Xyrauchen texanus

(Abbott, 1860)

Razorback Sucker

G1Critically Imperiled Found in 104 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G1Critically ImperiledGlobal Rank
Critically endangeredIUCN
Very high - highThreat Impact
Razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.104297
Element CodeAFCJC11010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNCritically endangered
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderCypriniformes
FamilyCatostomidae
GenusXyrauchen
Concept Reference
Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
MtDNA data indicate that the remaining populations are not geographically differentiated; conservation strategies can treat the species as a single population (Dowling et al. 1996). Has hybridized in some areas with Catostomus latipinnis, C. insignis, and C. ardens. See Snyder and Muth (1990) for a guide to the identification of larvae and early juveniles. See Smith (1992) for a study of the phylogeny and biogeography of the Catostomidae.

Harris and Mayden (2001) used molecular data to examine phylogenetic relationships of major clades of Catostomidae. In all trees, Scartomyzon was paraphyletic and embedded in Moxostoma, and Catostomus was never recovered as monophyletic (Xyrauchen was embedded within Catostomus). They concluded that the phylogenetic relationships and taxonomic composition of taxa presently included in Moxostoma and Scartomyzon are in need of further study, as are the relationships and composition of the genera Catostomus, Chasmistes, Deltistes, and Xyrauchen, and the phylogenetic affinites of Erimyzon and Minytrema.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2012-04-12
Change Date1996-09-19
Edition Date2011-01-13
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences1 - 20
Rank Reasons
Confined to the Colorado River system, where a large decline in distribution and abundance has occurred as a result of alteration and destruction of habitat by dams and interactions with non-native fishes; wild population is still declining.
Range Extent Comments
Range historically included most of the Colorado River basin, from Wyoming and Colorado to Sonora and Baja California Page and Burr 2011). Now it is much reduced in range and abundance. Currently the species is found in small numbers in the Green River (wild population being augmented), Yampa River (low numbers), White River (low number below Taylor Draw Dam), Duchesne River (small seasonal aggregations at mouth), upper Colorado River (low numbers), Gunnison River (wild population extirpated; being reestablished through stocking), and San Juan River (wild population extirpated; being reestablished through stocking); lower Colorado River between Lake Havasu and Davis Dam (spawned and produced larvae in early 2000s); reservoirs of lakes Mead and Mohave (population being augmented); in small tributaries of the Gila River subbasin (Verde River, Salt River, and Fossil Creek; limited distribution of hatchery stocks; no self-sustaining populations); and in local areas under intensive management such as Cibola High Levee Pond, Achii Hanyo Native Fish Facility, and Parker Strip (USFWS 2002).

Major known spawning areas in Lake Mohave include Cottonwood Cove, Arizona Bay, Six-mile Cove, and Eldorado Canyon (Minckley et al. 1991). An ongoing stocking program is attempting to enhance the number of suckers that reach maturity in Lake Mohave where few young fish escape predation by non-native fishes.

Since the late 1980s, the Arizona Game and Fish Department has attempted to establish populations in the Verde and Salt rivers through stocking, but few fish survive

In the Upper Colorado River Basin, adults and larvae are widely distributed in the Green River basin, especially in the upper basin from the mouth of the Duchesne River upstream to the lower 4 miles of the Yampa River, rarely occurring upstream as far as the Little Snake River. Spawning has been documented in lower Yampa River near confluence with Green River and in the upper Green River (Tyus and Karp 1989). Adults overwinter in the Echo Park area of Dinosaur National Monument (Tyus and Karp 1989). A small reproducing population exists in the lower Green River. In the upper Colorado River, most suckers occur in the Grand Valley (mainstem Colorado River and Gunnison River, Colorado. A reproducing population occurs in an off-channel pond in the Colorado River near Grand Junction. A few have been found in the San Juan River above Lake Powell, and adults have been found in the San Juan and Colorado River arms of the lake (USFWS 1997). The species is currently considered extant in New Mexico, based on ongoing reintroduction efforts in the San Juan River Basin (D. L. Propst, pers. comm., 26 October, 2000). The project started in 1995 and New Mexico Game and Fish documented reproduction in 1998 and 1999.

Razorback suckers were recorded in the late 1980s along the south shore of Lake Powell near the concrete boat ramp at Piute Farms Marina and near Bluff, Utah; the Lake Powell record apparently represented a spawning aggregation or staging prior to spawning elsewhere (Platania et al. 1991).

