Buteo lineatus

(Gmelin, 1788)

Red-shouldered Hawk

G5Secure Found in 143 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
MediumThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.103156
Element CodeABNKC19030
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
CITESAppendix II
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAves
OrderAccipitriformes
FamilyAccipitridae
GenusButeo
Other Common Names
Aguililla Pecho Rojo (ES) Buse à épaulettes (FR) red-shouldered hawk (EN)
Concept Reference
American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in The Auk]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
Taxonomic Comments
Five subspecies have been recognized. The nominate lineatus, formerly Falco lineatus, is based on the "barred-breasted buzzard" of Latham and the "red-shouldered falcon" of Pennant (AOU 1983). The other four subspecies include alleni of the southeastern U.S., extimus of extreme southern Florida, texanus of Texas and northeastern Mexico, and elegans of the west coast.

Palmer (1988) stated that "the red-shoulder fits better morphologically in asturina than in buteo," and placed it in the former as asturina lineata. Most authors have retained this species in the genus buteo.

The red-shouldered hawk and Ridgway's hawk, B. ridgwayi, a resident on Hispaniola and surrounding small islands (Beata, Gonave, Isle-a-Vache, Alto Velo, Grand Cayemite and Petite Cayemite) might constitute a superspecies (AOU 1983).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-10-01
Change Date1996-11-22
Edition Date2025-10-01
Edition AuthorsPeterson, J. M. C. (1995); rev. R. L. Gundy (2025)
Threat ImpactMedium
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank Reasons
This species is widespread throughout much of the U.S. with small portions of the range in Canada and México. The population suffered steep historical declines due to forest loss throughout much of the 19th and 20th centuries. The population has stabilized and rebounded in some areas. The primary threats include habitat loss and habitat degradation.
Range Extent Comments
BREEDING: northern California south, west of the Sierran Divide, to northern Baja California; and from eastern Nebraska, Iowa, central Minnesota, northern Wisconsin, northern Michigan, southern Ontario, southwestern Quebec and southern New Brunswick south to Veracruz, Tamaulipas, central and southern Texas, the Gulf Coast, and Florida (to the Florida Keys); also locally in the valley of Mexico (recorded in Zacatecas and Distrito Federal) (AOU 1983, Crocoll 1994). Now very scarce as a breeder in eastern and central Mexico.

NON-BREEDING: California and throughout the breeding range, at least sporadically, in eastern North America, but primarily from eastern Kansas, central Missouri, the Ohio Valley, northwestern Pennsylvania, southern New York, and southern New England south to central Mexico (Crocoll 1994, AOU 1998). Most numerous in the Gulf coast states and Georgia (Root 1988).
Occurrences Comments
Eleven states or provinces report more than 100 EOs. In the early 1990s, ranked S4 or S5 in at least 15 states/provinces.
Threat Impact Comments
Loss of forest habitat eliminates nesting sites, perching sites for hunting, and can cause a shift where this species is replaced by red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis) (Craighead and Craighead 1969, Bednarz and Dinsmore 1982, Bryant 1986, Postupalsky 1989). Degradation of wetland habitats from pollution also reduces prey availability, particularly in southern populations where amphibians and reptiles are the dominant prey items (Castrale 1991).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

ADULTS: A medium-sized, long-tailed, slender buteo, larger than the broad-winged hawk (BUTEO PLATYPTERUS) and smaller than the red-tailed hawk (BUTEO JAMAICENSIS). The long legs and feet are yellow, with less than half the tarsus feathered (versus half in red-tailed hawk). Wingtips do not reach the tail tip on perched birds. Sexes are similar, except that the female is larger, with considerable size overlap. In basic plumage the upperparts are dark but somewhat blotchy. The lesser upper wing coverts are rusty reddish or rufous and form the distinctive red-shoulder patch. The flight feathers are boldly barred with black and white above, not as boldly barred below, with a "window" (a white crescent-shaped panel) near the black outer primary tips. The underwing appears two-toned, with rufous coverts darker than the flight feathers. The wings are proportionately long and narrow, without the bulges of the red-tailed hawk. The leading edge is straight, while the trailing edge curves gently or not at all: "Seen from below, the wing of a red-shouldered hawk suggests a long, rectangular plank. The entire wing juts forward when the bird is in a full soar, as if it were reaching out, arms wide, to embrace something" (Dunne et al. 1988). Soaring typically occurs with wings in a slight downward droop. The underparts have transverse rusty to rufescent barring. The tail has several wide and very dark bars; the intervening narrow stripes and the tip of the tail are white. There is geographical and some sexual variation in the number of these tail bars (Palmer 1988, Clark and Wheeler 1987), among both adults and juveniles. The iris is dark brown and the cere is bright yellow.

YOUNG: nestlings are thickly covered with long, soft, silky down, longest on the head, yellowish-white above, tinged with "vinaceous-buff" on the back and wings, and whiter below. Somewhat older nestlings are covered with short, thick, woolly down, thickest and pure white on the belly, and grayish-white above. At about two weeks the wing quills sprout, followed by the scapulars, wing coverts, and contour plumage (Bent 1937, Kennard 1894).

Juvenile plumage is well-developed by fledging and held through the first winter into spring when gradually molted. It may not be completely molted until the following fall. The head is medium brown, usually with buffy superciliary line and dark brown malar stripes. The iris is light to medium gray-brown and the cere is greenish-yellow. The back is dark brown with some tawny mottling. The upper wing coverts are dark brown with some tawny and whitish mottling and often a hint of the red shoulder. Primaries are dark brown with a crescent-shaped tawny area on the upper surface next to the black tips. The white underparts are marked longitudinally with dark brown blobs. The underwing is uniform white to cream and shows the distinctive crescent panel or "window" when backlit. Leg feathers and undertail coverts are white and spotted with dark brown. The tail is brown above with many fine lighter brown bands.

