Clemmys guttata

(Schneider, 1792)

Spotted Turtle

G5Secure Found in 5 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
EndangeredIUCN
MediumThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.100580
Element CodeARAAD02010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNEndangered
CITESAppendix II
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassChelonia
OrderTestudines
FamilyEmydidae
GenusClemmys
Synonyms
Testudo guttataSchneider, 1792
Other Common Names
spotted turtle (EN) Tortue ponctuée (FR)
Concept Reference
King, F. W., and R. L. Burke, editors. 1989. Crocodilian, tuatara, and turtle species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Association of Systematics Collections, Washington, D.C. 216 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Molecular data and morphological evidence indicate that the genus Clemmys (sensu McDowell 1964) is paraphyletic (see Bickham et al. 1996, Holman and Fritz 2001, Feldman and Parham 2002, Seidel 2002, Stephens and Weins 2003). Based on morphological data, Holman and Fritz (2001) split Clemmys as follows: Clemmys guttata was retained as the only member of the genus; Clemmys insculpta and C. muhlenbergii were placed in the genus Glyptemys (as first reviser, Holman and Fritz gave Glyptemys Agassiz, 1857, precedence over the simultaneously published genus Calemys Agassiz, 1857); and Clemmys marmorata was transferred to the monotypic genus Actinemys.

Genetic data support the basic features of this arrangement. An analysis of emydid relationships based on molecular data (Feldman and Parham 2002) identified four well-supported clades: Terrapene; Clemmys guttata; C. insculpta and C. muhlenbergii; and Clemmys marmorata, Emys orbicularis, and Emydoidea blandingii. Feldman and Parham retained Clemmys guttata as the only member of that genus; regarded Clemmys marmorata, Emys orbicularis, and Emydoidea blandingii as congeneric (in the genus Emys, which has priority); and placed C. insculpta and C. muhlenbergii in the genus Calemys. However, Feldman and Parham were unaware that Holman and Fritz (2001) had given Glyptemys precedence over Calemys, so the correct generic name for these turtles under the arrangement of Feldman and Parham is Glyptemys. In contrast to Holman and Fritz (2001), Feldman and Parham (2002) argued that placing Clemmys marmorata in the monotypic genus Actinemys would unnecessarily obscure its phylogenetic relationships, and they recommended that marmorata be included in the genus Emys.

Davy and Murphy (2014) identified six distinct subpopulations but made no taxonomic recommendations.

See also McDowell (1964), Merkle (1975), Lovich et al. (1991), and Bickham et al. (1996) for information on relationships among turtles of the genus Clemmys (sensu lato).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2016-02-02
Change Date1996-10-21
Edition Date2010-01-28
Edition AuthorsVan Dam, B., J. D. Soule, and G. Hammerson
Threat ImpactMedium
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
Widely distributed from the southeastern Great Lakes region to New England and southern Quebec, and southward through the east coast states to Florida; locally common in many areas, but apparently declining in some areas, due to habitat loss and fragmentation and perhaps excessive collecting; better information is needed on the current population trend.
Range Extent Comments
Range extends from southern Maine (Hunter et al. 1999), southern Quebec, southern Ontario (MacCulloch 2002), Michigan (Lower Peninsula; Harding 1997), and northeastern Illinois south to central Indiana, central Ohio, and southwestern Pennsylvania, and southward along U.S. east coast from New England to northern or north-central Florida (Conant and Collins 1991, Ernst et al. 1994, Barnwell et al. 1997).
Occurrences Comments
About 200 element occurrence records from observations since 1970 were reported from seven states (Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Michigan, New Hampshire, Vermont, West Virginia). Six other states indicated there were thought to be "many" populations, ranging from estimates of 50+ to 100s, and ranked the species S4 or S5 (Connecticut, Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, New Jersey, Pennsylvania). Three other states (Florida, Ohio, Massachusetts) indicated that the species was somewhat rare (S3). Information on Canadian populations was not available. Based on this information, it is estimated that there are at least 500 occurrences rangewide.

