Ambystoma jeffersonianum

(Green, 1827)

Jefferson Salamander

G3Vulnerable (G3G4) Found in 12 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
HighThreat Impact
Jefferson Salamander (Ambystoma jeffersonianum). Photo by Hunter Hammil, CC BY 4.0, via iNaturalist.
Hunter Hammil, CC BY 4.0
Jefferson Salamander (Ambystoma jeffersonianum). Photo by John Abrams, CC BY 4.0, via iNaturalist.
John Abrams, CC BY 4.0
Jefferson Salamander (Ambystoma jeffersonianum). Photo by Dominic, CC BY 4.0, via iNaturalist.
Dominic, CC BY 4.0
Jefferson Salamander (Ambystoma jeffersonianum). Photo by Etienne Falquet, CC0 1.0, via iNaturalist.
Etienne Falquet, CC0 1.0
Jefferson Salamander (Ambystoma jeffersonianum). Photo by Dominic, CC BY 4.0, via iNaturalist.
Dominic, CC BY 4.0
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.100401
Element CodeAAAAA01050
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAmphibia
OrderCaudata
FamilyAmbystomatidae
GenusAmbystoma
Other Common Names
Jefferson salamander (EN) Salamandre de Jefferson (FR)
Concept Reference
Frost, D. R. 1985. Amphibian species of the world. A taxonomic and geographical reference. Allen Press, Inc., and The Association of Systematics Collections, Lawrence, Kansas. v + 732 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Taxonomic recognition of asexual forms that combine genomes of this species, A. laterale, A. texanum, and A. tigrinum raises complex issues. These include discordance between cytoplasmic and nuclear genes, reticulate evolution, and genome-swapping (Bogart 2003). Bi and Bogart (2010) confirm an ancient origin for the mitochondrial genome shared by asexual forms of this complex. Dubois and Rafaëlli (2012) resurrected the name platineum for the asexual forms (Crother 2017).

To accommodate the genetic variation in these salamanders (and the often uncertain genetic composition of particular populations), we have established for this database the following elements: (1) Ambystoma jeffersonianum (Jefferson Salamander), used for pure populations only; (2) Ambystoma laterale (Blue-spotted salamander), used for pure populations only; (3) Ambystoma hybrid pop. 1 (jeffersonianum x laterale; jeffersonianum genome dominates), used for hybrid populations dominated by the jeffersonianum genome (e.g., populations that include mainly LJJ individuals); this element includes "Ambystoma platineum"; (4) Ambystoma hybrid pop. 2 (jeffersonianum x laterale; laterale genome dominates), used for hybrid populations dominated by the laterale genome (e.g., populations that include mainly LLJ individuals); this element includes "Ambystoma tremblayi"; (5) Ambystoma pop. 3 (jeffersonianum/laterale complex - uncertain composition), used for populations for which chromosomal representation is unknown. If needed we could establish additional elements for hybrid populations that involve A. laterale, A. texanum, and/or A. tigrinum.

Also see Kraus (1985), Bogart and Licht (1987), Bogart et al. (1987), Kraus et al. (1991), Lowcock et al. (1991), and Bogart and Klemens (1997) for information on the involvement of A. jeffersonianum in hybridization with A. texanum, A. tigrinum, and/or A. laterale. See Lowcock et al. (1987) and Bogart and Klemens (1997) for discussions of nomenclatural treatment of hybrid populations.

See Kraus (1988), Shaffer et al. (1991), and Jones et al. (1993) for phylogenetic analyses of North American Ambystoma.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-03-05
Change Date2025-03-05
Edition Date2025-03-05
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G. (2011); rev. R. L. Gundy (2025)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank Reasons
This species is widespread in eastern North America. It is threatened by habitat loss, especially uplands surrounding breeding wetlands. The current population trend is unknown, but the species has reportedly declined compared to historical levels.
Range Extent Comments
This species is found in North America in the eastern United States and adjacent Ontario, Canada (Conant and Collins 1991, Petranka 1998, COSEWIC 2010). The range extends from western Illinois and western Kentucky northeastward to southern New York and Ontario (Conant and Collins 1991, Petranka 1998, COSEWIC 2010). Pure diploid populations have been confirmed throughout Pennsylvania and in southern New York (Bogart and Klemens 2008), east-central Illinois (Phillips et al. 1999), and Ontario (COSEWIC 2010). Using select Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) (2025) records from within the accepted diploid range, range extent is estimated to be approximately 675,000 km² (RARECAT 2024).