A few albinistic and partially albinistic birds have been recorded (Clark and Wheeler 1987).

EGGS: smooth and slightly glossy. Ground color dull white or with a faint buff wash, overlaid with variable blotches, spots, or specks of reddish-brown or dark brown, and rarely pale lilac, with the larger markings concentrated toward the larger end.

VOCALIZATIONS: common during the breeding season (Bent 1937). The most common call is a "kee-aah," with the accent on first syllable, and second extended and with falling inflection (Palmer 1988). Another vocalization includes a single or repeated "kip," which the male gives when fetching prey and nearing the nest, and the female responds similarly, while nestlings have a chirping call. The blue jay (CYANOCITTA CRISTATA) is notorious for mimicking the cry of the red-shouldered hawk. Bent (1937) and Palmer (1988) noted a variety of other vocalizations attributed to this hawk, mostly variants of the kee-aah cry or the nest call.

Habitat

BREEDING: varies from bottomland hardwoods and riparian areas (Stewart 1949, Henny et al. 1973, Bednarz and Dinsmore 1981, Kimmel and Fredrickson 1981, Woodrey 1986, Preston et al. 1989) to upland deciduous or mixed deciduous-conifer forest (Titus and Mosher 1981, Armstrong and Euler 1983, Morris and Lemon 1983, Crocoll and Parker 1989). Nesting areas are almost always found near some form of water, such as a swamp, marsh, river, or pond (Preston et al. 1989, Bosakowski et al. 1992), and the habitat is usually well forested (Portnoy and Dodge 1979, Kimmel and Fredrickson 1981, Titus and Mosher 1981, Morris and Lemon 1983, Ebbers 1989). Further, nesting habitat typically is mature forest with a well-developed high canopy and variable amounts of understory vegetation (Postupalsky 1980, Titus and Mosher 1981, Armstrong and Euler 1983, Morris and Lemon 1983, Titus 1984, Preston et al. 1989.). Sometimes occurs in coniferous stands in the West. In California, has been expanding range of occupied habitats to include various woodlands, including stands of eucalyptus trees amid urban sprawl (Ehrlich et al. 1992).

The nest is usually built in the main crotch of a large, living tree in mature forest, although in Florida, palmettos may be used. In eastern North America, nests generally are far from forest edges. At least 43 species of mainly deciduous trees have been chosen, so that the size and shape seem more important than the actual species (Bednarz 1979, Apfelbaum and Seelbach 1983, Titus and Mosher 1987, Palmer 1988, Ebbers 1989). The bulky structure of twigs, rather flat on top, is typically placed approximately halfway up the tree in the lower portion of the canopy (Morris et al. 1982, Titus and Mosher 1987). The typical height is between 11-15 m but can range from 1.5-33.5 m (Peck and James 1983, Ebbers 1989). The nest is lined with stems, leaves, lichen, and bark. Active nests are decorated with greenery and other materials. Hemlock and other conifer sprigs are often mentioned as nest greenery, as are deciduous sprigs once they have leafed out, and Bent (1937) mentioned such plants as flowering violets and nightshade. Other materials have included cornstalks, ears, and husks, dried tent caterpillar webs, tissue paper, twine, and nests of eastern wood-pewee, red-eyed vireo, and northern oriole (Palmer 1988).

In eastern North America, may use nest used previously by barred owl (STRIX VARIA) (and vice versa) (Palmer 1988). See Dijak et al. (1990) for information on nest-site characteristics affecting success and reuse of nests in Missouri.

NON-BREEDING: less restricted than that used for breeding; favors lowland areas near water, either standing or running, including river valleys, swamps, marshes, and perhaps canyon bottoms (Palmer 1988), and level, open country with scattered large trees (Bent 1937). In Florida, Bohall and Collopy (1984) found hawks most often in open areas such as pastures and fallow fields.

Ecology

Mortality has been reported to occur during the incubation, nestling, and fledgling stages of the breeding season (Craighead and Craighead 1956, Janik and Mosher 1982, Bosakowski and Speiser 1986, Crocoll and Parker 1989). Adults and juveniles have also been reported to suffer mortality (McCrary and Bloom 1984, Crocoll and Parker 1989). Mortality has taken the form of wind-destroyed nests (Wiley 1975, Portnoy and Dodge 1979, Dijak et al. 1990), addled eggs (Janik and Mosher 1982, Crocoll and Parker 1989), starvation of nestlings (Crocoll and Parker 1989), human disturbance at or near the nest-site (Craighead and Craighead 1956, Wiley 1975), and predation of eggs, nestlings or adults (Craighead and Craighead 1956, Wiley 1975, Portnoy and Dodge 1979, Bosakowski and Speiser 1986, Crocoll and Parker 1989). The most frequent predators on eggs and young are raccoons (PROCYON LOTOR) and great horned owls (BUBO VIRGINIANUS).

Breeding density is highly variable; recorded values include one pair per 48.7 ha in central Maryland (Stewart 1949), one pair per 171 ha in western New York (Crocoll and Parker 1989), one pair per 417 ha in Massachusetts, one pair per 455-588 ha in Indiana, one pair per 645 ha in Michigan (Craighead and Craighead 1956), and 1 pair/1000 ha in Wisconsin (see Peterson and Crocoll 1992). Stewart (1949) found nests a mean distance of 1072 m apart in the wide upper Patuxent River drainage in Maryland, and Parker (1986) found similar internest distances in Missouri. Crocoll and Parker (1989) found nests a mean distance of 1271 m apart in the Canadaway Creek Wildlife Management Area of western New York. Adjacent nests were 0.37-1.27 km apart in creek bottoms in southern California. Breeding home range of radio-tagged birds in California averaged 62 ha for males, 37 ha for females; used less space when not breeding. In northern New Jersey, nesting density was 0.22 nests per 100 ha, the highest density yet reported (about twice that reported in the few comparable studies in other states) (Bosakowski et al. 1992).

