Buteo regalis

(Gray, 1844)

Ferruginous Hawk

G4Apparently Secure Found in 106 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
Ferruginous Hawk (Buteo regalis). © Elliott Ress; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Elliott Ress; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Ferruginous Hawk (Buteo regalis). © Joachim Bertrands | Ornis Birding Expeditions; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Joachim Bertrands | Ornis Birding Expeditions; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Ferruginous Hawk (Buteo regalis). © Jonathan Casanova; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Jonathan Casanova; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Ferruginous Hawk (Buteo regalis). © Kyle Lima; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Kyle Lima; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Ferruginous Hawk (Buteo regalis). © Connor Cochrane; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Connor Cochrane; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Ferruginous Hawk (Buteo regalis). © Jeff Todoroff; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Jeff Todoroff; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Ferruginous Hawk (Buteo regalis). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.103222
Element CodeABNKC19120
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
CITESAppendix II
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAves
OrderAccipitriformes
FamilyAccipitridae
GenusButeo
Other Common Names
Aguililla Real (ES) Buse rouilleuse (FR) ferruginous hawk (EN)
Concept Reference
American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in The Auk]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2016-04-06
Change Date1996-11-22
Edition Date1995-12-11
Edition AuthorsReichel, J.D. and E.C. Atkinson. Partially revised/updated by G. Hammerson.
Range Extent20,000 to >2,500,000 square km (about 8000 to >1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank Reasons
Widespread and relatively common in the appropriate habitat. Reports of local declines, continued loss of habitat, sensitivity to disturbance in a prairie species, and relatively low numbers show this species should be carefully watched and regularly re-evaluated.
Range Extent Comments
BREEDING: eastern Washington, southern Alberta, southern Saskatchewan, extreme southwestern Manitoba (Bechard and Schmutz 1995), south to eastern Oregon, Nevada, northern Arizona, northern New Mexico, Texas panhandle, extreme western Oklahoma, and western Kansas. Recently discovered breeding in California (Small 1994). Historic breeding range in the southwestern U.S. apparently was much greater than at present (Hall et al. 1988). Two subpopulations are recognized (Bechard and Schmutz 1995); one to the east and another to the west of the Rocky Mountains. NON-BREEDING: primarily southwestern and south-central U.S. south to Baja California and central mainland of Mexico; in the U.S., in largest numbers in western Texas, eastern New Mexico, and western Oklahoma (Root 1988). Winters locally in some more northerly breeding areas (Bechard and Schmutz 1995).
Occurrences Comments
Probably in the low hundreds, however, until new EOSPECs are put in use, or more nests areas mapped, this is uncertain.
Threat Impact Comments
HABITAT LOSS: Some habitat has been lost due to agricultural development. Schmutz and Schmutz (1980) reported that habitat in the breeding range in Canada has been severely depleted by agriculture, disturbance, and forest invasion (see also Jensen 1995), though recent trends suggest relative stability (Schmutz 1995). Loss of grassland is not regarded as an immediate threat (USFWS 1992), but is likely a long-term threat (Olendorff 1993). Ability of native grasslands and shrublands to support viable populations may be compromised by the invasion of exotic annuals, especially cheatgrass (BROMUS TECTORUM) and Russian thistle (SALSOLA IBERICA). However, conversion of large areas of dense shrublands to grasslands may locally benefit Ferruginous Hawks. HUMAN DISTURBANCE: Easily disturbed during the breeding season (Olendorff 1973, Gilmer and Stewart 1983, Schmutz 1984, White and Thurow 1985, Bechard et al. 1990). Abandonment of nests occurs particularly in the early stages of nesting (Davy 1930, Weston 1968, Fitzner et al. 1977, Gilmer and Stewart 1983, White and Thurow 1985). In eastern Colorado, nests in remote locations had greater productivity compared to more accessible nests (Olendorff 1973). In South Dakota, the probability of fledging young was 11.4 percent greater in more remote nests than in nests within 2.47 kilometers of occupied buildings (Blair 1978). In North Dakota, avoided cropland and nesting within 0.7 kilometers of occupied buildings (Gaines 1985). In Alberta, rarely nested within 0.5 kilometers of farmyards (Schmutz 1984). In other instances, more tolerant of human disturbance. Nesting has occurred near active railroads and gravel roads (Rolfe 1896, Gilmer and Stewart 1983, MacLaren et al. 1988). Sensitivity to disturbance may be heightened in years of low prey abundance (White and Thurow 1985). Shooting may also be a threat, especially on the wintering grounds (Harmata 1981, Gilmer et al. 1985). Poisoning of prey species may be a threat both directly to hawks eating poisoned animals and indirectly through reduction of prey base, especially at prey concentration areas such as prairie dog colonies. Noted as an accidental but unsuitable host of the Brown-headed Cowbird (MOLOTHRUS ATER), an obligate brood parasite (Friedmann 1963).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

A hawk with a rusty back and shoulders, paler head, and white tail washed with pale rust; white patch at the base of the flight feathers on the upper wing surface; dark legs of adult contrast with whitish underparts; uncommon dark phase lacks dark tail bands; averages 58 cm long, 135 cm wingspan (NGS 1983).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Dark phase differs from dark-phase rough-legged hawk (BUTEO LAGOPUS) by absence of dark tail bands in the former. Immature resembles Great Plains form of red-tailed hawk (BUTEO JAMAICENSIS) but has larger white wing patches and lacks dark bar on leading edge of underwing (NGS 1983).