No pure diploid A. jeffersonianum populations were found northeast of New York in Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, or Vermont (Bogart and Klemens 2008).
Occurrences Comments
There are many occurrences throughout the range, although determining which populations are pure diploids is challenging (Petranka 1998, Phillips et al. 1999, Bogart and Klemens 2008, COSEWIC 2010).
Threat Impact Comments
Vulnerable to detrimental alteration of vernal pool breeding sites, especially as a result of residential development (COSEWIC 2010). Threats to local populations likely include intensive timber harvesting practices that reduce canopy closure, understory vegetation, uncompacted forest litter, or coarse woody debris (moderately to well-decayed) in areas surrounding breeding sites (deMaynadier and Hunter 1999). Some local populations incur heavy road mortality during migrations to and from breeding sites (Klemens 1993, COSEWIC 2010).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Often in well-shaded deciduous forest; hides in rodent burrows and beneath leaf litter, logs, stumps, and other surface objects; hibernates underground or in rotting logs (Faccio 2003). In caves in some areas (e.g., West Virginia) (Green and Pauley 1987). Eggs are attached to sticks and plant stems in ponds and pools with adjacent forest. Presence of fishes and newts reduces reproductive success. Not found in floodplains, swamps or marshes in New Jersey (Nyman et al. 1988). In central Pennsylvania, embryonic mortality was high in ponds below pH 4.5, though this was affected by the availability of other larval amphibians as prey (Sadinski and Dunson 1992).

Reproduction

Eggs are laid February-April (early to mid-March in Ohio). Clutch of a couple hundred eggs is divided among several clusters. Eggs hatch in about 2 weeks (Green and Pauley 1987) or up to 4-6 weeks. Larvae metamorphose during July-September. In a pond in Ohio, hatching rate over four years was 85-90%, and 51,800 to 84,400 larvae hatched (Brodman, 1995, J. Herpetol. 29:111-113). Aggregates when breeding.