Often uses nests of previous years (Terres 1980). Nesting territories can be used for many years by a succession of pairs, even in the face of logging and (formerly) egg collecting. Bent (1937) reported an unbroken record of 26 years for a territory that was occupied for at least 42 years, until the woods were nearly ruined by cutting. His longest record was 47 years, but he knew of a tract that was occupied for over a half-century, from 1872 until 1923.

LEUCOCYTOZOA sp., a hematozoan, was detected in the blood of hawks tested in Oklahoma (Kocan et al. 1977). Two lice (COLPOCEPHALUM FLAVESCENS and PHILOPTERUS TAUROCEPHALUS) and one bird fly (LYNCHIA AMERICANA) have been found on red-shoulders (Peters 1936). In New York, the ears of nestlings commonly were full of maggots (PROTOCALLIPHORA SPLENDIDA) (Sargent 1938). These maggot infestations seemingly did not cause deafness or hinder survival (Hands et al. 1989).

Reproduction

Courtship, territory establishment, and nest building (or refurbishing) occur shortly after arrival on the breeding grounds. In New York, Crocoll and Parker (1989) recorded birds back on territories and relining nests during the second and third weeks of March. Portnoy and Dodge (1979) in Massachusetts observed courtship flights during March and nest relining during the last week of March and first week of April. Morris et al. (1982) in southwestern Quebec observed territorial hawks soaring from early March to mid-April. Farther south, nesting activities begin several weeks earlier. Records from Alabama, Louisiana, and Oklahoma indicate that breeding begins in February.

Aerial nuptial displays are impressive and include "high-circling" and "sky-dancing," both extremely vocal performances. In the sky-dance, one individual (presumably the male) rides an upward thermal, crying as it circles, then drops with folded wings into a steep dive, pulling up and then shooting upward again. Neighboring pairs often join in, with as many as ten birds involved. The sky-dance can be immediately followed by copulation, which "occurs repeatedly and over considerable time" (Palmer 1988).

Clutch size varies from one to six (Palmer 1988), with two to four eggs being the most common sizes throughout the range. Clutch size is commonly two in Florida, three to four in the northern U.S. A mean of 3.45 eggs from 42 clutches was reported for the Great Lakes States (Henny 1972). Eggs are laid January-June (mostly March-April) in the southeastern U.S., March-June (mostly April) in northern U.S., mostly March-April in California (Palmer 1988). Nests late March to late May in Maryland (Bushman and Therres 1988) and New York (Bull 1974).

Incubation is by both sexes, but mainly by the female, who is fed by the male, and commences with the laying of the first egg. The incubation period is around 33 days per egg (Newton 1979), and the young hatch asynchronously and thus vary in size, as with many raptors (Newton 1979). The semi-altricial young are inactive at first, becoming active at about 10 days. Feathering begins in about two weeks. The nestling period lasts from five to six weeks (Harrison 1978, Crocoll and Parker 1989). Young leave the nest at 5-6 weeks; in California, first flight occurs at about 45 days (sometimes at considerably older age). Fledging generally occurs in mid-June in Maryland (Janik and Mosher 1982), June to mid-July in New York (Bull 1974, Crocoll and Parker 1989), and late June-early July in Massachusetts (Portnoy and Dodge 1979). Dates are similar throughout the northern range of the species, and are advanced 4 to 8 weeks in the south. In southern California, parents supplied food to young for 8-10 weeks after fledging.

Although a few nest at one year of age (Apanius 1977), most first breed when at least two years old (Palmer 1988). There has been evidence of polyandry with copulation and trio bonding at the nest recorded (Palmer 1988).

Nesting success (measured as the percentage of nests that fledge at least one young) has been reported to vary from 52.9% in Maryland to 100% in Missouri with an average of 68.7% over nine North American studies (Crocoll and Parker 1989). Two one-year studies reported lower nest success rates: 47.4% for 19 nests in northern Lower Michigan in 1986 (Ebbers 1986), and 25% for 1966 at the Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Maryland (Henny et al. 1973).

