Dipodomys elator

Merriam, 1894

Texas Kangaroo Rat

G2Imperiled Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
VulnerableIUCN
HighThreat Impact
Texas kangaroo rat (Dipodomys elator). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.101748
Element CodeAMAFD03120
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNVulnerable
Endemicendemic to a single state or province
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassMammalia
OrderRodentia
FamilyHeteromyidae
GenusDipodomys
Concept Reference
Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 1993. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Second edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. xviii + 1206 pp. Available online at: http://www.nmnh.si.edu/msw/.
Taxonomic Comments
Dipodomys elator is a monotypic species, with no recognized subspecies. Genetic data indicate that D. elator is most closely related to D. phillipsii (Hamilton et al. 1987, Mantooth et al. 2000).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-07-13
Change Date2006-03-09
Edition Date2011-06-15
Edition AuthorsWahl, R., E. Roth, G. Hammerson, and P. Horner (2011)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent5000-20,000 square km (about 2000-8000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 80
Rank Reasons
The range is limited to five counties in northern Texas. It has been extirpated from approximately 50 percent of the historical range. None of the occurrences are protected, and all are subject to threats including conversion of habitat to agricultural uses and rangeland management practices that result in dense vegetative growth.
Range Extent Comments
The current known distribution includes five counties in northern Texas along the Oklahoma border (USFWS 2011, Stuhler et al. 2023). Range extent is estimated to be 8,720 km² (NatureServe 2025, RARECAT 2025).

The historical range encompassed a small area in north-central Texas (11 counties) and adjacent Oklahoma (2 counties) (Caire et al. 1989, Schmidly 2004, USFWS 2011). The last confirmed sighting of this species in Oklahoma was in 1969 (Baumgardner 1987, Moss and Mehlhop-Cifelli 1990, Stangl et al. 1992, WildEarth Guardians 2010, USFWS 2011, Braun et al. 2021). The historical range extent was approximately 24,500 km² (USFWS 2011).
Occurrences Comments
This species is currently known from 26 sites in Texas (Stuhler et al. 2023). Applying a 5 km separation distance to extant occurrence records, 22 occurrences are estimated (NatureServe 2025, RARECAT 2025).
Threat Impact Comments
USFWS (2011) found that loss of burrowing habitat and genetic isolation of populations due to the conversion of native rangeland to agricultural cropland, and the inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms to protect against such land conversion, may pose a threat to the Texas kangaroo rat throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

This species is a chunky, large-headed, long-tailed, four-toed rat with a buffy, blackish-washed dorsum, white belly, large white thigh patches, external fur-lined cheek pouches, and large hind legs; the tail has a conspicuous white tuft at the tip, and the dorsal and ventral tail stripes barely meet in front of the terminal tuft. Adults are 260-345 mm in total length, 161-205 mm tail length, 42-49 mm hind foot length, 10-16 mm ear length, and 65-90 grams (sometimes to over 100 grams). In a sample of 15 adults, greatest length of skull averaged 37.2 mm, maxillary breadth 6.7 mm, mastoid breadth 23.7 mm, interorbital constriction 13.5 mm, and length of maxillary toothrow 5.3 mm (Carter et al. 1985).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Dipodomys elator differs from D. ordii in having a white-tipped tail.

Habitat

Habitat generally consists of sparsely vegetated areas that may or may not include mesquite, in areas with clay-containing sandy loam soils, including heavily grazed land, disturbed areas, and areas along fencerows adjacent to cultivated fields and roads (Webster and Jones 1985, Caire et al. 1989, Strangl et al. 1992, Schmidly 2004). Martin and Matocha (1991) noted that the species is not totally restricted to clay-loam or clay soil habitats but may also occupy soils with higher sand content). In Wichita County, Texas, Texas kangaroo rats favored grazed sites with short, sparse grasses and little overhead woody cover (Stasey et al. 2010); burrows were associated with high percentages of bare ground, and herbaceous and woody vegetation of low height (Goetze et al. 2007). When inactive, Texas kangaroo rats occupy underground burrows in firm clay loam soils, at the base of mesquite plants or in road cuts (Moss and Mehlhop-Cifelli 1990). In at least some areas, individuals may use more than one burrow (Goetze et al. 2007). Young are born in an underground nest chamber.

