Plethodon stormi

Highton and Brame, 1965

Siskiyou Mountains Salamander

G3Vulnerable (G3?) Found in 2 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
EndangeredIUCN
Very high - highThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.101429
Element CodeAAAAD12180
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNEndangered
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAmphibia
OrderCaudata
FamilyPlethodontidae
GenusPlethodon
Synonyms
Plethodon elongatus stormi
Concept Reference
Frost, D. R. 1985. Amphibian species of the world. A taxonomic and geographical reference. Allen Press, Inc., and The Association of Systematics Collections, Lawrence, Kansas. v + 732 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Plethodon stormi has been regarded as a subspecies of P. elongatus by some authors (Stebbins 2003). Recent genetic studies (DeGross 2004, Mahoney 2004) support the view that P. elongatus and P. stormi are distinct species. The two taxa are somewhat similar in morphology, but P. stormi mostly have 17 costal grooves compared to 18 in P. elongatus.

Mead et al. (2005) examined morphological and mtDNA variation in Plethodon populations near the California-Oregon border and concluded that P. stormi and P. elongatus are distinct species and that nearby populations in the vicinity of the Scott River in Siskiyou County, California, represent a distinct species, which was described as Plethodon asupak.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodLegacy Rank calculation - Excel v3.1x
Review Date2017-06-27
Change Date2017-06-27
Edition Date2017-12-06
Edition AuthorsRev. Yarusoo, A., Croteau, J., and Davidson, A.D. (2017); Hammerson, G.
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent1000-5000 square km (about 400-2000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 - 300
Rank Reasons
Limited to an area of about 1655 sq km in southern Oregon and northern California; threatened by deforestation, increased frequency and intensity of fire, and climate change.
Range Extent Comments
Restricted to the Siskiyou Mountains in southern Oregon (mostly upper Applegate River drainage, Jospehine and Jackson counties) and northern California (Siskiyou County: near Hutton Guard Station, the Cook and Green Guard Stations, along Joe and Dutch creeks in upper Applegate River drainage and along Seiad and Horse creeks in Klamath River drainage) (California Department of Fish and Game 1990). In Oregon, found at elevations from 490-1,463 m (Leonard et al. 1993).
Occurrences Comments
Surveys conducted by the US Forest Service, US Fish and Wildlife Service, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) suggest that there are 300 known occurrences. 70 are located in Oregon and 230 in California.
Threat Impact Comments
Key Threats: Habitat loss, degradation, and additional fragmentation of discrete populations are all potential threats to this species. Activities that may pose threats are those that disturb the surface microhabitats and/or microclimate conditions. Typically these involve actions that remove canopy and/or disturb the substrate. Removal of canopy over-story may cause desiccation of the rocky substrates and loss of the moss ground cover, a microhabitat feature of P. stormi sites (Olson 2007). Such removal has the potential to occur from timber harvest operations. Fire, fire suppression activities, construction of roads, disease, and climate change are also key threats to P. stormi.

Timber Harvest
Since timber harvesting disturbs more ground than any other land use in the known range of P. stormi, it is perceived to be the primary threat to P. stormi (Nussbaum 1974; California Department of Fish and Game 1987, Blaustein et al. 1994; Bury and Pearl 1999; USDA, USDI Species Review Panel 2001; Greenwald 2004). Timber operations may impact P. stormi directly when P. stormi are on the surface and active during the spring and fall by killing animals during operations or indirectly by reducing habitat suitability and connectivity. Heavy equipment operations can directly disturb talus substrates reducing habitat suitability.

Harvesting removes tree and shrub canopy, which modifies the microhabitat at and potentially below the ground surface (Chen et al. 1999). Approximately 24% (10% private and 14% Federal matrix) of the lands within the currently documented range could be modified by timber harvesting. The majority of the land within the species range is projected to have limited timber harvest under current Klamath National Forest management plans. Analysis of disturbance over the range of P. stormi in California shows that at least 37% of the landscape has been disturbed by fire or timber harvesting; however, they continue to be found in these areas and are reproducing (CDFW 2003).

Fire
Most prehistoric fires were probably low intensity, frequent, and occurred when the animals were not active near the surface, with little consequence for P. stormi. Recent fire suppression has made the landscape more prone to high intensity, stand-replacing fire events that could impact the species (USDA Forest Service 1994b; Taylor and Skinner 1998). Another potential threat to the species is prescribed fire when conducted during the times of the year when they may be active and near the surface.