Hybrid offspring are the result of gynogenetic or hybridogenetic reproduction (Bogart and Klemens 1997).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest - HardwoodForest - Mixed
Palustrine Habitats
TEMPORARY POOLSCRUB-SHRUB WETLANDFORESTED WETLANDRiparian
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN2
ProvinceRankNative
OntarioS2Yes
United StatesN4
ProvinceRankNative
New YorkS4Yes
New JerseyS3Yes
IllinoisS2Yes
VermontS3Yes
MarylandS3Yes
West VirginiaS3Yes
PennsylvaniaS3Yes
MassachusettsS2Yes
IndianaS4Yes
VirginiaS4Yes
New HampshireS2Yes
KentuckyS5Yes
OhioSNRYes
ConnecticutS3Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentRestricted (11-30%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasRestricted (11-30%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
1.2 - Commercial & industrial areasRestricted (11-30%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureRestricted (11-30%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsRestricted (11-30%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsSmall (1-10%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsSmall (1-10%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useRestricted (11-30%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingRestricted (11-30%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (12)
Vermont (1)
AreaForestAcres
Griffith Lake 09084Green Mountain and Finger Lakes National Forests1,833
Virginia (10)
AreaForestAcres
Broad RunJefferson National Forest10,971
Brush MountainJefferson National Forest6,002
Brush Mountain EastJefferson National Forest4,916
Little RiverGeorge Washington National Forest27,292
Mill MountainGeorge Washington National Forest10,840
North MountainJefferson National Forest8,377
Northern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest9,444
Peters Mountain Addition BJefferson National Forest2,909
Ramseys Draft AdditionGeorge Washington National Forest12,781
Shawvers Run AdditionJefferson National Forest1,927
West Virginia (1)
AreaForestAcres
Mcgowan MountainMonongahela National Forest10,504
References (45)
  1. Barbour, R. W. 1971. Amphibians and reptiles of Kentucky. Univ. Press of Kentucky, Lexington. x + 334 pp.
  2. Behler, J. L., and F. W. King. 1979. The Audubon Society field guide to North American reptiles and amphibians. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 719 pp.
  3. Bi, K. and J. P. Bogart. 2010. Time and time again: unisexual salamanders (genus <i>Ambystoma</i>) are the oldest unisexual vertebrates. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10: 238 (doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-238).
  4. Blackburn, L., P. Nanjappa, and M. J. Lannoo. 2001. An Atlas of the Distribution of U.S. Amphibians. Copyright, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana, USA.
  5. Bogart, J.P. 2003. Genetics and systematics of hybrid species. Pages 109-134 In: D.M. Sever (ed.), Reproductive biology and phylogeny of Urodela, Vol 1, Science Publishers, Enfield, New Hampshire.
  6. Bogart, J.P. and L.E. Licht. 1987. Evidence for the requirement of sperm in unisexual salamander hybrids (genus <i>Ambystoma</i>). Canadian Field-Naturalist. 101:434-436.
  7. Bogart, J.P. and M.W. Klemens. 1997. Hybrids and genetic interactions of mole salamanders (<i>Ambystoma jeffersonianum</i> and <i>A. laterale</i>) (Amphibia: Caudata) in New York and New England. American Museum Novitates (3218):1-78.
  8. Bogart, J.P. and M.W. Klemens. 2008. Additional distributional records of <i>Ambystoma laterale</i>, <i>A. jeffersonianum</i> (Amphibia: Caudata) and their unisexual kleptogens in northeastern North America. American Museum Novitates 3627:1-58.
  9. Bogart, J.P., Lowcock, L.A., Zeyl, C.W. and Mable, B.K. 1987. Genome constitution and reproductive biology of hybrid salamanders, genus <i>Ambystoma</i>, on Kelleys Island in Lake Erie. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 65:2188-2201.
  10. Conant, R. and J. T. Collins. 1991. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Third edition. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts. 450 pp.
  11. COSEWIC. 2010. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Jefferson salamander <i>Ambystoma jeffersonianum</i> in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xi + 38 pp.
  12. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  13. DeGraaf, R. M., and D. D. Rudis. 1983a. Amphibians and reptiles of New England. Habitats and natural history. Univ. Massachusetts Press. vii + 83 pp.
  14. DeMaynadier, P. G., and M. L. Hunter, Jr. 1999. Forest canopy closure and juvenile emigration by pool-breeding amphibians in Maine. Journal of Wildlife Management 63:441-450.
  15. Douglas, M. E., and B. L. Monroe, Jr. 1981. A comparative study of topographical orientation in Ambystoma (Amphibia: Caudata). Copeia 1981:460-463.
  16. Faccio, S. D. 2003. Postbreeding emigration and habitat use by Jefferson and spotted salamanders in Vermont. Journal of Herpetology 37:479-489.
