Ammospermophilus nelsoni

(Merriam, 1893)

Nelson's Antelope Squirrel

G2Imperiled (G2G3) Found in 4 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
EndangeredIUCN
High - mediumThreat Impact
Nelson's Antelope Squirrel (Ammospermophilus nelsoni). Photo by redrovertracy, CC BY 4.0, via iNaturalist.
redrovertracy, CC BY 4.0
Nelson's Antelope Squirrel (Ammospermophilus nelsoni). Photo by sjacobsen13, CC BY 4.0, via iNaturalist.
sjacobsen13, CC BY 4.0
Nelson's Antelope Squirrel (Ammospermophilus nelsoni). Photo by russnamitz, CC0 1.0, via iNaturalist.
russnamitz, CC0 1.0
Nelson's Antelope Squirrel (Ammospermophilus nelsoni). Photo by Cristhian Mace, CC BY 4.0, via iNaturalist.
Cristhian Mace, CC BY 4.0
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.101173
Element CodeAMAFB04040
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNEndangered
Endemicendemic to a single state or province
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassMammalia
OrderRodentia
FamilySciuridae
GenusAmmospermophilus
Concept Reference
Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 1993. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Second edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. xviii + 1206 pp. Available online at: http://www.nmnh.si.edu/msw/.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodLegacy Rank calculation - Excel v3.1x
Review Date2018-12-31
Change Date2017-09-15
Edition Date2018-12-31
Edition AuthorsMcIntyre, P. (2018), Hammerson, G., and D. F. Williams (2006)
Threat ImpactHigh - medium
Range Extent20,000-200,000 square km (about 8000-80,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 80
Rank Reasons
Restricted distribution in California, historic declines >80%, and ongoing moderate to high threats, primarily from continued loss and modification of habitat.
Range Extent Comments
The range is restricted to the central and western San Joaquin Valley and neighboring areas to the west in the inner Coast Ranges of California (e.g., Cuyama Valley, Panoche Valley, Carrizo Plain, Elkhorn Plain) (Best et al. 1990). Elevational range extends from about 50 meters on the floor of the San Joaquin Valley to around 1,100 meters in the Temblor Range, but antelope squirrels are not common above about 800 meters on the ridges and plains west of the San Joaquin Valley proper (Williams 1980; D.F. Williams, unpubl. data). Populations now exist primarily in marginal habitats of low foothills and mountains on the western edge of the San Joaquin Valley; significant populations occur only in western Kern County at Elk Hills and on portions of the Carrizo and Elkhorn plains. In the northern part of range, low density populations occur in the Panoche and Kettleman hills (California Department of Fish and Game 1990, Harris and Stearns 1991).

Range extent estimate based on the occurrence data from the California Natural Diversity Database (accessed Sept. 2017).
Occurrences Comments
There are 126 occurrences at 1km separation distance, 43 at 5km separation distance.
Threat Impact Comments
Moderate to high threats from habitat loss and modification from agriculture and development. Additional threats from use of rodenticides and disturbance from agricultural and natural gas/oil activities.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

This small brown squirrel has a white lateral stripe on each side. The dorsum is buffy, sometimes yellowish. Total length: 218-240 mm (Jameson and Peeters 2004).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Smaller than the California ground squirrel (Spermophilus beecheyi), which is an abundant species throughout the San Joaquin Valley. The latter lacks the distinctive white stripe on its sides. Antelope ground squirrels are often mistaken for chipmunks (Neotamias spp.), but the squirrels lack the black and white stripes on their faces and backs.

Habitat

Habitat consists of dry flat or rolling terrain, with slopes less than 10-14 degrees, on alluvial and loamy soils, soils with sandy or gravelly texture, or fine-grained soils that are nearly brick-hard when dry. The species inhabits grassy, sparsely shrubby ground (shrubs include saltbush, ephedra, bladder pod, goldenbush, snakeweed, etc.); it also occurs in areas lacking shrubs where giant kangaroo rats are present. Habitats in order of decreasing favorability: (1) xerophytic stage of alkali desert scrub with shrubs sparsely distributed and with friable soils, at elevations greater than 4,000 feet, (2) annual grassland with less than 6 inches annual precipitation, friable soils, and abundance of Dipodomys ingens, (3) halophytic stage of alkali desert scrub with shrubs sparsely distributed and with friable soils, at elevations above 2,200 feet, and (4) annual grassland with 7-9 inches annual precipitation and abundance of Dipodomys heermanni. Habitats that are avoided included valley floor areas of alkaline soils, iodine bush, and spring saltbush, probably due to high water tables (Biosystems Analysis 1989). See also Best et al. (1990) for habitat synopsis. These squirrels seldom dig their own burrows; most often they use burrows made by other small mammals. Preferred burrow locations are under shrubs, in the banks of arroyos at the base of alluvial fans, and along roadcuts, pipelines, and drilling platforms (Biosystems Analysis 1989).

