Zapus hudsonius preblei

Krutzsch, 1954

Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse

T2T2 (G5T2) Found in 6 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
T2T2Global Rank
EndangeredIUCN
High - mediumThreat Impact
Preble's meadow jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius preblei). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.104521
Element CodeAMAFH01011
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSubspecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNEndangered
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassMammalia
OrderRodentia
FamilyZapodidae
GenusZapus
Other Common Names
Preble's meadow jumping mouse (EN)
Concept Reference
Hall, E. R. 1981a. The Mammals of North America, second edition. Vols. I & II. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York. 1181 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
In historical literature, records of Zapus hudsonius from Colorado and adjacent areas in Wyoming were refered to as Z. h. campestris (e.g., Cary 1911, Warren 1910). Krutzch (1954) described the subspecies preblei on the basis of a specimen from Loveland, Colorado; Krutzsch regarded preblei as a well-marked, isolated subspecies. The taxonomic status and scope of Zapus hudsonius subspecies have been debated (see Ramey et al. 2005 and Vignieri et al. 2006).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodLegacy Rank calculation - Biotics v1
Review Date2019-11-21
Change Date1996-11-15
Edition Date2019-11-21
Edition AuthorsGundy, R. L. (2019)
Threat ImpactHigh - medium
Range Extent20,000-200,000 square km (about 8000-80,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 - 300
Rank Reasons
Historical range in Colorado has declined (USFWS 2007, USFWS 2018). Local populations have declined in both Colorado and Wyoming (Ryon 1996, Schorr 2001, Smith et al. 2004, Schorr 2012, Schorr and Mihlbachler 2018). There are documented threats from the destruction, or degradation, of riparian habitat through development, runoff, erosion, grazing, agriculture, and gravel mining (Clark and Stromber 1987, Compton and Hugie 1993, Bakemen et al. 1997, Schorr 2001, Clippinger 2002, Meaney et al. 2002, Schorr 2002, Smith et al. 2004, USFWS 2007, Schorr 2102, Schorr and Mihlbachler 2018, USFWS 2018).
Range Extent Comments
This subspecies occurs along the Front Range in north-central Colorado from about Colorado Springs (El Paso County) northward into southeastern Wyoming to about Douglas (Converse County) (Smith et al. 2004). Historical range in Colorado was El Paso, Elbert, Douglas, Jefferson, Arapahoe, Denver, Adams, Boulder, Weld, and Larimer Counties (Warren 1942, Armstrong 1972, Schorr 2001, USFWS 2007). In Colorado, recently confirmed in El Paso, Elbert, Douglas, Jefferson, Boulder, Weld, and Larimer Counties (USFWS 2007, USFWS 2018). In Wyoming, historically and currently found in Laramie, Albany, Platte, and Converse Counties (Smith et al. 2004, USFWS 2007).
Occurrences Comments
It is unclear what constitutes separate occurrences for this mouse. There are 115 extant records in the Colorado Natural Heritage Program database. There are additional occurrences in Wyoming not enumerated here (USFWS 2018).
Threat Impact Comments
Documented indirect threats include the destruction or degradation of riparian habitat through development, runoff, erosion, grazing, agriculture, and gravel mining (Clark and Stromber 1987, Compton and Hugie 1993, Bakemen et al. 1997, Schorr 2001, Clippinger 2002, Meaney et al. 2002, Schorr 2002, Smith et al. 2004, USFWS 2007, Schorr 2102, Schorr and Mihlbachler 2018, USFWS 2018). Potential threats come from increases in native and non-native predators due to development, invasive plants, and climate change (Smith et al. 2004, USFWS 2007, USFWS 2018).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

A mouse with yellowish brown upperparts; a broad dark dorsal stripe; a white venter and yellow sides; a long, round, sparsely haired, bicolored tail that is longer than the head and body; and very long hind feet; young have softer, paler pelage; upper incisors are grooved on the anterior surface; total length, 187-255 mm; tail length, 108-155 mm; hindfoot length, 28-35 mm (Fitzgerald et al. 1994).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Differs from subspecies Z. h. campestris of northeastern Wyoming and adjacent areas in having a paler, duller dorsum that is less heavily washed with black, and a generally smaller skull with narrower incisive foramina (see Krutzsch 1954:452). Western jumping mouse (Z. princeps) has a more distinct dorsal stripe, a less distinctly bicolored tail, and larger body size. See Conner and Shenk (2003) for information on the use of cranial measurements to distinguish this subspecies from Zapus princeps princeps (presence or absence of the anterior median toothfold of M3 is not by itself a reliable method for distinguishing between the subspecies).