Certainly there are at least several hundred occurrences, but the number of occurrences has not been assessed using recently developed occurrence criteria.
Threat Impact Comments
Primary threats to this species are habitat fragmentation and alteration, grazing, draining and filling of wetlands, road mortality, collecting, artificial control of water levels, and pollution. Warm-season draw-downs of wetlands for game management can initiate emigrations of turtles that result in significant road kills (Harding 1993, pers. comm.). Illicit commercial exploitation and incidental collecting is depleting populations in many parts of the range (Hunter et al. 1992). Increasing human populations and associated development in the last two decades have reduced the quantity and quality of the spotted turtle habitat in southern Maine (McCollough 1991) and southeastern New Hampshire (Carroll 1993, pers. comm.), as well as in many other parts of its range. Nest predation and road kills may increase as development fragments the landscape. The small wetlands favored by this species are often not protected by wetland conservation laws. Tolerant of nondestructive intrusion, though heavy human visitation in late spring/early summer could interfere with nesting.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

BRIEF SUMMARY: Shell hard, somewhat flattened; upper shell black and usually with scattered rounded yellow spots; yellow or orange spots on head and neck; lower shell yellow or yellow-orange with a large black blotch on each scute. Maximum upper shell length about 13 cm. Mature male: vent located beyond rear edge of upper shell with tail extended; chin tan or dark; lower shell concave. Mature female: vent at or inside rear edge of upper shell with tail extended; chin yellowish. Hatchling: usually one yellow spot on each large scute on upper shell.

MORE DETAILS: A small black turtle with small, round, yellow spots on the broad, smooth, keelless carapace; small and old individuals sometimes are spotless; some individuals have growth layers evident on the carapace scutes; plastron is yellow or yellow-orange and has a large black blotch on each scute; head is mostly black with scattered yellow spots and blotches; limbs are gray to black above and often have yellow spots; the skin under the legs and neck is orange or pinkish (Harding and Holman 1990); males have a tan chin, brown eyes, slightly concave plastron, and (in adults) a long thick tail with the vent well beyond the posterior end of the carapace; females have a yellow chin, orange eyes, a flat or convex plastron, and a short tail with the vent under the posterior marginals; carapace length is 12.5 cm or less (Ernst et al. 1994). Males, at 80 to 89 mm in plastron length, average 155.5 g; females, at 90 to 99 mm in plastron length, average 174.7 g (Ernst 1975). Hatchlings are blue-black and usually have one, more than one, or no yellow spots on each carapacial scute; plastron is yellow with a black pattern; head is spotted and sometimes the neck is spotted; average dimensions are 29.8 mm carapace length, 31.3 mm carapace width, 26.4 mm plastron length, and 16.0 mm plastron width (Ernst 1970). Juveniles are black and may lack or have reduced spotting on the shell.

The eggs are smooth, white and elliptical. Nests generally are about 2 inches deep, 2 inches wide near the bottom, and one inch wide at the top (Ernst 1970).

Habitat

Spotted turtles inhabit mostly unpolluted, shallow bodies of water with a soft bottom and aquatic vegetation, such as small marshes, marshy pastures, bogs, fens, woodland streams, swamps, small ponds, vernal pools, and lake margins; in some areas they occur in brackish tidal streams.. Ponds surrounded by relatively undisturbed meadow or undergrowth are most favorable. These turtles favor waters with a soft bottom and aquatic vegetation. They often bask along the water's edge, on brush piles in water, or on logs or vegetation clumps. Often they move seasonally among different wetland types and may spend significant time on land during summer.

Cold season hibernation occurs in the muddy bottoms of waterways or bogs in communal hibernacula. Hibernacula usually have water depths of 55 to 95 cm (22 to 37 in) with a slow but steady flow or drift of water through densely vegetated wetlands with a deep, soft, mucky substrate (Carroll, pers. comm.). Muskrat burrows in Pennsylvania were used as winter hibernacula, nocturnal sleeping sites, refugia from danger, and estivation sites during the warm dry months (Ernst 1976). In Massachusetts, radio-tagged individuals hibernated in red maple-sphagnum swamps, then moved in late March to upland vernal pools, where they spent 3-4 months, then left the pools in August and spent 4-14 days in secluded terrestrial sites, then completed the move back to the swamps in August (Graham 1995). Hibernation occurred exclusively in bogs in central Ontario (Haxton and Berrill 1999) and in sphagnum swamps on an island in Georgian Bay, Ontario (Litzgus and Brooks 2000). See Lewis and Ritzenthaler (1997) for characteristics of hibernacula and hibernacula use in a fen in Ohio. Litzgus and Brooks (2000) documented seasonal changes in habitat selection in Ontario.

