Agelaius tricolor

(Audubon, 1837)

Tricolored Blackbird

G3Vulnerable Found in 116 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
EndangeredIUCN
HighThreat Impact
Tricolored Blackbird (Agelaius tricolor). © Derek Lecy; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Derek Lecy; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Tricolored Blackbird (Agelaius tricolor). © Barbara Swanson; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Barbara Swanson; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Tricolored Blackbird (Agelaius tricolor). © Ted Beedy; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Ted Beedy; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Tricolored Blackbird (Agelaius tricolor). © Liam Huber; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Liam Huber; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Tricolored Blackbird (Agelaius tricolor). © Ian K Barker; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Ian K Barker; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Tricolored Blackbird (Agelaius tricolor). © Robert McNab; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Robert McNab; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Tricolored Blackbird (Agelaius tricolor). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.101015
Element CodeABPBXB0020
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNEndangered
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAves
OrderPasseriformes
FamilyIcteridae
GenusAgelaius
Other Common Names
Carouge de Californie (FR) Tordo Tricolor (ES) tricolored blackbird (EN)
Concept Reference
American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in The Auk]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
Taxonomic Comments
A. phoeniceus a sister taxon (AOU 1998).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-12-15
Change Date2025-12-15
Edition Date2025-12-15
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G., D. Mehlman, and S. Cannings (2013); rev. R. L. Gundy (2025)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 - 300
Rank Reasons
This species largely lives within the Central Valley of California with peripheral populations as far north as Washington and as far south as Baja California Norte. The population has suffered severe declines of at least 80% compared to historical estimates due to habitat loss. Due to the loss of wetlands, the species is largely relegated to living in agricultural settings. It is threatened by further habitat loss and by agricultural practices that are incompatible with nesting and foraging. Since 2014, the population has increased by 50%. However, it still remains a small fraction of historical population size.
Range Extent Comments
The breeding range extends from central southern Oregon south through interior California, and along the coast from central California south to localized areas in northwestern Baja California (Beedy et al. 2023).

During the nonbreeding period the range contracts somewhat as the species withdraws from several areas around the margins of the breeding range (Beedy et al. 2023). Idaho records from 2023 appear to only represent the nonbreeding range (Olsoy and Sorensen 2024).
Occurrences Comments
The 2022 statewide survey in California found blackbirds breeding in 158 locations (Colibri Ecological Consulting 2022).
Threat Impact Comments
The species has undergone a long-term population decline, primarily due to losses and fragmentation of breeding and foraging habitats caused by urban and agricultural land conversions, and water diversions (Tricolored Blackbird Working Group 2007). Most of California's formerly extensive freshwater wetlands have been lost, and the remaining ones often are small isolated patches that support high densities of natural predators (e.g., coyote, raccoon, black-crowned night-heron, common raven; great-tailed grackle in southern California), which sometimes may cause significant reductions in blackbird reproductive success through predation or disturbance (Tricolored Blackbird Working Group 2007). Formerly productive foraging habitats (especially those within 5-6 km of breeding colony sites) have been lost to perennial, woody crops (primarily almonds and grapes) and to urbanization (Tricolored Blackbird Working Group 2007). In addition, untimely harvesting of silage grains in locations where colonies have settled causes complete breeding failure of many thousands of birds for at least one breeding attempt (Cook and Toft 2005, Beedy 2008, Castañeda et al. 2023). This threat has been reduced through programs working with landowners to delay silage harvest and reimburse losses caused by delays (Castañeda et al. 2023).

Inappropriate water management sometimes causes nesting failures if managed water levels are too shallow (not deep enough to deter raccoon and other predators) or too deep (flooding nests, such as has occurred at Lake Isabella) (Tricolored Blackbird Working Group 2007). Low water levels generally defined unoccupied sites in California (Wilsey et al. 2019).

