Sceloporus woodi

Stejneger, 1918

Florida Scrub Lizard

G2Imperiled (G2G3) Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
Near threatenedIUCN
Very high - highThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.100784
Element CodeARACF14160
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNNear threatened
Endemicendemic to a single state or province
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassReptilia
OrderSquamata
FamilyPhrynosomatidae
GenusSceloporus
Other Common Names
Florida scrub lizard (EN)
Concept Reference
Sites, J. W., Jr., J.W. Archie, C.J. Cole and O. Flores-Villela. 1992. A review of phylogenetic hypotheses for lizards of the genus Sceleporus (Phrynosomatidae): implications for ecological and evolutionary studies. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. (213):1-110.
Taxonomic Comments
Branch et al. (2003) found strong phylogeographic structuring in S. woodi, with mtDNA of lizards from populations occupying different major scrub archipelagos differing by 2.0–8.0% and likely qualifying as evolutionarily significant units. Hybridization between S. woodi and S. undulatus does not appear to be threatening the existence of either species (Robbins et al. 2014) (Crother 2017).

In the past, some authors have questioned whether S. woodi is sufficiently differentiated from S. undulatus to be considered a distinct species.
See Sites et al. (1992) for a review of phylogenetic hypotheses for lizards of the genus Sceloporus.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodLegacy Rank calculation - Biotics v1
Review Date2020-06-02
Change Date2014-03-05
Edition Date2020-06-03
Edition AuthorsGundy, R. L. (2020)
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent20,000-200,000 square km (about 8000-80,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 - 300
Rank Reasons
The Florida scrub lizard is endemic to a portion of the Florida peninsula, where it specializes in scrub and other xeric habitats. The species continues to be threatened by habitat loss and degradation throughout its range (Enge et al. 2018). Resulting habitat fragmentation further threatens the species through reductions in gene flow and population viability (Clark et al. 1999, McCoy et al. 2004, Tucker et al. 2014, Orton 2017). Following long-term declines, efforts to conserve scrub habitat have helped to stabilize scrub lizard populations over the last few decades (Enge et al. 2018).
Range Extent Comments
Using the 122 extant occurrences in the FNAI database, GeoCat calculated Extent of Occurrence to be 26,719 sq. km. Occurs in scrubs on central and Atlantic coastal ridges. Major centers of distribution include Ocala National Forest (Marion County) and the remaining Lake Wales Ridge scrubs of Polk and Highlands counties. Smaller populations occur along the southeastern Atlantic coast. Presumably extirpated from the Gulf coast where it was formerly known from Lee and Collier Counties, and extirpated south of Jupiter Ridge Natural Area in Palm Beach and Broward Counties (Enge et al. 2018).
Occurrences Comments
As of 2020, there are 122 extant element occurrences in the FNAI database.
Threat Impact Comments
The greatest threat to Florida scrub lizards continues to be habitat loss (Enge et al. 2018). An estimated 85% of scrub habitat has been lost along the Lake Wales Ridge, mostly to conversion for agriculture and development (Turner et al. 2006, FNAI 2018). The threat of habitat loss to development remains high along the Atlantic coast, where some of the last remaining patches of habitat are for sale (Enge et al. 2018). Where scrub habitat remains, habitat alteration continues to affect this species negatively (Kaunert and McBrayer 2015). Fire suppression, planting of dense sand pine (Pinus clausa) plantations, clearcutting, roller-chopping, and encroachment by invasive species all reduce scrub habitat quality (Kaunert and McBrayer 2015). Suitable scrubs, those with abundant exposed sand openings, have become increasingly fragmented (Hokit et al. 1999). Habitat fragmentation threatens remaining populations because of low dispersal ability, often < 200 meters, making recolonization or gene flow unlikely beyond this distance (Clark et al. 1999, Hokit et al. 1999, McCoy et al. 2004, Heath et al. 2012, Tucker et al. 2014).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

A small lizard with spiny dorsal scales and a dark brown lateral stripe; dorsal surface is gray or grayish brown in south-central populations, brown with a reddish cast in northern east-coast populations. Adult total length usually is about 10-14 cm (females 39-63 mm SVL, males 40-58 mm SVL); hatchlings are about 4.4 cm in total length (19-23 mm SVL). Adult males have long, black-bordered blue patches on each side of the belly, a blue spot on each side of the otherwise black-and-white throat, generally few if any middorsal markings, and (when breeding) prominent femoral scales; blue color of males is more intense during the breeding season. Adult females generally have several wavy dark lines or diagonal bars across the back (may be fused or altered to form longitudinal lines), may have some faint blue on the throat and belly, and have diffuse orange coloration on the sides during the breeding season. Young resemble females but are paler (Powell et al. 2016, Krysko et al. 2019).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Differs from eastern fence lizard (S. undulatus) in having a distinct brown lateral stripe (bordered below by white) rather than a less clear-cut black lateral stripe (or no lateral stripe). Also, dorsal scale count (from back of head to base of tail) averages more than 40 rather than 34 (Powell et al. 2016).