Habitat

Open country, primarily prairies, plains and badlands; sagebrush, saltbush-greasewood shrubland, periphery of pinyon-juniper and other woodland, desert. In the southern Great Plains, common at black-tailed prairie dog colonies in winter (Schmutz and Fyfe 1987). Nests in tall trees or willows along streams or on steep slopes, in junipers (Utah), on cliff ledges, river-cut banks, hillsides, on power line towers, sometimes on sloped ground on the plains or on mounds in open desert. Generally avoids areas of intensive agriculture or human activity.

Prefer open grasslands and shrubsteppe communities. Uses native and tame grasslands, pastures, hayland, cropland, and shrubsteppe (Stewart 1975, Woffinden 1975, Powers and Craig 1976, Fitzner et al. 1977, Blair 1978, Wakeley 1978, Lardy 1980, Schmidt 1981, Gilmer and Stewart 1983, Green and Morrison 1983, Konrad and Gilmer 1986, MacLaren et al. 1988, Palmer 1988, Roth and Marzluff 1989, Bechard et al. 1990, Black 1992, Niemuth 1992, Bechard and Schmutz 1995, Faanes and Lingle 1995, Houston 1995, Zelenak and Rotella 1997, Leary et al. 1998). Usually occupy rolling or rugged terrain (Blair 1978, Palmer 1988, Black 1992). High elevations, forest interiors, narrow canyons, and cliff areas are avoided (Janes 1985, Palmer 1988, Black 1992), as is parkland habitat in Canada (Schmutz 1991a).

Landscapes with moderate coverage (less than 50 percent) of cropland and hayland are used for nesting and foraging (Blair 1978; Wakeley 1978; Gilmer and Stewart 1983; Konrad and Gilmer 1986; Schmutz 1989, 1991a; Bechard et al. 1990; Faanes and Lingle 1995; Leary et al. 1998). In North Dakota, hayfields and native pastures were the habitats most often used by both fledglings and adults, whereas cultivated fields rarely were used (Konrad and Gilmer 1986). Fledglings in South Dakota hunted in an area where native hay recently had been cut (Blair 1978). When prey densities were low in big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata)/grassland habitat, agricultural fields served as important foraging areas (Leary et al. 1998). Foraged extensively in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and irrigated potato fields in Washington and in alfalfa fields in Idaho during the breeding season presumably because of high prey densities (Wakeley 1978, Leary et al. 1998).

Nest site selection depends upon available substrates and surrounding land use. Ground nests typically are located far from human activities and on elevated landforms in large grassland areas (Lokemoen and Duebbert 1976, Blair 1978, Blair and Schitoskey 1982, Gilmer and Stewart 1983, Atkinson 1992, Black 1992). Lone or peripheral trees are preferred over densely wooded areas when trees are selected as the nesting substrate (Weston 1968, Lokemoen and Duebbert 1976, Gilmer and Stewart 1983, Woffinden and Murphy 1983, Palmer 1988, Bechard et al. 1990). Tree-nesting hawks seem to be less sensitive to surrounding land use, but they still avoid areas of intensive agriculture or high human disturbance (Gilmer and Stewart 1983; Schmutz 1984, 1987, 1991a; Bechard et al. 1990).

In eastern Colorado, nested more frequently in grassland areas than in cultivated areas (Olendorff 1973). In North Dakota, preferred to nest in areas dominated by pasture and hayland (Gilmer and Stewart 1983, Gaines 1985). In southwestern Montana, sagebrush (Artemisia) and grasslands predominated within 100 meters of nests (Atkinson 1992). Ground nests in northern Montana were located in grass-dominated, rolling (more than 10 percent slope) rangeland; in general, cropland and areas with dense (more than 30 percent cover), tall (more than 15.24 centimeters) sagebrush were avoided (Black 1992). In western Kansas, most nests were surrounded by more than 50 percent rangeland and 25-50 percent cropland, although one pair incorporated more than 75 percent cropland in its territory (Roth and Marzluff 1989). The majority of nests (86 of 99) were not in direct view of black-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) towns, although most nest sites were within 8 kilometers of towns (Roth and Marzluff 1989). In Utah, Idaho, Oregon, and California, preferred native grassland and shrubland habitats over cropland, and preferred areas with no perches (Janes 1985). In Washington, some nests occurred in agricultural fields, but most nests were in areas with higher percentages of grassland, shrubland, and western juniper (Juniperus occidentalis) (Bechard et al. 1990). Nest productivity in Idaho was greater in territories with higher amounts of crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum) fields interspersed with desert shrub than in territories with monotypic stands of crested wheatgrass or shrubland, or with greater amounts of Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma), alfalfa, and cropland (Howard 1975). In Nevada, open, rolling sagebrush near the pinyon-juniper interface is the preferred landscape for breeding Ferruginous Hawks (GBBO 2010).

In Alberta, however, cultivated areas (11-30 percent of 4,100 hectare plots) had higher nesting densities than grassland areas with 0-11 percent cultivation (Schmutz 1989). In cultivated areas (20 percent) in northcentral Montana, nests closer to cultivated fields and roads were more successful, presumably because of higher prey densities associated with edge habitats (Zelenak and Rotella 1997). The numbers of fledglings produced in unfragmented rangeland versus a mixture of rangeland and cropland were not significantly different in Nebraska (Podany 1996).