Habitat

Riparian habitat within about 350 m of streams at elevations between 4,600 - 8,000 feet (Schorr 2012, Trainor et al. 2012, Thompson et al. 2012). One study found irrigation ditches to be utilized (Meaney et al. 2003). High plant species diversity has been associated with capture locations (Ryon 1996, Clippinger 2002). A 14-year study using 499 individuals found that ground cover for forbs was approximately 35% of ground cover, grass approximately 30%, and vertical cover from shrubs approximately 20% (Schorr and Mihlbachler 2018). The same study found survival increased with grass and shrub cover. Survival and home range decline with precipitation (Trainor et al. 2012, Schorr and Mihlbachler 2018). Invasive plants were not strongly avoided in one study (Beauvais and Griscom 2009).

Day nests are raised mats of grasses, forbs, sedges, and rushes placed near shrubs (Bain and Shenk 2002). Maternal nests and hibernation chambers are shallow underground burrows, sometimes lined by leaf litter, or placed underneath logs (Bain and Shenk 2002). Hibernation chambers tend to be farther from streams than maternal nests and closer to shrubs (Schorr 2001, Bain and Shenk 2002).

Ecology

Annual survival rates generally average below 10% (Meaney et al. 2003, Schorr 2012, Schorr and Mihlbachler 2018). Summer survival rates are drastically lower than winter survival rates (Schorr 2001, Meaney et al. 2003). Capture rates and survival are lower with increasing density of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus), suggesting direct competition for resources (Schorr 2012). A 7-year study found survival increased with increasing vole captures, but a 14-year study of the same site found survival decreased with vole captures (Schorr 2012, Schorr and Mihlbachler 2018). May be particularly susceptible to native generalist predators and non-native domestic predators (Clippinger 2002, Smith et al. 2004, USFWS 2007).

Reproduction

The following is based on other subspecies and may characterize this subspecies as well. Nests are often near streams (Smith et al. 2004). Gestation lasts 17-20 days. There are 2-3 litters per year with first litters around July and second litters in August (Quimby 1951, Krutzsch 1954, Whitaker 1972, Smith et al. 2004). Litter size ranges from 2-9 (average 4-6) (Quimby 1951, Krutzsch 1954, Whitaker 1972).
Terrestrial Habitats
Shrubland/chaparralGrassland/herbaceousOld field
Palustrine Habitats
HERBACEOUS WETLANDSCRUB-SHRUB WETLANDRiparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN2
ProvinceRankNative
WyomingS1Yes
ColoradoS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
3 - Energy production & miningRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
3.2 - Mining & quarryingRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionLarge - restrictedSerious - slightHigh (continuing)
9.1 - Domestic & urban waste waterLarge - restrictedSerious - slightHigh (continuing)
9.1.2 - Run-offLarge - restrictedSerious - slightHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsLarge - restrictedSerious - slightHigh (continuing)
9.3.2 - Soil erosion, sedimentationLarge - restrictedSerious - slightHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)UnknownLow (long-term)