Pesticides do not appear to be directly impacting birds, though the population has almost certainly seen drastic reductions in insect prey availability (USFWS 2006, Graves et al. 2023).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Males are black with red, white-tipped shoulder patches (tips are buffy-white in fresh fall plumage); females are sooty-brown and streaked, with varying amounts of red on the shoulders (NGS 1983).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Males differ from male red-winged blackbirds by having a darker red shoulder patch with a white or buffy-white border (buff-yellow or absent in redwing); females are much darker than most races of the redwing and differ from first-year male redwings in lacking a large red shoulder patch; also, females have a bill that is thicker at the base and more sharply pointed (Peterson 1990).

Habitat

Breeding habitat includes freshwater marshes of cattails, tule, bulrushes, and sedges (AOU 1983). Nests are in vegetation of marshes or thickets, sometimes on the ground. Historically this species was strongly tied to emergent marshes; in recent decades much nesting has shifted to non-native vegetation (e.g., Himalayan blackberry). In migration and winter these blackbirds inhabit open cultivated lands and pastures as well as marshes (AOU 1983).

Ecology

These birds are highly gregarious. They roost and forage in flocks (Beedy and Hamilton 1999).

Reproduction

Nesting occurs in April-June. Males defend small territories within colonies and mate with 1-4 females. Clutch size is 3-4. Incubation, by female, lasts about 11 days (Terres 1980). Both parents feed young. Young leave nest 13 days after hatching. Two broods/year. Nests in large colonies (up to thousands of individuals). These blackbirds are itinerant breeders; they may nest more than once at different locations during a single breeding season (Beedy and Hamilton 1999). They often change nesting locations from year to year. Hamilton et al. 1995) found that 19 of 72 colonies (1991-1994) were active the following year (Hamilton et al. 1995). Of 75 colonies active in 1997, 19 were within 500 meters of colonies active in 1994 (Beedy and Hamilton 1997).
Terrestrial Habitats
Grassland/herbaceousCropland/hedgerow
Palustrine Habitats
HERBACEOUS WETLAND
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN1
ProvinceRankNative
WashingtonS2BYes
OregonS1BYes
CaliforniaS2Yes
NevadaS1BYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentSmall (1-10%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasSmall (1-10%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingSmall (1-10%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9.3.3 - Herbicides and pesticidesLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (116)
California (115)
AreaForestAcres
AntimonyLos Padres National Forest40,911
AntimonyLos Padres National Forest40,911
Arroyo SecoAngeles National Forest4,703
Arroyo SecoAngeles National Forest4,703
Barker ValleyCleveland National Forest11,940
Barker ValleyCleveland National Forest11,940
Bear MountainLos Padres National Forest913
Bear MountainLos Padres National Forest913
Big RocksLos Padres National Forest11,866
Big RocksLos Padres National Forest11,866
Black ButteLos Padres National Forest5,116
Black ButteLos Padres National Forest5,116
Black MountainLos Padres National Forest16,818
Black MountainLos Padres National Forest16,818
BriscoeMendocino National Forest7,212
BriscoeMendocino National Forest7,212
Cahuilla MountainSan Bernardino National Forest6,952
Cahuilla MountainSan Bernardino National Forest6,952
CajonSan Bernardino National Forest7,548
CajonSan Bernardino National Forest7,548
CalienteCleveland National Forest5,953
CalienteCleveland National Forest5,953
ChannellSequoia National Forest45,429
ChannellSequoia National Forest45,429
ChicoSequoia National Forest39,836
ChicoSequoia National Forest39,836
ColdwaterCleveland National Forest8,402
ColdwaterCleveland National Forest8,402
Cutca ValleyCleveland National Forest14,530
Cutca ValleyCleveland National Forest14,530
CuyamaLos Padres National Forest19,631
CuyamaLos Padres National Forest19,631
Deer MountainMendocino National Forest11,716
Deer MountainMendocino National Forest11,716
Devil GulchSierra National Forest30,490
Devil GulchSierra National Forest30,490
Dry LakesLos Padres National Forest17,043