Ecology

Half of remaining habitat supports fewer than 1 animal/ha, 15% of the remaining habitat supports 3-10 animals/ha (generally 4 or fewer per ha, California Department of Fish and Game 1990). SPERMOPHILUS BEECHEYI reportedly may restrict range of A. NELSONI (see Best et al. 1990). Among several predators, badger is most important. Lives in small groups.

Reproduction

Breeding season coincides with availability of green vegetation. Young are born in March, first seen above ground about the first week of April, at which time they gather food. Gestation lasts 26 days. One breeding season per year. Litter size is 6-12 (average 9). May live 5+ years, though usual life span is less than 1 year.
Terrestrial Habitats
Grassland/herbaceousDesert
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN2
ProvinceRankNative
CaliforniaS3Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (4)
California (4)
AreaForestAcres
CuyamaLos Padres National Forest19,631
Fox MountainLos Padres National Forest52,072
Lpoor CanyonLos Padres National Forest13,762
Sawmill - BadlandsLos Padres National Forest51,362
References (18)
  1. Allred, D. M., and D. E. Beck. 1963a. Ecological distribution of some rodents at the Nevada atomic test site. Ecology. 44:211-214.
  2. American Society of Mammalogists (ASM). 2024. The Mammal Diversity Database (MDD). Online. Available: www.mammaldiversity.org
  3. Best, T. L., et al. 1990. Ammospermophilus nelsoni. Am. Soc. Mamm., Mammalian Species No. 367:1-7.
  4. Biosystems Analysis, Inc. 1989. Endangered Species Alert Program Manual: Species Accounts and Procedures. Southern California Edison Environmental Affairs Division.
  5. Bradley, W. G. 1967. Home range, activity patterns, and ecology of the antelope ground squirrel in southern Nevada. Southwestern Naturalist 12:231-252.
  6. California Department of Fish and Game (CDF&G). 1990. 1989 annual report on the status of California's state listed threatened and endangered plants and animals. 188 pp.
  7. Grinnell, J. 1933. Review of the recent mammal fauna of California. University of California Publications in Zoology 40:71-234.
  8. Harris, J. H., and D. M. Stearns. 1991. Population density, census methods, habitat relationships, and home range of the San Joaquin antelope squirrel, 1988-89. California Department of Fish and Game, Nongame Bird and Mammal Section report 91-02. vi + 37 pp.
  9. Hawbecker, A.C. 1947. Food and moisture requirements of the Nelson antelope squirrel. J. Mamm. 28:115-125.
  10. Hawbecker, A. C. 1958. Survival and home range in the Nelson antelope ground squirrel. Journal of Mammalogy 39:207-215.
  11. Jameson, E. W., Jr., and H. J. Peeters. 2004. Mammals of California. Revised edition. University of California Press, Berkeley. 429 pp.
  12. Jones, J. K., Jr., R. S. Hoffman, D. W. Rice, C. Jones, R. J. Baker, and M. D. Engstrom. 1992a. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 1991. Occasional Papers, The Museum, Texas Tech University, 146:1-23.
  13. Koprowski, J. 2017. <i>Ammospermophilus nelsoni</i>. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T1149A22251492. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-2.RLTS.T1149A22251492.en
  14. NatureServe. Central Databases. Arlington, Virginia. U.S.A. Online. Available: http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/
  15. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1998. Recovery plan for upland species of the San Joaquin Valley, California. Region 1, Portland, OR. 319 pp.
  16. Williams, D.F. 1980. Distribution and population status of the San Joaquin antelope squirrel and giant kangaroo rat. Calif. Dep. Fish and Game, Nongame Wildl. Invest. Final Report. E-W-4, IV-10.1.
  17. Willner, G. R., G. A. Feldhammer, E. E. Zocker, and J. A. Chapman. 1980. <i>Ondatra zibethicus</i>. American Society of Mammalogists, Mammalian Species No. 141. 8 pp.
  18. Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 1993. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Second edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. xviii + 1206 pp. Available online at: http://www.nmnh.si.edu/msw/.