The slope, height, and exposure of nests were mostly similar across the species' range. The mean height of ground nests (on buttes or hills) above the surrounding prairie in South Dakota was less than 10 meters, and nests were oriented toward the south and west, providing access to prevailing winds from the south and west (Blair 1978). Lokemoen and Duebbert (1976) found ground nests in South Dakota were all oriented toward the west. Nests in southwestern Montana were significantly oriented toward the south (Atkinson 1992). Nests on rock outcrops in Montana were built on slopes averaging 62.8 percent and were found on the upper 35 percent of the slope (Atkinson 1992). Ground nests in northern Montana were located either on the top of a small rise or on slopes ranging from 10 to 50 percent (Black 1992). Average height of ground nests below the highest surrounding topographic feature was 10 meters, whereas average height of ground nest sites above the valley floor was 10.4 meters, indicating that nests were placed at mid-elevation sites within the immediate topography (Black 1992). Nests in Wyoming were built on a mean slope of 14.26 degrees, and the mean height of nests was 4.55 meters (MacLaren et al. 1988). In southeastern Washington, 86 percent of nests on outcrops and in western junipers were located less than 10 meters from the ground and had southern or western exposures (Bechard et al. 1990). In Oregon shrubsteppe, nests were in relatively short western juniper trees, were less than 10 meters from the ground, and had large support branches (Green and Morrison 1983). In Washington, Idaho, and Utah, the majority of nests also were less than 10 meters from the ground in western juniper and Utah juniper trees (Woffinden 1975, Fitzner et al. 1977, Woffinden and Murphy 1983). Howard (1975) and Howard and Wolfe (1976) also found Utah juniper trees were important nest substrates in southern Idaho and northern Utah. In Utah, nests were built 2-3 meters from the ground, were most commonly located on the sides or summits of hills, and often had southern or eastern exposures (Weston 1968). Woffinden (1975) found that the majority of nests in Utah were on slopes ranging from 15 to 80 degrees with a mean of 42.5 degrees.

Ecology

Density and productivity are closely associated with cycles of prey abundance (Woffinden 1975; Powers and Craig 1976; Smith and Murphy 1978, Smith et al. 1981; Gilmer and Stewart 1983; Houston and Bechard 1984; White and Thurow 1985; Palmer 1988; Schmutz 1989, 1991a; Schmutz and Hungle 1989; Bechard and Schmutz 1995). Estimates of home range size vary from 3.14 to 8.09 square kilometers in the Columbia River Basin and Great Basin regions of the western U.S. (Janes 1985). The average home range was 90.3 square kilometers in Washington, and the variability in home range was significantly related to distance from the nest to the nearest irrigated agricultural field (Leary et al. 1998). One male that nested closest to the surrounding agricultural fields had the smallest home range, whereas another male nesting farthest from the agricultural fields had the largest home range. In Utah, mean home range recorded of 5.9 square kilometers (Smith and Murphy 1973). An area of up to 21.7 square kilometers may be required by one pair for hunting in Idaho (Wakeley 1978). Up to 8-10 nests per 100 square kilomters if local conditions are favorable (see Palmer [1988] for density data in several areas). In 11 study areas, mean nearest neighbor distance was 3.4 kilometers (range 0.8-7.2); in six study areas the mean home range size was 7.0 square kilometers (range 3.4-21.7) (Olendorff 1993). Recent studies in Idaho (McAnnis 1990) and Washington (Leary 1996) found average home ranges of 7.6 square kilometers (minimum convex polygon)/19.4 square kilometers (95 percent harmonic mean) and 70 square kilometers (95 percent minimum convex polygon)/31 square kilometers (85 percent adaptive kernel), respectively.

First year mortality generally is around 66 percent in the Great Plains region (Schmutz and Fyfe 1987).