See Minckley et al. (1991) for a detailed account of the historic and present distribution and abundance.
Occurrences Comments
This species is represented by just a few extant spawning populations.
Threat Impact Comments
Threats to the species include streamflow regulation, habitat modification, competition with and predation by nonnative fish species, and pesticides and pollutants (USFWS 2002).

Recruitment is very low (or absent) despite spawning and hatched larvae (e.g., in upper Green River basin). For example, no recruitment to reservoir populations was detected between 1963 and 1990 in the lower Colorado River basin, despite collecting with appropriate equipment (Minckley et al. 1991). Low recruitment results primarily from predation on larvae and juveniles by introduced fishes (Marsh et al. 2003). Competition with and predation by exotic crayfish may also be a problem in some areas (Lenon et al. 2002).

Habitat changes resulting primarily from dam operations has greatly restricted the amount of suitable habitat; these detrimental changes include high winter flows, reduced high spring flows, altered river temperatures (Clarkson and Childs 2000), and reduced flooding (USFWS 1990).

Natural recovery is limited by a paucity of spawning adults. Hybridization with other suckers is a potential problem in some locations (Tyus and Karp 1990, Minckley et al. 1991).

See USFWS (1990) for many details on habitat changes that have affected this species.
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

"Habitats required by adults in rivers include deep runs, eddies, backwaters, and flooded off-channel environments in spring; runs and pools often in shallow water associated with submerged sandbars in summer; and low-velocity runs, pools, and eddies in winter. Spring migrations of adult razorback sucker were associated with spawning in historic accounts, and a variety of local and long-distance movements and habitat-use patterns have been documented. Spawning in rivers occurs over bars of cobble, gravel, and sand substrates during spring runoff at widely ranging flows and water temperatures (typically greater than 14 C). Spawning also occurs in reservoirs over rocky shoals and shorelines. Young require nursery environments with quiet, warm, shallow water such as tributary mouths, backwaters, or inundated floodplain habitats in rivers, and coves or shorelines in reservoirs." Source: USFWS (2002).

Flooded lowlands and lower portions of tributary streams presumably served as resting-feeding areas during breeding season in the Green River basin (Tyus and Karp 1990). This fish is often associated with sand, mud, and rock substrate in areas with sparse aquatic vegetation, where temperatures are moderate to warm (Sigler and Miller 1963). It has been collected in flooded gravel pits along the Colorado River, Colorado, and from irrigation canals along lower Colorado River (juveniles, Marsh and Minckley 1989). In the nonbreeding season, adults were most common in shoreline runs and along mid-channel sand bars in the mainstream Green River, with average water depth of less than 2 meters and average velocity of less than 0.5 meters per second (Tyus and Karp 1989). Radio-tagged suckers reintroduced into the Gila River, Arizona, used both sand-bottomed, flat-water, main-channel habitats and quieter pools and eddies adjacent to stronger currents (see Minckley et al. 1991). Hatchery-reared suckers released into the San Juan River inflow of Lake Powell most often used shallowly flooded stands of salt cedar and, in some cases, cobbled shorelines (Karp and Mueller 2002). Limited data indicate that young tend to remain along shorelines, in embayments along sandbars, or in tributary mouths (see Minckley et al. 1991). In Lake Mohave, individuals were associated with inshore habitats except during the hotter months when they moved offshore possibly to avoid warmer water temperatures (Mueller et al. 2000).

Spawning occurs most commonly near shore in streams over silty sand, gravel, or rock substrate at depths of up to about 6 meters (often in water less than 0.6 meters deep); known and suspected spawning sites in the Green and other upper-basin rivers all are in broad, flat-water segments (Minckley et al. 1991). Ripe individuals often have been taken over or near coarse sand, or gravel or cobble bars, in flowing water. In reservoirs, spawning occurs on gravel bars swept clean by wave action; also along shorelines over mixed substrates ranging from silt to cobble (Federal Register, 21 March 1994). Spawning has been observed downstream from major impoundments, below Davis Dam and Hoover Dam (Mueller 1989). Larvae appear to remain in gravel until swim-up (see USFWS 1990); apparently they prefer the shallow littoral zone for a few weeks after hatching, then disperse to deeper waters (see Federal Register, 21 March 1994, p. 13375). Seasonally inundated flood plains provide favorable feeding areas for young.