Eggs are laid in well-drained soil of marshy pastures, in grass or sedge tussock or mossy hummocks, in open areas (e.g., dirt path or road) at edge of thick vegetation, or similar sites exposed to sun. Sandy, sparsely vegetated strips and washouts along agricultural field edges are favorable for nesting (Carroll, pers. comm.). In South Carolina, gravid females spent a considerable amount of time on or at the edge of a powerline right-of-way, and they nested on the edge of the powerline and in relatively recent clearcuts (Litzgus and Mousseau 2004).

New Hampshire: deep-muck, densely vegetated scrub-shrub swamp or emergent marsh habitats that are edgewaters or backwaters of low-gradient reaches of permanent streams with moderate to slow flowages, and water depth of 10 to 50 cm (Carroll, pers. comm.). Rhode Island: reported from salt marshes and small bogs or ponds with adjacent dry upland oak-pine forest (DeGraaf and Rudis 1983). Florida: woodland or meadow streams with sphagnum. Indiana: thoroughly aquatic, said to inhabit bogs by Smith (1961); also has been collected in shallow inlets of lakes, grassy marshes, drainage ditches, and woodland ponds, and is rarely found in flowing water (Minton 1972). Maine: unpolluted, small, shallow wetlands surrounded by dense vegetation such as slow streams, ponds, vernal pools, bog ponds, roadside ditches, and wet meadows (Hunter et al. 1992). Vermont: areas of highbush blueberry/red maple swamps, and in kettle basin shrub swamps (Fichtel, pers. comm.).

Ecology

The spotted turtle is usually solitary but may be found in large aggregations in suitable feeding areas or at basking sites (Ernst 1976). In Pennsylvania, population density was estimated at 15-32 per acre (Ernst 1976). The population had a 1:1.46 male to female ratio and a 1:2.09 juvenile to adult ratio. Out of a total of seven different species of turtles captured in the mark-recapture study, Clemmys guttata was the second most abundant turtle comprising 10.2 percent of the total. Another turtle in this study, Chrysemys picta, had a population density of 239 individuals per acre. In two sites in Massachusetts, density was estimated at 0.2 and 1.4 adults per ha (Milam and Melvin 2001).

In Pennsylvania, Ernst (1976) found there to be a commensal relationship between spotted turtles and muskrats. Many turtles were dependent on the bank burrows of the muskrat, with the burrow forming the center of the home range.

In Maine, fish are believed to be competitors for food with the spotted turtle, and painted turtles are believed to compete for space (McCollough, pers. comm.). There is an overlap of habitat use and seasonal movements between adult spotted turtles and subadult Blanding's turtles; competition for food or space may or may not be a problem (Carroll, pers. comm.). Occasional juvenile common snapping turtles and adult eastern painted turtles appear in spotted turtle microhabitats and may compete for food (Carroll, pers. comm.).

Predators include foxes, skunks, and raccoons (Ernst 1976; McCollough, pers. comm.). Hatchlings and juveniles are eaten by many birds and small mammals such as shrews (Harding, pers. comm.).

Parasites include leeches (Placobdella sp.) that attach to limb sockets, tails, and plastrons (Ernst 1976). Leeches were found on spotted turtles just out of hibernation, suggesting that leeches overwinter attached to the turtles (Carroll, pers. comm.).

Reproduction

Mating occurs March-May, typically during cool weather (Ernst 1982). Eggs are laid late May-early July (mostly June) (Ernst 1967). Nest digging lasts 29 to 75 minutes (Ernst 1970); egg-laying and covering of the nest may last well into the night. All-night nesting has been documented in Illinois (Carroll, pers. comm.).