Dry LakesLos Padres National Forest17,043
Dry LakesLos Padres National Forest17,043
Eagle PeakCleveland National Forest6,481
Eagle PeakCleveland National Forest6,481
Fish CanyonAngeles National Forest29,886
Fish CanyonAngeles National Forest29,886
Fox MountainLos Padres National Forest52,072
Fox MountainLos Padres National Forest52,072
Fox MountainLos Padres National Forest52,072
Garcia MountainLos Padres National Forest7,850
Garcia MountainLos Padres National Forest7,850
Glass MountainInyo National Forest52,867
Greenhorn CreekSequoia National Forest28,226
Greenhorn CreekSequoia National Forest28,226
Greenhorn CreekSequoia National Forest28,226
Hixon FlatSan Bernardino National Forest8,095
Hixon FlatSan Bernardino National Forest8,095
Horse Creek RidgeSan Bernardino National Forest8,969
Horse Creek RidgeSan Bernardino National Forest8,969
Horse Creek RidgeSan Bernardino National Forest8,969
Horseshoe SpringsLos Padres National Forest14,089
Horseshoe SpringsLos Padres National Forest14,089
La BreaLos Padres National Forest14,031
Lpoor CanyonLos Padres National Forest13,762
Machesna MountainLos Padres National Forest12,271
Machesna MountainLos Padres National Forest12,271
Magic MountainAngeles National Forest15,542
Magic MountainAngeles National Forest15,542
Malduce BuckhornLos Padres National Forest14,177
Malduce BuckhornLos Padres National Forest14,177
MatilijaLos Padres National Forest5,218
Middle YubaTahoe National Forest7,379
Mill CreekSequoia National Forest27,643
Mill CreekSequoia National Forest27,643
No NameCleveland National Forest4,897
No NameCleveland National Forest4,897
NordhoffLos Padres National Forest12,031
NordhoffLos Padres National Forest12,031
Oat Mtn.Sequoia National Forest12,223
Oat Mtn.Sequoia National Forest12,223
Pine CreekCleveland National Forest503
Pine CreekCleveland National Forest503
Pyramid Peak BSan Bernardino National Forest7,194
Pyramid Peak BSan Bernardino National Forest7,194
QuatalLos Padres National Forest7,253
QuatalLos Padres National Forest7,253
Rouse HillSan Bernardino National Forest13,745
Rouse HillSan Bernardino National Forest13,745
Rouse HillSan Bernardino National Forest13,745
Salt CreekAngeles National Forest11,022
Salt CreekAngeles National Forest11,022
Salt CreekAngeles National Forest11,022
Santa CruzLos Padres National Forest21,182
Santa CruzLos Padres National Forest21,182
Sawmill - BadlandsLos Padres National Forest51,362
Sawmill - BadlandsLos Padres National Forest51,362
Sawmill - BadlandsLos Padres National Forest51,362
ScodiesSequoia National Forest725
ScodiesSequoia National Forest725
Sespe - FrazierLos Padres National Forest106,910
Sill HillCleveland National Forest5,294
Sill HillCleveland National Forest5,294
Snow MountainMendocino National Forest14,457
Snow MountainMendocino National Forest14,457
Tepusquet PeakLos Padres National Forest5,821
Tepusquet PeakLos Padres National Forest5,821
TequepisLos Padres National Forest9,080
TequepisLos Padres National Forest9,080
TequepisLos Padres National Forest9,080
TrabucoCleveland National Forest23,341
TrabucoCleveland National Forest23,341
TuleAngeles National Forest9,861
TuleAngeles National Forest9,861
White LedgeLos Padres National Forest18,632
White LedgeLos Padres National Forest18,632
WildhorseCleveland National Forest1,483
WildhorseCleveland National Forest1,483
WoolstaffSequoia National Forest41,445
Nevada (1)
AreaForestAcres
Jobs Peak (NV)Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest1,342
References (51)
  1. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1983. Check-list of North American Birds, 6th edition. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas. 877 pp.
  2. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in <i>The Auk</i>]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
  3. Balda, R. P., and G. C. Bateman. 1971. Flocking and annual cycle of the piñon jay, <i>Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus</i>. Condor 73:287-302.
  4. Ball-Damerow, J. E., L. K. M’Gonigle, and V. H. Resh. 2014. Changes in occurrence, richness, and biological traits of dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata) in California and Nevada over the past century. Biodiversity Conservation 23:2107–2126. 10.1007/s10531-014-0707-5