Ecology

Recaptures and radio-tracking indicate that individuals may remain in one area (a few km long) for several months (USFWS 1990), but individuals may move 100-200 km or or more over several years (Wick et al. 1982). In Lake Mohave, linear range lengths of 10 adults over 14 months were 18-72 km (mean 39 km) (Mueller et al. 2000).

Usually swims in schools.

Reproduction

Spawning groups can include hundreds of individuals (Mueller et al. 2000). Spawns mainly late Janury-April (rarely to May or June) in the lower Colorado River basin (reservoirs), at temperatures of about 11-21 C (USFWS 1990; Federal Register, 21 March 1994); this is earlier, and the spawning season is longer, than in riverine habitat (Mueller et al. 2000). Spawns when water level rising or peak and water warming. Ripe females have been captured from mid-April to mid-June in northeastern Utah and northwestern Colorado. During spawning 1 female may be attended by 2-12 males. Sexually mature as early as second year (males) or third year (females) under conditions at Dexter NFH, or in fifth or sixth year under other captive regimes (Minckley et al. 1991). Many individuals survive for several decades.
Palustrine Habitats
HERBACEOUS WETLAND
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN1
ProvinceRankNative
New MexicoS1Yes
UtahS2Yes
NevadaS1Yes
ArizonaS1Yes
WyomingSXYes
ColoradoS1Yes
CaliforniaS2Yes
Navajo NationS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
7 - Natural system modificationsPervasive (71-100%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/usePervasive (71-100%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive (71-100%)Extreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesPervasive (71-100%)Extreme - moderateHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (104)
Arizona (5)
AreaForestAcres
HackberryCoconino National Forest17,885
HackberryPrescott National Forest914
Lime CreekTonto National Forest42,568
MazatzalTonto National Forest16,942
PicachoTonto National Forest4,969
Colorado (11)
AreaForestAcres
Bristol HeadRio Grande NF46,087
Dome PeakRoutt NF35,716
HermosaSan Juan NF148,103
Long ParkRoutt NF42,100
Pagoda PeakRoutt NF57,676
Pole Mountain / Finger MesaRio Grande NF43,863
Red TableWhite River NF39,122
San MiguelSan Juan NF64,263
Storm PeakSan Juan NF57,617
Troublesome SouthRoutt NF47,359
Williams Fork Ptarmingan AdjacentArapaho & Roosevelt NFs36,351
Idaho (1)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekCaribou-Targhee National Forest118,582
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
Texas (1)
AreaForestAcres
Big CreekNational Forests in Texas1,447
Utah (57)
AreaForestAcres
0401001Ashley National Forest11,705
0401002Ashley National Forest36,113
0401003Ashley National Forest5,034
0401004Ashley National Forest10,510
0401005Ashley National Forest38,930
0401006Ashley National Forest7,645
0401007Ashley National Forest16,483
0401008Ashley National Forest15,616
0401009Ashley National Forest30,378
0401010Ashley National Forest21,886
0401011Ashley National Forest30,062
0401012Ashley National Forest46,400
0401013Ashley National Forest11,909
0401014Ashley National Forest26,903
0401016Ashley National Forest5,695
0401023Ashley National Forest8,352
0401024Ashley National Forest12,882
0401025Ashley National Forest1,471
0401026Ashley National Forest398
0401027Ashley National Forest7,312
0401028Ashley National Forest446
0401029Ashley National Forest6,718
0401030Ashley National Forest531
0401031Ashley National Forest7,110
0401032Ashley National Forest6,471
0401034Ashley National Forest967
0401037Ashley National Forest1,166
0418033Ashley National Forest24,909
0419020Ashley National Forest355,684
0419022Ashley National Forest2,232
418003Uinta National Forest10,912
418004Uinta National Forest16,661
418006Uinta National Forest11,714
418007Uinta National Forest6,816
418008Uinta National Forest9,367
418009Uinta National Forest18,064
418013Uinta National Forest14,643
418015Uinta National Forest17,289
418017Uinta National Forest19,631
418018Uinta National Forest11,218
418019Uinta National Forest6,854
418034Uinta National Forest6,170
418037Uinta National Forest9,694
418042Uinta National Forest7,313
418043Uinta National Forest9,493
418044Uinta National Forest5,495
Big Bear CreekManti-Lasal National Forest28,440
Boulger - Black CanyonManti-Lasal National Forest23,286
Dairy ForkManti-Lasal National Forest30,222
East MountainManti-Lasal National Forest30,705
High Uintas (UT)Wasatch-Cache National Forest102,398
Horse Mountain - Mans PeakManti-Lasal National Forest22,159
LakesWasatch-Cache National Forest121,967
Little West Fork BlacksWasatch-Cache National Forest8,209
Muddy Creek - Nelson Mt.Manti-Lasal National Forest59,034
Price RiverManti-Lasal National Forest24,349
Widdop MountainWasatch-Cache National Forest8,011