Reproduction

Occur on breeding areas from late February through early October (Weston 1968, Olendorff 1973, Maher 1974, Blair 1978, Smith and Murphy 1978, Gilmer and Stewart 1983, Schmutz and Fyfe 1987, Palmer 1988, Bechard and Schmutz 1995). See Palmer (1988) and Hall et al. (1988) for egg dates in different areas. Clutch size usually is two to four. Incubation lasts about 32-33 days, mostly by female; male provides food. Young fledge in 35-50 days (males before females), depend on parents for several weeks more. No evidence that yearlings breed. Renesting within the same year is rare (Woffinden 1975, Palmer 1988) even when clutch is lost. Territory and nest site reoccupancy is common and one of several nests within a territory may be used in alternate years (Davy 1930, Weston 1968, Olendorff 1973, Blair 1978, Smith and Murphy 1978, Palmer 1988, Roth and Marzluff 1989, Schmutz 1991b, Atkinson 1992, Houston 1995). Mate fidelity also is common. (Schmutz 1991b). Clutch size, fledging rate, and/or breeding density tend to vary with prey (especially jackrabbit [LEPUS SPP.] or ground squirrel [SPERMOPHILUS SPP.]) availability.
Terrestrial Habitats
SavannaGrassland/herbaceousDesertCliff
Palustrine Habitats
Riparian
Other Nations (2)
United StatesN4B,N4N
ProvinceRankNative
North DakotaSUYes
IdahoS3BYes
NevadaS3B,S4NYes
South DakotaS3BYes
New MexicoS2B,S4NYes
ColoradoS3B,S4NYes
KansasS2B,S4NYes
WyomingS4B,S3NYes
MontanaS3BYes
OklahomaS2B,S4NYes
CaliforniaS3Yes
UtahS2Yes
WashingtonS2BYes
TexasS2B,S4NYes
Navajo NationS2B,S3NYes
ArizonaS2B,S4NYes
OregonS3BYes
NebraskaS2Yes
MinnesotaSNAYes
CanadaN3B,N2M
ProvinceRankNative
ManitobaS1BYes
SaskatchewanS3BYes
AlbertaS3B,S2MYes
British ColumbiaSUYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
2 - Agriculture & aquaculturePervasive - largeModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsPervasive - largeModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingPervasive - largeModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
3 - Energy production & miningLarge - smallSlight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
3.2 - Mining & quarryingLarge - smallSlight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsPervasive - largeSlight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionPervasive - largeSlight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive - largeModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesPervasive - largeModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (106)
California (24)
AreaForestAcres
AntimonyLos Padres National Forest40,911
Barker ValleyCleveland National Forest11,940
CajonSan Bernardino National Forest7,548
Domeland Add.Sequoia National Forest3,046
Fox MountainLos Padres National Forest52,072
Garcia MountainLos Padres National Forest7,850
Glass MountainInyo National Forest52,867
Granite PeakSan Bernardino National Forest450
Los Machos HillsLos Padres National Forest11,112
Lpoor CanyonLos Padres National Forest13,762
Machesna MountainLos Padres National Forest12,271
MatilijaLos Padres National Forest5,218
NordhoffLos Padres National Forest12,031
PaiuteInyo National Forest58,712
Pleasant ViewAngeles National Forest26,395
Pyramid Peak BSan Bernardino National Forest7,194
QuatalLos Padres National Forest7,253
Sawmill - BadlandsLos Padres National Forest51,362
South SierraInyo National Forest41,853
TequepisLos Padres National Forest9,080
TinemahaInyo National Forest27,060
Wild Horse Mtn. (CA)Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest28,822
WoodpeckerSequoia National Forest11,936
WoolstaffSequoia National Forest41,445
Colorado (1)
AreaForestAcres
Bristol HeadRio Grande NF46,087
Idaho (4)
AreaForestAcres
Borah PeakSalmon-Challis National Forest130,463
Italian PeakCaribou-Targhee National Forest141,158
Lemhi RangeSalmon-Challis National Forest308,533
PalisadesCaribou-Targhee National Forest122,002
Montana (12)
AreaForestAcres
Bear - Marshall - Scapegoat - SwanLewis and Clark National Forest344,022
Big Snowy Mountains WsaLewis and Clark National Forest88,003
Big Snowy Mountains WsaLewis and Clark National Forest88,003
Cook MountainCuster National Forest9,621
Cook MountainCuster National Forest9,621
Freezeout MountainBeaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest97,305
Italian PeakBeaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest90,401
MadisonGallatin National Forest127,859
Mt. Gmt Area HCuster National Forest1,335
Mt. Gmt Area HCuster National Forest1,335
North AbsarokaGallatin National Forest159,075
VigilanteBeaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest15,893
Nevada (6)
AreaForestAcres
Bald Mtn.Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest41,598
Boundary Peak (NV)Inyo National Forest21,851
Jobs Peak (NV)Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest1,342
Pine Grove SouthHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest88,945
QuinnHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest62,459
South SchellHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest125,614
New Mexico (15)
AreaForestAcres
Apache Kid ContiguousCibola National Forest67,542
Apache Kid ContiguousCibola National Forest67,542
Candian RiverCibola National Forest7,149
Candian RiverCibola National Forest7,149
Candian RiverCibola National Forest7,149
Capitan MountainsLincoln National Forest14,069
Carrizo MountainLincoln National Forest17,280
Carrizo MountainLincoln National Forest17,280
Gila BoxGila National Forest23,759
Ortega PeakLincoln National Forest11,545