  17. Frost, D. R. 1985. Amphibian species of the world. A taxonomic and geographical reference. Allen Press, Inc., and The Association of Systematics Collections, Lawrence, Kansas. v + 732 pp.
  18. Frost, D.R. 2020. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. Online: http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html
  19. Green, N. B., and T. K. Pauley. 1987. Amphibians and reptiles in West Virginia. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. xi + 241 pp.
  20. Jones, T. R., A. G. Kluge, and A. J. Wolf. 1993. When theories and methodologies clash: a phylogenetic reanalysis of the North American ambystomatid salamanders (Caudata: Ambystomatidae). Systematic Biology 42:92-102.
  21. Klemens, M. W. 1993. Amphibians and reptiles of Connecticut and adjacent regions. State Geological and Natural History Survey of Connecticut, Bulletin 112. xii + 318 pp.
  22. Kraus, F. 1985b. Unisexual salamander lineages in northwestern Ohio and southeastern Michigan: a study of the consequences of hybridization. Copeia 1985:309-324.
  23. Kraus, F. 1988. An empirical evaluation of the use of the ontogeny polarization criterion in phylogenetic inference. Systematic Zoology 37:106-141.
  24. Kraus, F., P.K. Ducey, P. Moler,. and M.M. Miyamoto. 1991. Two new triparental unisexual <i>Ambystoma</i> from Ohio and Michigan. Herpetologica. 47:429-439.
  25. Lowcock, L. A., H. Griffith, and R. W. Murphy. 1991. The <i>Ambystoma laterale-jeffersonianum</i> complex in central Ontario: ploidy structure, sex ratio, and breeding dynamics in a bisexual-unisexual community. Copeia 1991:87-105.
  26. Lowcock, L. A., L. E. Licht, and J. P. Bogart. 1987. Nomenclature in hybrid complexes of <i>Ambystoma</i> (Urodela: Ambystomatidae): no case for the erection of hybrid "species." Syst. Zool. 36:328-336.
  27. Martof, B. S., W. M. Palmer, J. R. Bailey, and J. R. Harrison, III. 1980. Amphibians and reptiles of the Carolinas and Virginia. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 264 pp.
  28. McCarthy, M. A., W. F. Weller, and K. M. Parris. 2009. Effects of toe clipping on survival, recapture, and return rates of Jefferson salamanders (Ambystoma jeffersonianum) in Ontario, Canada. Journal of Herpetology 43(3): 394–401.
  29. Minton, S. A., Jr. 1972. Amphibians and reptiles of Indiana. Indiana Academy Science Monographs 3. v + 346 pp.
  30. Morris, M. A. 1985. A hybrid <i>Ambystoma platineum</i> x <i>A. tigrinum</i> from Indiana. Herpetologica 41:267-271.
  31. Morris, M. A., and R. A. Brandon. 1984. Gynogenesis and hybridization between <i>Ambystoma platineum</i> and <i>Ambystoma texanum</i> in Illinois. Copeia 1984:324-337.
  32. NatureServe's Rapid Analysis of Rarity and Endangerment Conservation Assessment Tool (RARECAT). 2024. Version: 1.1.1 (released Oct 01, 2024).
  33. Nyman, S., M. J. Ryan, and J. D. Anderson. 1988. The distribution of the AMBYSTOMA JEFFERSONIANUM complex in New Jersey. Journal of Herpetology 22:224-228.
  34. Phillips, C. A. 1991. Geographic distribution: Ambystoma jeffersonianum. Herpetological Review 22:133.
  35. Phillips, C. A., R. A. Brandon, and E. O. Moll. 1999. Field guide to amphibians and reptiles of Illinois. Illinois Natural History Survey Manual 8. xv + 282 pp.
  36. Sadinski, W. J., and W. A. Dunson. 1992. A multilevel study of effects of low pH on amphibians of temporary ponds. J. Herpetol. 26:413-422.
  37. Selander, T. C. 1994. Reproduction of unisexual hybrid AMBYSTOMA (Urodela: Ambystomatidae) in the absence of parental species. M.Sc. thesis, University of Dayton, Dayton, Ohio. 119 pp.
  38. Selander, T. C., J. P. Bogart, and P. K. Williams. 1993. Naturally occurring tetraploid AMBYSTOMA LATERALE-JEFFERSONIANUM-TEXANUM-TIGRINUM (Amphibia: Caudata) from Ohio. Abstract from combined meetings of American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, Herpetologists' League, Larval Fish Conference, and American Elasmobranch Society, University of Texas, Austin.
  39. Shaffer, H. B., J. M. Clark, and F. Kraus. 1991. When molecules and morphology clash: a phylogenetic analysis of the North American ambystomatid salamanders (Caudata: Ambystomatidae). Systematic Zoology 40:284-303.
  40. Species at Risk Branch. 2002. Species at risk range maps. Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada. Online. Available: http://www.sis.ec.gc.ca/download_e.htm.
  41. Thompson, E.L., J.E. Gates, and G.J. Taylor. 1980. Distribution and breeding habitat selection of the Jefferson salamander, Ambystoma jeffersonianum, in Maryland. J. Herpetol. 14:113-120.
  42. Tobey, F. J. 1985. Virginia's amphibians and reptiles: a distributional survey. Virginia Herpetological Survey. vi + 114 pp.
  43. Uzzell, Thomas M. 1964. Relations of the diploid and triploid species of <i>Ambystoma jeffersonianum</i> complex (Amphibia: Caudata). Copeia 1964(2):257-300.
  44. Uzzell, T.M. Jr. 1967a. <i>Ambystoma jeffersonianum</i>. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles 47:1-2.
  45. Uzzell, T.M. Jr. and S.M. Goldblatt. 1967. Serum proteins of salamanders of the Ambystoma jeffersonianum complex and the origin of the triploid species of this group. Evolution 21(2):345-354.