Wyoming (28)
AreaForestAcres
0401018Ashley National Forest6,157
0401019Ashley National Forest6,202
0401021Ashley National Forest5,152
0401035Ashley National Forest5,465
0401036Ashley National Forest6,309
Battle CreekMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest5,890
Big SandstoneMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest7,180
Bridger PeakMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest6,697
Deep CreekMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest6,411
Grayback RidgeBridger-Teton National Forest295,113
Gros Ventre MountainsBridger-Teton National Forest106,418
High Uintas (WY)Wasatch-Cache National Forest664
Lake Alice - Commissary RidgeBridger-Teton National Forest166,707
Little CottonwoodBridger-Teton National Forest5,468
Little SandstoneMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest5,483
Little Sheep MountainBridger-Teton National Forest14,192
Little SnakeMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest9,920
Mosquito Lake - Seven LakesBridger-Teton National Forest51,950
Mowry PeakMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest6,244
North MountainBridger-Teton National Forest9,798
Nugent Park - Hams Fork RidgeBridger-Teton National Forest21,241
Riley RidgeBridger-Teton National Forest4,765
Salt River RangeBridger-Teton National Forest235,661
Singer PeakMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest10,498
Solomon CreekMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest5,756
South Wyoming RangeBridger-Teton National Forest85,776
Strawberry CreekMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest5,880
West Slope WindsBridger-Teton National Forest143,252
References (61)
  1. Bundy, J.M., and K.R. Bestgen. 2001. Confirmation of daily increment deposition in otoliths of young razorback suckers. Southwestern Naturalist 46:34-40.
  2. California Department of Fish and Game (CDF&G). 1990. 1989 annual report on the status of California's state listed threatened and endangered plants and animals. 188 pp.
  3. Clarkson, R. W., and M. R. Childs. 2000. Temperature effects of hypolimnion-release dams on early life history stages of Colorado river basin big-river fishes. Copeia 2000:402-412.
  4. Clemmer, Glenn (Nevada Natural Heritage Program). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. 1997.
  5. Colorado Fish Advisory Commission. 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. Spring 1997.
  6. Dill, W.A. 1944. The fishery of the lower Colorado River. California Fish and Game 30(2):109–211.
  7. Douglas, M. E., and P. C. Marsh. 1998. Population and survival estimates of <i>Catostomus latipinnis</i> in northern Grand Canyon, with distribution and abundance of hybrids with <i>Xyrauchen texanus</i>. Copeia 1998:915-925.
  8. Dowling, T. E., W. L. Minckley, and P. C. Marsh. 1996. Mitochondrial DNA diversity within and among populations of razorback sucker (<i>Xyrauchen texanus</i>) as determined by restriction endonuclease analysis. Copeia 1996:542-550.
  9. Fertig, Walter (Wyoming Natural Diversity Database). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. August 1997.
  10. Harris, P. M., and R. L. Mayden. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships of major clades of Catostomidae (Teleostei: Cypriniformes) as inferred from mitchondrial SSU and LSU rDNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 20:225-237.
  11. Holden, Paul B. (Bio/West, Utah). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. April 1997.
  12. Jelks, H. L., S. J. Walsh, N. M. Burkhead, S. Contreras-Balderas, E. Díaz-Pardo, D. A. Hendrickson, J. Lyons, N. E. Mandrak, F. McCormick, J. S. Nelson, S. P. Platania, B. A. Porter, C. B. Renaud, J. Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, E. B. Taylor, and M.L. Warren, Jr. 2008. Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33(8):372-407.
  13. Karp, C. A., and G. Mueller. 2002. Razorback sucker movements and habitat use in the San Juan River inflow, Lake Powell, Utah, 1995-1997. Western North American Naturalist 62:106-111.
  14. Lanigan, S. H., and H. M Tyus. 1989. Population size and status of the razorback sucker in the Green River basin, Utah and Colorado. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 9:68-73.
  15. Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, North Carolina. i-x + 854 pp.
  16. Lenon, N., K. Stave, T. Burke, and J. E. Deacon. 2002. Bonytail (<i>Gila elegans</i>) may enhance survival of razorback suckers (<i>Xyrauchen texanus</i>) in rearing ponds by preying on exotic crayfish. Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science 34(1):46-52.
  17. Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program (LCRMSCP). 2016. Species Account and Conservation Actions for the Razorback Sucker (<i>Xrauchen texanus</i>). Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program. https://lcrmscp.gov/lcrm-prod/lcrm-prod/pdfs/c03_species_accounts_2013.pdf#razorback