Ortega PeakLincoln National Forest11,545
South Guadalupe MountainsLincoln National Forest20,930
South Guadalupe MountainsLincoln National Forest20,930
Tucson MountainLincoln National Forest16,905
Tucson MountainLincoln National Forest16,905
North Dakota (12)
AreaForestAcres
BlacktailDakota Prairie Grasslands8,620
BlacktailDakota Prairie Grasslands8,620
Dawsons WaterholeDakota Prairie Grasslands6,087
Dawsons WaterholeDakota Prairie Grasslands6,087
Scairt WomanDakota Prairie Grasslands6,099
Scairt WomanDakota Prairie Grasslands6,099
Tracy MountainDakota Prairie Grasslands9,756
Tracy MountainDakota Prairie Grasslands9,756
Twin ButtesDakota Prairie Grasslands13,492
Twin ButtesDakota Prairie Grasslands13,492
WannaganDakota Prairie Grasslands6,026
WannaganDakota Prairie Grasslands6,026
Oregon (2)
AreaForestAcres
HellholeUmatilla National Forest65,679
Snake RiverWallowa-Whitman National Forest31,229
South Dakota (4)
AreaForestAcres
Beaver ParkBlack Hills National Forest5,010
Beaver ParkBlack Hills National Forest5,010
Twin Butte CreekDakota Prairie Grasslands6,700
Twin Butte CreekDakota Prairie Grasslands6,700
Utah (8)
AreaForestAcres
418029Uinta National Forest15,673
Box - Death HollowDixie National Forest3,175
Casto BluffDixie National Forest87,466
North PavantFishlake National Forest53,262
Oak CreekFishlake National Forest54,053
Signal PeakFishlake National Forest30,889
Stansbury MountainsWasatch-Cache National Forest39,696
WellsvilleWasatch-Cache National Forest1,717
Wyoming (18)
AreaForestAcres
Beartooth Proposed WildernessShoshone National Forest16,837
Devils CanyonBighorn National Forest37,416
Little BighornBighorn National Forest133,949
Little BighornBighorn National Forest133,949
Little BighornBighorn National Forest133,949
Middle ForkMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest13,238
Pacific Creek - Blackrock CreekBridger-Teton National Forest24,658
PalisadesTarghee National Forest1,121
ReefShoshone National Forest16,817
South Beartooth HighwayShoshone National Forest105,570
Spread Creek - Gros Ventre RiverBridger-Teton National Forest166,097
Sulphur CreekShoshone National Forest30,221
Teton Corridor TrailheadsBridger-Teton National Forest286
Walker PrairieBighorn National Forest62,434
Walker PrairieBighorn National Forest62,434
West Slope TetonsTarghee National Forest47,448
West Slope WindsBridger-Teton National Forest143,252
Windy MountainShoshone National Forest31,283
References (114)
  1. Allen, J. A. 1874. Notes on the natural history of portions of Dakota and Montana Territories, being the substance of a report to the Secretary of War on the collections made by the North Pacific Railroad Expedition of 1973. Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History. pp. 68-70.
  2. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1983. Check-list of North American Birds, 6th edition. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas. 877 pp.
  3. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in <i>The Auk</i>]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
  4. Andersen, D.E., O.J. Rongstad, and W.R. Mytton. 1990. Home-range changes in raptors exposed to increased human activity levels in southeastern Colorado. Wildlife Society Bulletin 18:134-142.
  5. Angell, T. 1969. A study of the ferruginous hawk: Adult and brood behavior. Living bird, 8th annual, pp. 225-41.
  6. Atkinson, E. C. 1992. Ferruginous hawk (BUTEO REGALIS) inventories on the Dillon Resource Area of southwest Montana: 1992. Montana Natural Heritage Program for Bureau of Land Management, Dillon Resource Area. 34 pp. plus appendices.
  7. Bechard, M.J., and J.K. Schmutz. 1995. Ferruginous Hawk (BUTEO REGALIS). In A. Poole and F. Gill, editors, The Birds of North America, No. 172. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC. 20 pp.
  8. Bechard, M. J., R. L. Knight, D. G. Smith, and R. E. Fitzner. 1990. Nest sites and habitats of sympatric hawks (BUTEO spp.) in Washington. J. Field Ornithol. 61:159-170.
  9. BirdLife International. 2004b. Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD ROM. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
  10. Black, A. 1992. Ferruginous Hawk reproduction and habitat survey. Northern Rockies Conservation Cooperative, Jackson, WY. 30 pp.
  11. Blair, C.L. 1978. Breeding biology and prey selection of Ferruginous Hawks in northwestern South Dakota. M.S. thesis. South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD. 60 pp.
  12. Blair, C.L., and F. Schitoskey Jr. 1982. Breeding biology and diet of the Ferruginous Hawk in South Dakota. Wilson Bulletin 94:46-54.
  13. Bock, C.E., V.A. Saab, T.D. Rich, and D.S. Dobkin. 1993. Effects of livestock grazing on Neotropical migratory landbirds in western North America. Pages 296-309 in D.M. Finch and P.W. Stangel, editors. Status and management of Neotropical migratory birds. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report RM-229.
  14. Cameron, E. S. 1914. Ferruginous rough-leg, ARCHIBUTEO FERRUGINOUS, in Montana. Auk 31:158-167.
  15. Clarkson, K. E. and L. P. Laniawe. 2000. Hawaiian Hawk, <i>Buteo solitarius</i>. In A. Poole and F. Gill, editors. The Birds of North America. No. 523. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 16 pp.
  16. Craig, G.R., and W.C. Anderson. 1979. Ferruginous Hawk nesting studies. Pages 111-120 in Game Research Report, Colorado Division of Wildlife, Denver, CO.