The average number of young fledged per nest over the previously cited nine studies varied from 1.11 young to 2.9. Henny et al. (1973) used a mathematical model and field data to predict that in a stable population each pair should fledge an average of 1.95 young. Four of the nine above mentioned studies had fledging numbers below the Henny et al. (1973) standard. Three of the studies were conducted in the Northeast: New York (1.11 young fledged, Crocoll and Parker 1989), Western Maryland (1.8 young fledged, Janik and Mosher 1982), and central Maryland (1.58 young fledged, Henny et al. 1973). One Michigan population produced a mean 1.2 young fledged (n = 44) over three years of study, while another population fledged 2.2 young (n = 29) over the same time period (Ebbers 1989). Ebbers (1989) noted that there is concern that the 1.95 standard may be too high because of possible biases in the data used to scale the model values. Nevertheless, it does appear that some populations produce excess young ("source" populations), while others would not survive without immigration ("sink" populations).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest - HardwoodForest - MixedWoodland - HardwoodWoodland - MixedCropland/hedgerow
Palustrine Habitats
FORESTED WETLANDRiparian
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN4B,N2N
ProvinceRankNative
OntarioS4B,S2NYes
QuebecS4BYes
New BrunswickS1BYes
United StatesN5B,N5N
ProvinceRankNative
PennsylvaniaS4B,S5N,S4MYes
ConnecticutS5BYes
South DakotaSUBYes
LouisianaS5Yes
VirginiaS4Yes
TexasS4BYes
MassachusettsS4B,S4NYes
New HampshireS3Yes
KansasS3Yes
New JerseyS1B,S3NYes
ArkansasS3Yes
ColoradoSNAYes
MaineS3N,S4BYes
GeorgiaS4Yes
IllinoisS2Yes
IowaS2BYes
DelawareS3B,S3NYes
OklahomaSNRYes
NebraskaS4Yes
FloridaS4Yes
IndianaS3Yes
AlabamaS5Yes
MinnesotaS3B,SNRNYes
MissouriS4Yes
Rhode IslandS3B,S3NYes
North CarolinaS5B,S5NYes
MichiganS4Yes
District of ColumbiaS2B,S3NYes
MississippiS4BYes
OregonS3NYes
OhioS3Yes
MarylandS4B,S4NYes
VermontS2BYes
West VirginiaS5B,S5NYes
WisconsinS3B,S1NYes
CaliforniaSNRBYes
New YorkS4BYes
South CarolinaS5Yes
ArizonaS1B,S3NYes
TennesseeS4BYes
KentuckyS4B,S4NYes
NevadaS3Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
1.2 - Commercial & industrial areasRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureLarge (31-70%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsLarge (31-70%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.2 - Wood & pulp plantationsRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. decline
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. decline
5.3.4 - Unintentional effects: large scale (species being assessed is not the target) [harvest]Restricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. decline
9 - PollutionLarge (31-70%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsLarge (31-70%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (143)
Arkansas (2)
AreaForestAcres
Dismal CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest9,160
Little BlakelyOuachita National Forest3,342
California (86)
AreaForestAcres
AgnewSequoia National Forest9,561
AntimonyLos Padres National Forest40,911
Arroyo SecoAngeles National Forest4,703
Barker ValleyCleveland National Forest11,940
Black ButteMendocino National Forest15,461
Black Mtn.Sequoia National Forest15,102
Blue Creek Rare ISix Rivers National Forest12,134
Boundary Peak (CA)Inyo National Forest210,884
CajonSan Bernardino National Forest7,548
CamuesaLos Padres National Forest8,209
ChannellSequoia National Forest45,429
ChicoSequoia National Forest39,836
Chips CreekLassen National Forest29,089
City CreekSan Bernardino National Forest9,997
ColdwaterCleveland National Forest8,402
Cow CreekShasta-Trinity National Forest22,627
Crystal CreekSan Bernardino National Forest6,783
Cucamonga BSan Bernardino National Forest11,933
Cucamonga CSan Bernardino National Forest4,106
Cutca ValleyCleveland National Forest14,530
Deep CreekSan Bernardino National Forest23,869
Devil GulchSierra National Forest30,490
DiableLos Padres National Forest19,597
Dinkey LakesSierra National Forest34,171
Dry LakesLos Padres National Forest17,043
Eagle PeakCleveland National Forest6,481
Excelsior (CA)Inyo National Forest45,607
Garcia MountainLos Padres National Forest7,850
Glass MountainInyo National Forest52,867
Greenhorn CreekSequoia National Forest28,226
GrindstoneMendocino National Forest26,031
Hall Natural AreaInyo National Forest5,236
Hoover - Green Ck NoHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest7,155
Hoover - Virginia LksHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest5,050
Horse Creek RidgeSan Bernardino National Forest8,969
Horse Mdw.Inyo National Forest5,687
JuncalLos Padres National Forest12,289
Kings RiverSierra National Forest52,999
LaddCleveland National Forest5,300
Little French CShasta-Trinity National Forest11,529
Magic MountainAngeles National Forest15,542
Malduce BuckhornLos Padres National Forest14,177
MatilijaLos Padres National Forest5,218
Mill PeakSan Bernardino National Forest7,884
MonoLos Padres National Forest28,141
MosesSequoia National Forest22,077
Mt. HoffmanModoc National Forest9,780
Mt. RebaStanislaus National Forest3,869
Mt. Shasta BShasta-Trinity National Forest2,809
No NameCleveland National Forest4,897
NordhoffLos Padres National Forest12,031
North MountainStanislaus National Forest7,856
Orleans Mtn. BSix Rivers National Forest17,183
PaiuteInyo National Forest58,712
Pine CreekCleveland National Forest503
Pleasant ViewAngeles National Forest26,395
PyramidEldorado National Forest24,347
Pyramid Peak BSan Bernardino National Forest7,194
Raymond PeakEldorado National Forest2,518
Raymond PeakStanislaus National Forest3,646
Raywood Flat BSan Bernardino National Forest11,373
Red MountainAngeles National Forest8,034
Rock Creek WestInyo National Forest3,626
Rouse HillSan Bernardino National Forest13,745
San DimasAngeles National Forest7,160