  5. Beedy, E. C. 2008. Tricolored blackbird (<i>Agelaius tricolor</i>). Pages 437-443 in Shuford, W. D., and T. Gardali, editors. California bird species of special concern: a ranked assessment of species, subspecies, and distinct populations of birds of immediate conservation concern in California. Studies of Western Birds 1. Western Field Ornithologists, Camarillo, California, and California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento.
  6. Beedy, E. C., and W. J. Hamilton III. 1997. Tricolored Blackbird status update and management guidelines. September. (Jones and Stokes Associates, Inc. 97-099) Sacramento, CA. Prepared for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon, and California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California.
  7. Beedy, E. C. and W. J. Hamilton, III. 1999. Tricolored blackbird (<i>Agelaius tricolor</i>), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, editor). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology.
  8. Beedy, E. C., W. J. Hamilton III, R. J. Meese, D. A. Airola, W. S. Schackwitz, and P. Pyle. 2023. Tricolored Blackbird (A<i>gelaius tricolor</i>), version 2.0. In Birds of the World (P. G. Rodewald and B. K. Keeney, Editors). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.tribla.02
  9. Bent, A.C. 1958. Life histories of North American blackbirds, orioles, tanagers, and their allies. U.S. National Museum Bulletin 211. Washington, DC.
  10. BirdLife International. 2004b. Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD ROM. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
  11. Castañeda, X., N. Clipperton, D. A. Airola, S. Arthur, and P. Sousa. 2023. Effectiveness of public-private efforts to conserve tricolored blackbird colonies on agricultural lands in the San Joaquin Valley, California. Western Birds 54(1): 2-18. doi: 10.21199/WB54.1.1
  12. Colibri Ecological Consulting. 2022. 2022 tricolored blackbird statewide survey. California Department of Fish and Wildlife, West Sacramento, CA, USA. 40 pp.
  13. Cook, L. F., and C.A. Toft. 2005. Dynamics of extinction: population decline in the colonially nesting tricolored blackbird <i>Agelaius tricolor</i>. Bird Conservation International 15: 73-88.
  14. Dudgeon, D., A. H. Arthington, M. O. Gessner, Z. Kawabata, D. J. Knowler, C. Lévêque, R. J. Naiman, A. H. Prieur-Richard, D. Soto, M. L. Stiassny, and C. A. Sullivan. 2006 [2005]. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 81(2):163-82. doi: 10.1017/S1464793105006950. Epub 2005 Dec 12. PMID: 16336747.
  15. Ehrlich, P. R., D. S. Dobkin, and D. Wheye. 1988. The birder's handbook: a field guide to the natural history of North American birds. Simon and Shuster, Inc., New York. xxx + 785 pp.
  16. Gaines, E. Zoology Data Manager, Oregon Natural Heritage Program, Oregon Field Office, Portland, Oregon. Pers. comm.
  17. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). 2025. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) data portal. Online. Available: https://www.gbif.org/ (accessed 2025).
  18. Graves, E. E., R. J. Meese, and M. Holyoak. 2023. Neonicotinoid exposure in tricolored blackbirds (<i>Agelaius tricolor</i>). Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30: 15392–15399. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23290-4
  19. Green, M., and L. Edson. 2004. The 2004 tricolored blackbird April survey. Central Valley Bird Club Bull. 7:23-31.
  20. Hamilton, W. J., III. 2000. Tricolored blackbird 2000 survey and population analysis. Unpublished report prepared for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR.
  21. Hamilton, W. J., III, L. Cook, and R. Grey. 1995. Tricolored Blackbird project 1994. Unpubl. report prepared for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon.
  22. Horn, H. S. 1968. The adaptive significance of colonial nesting in the Brewer's Blackbird. Ecology 49:682-694.
  23. Johnson, H. 2007. Factors affecting the occurrence and distribution of pesticides in the Yakima River Basin, Washington, 2000. National Water-Quality Assessment Program, Reston, VA
  24. Ligon, J. D. 1971. Late summer-autumnal breeding of the piñon jay in New Mexico. Condor 73:147-153.
  25. McCormick, A. J. 2022. The tricolored blackbird in Washington State: first assessment of status and distribution. Western Birds 53(3):186-198.
  26. Meese, R. J. 2017. Results of the 2017 Tricolored Blackbird statewide survey. California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Wildlife Branch, Nongame Wildlife Program Report 2017-04.