USFS forest inventory data for the Klamath National Forest (USDA Forest Service 1994b) suggest a historical average high intensity, stand-replacing fire frequency of 110 to 180 years in all forest types. Wildfires occur more frequently during warm dry conditions when P. stormi are unlikely to be at the surface, and so direct mortality is not likely. The loss of tree canopy and organic debris on the soil surface by burning may modify the talus microclimate and interrupt the supply of organic material serving as an energy source for prey organisms. Several decades of fire suppression have likely augmented fuel loading that increase the intensity of fire when it occurs. In this landscape where high intensity stand-replacing fires occurred on a frequency of 110 to 180 years, P. stormi have successfully inhabited the area for a very long time, conservatively three to four million years. No data is available documenting exactly how long P. stormi have occupied any specific location within their range.

Roads
Available information suggests that P. stormi are found in areas with various levels of disturbance. P. stormi are known to occur within disturbed sites, such as rock quarries, log landings, and road and skid road cutbanks and fill-slopes. Due to ease of capture, many animals have been collected from talus banks of road cuts. P. stormi may colonize road cuts soon after road construction, moving in from talus above and below the road. P. stormi move into the road cut only during the wet season or, more likely, were already on site (Nussbaum 1974). Road construction is a likely cause that “take” (Fish & G. Code, § 86) may occur. Emergency operations conducting fire suppression activities may require road construction in areas that may contain suitable P. stormi habitat.

Disease
Chytridiomycosis is a potentially fatal epidermal infection caused by a chytrid fungus, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd), which has been found to affect several amphibian populations worldwide. In the United States massive amphibian deaths have been recorded in Arizona, California, and Colorado (Daszak et al. 1999). Although the disease has been responsible for mass mortality, population declines, and species extinction not all infected populations and species are negatively affected (Weldon 2002; Mazzoni et al. 2003) and light infections have also been found on amphibians in the wild which show no clinical signs of the infection (Retallick et al. 2004).

Bd is a member of the phylum Chytridiomycota. Some chytrids are found in water and soil, and contribute significantly to the initial degradation of organic matter such as chitin and keratin while other are parasites of algae, plants, nematodes or insects (Barr 1990). Chytrid fungus infection was reported on a wild-caught, strictly terrestrial salamander. A single adult, gravid female, Jemez Mountains salamander (Plethodon neomexicanus), a species endemic to the Jemez Mountains in New Mexico, was collected in a meadow containing a few aspen trees (Populus tremuloides) (Cummer et al. 2005). Infected tiger salamanders (Ambystoma tigrinum) and boreal chorus frogs (Pseudacris maculate) were found in the area and the article suggests the possibility that the fungus may have been transmitted to the terrestrial salamander through direct or indirect contact with an infected aquatic amphibian. Muletz et al. (2014) found no Bd on preserved Plethodon spp. from the Appalachian Mountains and an extremely low incidence in wild specimens and concluded that these exceptionally low levels of Bd, in a region known to harbor Bd, may indicate that Plethodon specific traits limit Bd infection. Amphibian species known to acquire the disease inhabit areas within P. stormi range creating a potential mode of transport.

A new emerging chytrid fungus, B. salamandrivorans (Bsal), has resulted in large-scale declines of some wild populations of salamanders in Europe. Martel et al. (2014) assessed 24 species of salamanders from 5 families and found that species from the families Salamandridae and Plethodontidae, particularly newts (family Salamandridae), were found to be the most susceptible to the disease. Only one species in genus Plethodon was included in the susceptibility tests, P. glutinosus, which incurred transient lesions but was considered “resistant” to the disease. Because this species was infected temporarily, it is considered at least a short-term carrier, and as a result, the USFWS included all Plethodon spp. in its salamander importation ban. To date, there are no documented cases of Bsal in the United States.

CDFW has determined chytridiomycosis is not likely a threat to P. stormi. As water is the primary mode of transmittal for the disease, the terrestrial nature of P. stormi greatly reduces its risk of infection and, if an infection were to occur, the outcome is currently unknown. However, potential introduction of the disease may also occur through fire suppression activities where water harboring Bd is used.

Climate Change
The petition proposing Federal listing of P. stormi identified climate change, specifically an increase in temperature, as a concern and partial justification for protection under the Federal ESA. The petition hypothesized that climate change may lead to less opportunity for P. stormi to forage and reproduce. Further, since P. stormi exhibits low movement/dispersal, the species is unlikely to simply relocate to more suitable habitat as the climate warms.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2004) cites the National Academy of Sciences in reporting that “[T]he Earth’s surface temperature has risen by about 1 degree Fahrenheit in the past century, with accelerated warming during the past two decades.” The consequences of this trend could include an increase in the average global surface temperature of 1-4.5°F in the next 50 years. Predicted environmental consequences of this include changes in the geographic range of forests, increases in the frequency of fire and insect outbreaks, changes in the carbon storage function of forests, increased precipitation, and changes in weather patterns (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2001).