Ecology

Roberts and Packard (1973) estimated population density at 10-27 per hectare. Goetze et al. (2007) estimated density at about 2 per hectare. This species shows very low genetic diversity (Pfau et al. 2019).

Reproduction

Adults are reproductively active apparently throughout the year, with a peak in recruitment in late spring and early summer; young born early in the year breed in summer and fall of the same year (Webster and Jones 1985). Limited data indicate a litter size of 2-4.
Terrestrial Habitats
Shrubland/chaparralGrassland/herbaceous
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN2
ProvinceRankNative
TexasS1Yes
OklahomaSHYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentSmall (1-10%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasSmall (1-10%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
7.3 - Other ecosystem modificationsLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (1)
Texas (1)
AreaForestAcres
Big CreekNational Forests in Texas1,447
References (62)
  1. American Society of Mammalogists (ASM). 2024. The Mammal Diversity Database (MDD). Online. Available: www.mammaldiversity.org
  2. Bartholomew, G. A., and H. H. Caswell. 1951. Locomotion in kangaroo rats and its adaptive significance. Journal of Mammalogy 32:155-169.
  3. Baumgardner, G. D. 1987. A recent specimen of the Texas kangaroo rat, <i>Dipodomys elator</i> (Heteromyidae), from Oklahoma. Southwestern Naturalist 32:285-286.
  4. Baumgardner, G. D., and M. L. Kennedy. 1994. Patterns of interspecific morphometric variation in kangaroo rats (genus <i>Dipodomys</i>). Journal of Mammalogy 75:203-211.
  5. Best, T. L. 1987. Sexual dimorphism and morphometric variation in the Texas kangaroo rat (<i>Dipodomys elator </i>Merriam 1894). Southwestern Naturalist 32:53-59.
  6. Blair, W. F. 1943. Populations of the deer mouse and associated small mammals in the mesquite associations of southern New Mexico. Contributions of the Laboratory of Vertebrate Biology, University of Michigan, No. 21. 40 pp.
  7. Bradford, D. F. 1976. Space utilization by rodents in <i>Adenostoma </i>chaparral. Journal of Mammalogy 57:576-579.
  8. Braun, J. K., B. S. Coyner, and M. A. Mares. 2021. Modern extirpation of the Texas kangaroo rat, <em>Dipodomys elator</em>, in Oklahoma: changing land use and climate over a century of time as the road to eventual extinction. Therya 12(2): 177-186.
  9. Caire, W., J. D. Tyler, B. P. Glass, and M. A. Mares. 1989. Mammals of Oklahoma. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman. Oklahoma. 567 pp.
  10. Cameron, G. N., and D. Scheel. 2001. Getting warmer: effect of global climate change on distribution of rodents in Texas. Journal of Mammalogy 82:652-680.
  11. Carter, D. C., W. D. Webster, J. K. Jones, Jr., C. Jones, and R. D. Suttkus. 1985. <i>Dipodomys elator</i>. Mammalian Species No. 232:1-3.
  12. Chew, R. M., and B. B. Butterworth. 1964. Ecology of rodents in Indian Cove (Mojave Desert), Joshua Tree National Monument, California. Journal of Mammalogy 45:203-225.
  13. Dalquest, W. W., and N. V. Horner. 1984. Mammals of north-central Texas. Midwestern State University Press, Wichita Falls, Texas, 261 pp.
  14. Dalquest, W. W., J. V. Grimes, and F. B. Stangl, Jr. 1992. Characters of the upper premolar of five species of <i>Dipodomys </i>and evidence for diphyly in the genus. Southwestern Naturalist 37:231-246.
  15. Fitch, H. S. 1948. Habits and economic relationships of the Tulare kangaroo rat. Journal of Mammalogy 29:5-35.
  16. Garland, T., Jr. and W. G. Bradley. 1984. Effects of a highway on Mojave Desert rodent populations. American Midland Naturalist 111:47-56.
  17. Genoways, H. H., and J. H. Brown, editors. 1993. Biology of the Heteromyidae. American Society of Mammalogists Special Publication No. 10. 719 pp.
  18. Ghiselin, J. 1970. Edaphic control of habitat selection by kangaroo mice (<i>Microdipodops</i>) in three Nevada populations. Oecologia 4:248-261.
  19. Goetze, J. R., W. C. Stasey, A. D. Nelson, and P. D. Sudman. 2007. Habitat attributes and population size of Texas kangaroo rats on an intensely grazed pasture in Wichita County, Texas. Texas Journal of Science 59:11-22.
