, P. E., editor. 1992. Rare and endangered biota of Florida. Volume III. Amphibians and reptiles. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. xviii + 291 pp.
  39. Mount, R. H. 1975. The reptiles and amphibians of Alabama. Auburn University Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn, Alabama. vii + 347 pp.
  40. NatureServe. Central Databases. Arlington, Virginia. U.S.A. Online. Available: http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/
  41. Neill, W. T. 1951. Notes on the role of crawfishes in the ecology of reptiles, amphibians, and fishes. Ecology. 32(4):764-6.
  42. O’Donnell, K. M, A. F. Messerman, W. J. Barichivich, R. D. Semlitsch, T. A. Gorman, H. G. Mitchell, N. Allan, D. Fenolio, A. Green, F. A. Johnson, A Keever, M. Mandica, J. Martin, J. Mott, T. Peacock, J. Reinman, S. S. Romañach, G. Titus, C. P. McGowan, and S. C. Walls. 2017. Structured decision making as a conservation tool for recovery planning of two endangered salamanders. Journal for Nature Conservation 37: 66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2017.02.011
  43. Palis, J. G. 1997a. Breeding migration of <i>Ambystoma cingulatum</i> in Florida. Journal of Herpetology 31:71-78.
  44. Palis, J. G. 1997b. Distribution, habitat, and status of the flatwoods salamander (<i>Ambystoma cingulatum</i>) in Florida, USA. Herpetological Natural History 5:53-65.
  45. Palis, J. G. 1998. Review of draft EO Specifications for the flatwoods salamander. Letter dated 17 October 1998.
  46. Palis, J. G., and J. B. Jensen. 1995. Distribution and breeding biology of the flatwoods salamander (<i>Ambystoma cingulatum</i>) and gopher frog (<i>Rana capito</i>) on Eglin Air Force Base, Florida. Final Report. Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Tallahassee, Florida.
  47. Palis, J. G., M. J. Aresco, and S. Kilpatrick. 2006. Breeding biology of a Florida population of <i>Ambystoma cingulatum</i> (flatwoods salamander) during a drought. Southeastern Naturalist 5(1): 1-8.
  48. Palis, J. G., T. A. Gorman, and G. B. Pauly. 2022. Ambystoma bishopi. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles 929: 1-21.
  49. Palis, John G., Jonesboro, IL
  50. Pauly, G. B., O. Piskurek, and H. B. Shaffer. 2007. Phylogeographic concordance in the southeastern United States: the flatwoods salamander, <i>Ambystoma cingulatum</i>, as a test case. Molecular Ecology 16:415-429. [Note: Two errors were inadvertently introduced into the paragraph on pages 424-425. The common names attributed to each flatwoods salamander species are reversed. Similarly, the previously published color pattern descriptions are incorrectly attributed to each species.]
  51. Pauly, G. B., S. H. Bennett, J. G. Palis, and H. B. Shaffer. 2012. Conservation and genetics of the frosted flatwoods salamander (<i>Ambystoma cingulatum</i>) on the Atlantic coastal plain. Conservation Genetics 13: 1–7. doi: 10.1007/210592-011-0274-1
  52. Petranka, J. W. 1998. Salamanders of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
  53. <p>NatureServe's Rapid Analysis of Rarity and Endangerment Conservation Assessment Tool (RARECAT). 2025. Version: 2.1.1 (released April 04, 2025).</p>
  54. Pope, C. H., and S. H. Pope. 1951. A study of the salamander <i>Plethodon ouachitae</i> and the description of an allied form. Bull. Chicago Acad. Sci. 9:129-152.
  55. Sekerak, C. M. 1994. Vegetation and aquatic vertebrate and macroinvertebrate assemblages in flatwoods salamander breeding ponds in the Apalachicola National Forest. MS Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
  56. Semlitsch, R. D. 1998. Biological delineation of terrestrial buffer zones for pond-breeding salamanders. Conservation Biology 12:1113-1119.
  57. Semlitsch, R. D., S. C. Walls, W. J. Barichivich, and K. M. O'Donnell. 2017. Extinction debt as a driver of amphibian declines: an example with imperiled flatwoods salamanders. Journal of Herpetology 51(1): 12-18. doi: 10.1670/16-090
  58. Shaffer, H. B., J. M. Clark, and F. Kraus. 1991. When molecules and morphology clash: a phylogenetic analysis of the North American ambystomatid salamanders (Caudata: Ambystomatidae). Systematic Zoology 40:284-303.
  59. Shaffer, H. B., R. A. Alford, B. D. Woodward, S. J. Richards, R. G. Alting and C. Gascon. 1994. Quantitative sampling of amphibian larvae. Pp. 130-41 in W. R. Heyer, M. A. Donnely, R. W. McDiarmid, L. C. Hayek and M. S. Foster (eds.). Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity, Standard Methods for Amphibians. Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington, DC.
  60. Travis, J. 1994. Calibrating our expectations in studying amphibian populations. Herpetologica 50:104-108.
  61. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2020. Species status assessment for the frosted flatwoods salamander (<i>Ambystoma cingulatum</i>). Version 1.0. March 2020. Panama City, FL.
  62. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 16 December 1997. Proposed rule to list the flatwoods salamander as threatened. Federal Register 62(241):65787-65794.
  63. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1 April 1999. Final rule to list the flatwoods salamander as a threatened species. Federal Register 64(62):15691-15704.
  64. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2005. Draft recovery plan for the flatwoods salamander (<i>Ambystoma cingulatum</i>). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.
  65. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2023. Initiation of 5-Year Status Reviews for 67 Southeastern Species. Notice of initiation of reviews; <br/>request for information. Federal Register 88(91): 30324-30328.
  66. Walls, S. C., W. J. Barichivich, J. Chandler, A. M. Meade, M. Milinichik, K. M. O’Donnell, M. E. Owens, T. Peacock, J. Reinman, R. C. Watling, O. E. Wetsch. 2019. Seeking shelter from the storm: conservation and management of imperiled species in a changing climate. Ecology and Evolution 9(12): 7122-7133.
  67. Ware, S., C. Frost and P. D. Doerr. 1993. Southern mixed hardwood forest: the former longleaf pine forest. Pages 447-93 in W. H. Martin, S. G. Boyce, and A. C. Echternacht (editors). Biodiversity of the southeastern United States, lowland terrestrial communities. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  68. Westervelt, J. D., J. H. Sperry, J. L. Burton, and J. G. Palis. 2013. Modeling response of frosted flatwoods salamander populations to historic and predicted climate variables. Ecological Modelling 268: 18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.07.026
  69. Whiles, M. R., J. B. Jensen, J. G. Palis, and W. G. Dyer. 2004. Diets of larval flatwoods salamanders, <i>Ambystoma cingulatum</i>, from Florida and South Carolina. Journal of Herpetology 38:208-214.
  70. Williams, S. T., J. P. Elbers, and S. S. Taylor. 2021. Population structure, gene flow, and sex- biased dispersal in the reticulated flatwoods salamander (<i>Ambystoma bishopi</i>): implications for translocations. Evolutionary Applications 14: 2231–2243. doi: 10.1111/eva.13287