  27. Moore, W. S., and R. A. Dolbeer. 1989. The use of banding recovery data to estimate dispersal rates and gene flow in avian species: case studies in the Red-winged Blackbird and Common Grackle. Condor 91:242-253.
  28. National Geographic Society (NGS). 1983. Field guide to the birds of North America. National Geographic Society, Washington, DC.
  29. Neff, J. A. 1937. Nesting distribution of the tri-colored red-wing. Condor 39 (2): 61-81.
  30. Olsoy, P. J., and K. J. Sorenson. 2024. First record of tricolored blackbirds in Idaho. Western Birds 55: 43–50. doi: 10.21199/WB55.1.3
  31. Orians, G. H. 1980. Some adaptations of marsh-nesting blackbirds. Princeton Univ. Press. 295 pp.
  32. Orians, G. H. 1985. Blackbirds of the Americas. Univ. Washington Press, Seattle.
  33. Parker III, T. A., D. F. Stotz, and J. W. Fitzpatrick. 1996. Ecological and distributional databases for neotropical birds. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  34. Payne, R. B. 1969. Breeding seasons and reproductive physiology of tricolored blackbirds and redwing blackbirds. University of California Publications in Zoology 90. 137 pp.
  35. Peterson, R. T. 1990b. A field guide to western birds. Third edition. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston. 432 pp.
  36. <p>NatureServe's Rapid Analysis of Rarity and Endangerment Conservation Assessment Tool (RARECAT). 2025. Version: 2.1.1 (released April 04, 2025).</p>
  37. Poole, A. F. and F. B. Gill. 1992. The birds of North America. The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. and The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA.
  38. Sauer, J. R., J. E. Hines, and J. Fallon. 2003. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, results and analysis 1966 - 2002. Version 2003.1, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Reseach Center, Laurel, MD Available at: http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/bbs.html.
  39. Small, A. 1994. California birds: their status and distribution. Ibis Publishing Co., 3420 Freda's Hill Road, Vista, California 92084. xiv + 342 pp.
  40. Tarvin, K. A., and G. E. Woolfenden. 1999. Blue Jay (<i>Cyanocitta cristata</i>). No. 469 IN A. Poole and F. Gill, editors. The birds of North America. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 32pp.
  41. Terres, J. K. 1980. The Audubon Society encyclopedia of North American birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  42. Thompson, F. R., III. 1994. Temporal and spatial patterns of breeding brown-headed cowbirds in the midwestern United States. Auk 111:979-990.
  43. Tricolored Blackbird Working Group. 2007. Conservation plan for the tricolored blackbird (<i>Agelaius tricolor</i>). Susan Kester, editor. Sustainable Conservation, San Francisco, CA.<br>
  44. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2015. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; 90-day findings on 25 petitions, notice of petition findings and initiation of status reviews. Federal Register 80(181):56423-56432.
  45. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2019. 12-Month Findings on Petitions To List Eight Species as Endangered or Threatened Species. Federal Register 84(158): 41694-41699.
  46. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2019. Species Status Assessment for the Tricolored Blackbird (Agelaius tricolor), Version 1.1. February 2019. Sacramento, California. 93 pp.
  47. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 5 December 2006. 90-day finding on a petition to list the tricolored blackbird as threatened or endangered. Federal Register 71(233):70483-70492.
  48. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2015. Washington’s State Wildlife Action Plan: 2015 Update. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington, USA. 1095 pp.
  49. Williams, L. 1952b. Breeding behavior of the Brewer blackbird. Condor 54:3-47.
  50. Willson, M. F. 1966. Breeding ecology of the Yellow-headed Blackbird. Ecological Monographs 36:51-77.
  51. Wilsey, C. B., N. L. Michel, K. Krieger, L. Taylor, L. Lee, S. Arthur, and N. Clipperton. 2019. Defining spring foraging habitat and prioritization of conservation sites for tricolored blackbirds in California, USA. 121: 1-13. doi: 10.1093/condor/duz054