San Gabriel AddAngeles National Forest2,527
San JoaquinSierra National Forest22,474
San SevaineSan Bernardino National Forest6,866
Santa CruzLos Padres National Forest21,182
Sespe - FrazierLos Padres National Forest106,910
Sheep MountainAngeles National Forest21,098
SherwinInyo National Forest3,140
Sill HillCleveland National Forest5,294
Slate Mtn.Sequoia National Forest12,299
SnoozerKlamath National Forest23,414
South ForkShasta-Trinity National Forest16,786
South SierraInyo National Forest41,853
South SierraSequoia National Forest8,008
Strawberry PeakAngeles National Forest7,245
TequepisLos Padres National Forest9,080
Tioga LakeInyo National Forest829
TrabucoCleveland National Forest23,341
TuleAngeles National Forest9,861
West ForkAngeles National Forest1,169
WestforkAngeles National Forest4,407
White LedgeLos Padres National Forest18,632
Florida (2)
AreaForestAcres
Alexander Springs CreekOcala National Forest2,954
Farles PrairieOcala National Forest1,901
Georgia (3)
AreaForestAcres
Helton CreekChattahoochee National Forest2,348
Lance CreekChattahoochee National Forest9,025
Pink KnobChattahoochee National Forest12,127
Idaho (2)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekCaribou-Targhee National Forest118,582
NeedlesPayette National Forest131,279
Illinois (1)
AreaForestAcres
Ripple HollowShawnee National Forest3,788
Indiana (1)
AreaForestAcres
Mogan RidgeHoosier National Forest8,435
Kentucky (1)
AreaForestAcres
WolfpenDaniel Boone National Forest2,835
Nevada (3)
AreaForestAcres
Arc Dome - Secret BsnHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest74,782
Jobs Peak (NV)Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest1,342
Mt. ArdiveyHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest37,984
North Carolina (7)
AreaForestAcres
Craggy MountainPisgah National Forest2,657
Harper CreekPisgah National Forest7,325
Jarrett CreekPisgah National Forest7,485
Laurel MountainPisgah National Forest5,683
Mackey MountainPisgah National Forest5,934
South Mills RiverPisgah National Forest8,588
Tusquitee BaldNantahala National Forest13,670
Oregon (5)
AreaForestAcres
Crane MountainFremont National Forest23,096
Mt. BaileyUmpqua National Forest18,401
Mt. HagenWillamette National Forest6,406
Sky Lakes AWinema National Forest3,940
Umpqua SpitSiuslaw National Forest2,090
Pennsylvania (1)
AreaForestAcres
Allegheny FrontAllegheny National Forest7,430
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
Tennessee (5)
AreaForestAcres
Bald MountainCherokee National Forest11,743
Flint Mill GapCherokee National Forest9,494
Slide HollowCherokee National Forest4,057
Stone MountainCherokee National Forest5,367
Sycamore CreekCherokee National Forest6,984
Texas (3)
AreaForestAcres
Big CreekNational Forests in Texas1,447
Big WoodsNational Forests in Texas1,320
Little Lake CreekNational Forests in Texas596
Virginia (16)
AreaForestAcres
Adams PeakGeorge Washington National Forest7,135
Bear CreekJefferson National Forest18,274
Beards MountainGeorge Washington National Forest7,505
Broad RunJefferson National Forest10,971
Brush MountainJefferson National Forest6,002
Brush Mountain EastJefferson National Forest4,916
Kelley MountainGeorge Washington National Forest7,590
Little Walker MountainJefferson National Forest9,818
Mountain Lake Addition B (VA)Jefferson National Forest3,405
North MountainJefferson National Forest8,377
Peters Mountain Addition BJefferson National Forest2,909
Raccoon BranchJefferson National Forest4,388
Seng MountainJefferson National Forest6,428
Shawvers Run AdditionJefferson National Forest1,927
Southern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest11,985
The PriestGeorge Washington National Forest5,737
West Virginia (4)
AreaForestAcres
Canaan LoopMonongahela National Forest7,867
Dolly Sods Roaring PlainMonongahela National Forest13,392
Mcgowan MountainMonongahela National Forest10,504
Mountain Lake Addition B (WV)Jefferson National Forest557
References (111)
  1. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1983. Check-list of North American Birds, 6th edition. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas. 877 pp.
  2. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in <i>The Auk</i>]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
  3. Apanius, V. 1977. Red-shouldered hawks in juvenile plumage nest successfully. Auk 94:585.
  4. Apfelbaum, S. I., and P. Seelbach. 1983. Nest tree, habitat selection and productivity of seven North American raptor species based on the Cornell University Nest Record Card Program. Raptor Research 17:97-113.
  5. Armstrong, E., and D. Euler. 1983. Habitat usage of two woodland BUTEO species in central Ontario. Can. Field-Nat. 97:200-207.
  6. Badzinski, D., C. M. Francis, and B. Whittam. 2000. Red-shouldered Hawk and spring woodpecker survey: 2000 final report. Bird Studies Canada, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Wildlife Assessment Program. Available at: http://www.bsc-eoc.org/rsharprt99.html. Accessed 2001-12-03. 26pp.
  7. Balding, T., and E. Dibble. 1984. Responses of red-tailed, red-shouldered and broad-winged hawks to high volume playback recordings. Passenger Pigeon 46:71-75.
  8. Bednarz, J. C. 1979. I. Productivity, nest sites, and habitat of red-shouldered and red-tailed hawks in Iowa. II. Status, habitat utilization, and management of red-shouldered hawks in Iowa. M.S. thesis, Iowa State Univ., Ames.
  9. Bednarz, J. C., and J. J. Dinsmore. 1981. Status, habitat use and management of red-shouldered hawks in Iowa. J. Wildlife Manage. 45:236-241.
  10. Bednarz, J. C., and J. J. Dinsmore. 1982. Nest-sites and habitat of red-shouldered and red-tailed hawks in Iowa. Wilson Bull. 94:31-45.
  11. Bednarz, J. C., and P. Kerlinger. 1989. Monitoring hawk populations by counting migrants. Pages 328-343 in Proceedings of the Northeast Raptor Management Symposium and Workshop. Natl. Wildl. Fed., Washington, D.C.