Habitat

A specialist of xeric scrub communities but can also marginally occupy ecotones with sandhill, scrubby flatwoods, and xeric hammock (Campbell and Christman 1982, Kaunert and McBrayer 2015, Williams and McBrayer 2015, Orton 2017, Enge et al. 2018). Strongly prefers sites with open sandy patches (Hokit et al. 1999, Orton 2017). Development of a closed canopy (e.g., in the absence of fire) results in increasingly unsuitable habitat. The species is mostly terrestrial but commonly perches low on tree trunks, especially in sandhill habitat (Kaunert and McBrayer 2015, Williams and McBrayer 2015).

Ecology

Adults and possibly juveniles are territorial in the spring and summer, males can be seen actively defending a territory which contains the home range of at least one adult female; they are presumably defending mating rights rather than a foraging territory. Defensive and aggressive activities include displaying blue coloration (via push-ups and arching), chasing, and occasionally biting. Adults ignore the presence of hatchlings in their territories (Hartmann, unpubl.).

Reproduction

This species typically becomes sexually mature within 10-11 months but can mature in 7-8 months in some areas (Jackson and Telford 1974). Mating occurs from late March through June. Eggs are laid in soil (e.g., Geomys and tortoise mounds) (Ashton and Ashton 1985). Multiple clutches of 2-8 eggs are laid from April-November. Hatching begins in late May in central Florida and in late June in northern Florida and extends through November (Hartmann 1995, Jackson and Telford 1974, Enge et al. 2018). This is a fast-growing, early-maturing, short-lived species. The oldest individual in one study was a 27-month old male, but the average life span was 12.6 months (Mushinsky and McCoy et al. 2004).
Terrestrial Habitats
Woodland - HardwoodWoodland - ConiferWoodland - MixedShrubland/chaparralSand/duneCropland/hedgerow
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN2
ProvinceRankNative
FloridaS2Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureLarge - smallModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
2.2 - Wood & pulp plantationsLarge - restrictedModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useLarge - restrictedSerious - slightHigh (continuing)
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingLarge - restrictedSerious - slightHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge (31-70%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionLarge (31-70%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (1)
Florida (1)
AreaForestAcres
Farles PrairieOcala National Forest1,901
References (44)
  1. Anderson, R. A., and H. M. Tiebout, III. 1993. The effects of timber management practices on the lizards of xeric pineland habitats: an investigation of the Florida sand pine scrub. Final report to The Nature Conservancy.
  2. Ashton, R. E., Jr., and P. S. Ashton. 1985. Handbook of reptiles and amphibians of Florida. Part two. Lizards, turtles & crocodilians. Windward Pub., Inc., Miami. 191 pp.
  3. Bartlett, R. D., and P. P. Bartlett. 1999b. A field guide to Florida reptiles and amphibians. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, Texas. xvi + 278 pp.
  4. Behler, J. L., and F. W. King. 1979. The Audubon Society field guide to North American reptiles and amphibians. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 719 pp.
  5. Bowie, A. 1973. Predation on lizards by <i>Sceloporus woodi</i>. J. Herpetol. 7(3):318.
  6. Bowie, A. 1974. Comparative study of the gastrointestinal nematodes of two sceloporoid lizards in Florida. Masters thesis, Zoology Department, Univ. of Florida. 47 pp.
  7. Branch, L.C., A-M. Clark, P.E. Moler, and B.W. Bowen. 2003. Fragmented landscapes, habitat specificity, and conservation genetics of three lizards in Florida scrub. Conservation Genetics 4:199-212.
  8. Campbell, H. W., and S. P. Christman. 1982a. The herpetological components of Florida sandhill and sand pine scrub associations. Pages 163-171 in N. J. Scott (editor). Herpetological communities. U.S. Fish &amp; Wildlife Service, Wildlife Res. Rep. 13.
  9. Carr, A., and C. J. Goin. 1955. Guide to the reptiles, amphibians and fresh-water fishes of Florida. Univ. Florida Press, Gainesville.
  10. Clark, A. M., B. W. Bowen, and L. C. Branch. 1999. Effects of natural habitat fragmentation on an endemic scrub lizard (<i>Sceloporus woodi</i>): an historical perspective based on a mitochondrial DNA gene genealogy. Molecular Ecology 8:1093-1104.
  11. Collins, J. T. 1990. Standard common and current scientific names for North American amphibians and reptiles. 3rd ed. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. Herpetological Circular No. 19. 41 pp.
  12. Conant, R. 1975. A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Eastern and Central North America. Second Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. xvii + 429 pp.
  13. Conant, R. and J. T. Collins. 1991. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Third edition. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts. 450 pp.
  14. Conant, R., and J. T. Collins. 1998. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Third edition, expanded. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts. 616 pp.