  20. Hafner, D. J., E. Yensen, and G. L. Kirkland, Jr. (compilers and editors). 1998. North American rodents. Status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC Rodent Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. x + 171 pp.
  21. Hamilton, M.J ., R. K. Chesser, and T. L. Best. 1987. Genetic variation in the Texas kangaroo rat, <i>Dipodomys elator </i>Merriam. Journal of Mammalogy 68:775-781.
  22. Iverson, S. L. 1967. Adaptations to arid environments in <i>Perognathus parvus</i> (Peale). Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. British Columbia, Vancouver. 130pp.
  23. Jones, C., M. A. Bogan, and L. M. Mount. 1988. Status of the Texas kangaroo rat (<i>Dipodomys elator</i>). Texas Journal of Science 40:249-258.
  24. Jones, J. K., Jr., R. S. Hoffman, D. W. Rice, C. Jones, R. J. Baker, and M. D. Engstrom. 1992a. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 1991. Occasional Papers, The Museum, Texas Tech University, 146:1-23.
  25. Jorgensen, C. D., and C. L. Hayward. 1965. Mammals of the Nevada test site. Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biol. Ser. No. 7. 81pp.
  26. MacMillen, R. E. 1964. Population ecology, water relations and social behavior of a southern California semidesert rodent fauna. University of California Publications in Zoology 71:1-59.
  27. Mantooth, S. J., C. Jones, and R. D. Bradley. 2000. Molecular systematics of <i>Dipodomys elator</i> (Rodentia: Heteromyidae) and its phylogeographic implications. Journal of Mammalogy 81:885-894.
  28. Martin, R. E. 2002. Status and long-term survival of the Texas kangaroo rat, <i>Dipodomys elator</i>. Section 6, Project 70. Unpublished report prepared for Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Austin, Texas. 44 pp.
  29. Martin, R. E., and K. G. Matocha. 1972. Distributional status of the kangaroo rat, <i>Dipodomys elator</i>. Journal of Mammalogy 53:873-877.
  30. Martin, R. E., and K. G. Matocha. 1991. The Texas kangaroo rat, <i>Dipodomys elator</i>, from Motley Co., Texas, with notes on habitat attributes. Southwestern Naturalist 36:354-6.
  31. Martin, R. E., and K. G. Matocha. 1998. <i>Dipodomys elator </i>Merriam, Texas kangaroo rat. Pages 69-70 in Hafner, D. J., E. Yensen, and G. L. Kirkland, Jrs. (compilers and eds). North American Rodents. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. IUCN/SSC Rodent Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. X + 171 pp.
  32. Martin, Robert E. Professor. Has been studying Texas kangaroo rats since at least 1972; currently under contract with TPWD to conduct status report. Department of Biology, McMurry University, Abilene, Texas
  33. Maza, B. G., N. R. French, and A. P. Aschwanden. 1973. Home range dynamics in a population of heteromyid rodents. Journal of Mammalogy 54:405-425.
  34. Moss, S. P., and P. Mehlhop-Cifelli. 1990. Status of the Texas kangaroo rat, <i>Dipodomys elator</i> (Heteromyidae), in Oklahoma. Southwestern Naturalist 35:356-8.
  35. NatureServe. 2025. NatureServe Network Biodiversity Location Data. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.
  36. NatureServe. Central Databases. Arlington, Virginia. U.S.A. Online. Available: http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/
  37. O'Farrell, M. J. 1978. Home range dynamics of rodents in a sagebrush community. Journal of Mammalogy 59:657-68.
  38. O'Farrell, M.J. and A.R. Blaustein. 1974b. <i>Microdipodops megacephalus</i>. Mammalian Species 46:1-3.
  39. O'Farrell, T. P., R. J. Olson, R. O. Gilbert, and J. D. Hedlund. 1975. A population of Great Basin pocket mice, <i>Perognathus parvus</i>, in the shrub-steppe of south-central Washington. Ecological Monographs 45:1-28.
  40. Oxley, D. J., M. B. Fenton and G. R. Carmody. 1974. The effects of roads on populations of small mammals. Journal of Applied Ecology 11: 51-59.
  41. Pfau, R. S., J. R. Goetze, R. F. Martin, K. G. Matocha, and A. D. Nelson. 2019. Journal of Mammalogy 100(4): 1169–1181.
  42. <p>NatureServe's Rapid Analysis of Rarity and Endangerment Conservation Assessment Tool (RARECAT). 2025. Version: 2.1.1 (released April 04, 2025).</p>