  12. Bednarz, J. C., D. Klem Jr., L. J. Goodrich, and S. E. Senner. 1990. Migration counts of raptors at Hawk Mountain, Pennsylvania, as indicators of population trends, 1934-1986. The Auk 107:96-109.
  13. Bent, A.C. 1937. Life histories of North American birds of prey. Part 1. Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus. 137. 409 pp.
  14. BirdLife International. 2004b. Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD ROM. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
  15. Bohall, P. G., and M. W. Collopy. 1984. Seasonal abundance, habitat use and perch sites of four raptor species in northcentral Florida. J. Field Ornithol. 55:181-189.
  16. Bosakowski, T., an D. G. Smith. 1989. Survey of the woodland raptor community in the Pequannock watershed. Unpublished report. 19 pp.
  17. Bosakowski, T., and R. Speiser. 1986. Apparent great horned owl predation on nesting red-shouldered hawks in New Jersey. Records of New Jersey Birds 12:44-45.
  18. Bosakowski, T., D. G. Smith, and R. Speiser. 1992. Status, nesting density, and macrohabitat selection of red-shouldered hawks in northern New Jersey. Wilson Bull. 104:434-446.
  19. Bowles, J. J. Stravers, and D. M. Roosa. 1984. A nesting survey of the red-shouldered hawks in Iowa, with comments on other raptors. Central College, Pella, Iowa. Unpublished report.
  20. Brown, W. H. 1971. Winter population trends in the red-shouldered hawk. American Birds 25(5):813-817.
  21. Bryant, A.A. 1986. Influence of selective logging on red-shouldered hawks, BUTEO LINEATUS, in Waterloo region, Ontario, 1953-1978. Canadian Field-Naturalist 100:520-525.
  22. Bull, J. 1974. Birds of New York state. Doubleday/Natural History Press, Garden City, New York. Reprint, 1985 (with Supplement, Federation of New York Bird Clubs, 1976), Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York.
  23. Bushman, E. S., and G. D. Therres. 1988. Habitat management guidelines for forest interior breeding birds of coastal Maryland. Maryland Dept. Natural Resources, Wildlife Tech. Publ. 88-1. 50 pp.
  24. Castrale, J. S. 1991. Eastern woodland buteos. Pages 50- 9 in Proceedings of Midwest Raptor Management Symposium and Workshop 27 Feb - 1 Mar 1989, Chicago, Illinois. National Wildlife Federation Scientific and Technical Series No. 15.
  25. Clarkson, K. E. and L. P. Laniawe. 2000. Hawaiian Hawk, <i>Buteo solitarius</i>. In A. Poole and F. Gill, editors. The Birds of North America. No. 523. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 16 pp.
  26. Clark, W. S., and B. K. Wheeler. 1987. A Field Guide to Hawks of North America. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts.
  27. Considine, T. J., Jr., and T. S. Frieswyk. 1982. Forest statistics for New York. 1980. Northeast Forest Expt. Sta., USDA Forest Serv., Res. Bull. NE-71. 118 pp.
  28. Craighead, J. J., and F. C. Craighead, Jr. 1956. Hawks, Owls and Wildlife. The Stackpole Company, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and the Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, D.C.
  29. Crocoll, S. 1991. The potential impact of gypsy moth defoliation on broad-winged hawk reproductive success. The Kingbird 41:224-227.
  30. Crocoll, S., and J. W. Parker. 1986. Canadaway raptors. The Conservationist 41:36-41.
  31. Crocoll, S., and J. W. Parker. 1988. The life and times of the red-shouldered hawk. The Conservationist 43:41-45.
  32. Crocoll, S.T. 1994. Red-shouldered Hawk (<i>Buteo lineatus</i>). In A. Poole and F. Gill, editors, The Birds of North America, No. 107. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC. 20 pp.
  33. Crocoll, S. T., and J. W. Parker. 1989. The breeding biology of broad-winged and red-shouldered hawks in western New York. J. Raptor Res. 23:125-39.
  34. Devereux, J. G., and J. A. Mosher. 1984. Breeding ecology of barred owls in the central Appalachians. Raptor Research 18:49-58.
  35. Dijak, W. D., B. Tannenbaum, and M. A. Parker. 1990. Nest-site characteristics affecting success and reuse of red-shouldered hawk nests. Wilson Bull. 102:480-486.
  36. Dunne, P., D. Sibley, and C. Sutton. 1988. Hawks in Flight: The Flight Identification of North American Raptors. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts.
  37. Ebbers, B. C. 1986. Distribution, status and reproductive ecology of red-shouldered hawks in the northern Lower Peninsula of Michigan. Unpublished report submitted to Michigan Department of Natural Resources.
  38. Ebbers, B. C. 1989. Relationships between red- shouldered hawk reproduction and the environment in northern Michigan. Unpublished report submitted to Michigan Department of Natural Resources.
  39. Ehrlich, P. R., D. S. Dobkin, and D. Wheye. 1992. Birds in Jeopardy: the Imperiled and Extinct Birds of the United States and Canada, Including Hawaii and Puerto Rico. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. 259 pp.
  40. England, A. S., M. J. Bechard, and C. S. Houston. 1997. Swainson's Hawk (<i>Buteo swainsoni</i>). No. 265 IN A. Poole and F. Gill, editors, The birds of North America. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, and The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC. 28pp.
  41. Evers, D. C. 1992. A guide to Michigan's endangered wildlife. Univ. Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. viii + 103 pp.
  42. Fisher, A.K. 1893. The hawks and owls of the United States in their relation to agriculture. Washington U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Bull. no. 6. 210 pp.
  43. Fuller, M. R., and J. A. Mosher. 1987. Raptor survey techniques. Pages 37-65 in B. A. Giron Pendleton, et al., eds. Raptor management techniques manual. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, D.C.
  44. Hands, H. M., R. D. Drobney, and M. R. Ryan. 1989. Status of the red-shouldered hawk in the northcentral United States. Missouri Coop. Fish Wildl. Res. Unit Rep. 21 pp.