  17. Craighead, J. J., and F. C. Craighead, Jr. 1956. Hawks, Owls and Wildlife. The Stackpole Company, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and the Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, D.C.
  18. Davy, G.L. 1930. Nesting of the Ferruginous Roughleg Hawk in northern North Dakota. Oologist 47:14-18.
  19. Dechant, J. A., M. L. Sondreal, D. H. Johnson, L. D. Igl, C. M. Goldade, A. L. Zimmerman, and B. R. Euliss. 1999. Effects of management practices on grassland birds: Ferruginous Hawk. Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Jamestown, ND. 21 pp.
  20. De Smet, K.D., and M.P. Conrad. 1991. Status, habitat requirements, and adaptations of Ferruginous Hawks in Manitoba. Pages 219-221 in G.L. Holroyd, G. Burns, and H.C. Smith, editors. Proceedings of the second endangered species and prairie conservation workshop. Natural History Occasional Paper 15. Provincial Museum of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
  21. Droege, S., and J.R. Sauer. 1990. North American Breeding Bird Survey, annual summary, 1989. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Report 90(8). 22 pp.
  22. Ehrlich, P. R., D. S. Dobkin, and D. Wheye. 1992. Birds in Jeopardy: the Imperiled and Extinct Birds of the United States and Canada, Including Hawaii and Puerto Rico. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. 259 pp.
  23. England, A. S., M. J. Bechard, and C. S. Houston. 1997. Swainson's Hawk (<i>Buteo swainsoni</i>). No. 265 IN A. Poole and F. Gill, editors, The birds of North America. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, and The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC. 28pp.
  24. Ensign, J. T. 1983. Nest site selection, productivity, and food habits of ferruginous hawks in southeastern Montana. M.S. thesis. Montana State University, Bozeman. 85 pp.
  25. Evans, D. L. 1982. Status reports on twelve raptors. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Special Scientific Report No. 238. 68 pp.
  26. Faanes, C.A., and G.R. Lingle. 1995. Breeding birds of the Platte River Valley of Nebraska. Online. Available: http://www.npwrc.org/resource/distr/birds/platte/platte.htm.
  27. Fisher, A.K. 1893. The hawks and owls of the United States in their relation to agriculture. Washington U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Bull. no. 6. 210 pp.
  28. Fitzner, R.E., D. Berry, L.L. Boyd, and C.A. Reick. 1977. Nesting of Ferruginous Hawks (BUTEO REGALIS) in Washington, 1974-75. Condor 79:245-249.
  29. Friedmann, H. 1963. Host relations of the parasitic Cowbird. Museum of Natural History. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C.
  30. Fyfe, R. W., and R. R. Olendorff. 1976. Minimizing the dangers of nesting studies to raptors and other sensitive species. Canadian Wildl. Serv. Occas. Pap. 23. 17 pp.
  31. Gaines, R.C. 1985. Nest site selection, habitat utilization, and breeding biology of the Ferruginous Hawk in central North Dakota. M.S. thesis. North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND. 32 pp.
  32. Garrison, B.A. 1990. Trends in winter abundance and distribution of Ferruginous Hawks in California. Trans. West. Sec. Wildl. Soc. 26:51-56.
  33. GBBO (Great Basin Bird Observatory). 2010. Nevada Comprehensive Bird Conservation Plan, ver. 1.0. Great Basin Bird Observatory, Reno, NV. Available online at www.gbbo.org/bird_conservation_plan.html
  34. Gilmer, D.S., and R.E. Stewart. 1983. Ferruginous Hawk populations and habitat use in North Dakota. Journal of Wildlife Management 47(1):146-157.
  35. Gilmer, D.S., D.L. Evans, P.M. Kondrad, and R.E. Stewart. 1985. Recoveries of ferruginous hawks banded in south-central North Dakota. Journal of Field Ornithology 56:184-187.
  36. Godfrey, W.E. 1966. The birds of Canada. National Museums of Canada. Ottawa. 428 pp.
  37. Green, G.A., and M.L. Morrison. 1983. Nest-site selection of sympatric Ferruginous and Swainson's hawks. Murrelet 64:20-22.
  38. Hall, R. S., et al. 1988. Ferruginous hawk. Pages 111-118 in Glinski et al., eds. Proc. Southwest Raptor Manage. Symp. and Workshop. Nat. Wildl. Fed. Sci. and Tech. Ser. No. 11.
  39. Harmata, A. R. 1981. Recoveries of ferruginous hawks banded in Colorado. North Amer. Bird Bander 6:144-147.
  40. Harrison, C. 1978. A Field Guide to the Nests, Eggs and Nestlings of North American Birds. Collins, Cleveland, Ohio.
  41. Hawbecker, A. C. 1942. A life history study of the white-tailed kite. Condor 44:267-276.
  42. Hector, D. P. 1988b. Aplomado Falcon (<i>Falco femoralis</i>). Pages 315-322 in R. S. Palmer, editor, Handbook of North American birds. Vol. 5: Family Accipitridae, Family Falconidae. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
  43. Houston, C.S. 1982. Artificial nesting platforms for Ferruginous Hawks. Blue Jay 40:208-213.
  44. Houston, C.S. 1985. Ferruginous Hawk nest platforms--progress report. Blue Jay 43:243-246.
  45. Houston, C.S. 1995. Thirty-two consecutive years of reproductive success at a Ferruginous Hawk nest. Journal of Raptor Research 29:282-283.
  46. Houston, C. S., and J. K. Schmutz. 1995. Swainson's Hawk banding in North America to 1992. North American Bird Bander 20:120-127.
  47. Houston, S.C., and M.J. Bechard. 1984. Decline of the Ferruginous Hawk in Saskatchewan. American Birds 38:166-170.
  48. Howard, R.P. 1975. Breeding ecology of the Ferruginous Hawk in northern Utah and southern Idaho. M.S. thesis. Utah State University, Logan, UT. 43 pp.
  49. Howard, R.P., and M.L. Wolfe. 1976. Range improvement practices and Ferruginous Hawks. Journal of Range Management 29:33-37.