Roadless Areas (6)
Colorado (1)
AreaForestAcres
Comanche Peak Adjacent AreaArapaho & Roosevelt NFs44,158
Idaho (1)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekCaribou-Targhee National Forest118,582
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
Wyoming (3)
AreaForestAcres
Cow Creek MountainMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest8,276
Labonte CanyonMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest16,281
Laramie PeakMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest28,608
References (29)
  1. Armstrong, D.M. 1972. Distribution of mammals in Colorado. University of Kansas, Museum of Natural History, Monograph No. 3, Lawrence.
  2. Cary, M. 1911. A biological survey of Colorado. USDA Bureau of Biological Survey, North American Fauna 33. 256 pp.
  3. Clark, T. W., and M. R. Stromberg. 1987. Mammals in Wyoming. Univ. Kansas Mus. Nat. Hist. Publ. Education Series No. 10. xii + 314 pp.
  4. Compton, S.A. and R.D. Hugie. 1993a. Status Report on <i>Zapus hudsonius preblei</i>, a Candidate Endangered Subspecies. Prepared by Pioneer Environmental consulting Services, Inc. under contract to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
  5. Compton, S.A., and R.D. Hugie 1993b. September 15, 1993 Draft addendum to the status report on <i>Zapus hudsonius preblei</i>, a candidate subspecies. This addendum to the status report was prepared by Pioneer Environmental Services, Inc., Logan, Utah, under contract to the Fish and Wildlife Service.
  6. Conner, M. M., and T. M. Shenk. 2003. Distinguishing <i>Zapus hudsonius preblei</i> from <i>Zapus princeps princeps</i> by using repeated cranial measurements. Journal of Mammalogy 84:1456-1463.
  7. Corn, J. G., C. A. Pague, A, R. Ellingson, M. Sherman, T. Zwiejacz, G. Kittel and C. Fleming. 1995. Final report on the geographic extent of the Preble's meadow jumping mouse population of the United States Air Force Academy. Colorado Natural Heritage Program report to the USAFA, Colorado Springs, CO.
  8. Cruzan, J. 1968. Ecological Distributions and Interactions of Four Species of <i>Microtus </i>in Colorado. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder, +116 pp.
  9. Ebasco Biologists. 1992. Information on Preble's jumping mouse at Rocky Flats Plant. Correspondance from D.J. Tate to B. Garza (USFWS), 14 July 1992. Golden, CO.
  10. Ellingson, A.R. 1994. West Plum Creek field survey.
  11. Ellingson, A.R., S.M. Kettler, S.C. Spackman, C.A. Pague, and J.G. Corn. 1995. Significant Natural Heritage Resources of the United States Air Force Academy and their Conservation. Draft report to the United States Air Force Academy. 90pp.
  12. Fitzgerald, J. P. et al. 1992. Mammals of Colorado. Review manuscript.
  13. Hall, E. R. 1981a. The Mammals of North America, second edition. Vols. I &amp; II. John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, New York. 1181 pp.
  14. Harrington, F., Miller, C., et al. 1994. Preble's meadow jumping mouse habitat tour on August 23rd. City of Boulder Open Space and the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site. Includes background information, agenda and minutes.
  15. Jones, C. A. 1999. <i>Zapus hudsonius</i> in southern Colorado. Museum of Texas Tech University Occasional Papers 191:1-7.
  16. Jones, G.S., and D.B. Jones. 1985. Observations of intraspecific behavior of meadow jumping mice, <i>Zapus hudsonius</i>, and escape behavior of a western jumping mouse, <i>Zapus princeps</i>, in the wild. Canadian Field-Naturalist 99(3):378-380.
  17. Krutzsch, P. H. 1954. North American jumping mice (genus <i>Zapus</i>). Univ. Kansas Publ., Mus Nat. Hist. 7:349-472.
  18. Meaney, C. A., A. K. Ruggles, B. C. Lubow, and N. W. Clippinger. 2003. Abundance, survival, and hibernation of Preble's meadow jumping mice (<i>Zapus hudsonius preblei</i>) in Boulder County, Colorado. Southwestern Naturalist 48:610-623.
  19. Miller, Clint. 1994. Documented locations of Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse (<i>Zapus hudsonius preblei</i>) on City of Boulder Open Space. Unpublished report. Boulder, Colorado, 1 page plus cover letter.
  20. Quimby, D.C. 1951. Life history and ecology of the jumping mouse, <i>Zapus hudsonius</i>. Ecol. Monogr. 21(1):61-95.
  21. Ramey, R.R., II, H.-P. Liu, C. W. Epps, L. M. Carpenter, and J. D. Wehausen, J.D. 2005. Genetic relatedness of the Preble's meadow jumping mouse (<i>Zapus hudsonius preblei</i>) to nearby subspecies of <i>Z. hudsonius </i>as inferred from variation in cranial morphology, mitochondrial DNA and microsatellite DNA: implications for taxonomy and conservation. Animal Conservation 8:329-346.
  22. Stoeker, R.E. 1992. Report of Findings. Survey for Preble's jumping mouse, Rocky Flats Buffer Zone, Jefferson Co., CO. Prepared by Stoeker Ecological Consultants for EG& G Rocky Flats Inc., through ESCO Associates, Inc., Boulder, CO.
  23. Stoeker, R. E. 1993. Report of Findings. 2nd year survey for the Preble's jumping mouse, Rocky Flats Buffer Zone, Jefferson Co., CO. Prepared by Stoeker Ecological Consultants for EG& G Rocky Flats, Inc. through ESCO Associates Inc., Boulder, CO.
  24. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 13 May 1998. Final rule to list the Preble's meadow jumping mouse as a threatened species. Federal Register 63(92):26517-26530.
  25. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2011. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; reinstatement of listing protections for the Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse. Federal Register 76(151):47490-47491.
  26. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 25 March 1997. Proposal to list the Preble's meadow jumping mouse as an endangered species. Federal Register 62:14093-14101.
  27. Vignieri, S. N., E. M. Hallerman, B. J. Bergstrom, D. J. Hafner, A. P. Martin, P. Devers, P. Grobler, and N. Hitt. 2006. Mistaken view of taxonomic validity undermines conservation of an evolutionarily distinct mouse: a response to Ramey <i>et al</i>. (2005). Animal Conservation 9:237-243.
  28. Warren, E.R. 1910. The Mammals of Colorado. G.P. Putnam's Sons:New York and London. 300 pp.
  29. Whitaker, J. O. 1972. <i>Zapus hudsonius</i>. Am. Soc. Mamm., Mammalian Species 11:1-7.