  45. Harrison, C. 1978. A Field Guide to the Nests, Eggs and Nestlings of North American Birds. Collins, Cleveland, Ohio.
  46. Harrison, H. H. 1979. A field guide to western birds' nests. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. 279 pp.
  47. Havera, S. P., and R. E. Duzan. 1986. Organochlorine and polychlorinated biphenyl residues in tissues of raptors from Illinois, USA 1966-1981. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 36:23-32.
  48. Hawbecker, A. C. 1942. A life history study of the white-tailed kite. Condor 44:267-276.
  49. Hector, D. P. 1988b. Aplomado Falcon (<i>Falco femoralis</i>). Pages 315-322 in R. S. Palmer, editor, Handbook of North American birds. Vol. 5: Family Accipitridae, Family Falconidae. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
  50. Henny, C. J. 1972. An analysis of the population dynamics of selected avian species with special reference to changes during the modern pesticide era. Bureau of Sport, Fish and Wildlife, Washington, D. C. 99 p.
  51. Henny, C. J., et al. 1973. Territorial behavior, pesticides and the population ecology of red-shoulder hawks in central Maryland, 1943-1971. Ecology 54:545-554.
  52. Herkert, J. R., editor. 1992. Endangered and threatened species of Illinois: status and distribution. Vol. 2: Animals. Illinois Endangered Species Protection Board. iv + 142 pp.
  53. Houston, C. S., and J. K. Schmutz. 1995. Swainson's Hawk banding in North America to 1992. North American Bird Bander 20:120-127.
  54. Iverson, G. C., and M. R. Fuller. 1991. Area-occupied survey technique for nesting woodland raptors. Pages 118-124 in Proceedings of Midwest Raptor Management Symposium and Workshop 27 Feb - 1 Mar 1989, Chicago, Illinois. National Wildlife Federation Scientific and Technical Series No. 15.
  55. Janik, C. A., and J. A. Moser. 1982. Breeding biology of raptors in the central Appalachians. Raptor Res. 16:18-24.
  56. Johnsgard, P. A. 1990. Hawks, eagles, and falcons of North America. Smithsonian Inst. Press, Washington, D.C. xvi + 403 pp.
  57. Johnson, G., and R. E. Chambers. 1990. Response to conspecific, roadside playback recordings: an index of red-shouldered hawk breeding density. Pages 71-76 in Mitchell et al., eds. Ecosystem management: rare species and significant habitats. New York State Mus. Bull. 471.
  58. Johnson, R. R., R. L. Glinski, and S. W. Matteson. 2000. Zone-tailed Hawk (<i>Buteo albonotatus</i>). No. 529 IN A. Poole and F. Gill, editors, The birds of North America. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 20pp.
  59. Kennard, F. H. 1894. The young of the red-shouldered hawk (BUTEO LINEATUS). Auk 11:270-280.
  60. Kimmel, V. L., and L. H. Fredrickson. 1981. Nesting ecology of the red-shouldered hawk in southeastern missouri. Trans. Missouri Acad. Sci. 15:21-27.
  61. Kirk, D. A., D. Hussell, and E. Dunn. 1995. Raptor population status and trends in Canada. Bird Trends (Canadian Wildlife Service) 4:2-9.
  62. Knight, O.W. 1908. The Birds of Maine with Key to and Description of the Various Species Known to Occur or to Have Occurred in the State, an Account of Their Distribution and Migration, Showing Their Relative Abundance in the Various Counties of the State as Well as Other Regions, and Contributions to Their Life Histories. Charles H. Glass & Co.: Bangor, Maine. 693 pp.
  63. Kocan, A. A., J. Snelling, and E. C. Greiner. 1977. some infectons and parasitic diseases in Oklahoma raptors. J. Wildl. Dis. 13:304-6.
  64. Kochert, M. N. 1986. Raptors. pages 313-349 IN: A. Y. Cooperrider, R. J. Boyd, and H. R. Stuart, editors. Inventory and monitoring of wildlife habitat. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Denver Service Center.
  65. Leary, A. W., R. Mazaika, and M. J. Bechard. 1998. Factors affecting the size of Ferruginous Hawk home ranges. Wilson Bulletin 110:198-205.
  66. Matteson, S. W., and J. O. Riley. 1981. Distribution and nesting success of Zone-tailed Hawks in west Texas. Wilson Bulletin 107:719-723.
  67. McCrary, M. D., and P. H. Bloom. 1984. Lethal effects of introduced grasses on red-shouldered hawks. Journal of Wildlife Management. 48(3): 1005-1008.
  68. Montoya, A.B., P.J. Zwank, and M. Cardenas. 1997. Breeding biology of Aplomado Falcons in desert grasslands of Chihuahua, Mexico. Journal of Field Ornithology 68(1):135-143.
  69. Morris, M. M. J., and R. E. Lemon. 1983. Characteristics of vegetation and topography near red-shouldered hawk nests in southwestern Quebec. J. Wildlife Manage. 47:138-145.
  70. Morris, M. M. J., et al. 1982. Characterisitics of red-shouldered hawk, BUTEO LINEATUS, nest sites in southwestern Quebec. Can. Field-Nat. 96:139-142.
  71. Mosher, J. A., M. R. Fuller, and M. Kopeny. 1990. Surveying woodland raptors by broadcast of conspecific vocalizations. J. Field Ornithol. 61:453-461.
  72. Nelson, B. B., and K. Titus. 1989. Silvicultural practices and raptor habitat associations in the Northeast. Pages 171-179 in Proceedings of the Northeast Raptor Management symposium and workshop. Natl. Wildl. Fed., Washington, D.C.
  73. Newton, I. 1979. Population ecology of raptors. Buteo Books, Vermillion, South Dakota.
  74. Olendorff, R. R. 1993. Status, biology, and management of Ferruginous Hawks: a review. Raptor Res. and Tech. Asst. Cen., Special Report. U.S. Dept. Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Boise, Idaho. 84 pp.
  75. Palmer, R. S. 1988c. Red-shouldered hawk, ASTURINA LINEATA. Pages 413-29 in R. S. Palmer (editor). Handbook of North American Birds. Vol. 4: Diurnal Raptors (Part 1). Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut. 433 pp.
  76. Palmer, R. S., editor. 1988a. Handbook of North American birds. Vol. 4. [Diurnal raptors, part 1]. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT. vii + 433 pp.