  50. Janes, S.W. 1985. Habitat selection in raptorial birds. Pages 159-188 in M.L. Cody, editor. Habitat selection in birds. Academic Press, New York, NY.
  51. Jensen, J. 1995. Recovery of the ferruginous hawk. Bird Trends (Canadian Wildlife Service) 4:23-24.
  52. Johnsgard, P. A. 1990. Hawks, eagles, and falcons of North America. Smithsonian Inst. Press, Washington, D.C. xvi + 403 pp.
  53. Johnson, R. R., R. L. Glinski, and S. W. Matteson. 2000. Zone-tailed Hawk (<i>Buteo albonotatus</i>). No. 529 IN A. Poole and F. Gill, editors, The birds of North America. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 20pp.
  54. Kantrud, H.A., and R.L. Kologiski. 1982. Effects of soils and grazing on breeding birds of uncultivated upland g rasslands of the Northern Great Plains. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wildl. Res. Rep. 15. 33 pp.
  55. Kirk, D. A., D. Hussell, and E. Dunn. 1995. Raptor population status and trends in Canada. Bird Trends (Canadian Wildlife Service) 4:2-9.
  56. Kochert, M. N. 1986. Raptors. pages 313-349 IN: A. Y. Cooperrider, R. J. Boyd, and H. R. Stuart, editors. Inventory and monitoring of wildlife habitat. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Denver Service Center.
  57. Konrad, P.M., and D.S. Gilmer. 1986. Post fledging behavior of Ferruginous Hawks in North Dakota. Raptor Research 20:35-39.
  58. Lardy, M.E. 1980. Raptor inventory and Ferruginous Hawk biology in southeastern Oregon. M.S. thesis. University of Idaho, Moscow, ID. 52 pp.
  59. Leary, A.W. 1996. Home ranges, core use areas, and dietary habits of ferruginous hawks in southcentral Washington. M.S. Thesis, Boise State University, Boise, ID. 72 pp.
  60. Leary, A. W., R. Mazaika, and M. J. Bechard. 1998. Factors affecting the size of Ferruginous Hawk home ranges. Wilson Bulletin 110:198-205.
  61. Lefranc, M. N., Jr., and R. L. Glinski. 1988. Southwest raptor management issues and recommendations. Pages 375-392 in Glinski et al., eds. Proc. Southwest raptor management symposium and workshop. National Wildlife Federation Science and Tech. Ser. No. 11.
  62. Lehman, R.N., L.B. Carpenter, M.N. Kochert, and K. Steenhof. 1996. Effects of fire and habitat alterations on Ferruginous Hawks. Abstracts of the 114th Stated Meeting of the American Ornithologists' Union and 1996 Annual Meeting of the Raptor Research Foundation. Boise, ID.
  63. Lokemoen, J.T., and H.F. Duebbert. 1976. Ferruginous Hawk nesting ecology and raptor populations in northern South Dakota. Condor 78:464-470.
  64. MacLaren, P.A., S.H. Anderson, and D.E. Runde. 1988. Food habits and nest characteristics of breeding raptors in southwestern Wyoming. Great Basin Naturalist 48:548-553.
  65. Maher, W.J. 1974. Matador Project: Birds II. Avifauna of the Matador area. Canadian Committee for the International Biological Pragramme, Matador Project, Technical Report 58. University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. 31 pp.
  66. Matteson, S. W., and J. O. Riley. 1981. Distribution and nesting success of Zone-tailed Hawks in west Texas. Wilson Bulletin 107:719-723.
  67. McAnnis, D.M. 1990. Home range, activity budgets, and habitat use of Ferruginous Hawks (BUTEO REGALIS) breeding in southwest Idaho. M.S. Thesis, Boise State University, Boise, ID. 81 pp.
  68. Montoya, A.B., P.J. Zwank, and M. Cardenas. 1997. Breeding biology of Aplomado Falcons in desert grasslands of Chihuahua, Mexico. Journal of Field Ornithology 68(1):135-143.
  69. National Geographic Society (NGS). 1983. Field guide to the birds of North America. National Geographic Society, Washington, DC.
  70. Niemuth, N. 1992. Use of man-made structures by nesting Ferruginous Hawks in Wyoming. Prairie Naturalist 24:43.
  71. Olendorff, R.R. 1973. The ecology of the nesting birds of prey of northeastern Colorado. U.S. International Biological Program, Grassland Biome Technical Report 211. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO. 233 pp.
  72. Olendorff, R. R. 1993. Status, biology, and management of Ferruginous Hawks: a review. Raptor Res. and Tech. Asst. Cen., Special Report. U.S. Dept. Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Boise, Idaho. 84 pp.
  73. Palmer, R. S., ed. 1988b. Handbook of North American birds. Vol. 5. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven. 465 pp.
  74. Parker III, T. A., D. F. Stotz, and J. W. Fitzpatrick. 1996. Ecological and distributional databases for neotropical birds. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  75. Pendleton, B. A. G., B. A. Millsap, K. W. Cline, and D. M. Bird. 1987. Raptor management techniques manual. National Wildlife Federation, Sci. and Tech. Ser. No. 10. 420 pp.
  76. Petersen, L. 1979. Ecology of Great Horned Owls and Red-tailed Hawks in southeastern Wisconsin. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Technical Bulletin no. 111.
  77. Podany, M.B. 1996. Nest placement of the Ferruginous Hawk BUTEO REGALIS in northwestern Nebraska. M.A. thesis. University of Nebraska, Omaha, NE. 26 pp.
  78. Poole, A. F. and F. B. Gill. 1992. The birds of North America. The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. and The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA.
  79. Powers, L.R., and T.H. Craig. 1976. Status of nesting Ferruginous Hawks in the Little Lost River Valley and vicinity, southeastern Idaho. Murrelet 57:46-47.
  80. Rolfe, E.S. 1896. Nesting of the Ferruginous Rough-leg. Osprey 1:8-10.