  43. Reynolds, H. G., and H. S. Haskell. 1949. Life history notes on Price and Bailey pocket mice of southern Arizona. Journal of Mammalogy 30:150-156.
  44. Roberts, J.D. 1969. Ecological study of the Texas Kangaroo Rat, <i>Dipodomys elator</i>. Master's thesis. Texas Tech University, Lubbock. 56 pp.
  45. Roberts, J. D., and R. L. Packard. 1973. Comments on movements, home range and ecology of the Texas Kangaroo Rat, <i>Dipodomys elator </i>Merriam. Journal of Mammology 54(4):957-962.
  46. Ryan, J. M. 1989. Comparative myology and phylogenetic systematics of the Heteromyidae (Mammalia, Rodentia). Univ. Michigan Museum Zoology Miscellaneous Publication (176):1-103.
  47. Schmidly, D. J. 2004. The mammals of Texas. Revised edition. University of Texas Press, Austin. xviii + 501 pp.
  48. Shaw, D.M. 1990. GIS and remote sensing for Texas Kangaroo Rat habitat characterization. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. Final report. 46 pp.
  49. Stangl, F.B., and T.S. Schafer. 1990. Report on the current status of the Texas Kangaroo Rat, <i>Dipodomys elator</i>, in north-central Texas. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. final report. 17 pp.
  50. Stangl, F. B., Jr., T. S. Schafer, J. R. Goetze, and W. Pinchak. 1992. Opportunistic use of modified and disturbed habitat by the Texas kangaroo rat (<i>Dipodomys elator</i>). Texas Journal of Science, 44: 25-35.
  51. Stasey, W. C., J. R. Goetze, P. D. Sudman, and A. D. Nelson. 2010. Differential use of grazed and ungrazed plots by <i>Dipodomys elator</i> (Mammalia: Heteromyidae) in north central Texas. Texas Journal of Science 62:3-14.
  52. Stasey, W. S. 2005. An evaluation of Texas kangaroo rat <i>(Dipodomys elator</i>): biological habits and population estimation. Masters thesis, Tarleton State University, Texas.
  53. Stuhler, J. D., M. K. Halsey, J. R. Goetz, R. D. Bradley, D. A. Ray, and R. D. Stevens. 2023. Updated distribution of the Texas kangaroo rat (<i>Dipodomys elator</i>) and patterns of rodent species associations from county road surveys in Texas. Therya 14(2): 261-268.
  54. Thomas, J. R., Jr. 1975. Distribution, population densities, and home range requirements of the Stephens' kangaroo rat (<i>Dipodomys stephensi</i>). M.S. Thesis, California State Polytechnic University, Ponoma. 64pp.
  55. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2023. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for Texas Kangaroo Rat and Designation of Critical Habitat. Proposed rule. Federal Register 88(158):55962-55991.
  56. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2025. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notification of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions. Candidate notice of review (CNOR). Federal Register 90(209):48912-48937.
  57. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 8 March 2011. 90-day finding on a petition to list the Texas kangaroo rat as endangered or threatened. Federal Register 76(45):12683-12690.
  58. Webster, W. D., and J. K. Jones, Jr. 1985. Nongeographic variation, reproduction, and demography in the Texas kangaroo rat, <i>Dipodomys elator</i> (Rodentia: Heteromyidae). Texas Journal of Science 37:51-61.
  59. WildEarth Guardians. 2010. Petition to list the Texas kangaroo rat (<i>Dipodomys elator</i>) under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. WildEarth Guardians, 1536 Wynkoop St., Suite 301, Denver, CO 80202.
  60. Wilkins, K. T. 1982. Highways as barriers to rodent dispersal. Southwestern Naturalist 27: 459-460.
  61. Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 1993. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Second edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. xviii + 1206 pp. Available online at: http://www.nmnh.si.edu/msw/.
  62. Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 2005. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Third edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Two volumes. 2,142 pp. [As modified by ASM the Mammal Diversity Database (MDD) at https://www.mammaldiversity.org/index.html]