  77. Parker III, T. A., D. F. Stotz, and J. W. Fitzpatrick. 1996. Ecological and distributional databases for neotropical birds. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  78. Parker, M.A. 1986. The foraging behavior and habitat use of breeding Red-shouldered Hawks (BUTEO LINEATUS) in southeastern Missouri. Master's thesis. University of Missouri, Columbia.
  79. Peck, G. K., and R. D. James. 1983. Breeding birds of Ontario, nidology and distribution, volume 1: nonpasserines. Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Canada.
  80. Pendleton, B. A. G., B. A. Millsap, K. W. Cline, and D. M. Bird. 1987. Raptor management techniques manual. National Wildlife Federation, Sci. and Tech. Ser. No. 10. 420 pp.
  81. Petersen, L. 1979. Ecology of Great Horned Owls and Red-tailed Hawks in southeastern Wisconsin. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Technical Bulletin no. 111.
  82. Peters, H.S. 1936. A list of external parasites from birds of the eastern part of the United States. Bird-Banding 7:9-27.
  83. Peterson, J. M. C., and S. T. Crocoll. 1992. Red-shouldered hawk, BUTEO LINEATUS. Pages 333-351 in K. J. Schneider and D. M. Pence, editors. Migratory nongame birds of management concern in the Northeast. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Newton Corner, Massachusetts. 400 pp.
  84. Poole, A. F. and F. B. Gill. 1992. The birds of North America. The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. and The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA.
  85. Portnoy, J. W., and W. E. Dodge. 1979. Red-shouldered hawk nesting ecology and behavior. Wilson Bull. 91:104-117.
  86. Postupalsky, S. 1980. The red-shouldered hawk breeding in Michigan's Upper Peninsula. The Jack Pine Warbler 58:73-76.
  87. Postupalsky, S. 1989. Past and current nesting status of the red-shouldered hawk in Michigan. Unpublished preliminary report submitted to Michigan Department of Natural Resources.
  88. Preston, C. R., C. S. Harger, and H. E. Harger. 1989. Habitat use and nest-site selection by red-shouldered hawks in Arkansas. Southwest. Nat. 34:72-78.
  89. Robbins, C. S., D. Bystrak, and P. H. Geissler. 1986. The Breeding Bird Survey: its first fifteen years. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serv. Resource Publ. 157. iii + 196 pp.
  90. Robbins, S. D., Jr. 1991. Wisconsin Birdlife: Population and Distribution Past and Present. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.
  91. Root, T. 1988. Atlas of wintering North American birds: An analysis of Christmas Bird Count data. University of Chicago Press. 336 pp.
  92. Rosenberg, K.V, A.M. Dokter, P.J. Blancher, J.R. Sauer, A.C. Smith, P.A. Smith, J.C. Stanton, A. Panjabi, L. Helft, M. Parr, P.P. Marra. 2019. Decline of the North American avifauna. Science. Published online. 19 Sep 2019.
  93. Sargent, W. D. 1938. Nest parasitism of hawks. Auk 55:82-84.
  94. Schneider, K.J., and D.M. Pence, editors. 1992. Migratory nongame birds of management concern in the Northeast. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Newton Corner, MA. 400 pp.
  95. Smith, D. G., and J. R. Murphy. 1973. Breeding ecology of raptors in the eastern Great Basin of Utah. Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biol. Ser. 13:1-76.
  96. Steenhof, K. 1998. Prairie Falcon (<i>Falco mexicanus</i>). In A. Poole and F. Gill, editors, The Birds of North America, No. 346. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 28 pp.
  97. Stewart, R. E. 1949. Ecology of a nesting red-shouldered hawk population. Wilson Bull. 61:26-35.
  98. Suarez, W., and S.L. Olson. 2003. Red-shouldered Hawk and Aplomado Falcon from Quaternary asphalt deposits in Cuba. Journal of Raptor Research 37:71-75.
  99. Tate, J., Jr. 1986. The Blue List for 1986. American Birds 40:227-236.
  100. Terres, J. K. 1980. The Audubon Society encyclopedia of North American birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  101. Titus, K. 1984. Uniformity in relative habitat selection by BUTEO LINEATUS and B. PLATYPTERUS in two temperate forest regions. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. Maryland.
  102. Titus, K., and J. A. Mosher. 1981. Nest site habitat selection by woodland hawks in the central Appalachians. Auk 98:270-281.
  103. Titus, K., and J. A. Mosher. 1987. Selection of nest tree species by red-shouldered and broad-winged hawks in two temperate forest regions. J. Field Ornithol. 58:274-283.
  104. Titus, K., and M. R. Fuller. 1990. Recent trends in counts of migrant hawks from northeastern North America. Journal of Wildlife Management 54:463-470.
  105. Titus, K., et al. 1989a. Buteos. Pages 53-64 in Proceedings of the Northeast Raptor Management Symposium and Workshop. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, D.C.
  106. Titus, K., M. R. Fuller, and J. L. Ruos. 1989b. Considerations for monitoring raptor population trends based on counts of migrants. Pages 19-32 in B. U. Meyburg and R. D. Chancellor (editors). Raptors in the Modern World. Proceedings of the Third World Conference on Birds of Prey. International Council Bird Preservation, Berlin.
  107. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1987. Migratory Nongame Birds of Management Concern in the United States: The 1987 List. Office of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. 63 pp.
  108. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1987. Migratory nongame birds of management concern in the United States: the 1987 list. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Migratory Bird Management, Washington, D.C. 63 pp.
  109. Wiley, J. W. 1975. The nesting and reproductive success of red-tailed hawks and red-shouldered hawks in Orange County, California, 1973. Condor 77:133-139.
  110. Woodbridge, B., K. K. Finley, and P. H. Bloom. 1995. Reproductive performance, age structure, and natal dispersal of Swainson's Hawks in the Butte Valley, California. Journal of Raptor Research 29:187-192.
  111. Woodrey, M. S. 1986. Characteristics of red-shouldered hawk nests in southeast Ohio. Wilson Bull. 98:466-469.