  18. Marsh, Paul C. (Center for Environmental Studies, Arizona State University). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC.
  19. Marsh, P. C. 1987. Digestive tract contents of adult razorback suckers in Lake Mohave, Arizona-Nevada. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 116:117-119.
  20. Marsh, P. C., and J. E. Brooks. 1989. Predation by ictalurid catfishes as a deterrent to re-establishment of hatchery-reared razorback suckers. Southwestern Naturalist 34:188-195.
  21. Marsh, P. C., and W. L. Minckley. 1989. Observations on recruitment and ecology of razorback sucker: lower Colorado River, Arizona-California-Nevada. Great Basin Naturalist 49:71-78.
  22. Marsh, P. C., C. A. Pacey, and B. R. Kesner. 2003. Decline of the razorback sucker in Lake Mohave, Colorado River, Arizona and Nevada. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 132:1251-1256.
  23. Master, L. L. and A. L. Stock. 1998. Synoptic national assessment of comparative risks to biological diversity and landscape types: species distributions. Summary Report submitted to Environmental Protection Agency. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA. 36 pp.
  24. McAda, C. W., and R. S. Wydowski. 1980. The razorback sucker, <i>Xyrauchen texanus</i>, in the Upper Colorado River Basin. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Technical Paper 99:1-15.
  25. Miller, W. H., H. M. Tyus, and C. A. Carlson. 1982. Fishes of the upper Colorado system: present and future. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. 131 pp.
  26. Minckley, W. L. 1973. Fishes of Arizona. Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix, Arizona. 293 pp.
  27. Minckley, W. L. 1983. Status of the razorback sucker, <i>Xyrauchen texanus</i> (Abbott), in the lower Colorado River basin. Southwestern Naturalist 28:165-187.
  28. Minckley, W. L., and J. E. Deacon. 1991. Battle Against Extinction: Native Fish Management in the American West. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. xviii + 517 pp.
  29. Minckley, W. L., G. K. Meffe, and D. L. Soltz. 1991a. Conservation and management of short-lived fishes: the cyprinodontoids. Pages 247-82 in W. L. Minckley and J. E. Deacon (editors). Battle Against Extinction: Native Fish Management in the American West. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona.
  30. Minckley, W. L., P. C. Marsh, J. E. Brooks, J. E. Johnson and B. L. Jensen. 1991b. Management toward recovery of the razorback sucker. Pages 303-357 in W. L. Minckley and J. E. Deacon, editors. Battle against extinction: native fish management in the American West. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
  31. Moyle, P. B. 1976a. Inland fishes of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. 405 pp.
  32. Mueller, G. 1989. Observations of spawning razorback sucker (<i>Xyrauchen texanus</i>) utilizing riverine habitat in the lower Colorado River, Arizona-Nevada. Southwestern Naturalist 34:147-149.
  33. Mueller, G., P. C. Marsh, G. Knowles, and T. Wolters. 2000. Distribution, movements, and habitat use of razorback suckers (<i>Xyrauchen texanus</i>) in a lower Colorado River reservoir, Arizona-Nevada. Western North American Naturalist 60:180-187.
  34. Muth, R. T., and J. B. Ruppert. 1996. Effects of two electrofishing currents on captive ripe razorback suckers and subsequent egg-hatching success. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 16:473-476.
  35. Nelson, J. S., E. J. Crossman, H. Espinosa-Perez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, and J. D. Williams. 2004. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 29, Bethesda, Maryland. 386 pp.
  36. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 1991. A field guide to freshwater fishes: North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. 432 pp.
  37. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston. xix + 663 pp.
  38. Page, L. M., H. Espinosa-Pérez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, R. L. Mayden, and J. S. Nelson. 2013. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Seventh edition. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 34, Bethesda, Maryland.
  39. Page, L. M., K. E. Bemis, T. E. Dowling, H.S. Espinosa-Pérez, L.T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, K. E. Hartel, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, M. A. Neigbors, J. J. Schmitter-Soto, and H. J. Walker, Jr. 2023. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Eighth edition. American Fisheries Society (AFS), Special Publication 37, Bethesda, Maryland, 439 pp.