  15. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2008. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. Sixth edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Herpetological Circular 37:1-84. Online with updates at: http://www.ssarherps.org/pages/comm_names/Index.php
  16. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2012. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 7th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 39:1-92.
  17. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  18. DeMarco, V. 1992. Florida scrub lizard <i>Sceloporus woodi</i> Stejneger. Pages 141-145 in P. E. Moler, editor. Rare and endangered biota of Florida. Vol. III. Amphibians and reptiles. Univ. Press of Florida.
  19. Enge, K. M. , J. Stalker, K. W. Christman, and B. Woo. 2025. Discovery of a disjunct population of the Florida scrub lizard (<i>Sceloporus woodi</i>) in St. Lucie County, Florida. Southeastern Naturalist 24(4):N59-N63.
  20. Enge, K. M., M. M. Bentzien, and H. F. Percival. 1986. Florida scrub lizard status survey. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Technical Report No. 26. Jacksonville, Florida. 72 pp.
  21. Funderburg, J. B., and D. S. Lee. 1970. Reproduction and growth of the endemic Florida scrub lizard, <i>Sceloporus woodi</i> Stejneger. (Abstract only). ABS Bull. 17(2):43.
  22. Hartmann, P. P. 1995. The population dynamics of the Florida scrub lizard, <i>Sceloporus woodi</i>, on the Lakes Wales Ridge of central Florida. Final report to The Nature Conservancy. 53 pp.
  23. Heckel, D. G., and J. Roughgarden. 1979. A technique for estimating the size of lizard populations. Ecology 60:966-975.
  24. Hokit, D. G., and L. C. Branch. 2003. Habitat patch size affects demographics of the Florida scrub lizard (<i>Sceloporus woodi</i>). Journal of Herpetology 37:257-265.
  25. Hokit, D. G., B. M. Smith, and L. C. Branch. 1999. Effects of landscape structure in Florida scrub: a population perspective. Ecological Applications 9:124-134.
  26. Hokit, D. G., B. M. Smith, and L. C. Branch. 2001. Comparison of two types of metapopulation models in real and artificial landscapes. Conservation Biology 15:1102-1113.
  27. Jackson, J. F. 1972. The population phenetics and behavioral ecology of the Florida scrub lizard (<i>Sceloporus woodi</i>). Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. Florida, Gainesville.
  28. Jackson, J. F. 1973. The phenetics and ecology of a narrow hybrid zone. Evolution 27:58-68.
  29. Jackson, J. F., and S. R. Telford, Jr. 1974. Reproductive ecology of the Florida scrub lizard, <i>Sceloporus woodi</i>. Copeia 1974:689-694.
  30. Krysko, K. L., K. M. Enge, and P. E. Moler. 2011. Atlas of amphibians and reptiles in Florida. Final report to Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Tallahassee, Florida. Submitted 15 December 2011.
  31. Lee, D. S. 1974. The possible role of fire on population density of the Florida scrub lizard, <i>Sceloporus woodi</i> Stejneger. Bull. Maryland Herpetol. Soc. 10:20-22.
  32. Lee, D. S., and J. B. Funderberg. 1977. Sceloporus woodi. Cat. Am. Amph. Rep. 196.1-196.2.
  33. Lee, D. S., and J. B. Funderburg. 1970. The geographical and ecological distribution of the Florida scrub lizard, <i>Sceloporus woodi</i> Stejneger. (Abstract). ASB Bull. 17(2):52.
  34. Lee, D. S., and L. R. Franz. 1974. Growth and feeding behavior in the endemic Florida scrub lizard, <i>Sceloporus woodi</i> Stejneger. Bull. Maryland Herpetol. Soc. 10(1):16-19.
  35. McCoy, E. D., P. P. Hartmann, and H. R. Mushinsky. 2004. Population biology of the rare Florida scrub lizard in fragmented habitat. Herpetologica 60:54-61.
  36. Moler, P. E., editor. 1992. Rare and endangered biota of Florida. Volume III. Amphibians and reptiles. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. xviii + 291 pp.
  37. Mushinsky, H. R., and E. D. McCoy. 1991. Vertebrate species composition of selected scrub islands on the Lake Wales Ridge of central Florida. Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission, Nongame Wildlife Program, Report No. NG87-149.
  38. Robbins, T. R., L. E. Walker, K. D. Gorospe, S. A. Karl, A. W. Schrey, E. D. McCoy, and H. R. Mushinsky. 2014. Rise and fall of a hybrid zone: implications for the roles of aggression, mate choice, and secondary succession. Journal of Heredity 105(2):226-236.
  39. Seber, G. A. F. 1982. The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters.Second edition. Griffin, London.
  40. Sites, J. W., Jr., J.W. Archie, C.J. Cole and O. Flores-Villela. 1992. A review of phylogenetic hypotheses for lizards of the genus <i>Sceleporus</i> (Phrynosomatidae): implications for ecological and evolutionary studies. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. (213):1-110.
  41. Tiebout, H. M., III, and R. A. Anderson. 2001. Mesocosm experiments on habitat choice by an endemic lizard: implications for timber management. Journal of Herpetology 35:173-185.
  42. Tucker, D. B., L. D. McBrayer, and J. S. Harrison. 2014. Population structure of Florida scrub lizards (<i>Sceloporus woodi</i>) in an anthropogenically fragmented forest. Herpetologica 70(3):266–278.
  43. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2016. 90-Day Findings on 10 Petitions. Federal Register 81(178): 63160-63165.
  44. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2023. National Listing Workplan. Online. Available: https://www.fws.gov/project/national-listing-workplan