The subterranean microenvironment in which P. stormi spend most of their time is less sensitive to temperature changes than aboveground environments. Changes in vegetation types above ground, rainfall and fire frequency likely pose risks to P. stormi by altering elements of the current habitat conditions. Potential effect mechanisms include canopy modification that changes temperature at the soil surface, changes in the rates of organic input to the talus habitat, and changes in the associated animal community that depends upon these organic inputs.
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

This species, as with its sister species (P. elongatus, Welsh and Lind 1995), is highly associated with rocky talus slopes in areas of dense mature and late-seral forest (Welsh and Lind 1995, Bury 1998, Ollivier et al. 2001). Most individuals occur in talus and rocky soils or slopes and, occasionally, are found under logs, leaf litter, and other cover if talus is nearby (Nussbaum et al. 1983; Bury 1998; Bury and Welsh, in press). Eggs are laid on land apparently in cavities in talus (Nussbaum et al. 1983).

Ecology

Moves over a range only about 25 meters across; only a few under each rock or log but may be about 20/acre.

Reproduction

Terrestrial brreder. Female probably lays clutch of about 9 (2-18) eggs in spring and broods them during summer. Fully formed young apparently hatch in fall, may remain underground until the following spring. Females probably lay eggs every other year (Nussbaum et al. 1983). Both sexes probably mature at about 5-6 years of age.
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest - MixedBare rock/talus/scree
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN2
ProvinceRankNative
OregonS2Yes
CaliforniaS3Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
4 - Transportation & service corridorsRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useLarge - smallSerious - slightHigh (continuing)
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingLarge - smallSerious - slightHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge - smallSerious - slightHigh (continuing)
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionLarge - smallSerious - slightHigh (continuing)
7.1.1 - Increase in fire frequency/intensityPervasive - largeSerious - moderateHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive - largeSerious - moderateHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (2)
California (2)
AreaForestAcres
Condrey Mtn.Klamath National Forest2,923
KangarooKlamath National Forest40,617
References (38)
  1. Behler, J. L., and F. W. King. 1979. The Audubon Society field guide to North American reptiles and amphibians. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 719 pp.
  2. Blackburn, L., P. Nanjappa, and M. J. Lannoo. 2001. An Atlas of the Distribution of U.S. Amphibians. Copyright, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana, USA.
  3. Brodie, E. D. 1970. Western salamanders of the genus <i>Plethodon</i>: systematics and geographic variation. Herpetologica 26:468-516.
  4. Brodie, E.D., Jr. 1971. Plethodon stormi. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. 103:1-2.
  5. Bury, R. B. 1973. Western <i>Plethodon</i>: systematics and biogeographic relationships of the <i>elongatus </i>group (Abstract). HISS News-Journal 1:56-57.
  6. Bury, R. B. 1998. Evolution and zoogeography of the Del Norte and Siskiyou Mountain salamander with management recommendations. Unpubl. Final Report to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Bureau of Land Management, Medford District. USGS Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center.
  7. Bury, R. B., and C. A. Pearl. 1999. Klamath-Siskiyou herpetofauna: biogeographic patterns and conservation strategies. Natural Areas Journal 19:341-350.
  8. Bury, R. B., and H. H. Welsh, Jr. 2005. <i>Plethodon stormi</i> Highton and Brame, 1965: Siskiyou Mountains Salamander. In M. Lannoo, editor. Status and Conservation of U.S. Amphibians. Volume 2: Species Accounts, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
  9. Bury, R. B., C. K. Dodd, Jr., and G. M. Fellers. 1980. Conservation of the Amphibia of the United States: a review. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C., Resource Publication 134. 34 pp.
  10. California Department of Fish and Game (CDF&G). 1990. 1989 annual report on the status of California's state listed threatened and endangered plants and animals. 188 pp.
  11. Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) et al. 2004. Petition to list the Siskiyou Mountains salamander (<i>Plethodon stormi </i>and <i>asupaki) </i>as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act. Submitted to USFWS 16 June 2004.
  12. Clayton, David. Applegate Ranger District, Rogue River National Forest. Sent in animal sighting reports.
  13. Clayton, D. R. et al. 1998. Survey protocol for the Siskiyou Mountains Salamander (<i>Plethodon stormi</i>). USFS, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 18 pp.
  14. Clayton, D. R., L. M. Ollivier, and H. H. Welsh, Jr. <i>In press</i>. Management recommendations for the Siskiyou Mountain salamander (<i>Plethodon stormi</i>). Interagency publication of the Regional Ecosystem Office, Portland, Oregon.