Clutch size is 1-8, with an average of 3-5 (Adler 1961, Ernst 1970); mean clutch size is larger in the north than in the south (Litzgus and Mousseau 2003). Usually one clutch is laid each year (Ernst 1967), but some females may produce 2 clutches/season (Herp. Rev. 20:69). In South Carolina, 5 of 12 gravid females produced second clutches and 1 produced a third (Litzgus and Mousseau 2003). Incubation requires 45 to 83 days, depending on nest temperature.

Hatching occurs in late August to September (Fineran 1948, Ernst and Barbour 1972, Ernst et al. 1974, Harding and Holman 1990). Rarely, hatchlings from late nestings may overwinter in the nest, emerging the following spring (Ernst 1975). Growth of the hatchlings the first season depends on the date of emergence from the nest, varying from 4.2 to 17.5 mm (Pennsylvania; Ernst 1975).

Growth after the first season varies, with the smallest individuals growing the fastest (Ernst 1975). The growth rate decreases as the turtles increase in size; adults grow at a rate of 2 to 3 percent each year (Ernst 1975). In Rhode Island, mean plastral length increased 7.5 mm per year from the first through the fifth year of growth (Graham 1970). The annual growth rate declined each season from the second to the sixth and then increased in the seventh preceding the attainment of sexual maturity.

Age of sexual maturity is probably more closely related to reaching a specific size than age, although this length is usually obtained by 10 years of age (Ernst 1975). Sexual maturity may take longer to achieve in the north than in southeastern Pennsylvania, where females are sexually mature in about 7-9 years, males in 7-10 years (Ernst, 1994, J. Herpetol. 28:99-102). Males reached maturity at a minimum plastron length of 83.4 mm; in females the minimum was 80.8 mm (Ernst and Barbour 1972).

The maximum life span of adults is at least 26 years but may be as high as 50 (Tyning 1990). The longevity of a captive recorded by Pope (1939) was 42 years, and Graham (1970) recorded a 26-year-old turtle found in the wild. In Pennyslvania, prenatal mortality eliminated 32 percent of the eggs per clutch and postnatal mortality reduced the progeny to still a smaller number (Ernst 1976); egg survivorship to hatching in Pennsylvania was 0.58 (Iverson 1991); reproductive potential was 2.4 young per clutch (Ernst 1976); estimated average annual mortality for juveniles was 45%.