  40. Patton, Tim M. (University of Wyoming). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  41. Platania, S. P., K. R. Bestgen, M. A. Moretti, D. L. Propst, and J. E. Brooks. 1991. Status of Colorado squawfish and razorback sucker in the San Juan River, Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah. Southwestern Naturalist 36:147-150.
  42. Propst, David. L. 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Endangered Species Biologist. New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Sante Fe, NM.
  43. Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
  44. Sigler, W. F., and R. R. Miller. 1963. Fishes of Utah. Utah State Department of Fish and Game, Salt Lake City, Utah, 203 pp.
  45. Smith, G. R. 1992. Phylogeny and biogeography of the Catostomidae, freshwater fishes of North America and Asia. Pages 778-826 in R.L. Mayden, editor. Systematics, historical ecology, and North American freshwater fishes. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. xxvi + 969 pp.
  46. Snyder, D. E., and R. T. Muth. 1990. Description and identification of razorback, flannelmouth, white, Utah, bluehead, and mountain sucker larvae and early juveniles. Colorado Division of Wildlife Technical Publication No. 38. 152 pp.
  47. State Natural Heritage Data Centers. 1996a. Aggregated element occurrence data from all U.S. state natural heritage programs, including the Tennessee Valley Authority, Navajo Nation and the District of Columbia. Science Division, The Nature Conservancy.
  48. State Natural Heritage Data Centers. 1996b. Aggregated element occurrence data from all U.S. state natural heritage programs, including the Tennessee Valley Authority, Navajo Nation and the District of Columbia: Export of freshwater fish and mussel records west of the Mississippi River in 1997. Science Division, The Nature Conservancy.
  49. Sublette, J. E., M. D Hatch, and M. Sublette. 1990. The fishes of New Mexico. University New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, New Mexico. 393 pp.
  50. Tyus, H. M. 1987. Distribution, reproduction, and habitat use of the razorback sucker in the Green River, Utah, 1979- 1986. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 116:111-116.
  51. Tyus, H. M., and C. A. Karp. 1989. Habitat use and streamflow needs of rare and endangered fishes, Yampa River, Colorado. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Report 89(14). 27 pp.
  52. Tyus, H. M., and C. A. Karp. 1990. Spawning and movements of razorback sucker, <i>Xyrauchen texanus</i>, in the Green River basin of Colorado and Utah. Southwestern Naturalist 35:427-433.
  53. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1993. Notice of availability of draft agreement regarding Section 7 consultation, sufficient progress and historic projects, recovery implementation program for the endangered fish species in the upper Colorado River basin, and the draft recovery implementation program recovery action plan. Federal Register 58(159):44188-44189. 19 August 1993.
  54. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1997. Razorback sucker (<i>Xyrauchen texanus</i>) draft recovery plan. Denver, Colorado.
  55. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1998. Razorback sucker (<i>Xyrauchen texanus</i>) recovery plan. Denver, Colorado. 81 pp.
  56. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2002. Razorback sucker (<i>Xyrauchen texanus</i>) recovery goals: amendment and supplement to the Razorback Sucker Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Mountain-Prairie Region (6), Denver, Colorado.
  57. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2018a. Species Status Assessment for the Razorback Sucker (<i>Xrauchen texanus</i>). Final Report. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Mountain-Prairie Region, Denver, CO. 192 pp. https://ecos.fws.gov/ServCat/DownloadFile/166375
  58. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2018b. Razorback Sucker (<i>Xrauchen texanus</i>). 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 6, Lakewood, CO. 25 pp. https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/tess/species_nonpublish/2605.pdf
  59. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2021. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Reclassification of the Razorback Sucker From Endangered to Threatened With a Section 4(d) Rule. Federal Register 86(127):35708-35728.
  60. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 22 May 1990. Proposal to determine the razorback sucker (<i>Xyrauchen texanus</i>) to be an endangered species. Federal Register 55(99):21154-21161.
  61. Wick, E. J., C. W. McAda, and R. V. Bulkley. 1982. Life history and prospects for recovery of the razorback sucker. Pages 120-126 in W.H. Miller, editor. Fishes of the Upper Colorado River System: present and future. American Fisheries Society.