  15. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  16. DeGross, D. J. 2004. Gene flow and the relationship of <i>Plethodon stormi </i>and <i>P. elongatus </i>assessed with 11 novel microsatellite loci. Thesis. Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.
  17. Diller, L. V., and R. L. Wallace. 1994. Distribution and habitat of PLETHODON ELONGATUS on managed, young growth forests in north coastal California. J. Herpetol. 28:310-318.
  18. Frost, D. R. 1985. Amphibian species of the world. A taxonomic and geographical reference. Allen Press, Inc., and The Association of Systematics Collections, Lawrence, Kansas. v + 732 pp.
  19. Frost, D.R. 2020. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. Online: http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html
  20. Highton, R., and A. H. Brame. 1965. <i>Plethodon stormi</i> species nov. Amphibia: Urodela: Plethodontidae. Pilot Register of Zoology, Card 20.
  21. Leonard, W. P., H. A. Brown, L. L. C. Jones, K. R. McAllister, and R. M. Storm. 1993. Amphibians of Washington and Oregon. Seattle Audubon Society, Seattle, Washington. viii + 168 pp.
  22. Mahoney, M. J. 2001. Molecular systematics of <i>Plethodon </i>and <i>Aneides </i>(Caudata: Plethodontini): phylogenetic analysis of an old and rapid radiation. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 18:174-188.
  23. Mahoney, M. J. 2004. Molecular systematics and phylogeography of the <i>Plethodon elongatus </i>species group: combining phylogenetic and population genetic methods to investigate species history. Molecular Ecology 13:149-166.
  24. Mead, L. S., D. R. Clayton, R. S. Nauman, D. H. Olson, and M. E. Pfrender. 2005. Newly discovered populations of salamanders from Siskiyou County California represent a species distinct from<i> Plethodon stormi</i>. Herpetologica 61:158-177.
  25. NatureServe. Central Databases. Arlington, Virginia. U.S.A. Online. Available: http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/
  26. Nussbaum, R.A. 1974. The distributional ecology and life history of the Siskiyou Mountains salamander, <i>Plethodon stormi</i>, in relation to the potential impact of the proposed Applegate Reservoir on this species. Unpublished report submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers, Portland Division, Portland, OR. 70 pp.
  27. Nussbaum, R.A., E.D. Brodie, Jr., and R.M. Storm. 1983. Amphibians and Reptiles of the Pacific Northwest. University Press of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho. 332 pp.
  28. Ollivier, L., H. H. Welsh, Jr., and D. R. Clayton. 2001. Habitat correlates of the Siskiyou Mountains salamander <i>Plethodon stormi</i> (Caudata: Plethodontidae); with comments on the species' range. Final Report, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Redwood Sciences Laboratory, Arcata, CA. 95521. Available at www.rsl.psw.fs.fed.us/pubs/wild90s.html
  29. Petranka, J. W. 1998. Salamanders of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
  30. Stebbins, R. C. 1985a. A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. xiv + 336 pp.
  31. Stebbins, R. C. 2003. A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians. Third edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
  32. Thomas, J. W., Ward, J., Raphael, M.G., Anthony, R.G., Forsman, E.D., Gunderson, A.G., Holthausen, R.S., Marcot, B.G., Reeves, G.H., Sedell, J.R. and Solis, D.M. 1993. Viability assessments and management considerations for species associated with late-successional and old-growth forests of the Pacific Northwest. The report of the Scientific Analysis Team. USDA Forest Service, Spotted Owl EIS Team, Portland Oregon. 530 pp.
  33. USDA, USDI. 2004. Final supplemental environmental impact statement to remove or modify the survey and manage mitigation measure standards and guidelines. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service and U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management. January, 2004.
  34. USDA, USDI Species Review Panel. 2001. Species Review Process Step 2 Worksheet (In Depth Analysis). Reviewers: David Clayton, Dede Olson, Steve Morey, Brenda Devlin, Hartwell Welsh, Richard Nauman, Charile Crisafulli. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service and U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management. April 27, 2001.
  35. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2019. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Findings for Three Species. Federal Register 84(158):41691-41694.
  36. Welsh, H. H., and A. J. Lind. 1992. Population ecology of two relictual salamanders from the Klamath Mountains of Northwestern California. Pp. 419-437 in McCullough D. R. and Barrett, R. H. 1992, Wildlife 2001: Populations. Elsevier Applied Science, London.
  37. Welsh, H. H. and A. L. Lind. 1988. Old growth forests and the distribution of the terrestrial herptofauna. Pp. 439- in Szaro et al. 1988, Management of Amphibians, reptiles, and Small Mammals in North America, Proceedings of the Symposium in Flagstaff AZ. USFS GTR# RM-166.
  38. Welsh, H. H., Jr., and A. J. Lind. 1995. Habitat correlates of the Del Norte salamander, <i>Plethodon elongatus</i>, in northwestern California. Journal of Herpetology 29:198-210.