  81. Root, T. 1988. Atlas of wintering North American birds: An analysis of Christmas Bird Count data. University of Chicago Press. 336 pp.
  82. Roth, S.D., Jr., and J.M. Marzluff. 1989. Nest placement and productivity of Ferruginous Hawks in western Kansas. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 92:132-148.
  83. Schmidt, R. 1981. Ferruginous Hawk breeding documented in Sargent County, North Dakota. Prairie Naturalist 13:32.
  84. Schmutz, J. K. 1984. Ferruginous and Swainson's hawk abundance and distribution in relation to land use in southeastern Alberta. J. Wildl. Manage. 48:1180-1187.
  85. Schmutz, J.K. 1987. The effect of agriculture on Ferruginous and Swainson's hawks. Journal of Range Management 40:438-440.
  86. Schmutz, J. K. 1989. Hawk occupancy of disturbed grasslands in relation to models of habitat selection. Condor 91:362-371.
  87. Schmutz, J.K. 1991a. Population dynamics of Ferruginous Hawks in Alberta. Pages 212-214 in G.L. Holroyd, G. Burns, and H.C. Smith, editors. Proceedings of the second endangered species and prairie conservation workshop. Natural History Occasional Paper 15. Provincial Museum of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
  88. Schmutz, J.K. 1991b. Age-related differences in reproductive success among Ferruginous and Swainson's hawks in Alberta. Journal of Raptor Research 25:160.
  89. Schmutz, J.K. 1995. Updated status report on the Ferruginous Hawk (BUTEO REGALIS) in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC), Ottawa, Ontario. 15 pp.
  90. Schmutz, J.K. and D.J. Hungle. 1989. Population of ferruginous and Swainson's hawks increase in synchrony with ground squirrels. Can. J. Zool. 67:2596-2601.
  91. Schmutz, J. K., and R. W. Fyfe. 1987. Migration and mortality of Alberta ferruginous hawks. Condor 89:169-174.
  92. Schmutz, J.K., and S.M. Schmutz. 1980. Status of the Ferruginous Hawk. Committee on Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada.
  93. Schmutz, J. K., D. A. Moore, and A. R. Smith. 1984. Artificial nests for ferruginous and Swainson's hawks. J. Wildl. Manage. 48:1009-1013.
  94. Small, A. 1994. California birds: their status and distribution. Ibis Publishing Co., 3420 Freda's Hill Road, Vista, California 92084. xiv + 342 pp.
  95. Smith, D. G., and J. R. Murphy. 1973. Breeding ecology of raptors in the eastern Great Basin of Utah. Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biol. Ser. 13:1-76.
  96. Smith, D.G., and J.R. Murphy. 1978. Biology of the Ferruginous Hawk in central Utah. Sociobiology 3:79-98.
  97. Smith, D.G., J.R. Murphy, and N.D. Woffinden. 1981. Relationships between jackrabbit abundance and Ferruginous Hawk reproduction. Condor 83:52-56.
  98. Snow, C. 1974. Habitat management series for unique or endangered species, Report No. 13, Ferruginous Hawk, BUTEO REGALIS. Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Dept. of Int., Technical Note, T/N-255, Denver.
  99. Steenhof, J., and M.N. Kochert. 1985. Dietary shifts of sympatric buteos during a prey decline. Oecologia 66:6-16.
  100. Steenhof, K. 1998. Prairie Falcon (<i>Falco mexicanus</i>). In A. Poole and F. Gill, editors, The Birds of North America, No. 346. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 28 pp.
  101. Stewart, R. E. 1975. Breeding Birds of North Dakota. Tri-College Center for Environmental Studies, Fargo ND.
  102. Terres, J. K. 1980. The Audubon Society encyclopedia of North American birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  103. Thurow, T.L., C.M. White, R.P. Howard, and J.F. Sullivan. 1980. Raptor ecology of Raft River valley, Idaho. EG&G Idaho, Inc., Idaho Falls. 45 pp.
  104. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1987. Migratory nongame birds of management concern in the United States: the 1987 list. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Migratory Bird Management, Washington, D.C. 63 pp.
  105. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1992. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants. Notice of finding on petition to list the Ferruginous Hawk. Federal Register 57(161):37507-37513.
  106. Van Horn, R.C. 1993. A summary of reproductive success and mortality in a disturbed Ferruginous Hawk (BUTEO REGALIS) population in northcentral Montana. Journal of Raptor Research 27:94.
  107. Wakeley, J.S. 1978. Factors affecting the use of hunting sites by Ferruginous Hawks. Condor 80:316-326.
  108. Warkentin, I.G., and P.C. James. 1988. Trends in winter distribution and abundance of Ferruginous Hawks. Journal of Field Ornithology 59:209-214.
  109. Weston, J.B. 1968. Nesting ecology of the Ferruginous Hawk, BUTEO REGALIS. Brigham Young University Science Bulletin 10:25-36.
  110. White, C. M., and T. L. Thurow. 1985. Reproduction of ferruginous hawks exposed to controlled disturbance. Condor 87:14-22.
  111. Woffinden, N.D. 1975. Ecology of the Ferruginous Hawk (BUTEO REGALIS) in central Utah: population dynamics and nest site selection. M.S. thesis. Brigham Young University, Provo, UT. 102 pp.
  112. Woffinden, N. D., and J. R. Murphy. 1989. Decline of a ferruginous hawk population: a 20-year summary. J. Wildl. Manage. 53:1127-1132.
  113. Woodbridge, B., K. K. Finley, and P. H. Bloom. 1995. Reproductive performance, age structure, and natal dispersal of Swainson's Hawks in the Butte Valley, California. Journal of Raptor Research 29:187-192.
  114. Zelenak, J.R., and J.J. Rotella. 1997. Nest success and productivity of Ferruginous Hawks in northern Montana. Canadian Journal of Zoology 75:1035-1041.