As is true of most turtles, spotted turtles have temperature-dependent sex determination; eggs incubated at 27 C or below produced a large percentage of males whereas those incubated at 30 C produced all females (Ewert and Nelson 1991).
Palustrine Habitats
TEMPORARY POOLHERBACEOUS WETLANDSCRUB-SHRUB WETLANDFORESTED WETLANDBog/fenRiparian
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN2
ProvinceRankNative
OntarioS2Yes
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
North CarolinaS4Yes
IllinoisS1Yes
MassachusettsS3Yes
GeorgiaS3Yes
South CarolinaS2Yes
Rhode IslandS5Yes
New HampshireS2Yes
IndianaS2Yes
PennsylvaniaS3Yes
DelawareS3Yes
New JerseyS3Yes
West VirginiaS2Yes
FloridaS2Yes
OhioS2Yes
District of ColumbiaS1Yes
MaineS3Yes
VermontS1Yes
MarylandS3Yes
VirginiaS4Yes
MichiganS2Yes
New YorkS3Yes
ConnecticutS3Yes
Roadless Areas (5)
North Carolina (3)
AreaForestAcres
Catfish Lake NorthCroatan National Forest11,299
Pond Pine BCroatan National Forest2,961
Sheep Ridge AdditionCroatan National Forest5,808
South Carolina (1)
AreaForestAcres
Hellhole ExtFrancis Marion National Forest891
Virginia (1)
AreaForestAcres
Three RidgesGeorge Washington National Forest4,745
References (68)
  1. Adler, K. K. 1961. Egg-laying in the spotted turtle, <i>Clemmys guttata</i> (Schneider). Ohio J. Sci. 61(3):180-2.
  2. Barnwell, M. E., P. A. Meylan, and T. Walsh. 1997. The spotted turtle (<i>Clemmys guttata</i>) in central Florida. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 2(3):405-408.
  3. Bickham, J. W., T. Lamb, P. Minx, and J. C. Patton. 1996. Molecular systematics of the genus <i>Clemmys</i> and the intergeneric relationships of emydid turtles. Herpetologica 52:89-97.
  4. Brodman, R., S. Cortwright, and A. Resetar. 2002. Historical changes of reptiles and amphibians of northwest Indiana fish and wildlife properties. American Midland Naturalist 147:135-144.
  5. Butterworth, Scott. West Virginia Nongame Program. Personal communication.
  6. Carroll, D. M. Warner, NH. Personal communication.
  7. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2008. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. Sixth edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Herpetological Circular 37:1-84. Online with updates at: http://www.ssarherps.org/pages/comm_names/Index.php
  8. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  9. Davy, C. M., and R. W. Murphy. 2014. Conservation genetics of the endangered Spotted Turtle (<i>Clemmys guttata</i>) illustrate the risks of “bottleneck tests”. Canadian Journal of Zoology 92(2):149-162.
  10. DeGraaf, R. M., and D. D. Rudis. 1983a. Amphibians and reptiles of New England. Habitats and natural history. Univ. Massachusetts Press. vii + 83 pp.
  11. DeGraaf, R. M., and D. D. Rudis. 1983b. Amphibians and Reptiles of New England: Habitats and Natural History. Northeast Exper. Station, U.S. Forest Service. General Technical Report NE-108. 491 pp.
  12. Ernst, Carl H. and Roger W. Barbour. 1989a. Turtles of the World. Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington, D.C.
  13. Ernst, C. H. 1967. A mating aggregation of the turtle <i>Clemmys guttata</i>. Copeia No. 2.
  14. Ernst, C. H. 1968. Evaporative water-loss relationships of turtles. Journal of Herpetology 2(3-4):159-61.
  15. Ernst, C. H. 1970a. Home range of the spotted turtle, <i>Clemmys guttata</i> (Schneider). Copeia 1970(2):391-3.
  16. Ernst, C. H. 1970b. Reproduction in <i>Clemmys guttata</i>. Herpetologia 26:228-32.
  17. Ernst, C.H. 1972. Clemmys guttata. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. SSAR NO. 124:1-2.
  18. Ernst, C. H. 1975. Growth of the spotted turtle, <i>Clemmys guttata</i>. Journal of Herpetology 9(3):313-8.
  19. Ernst, C.H. 1976. Ecology of the Spotted Turtle, <i>Clemmys guttata</i> (Reptilia, Testudines, Testudinidae), in southeastern Pennsylvania. Journal of Herpetology 10:25-33.
  20. Ernst, C. H. 1982. Environmental temperatures and activities in wild spotted turtles, <i>Clemmys guttata</i>. Journal of Herpetology 16(2):112-20.
  21. Ernst, C. H., and R. W. Barbour. 1972. Turtles of the United States. Univ. Press of Kentucky, Lexington. x + 347 pp.
  22. Ernst, C. H., R. W. Barbour, and J. E. Lovich. 1994. Turtles of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. xxxviii + 578 pp.
  23. Ernst, C. H., R. W. Barbour and M. F. Hershey. 1974. A new coding system for hardshelled turtles. Trans. Kentucky Acad. Sci. 35:27-8.
  24. Ewert, M. A., and C. E. Nelson. 1991. Sex determination in turtles: Diverse patterns and some possible adaptive values. Copeia (1):50-69.
  25. Feldman, C. R., and J. F. Parham. 2001. Molecular systematics of emydine turtles. Linnaeus Fund Research Report. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 4:224-228.
  26. Feldman, C. R., and J. F. Parham. 2002. Molecular phylogenetics of emydine turtles: taxonomic revision and the evolution of shell kinesis. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 22:388-398.
  27. Finneran, L. C. 1948. Reptiles at Branford, Connecticut. Herpetologica 4(4):123-6.
  28. Graham. T. E. 1970. Growth rate of the spotted turtle, <i>Clemmys guttata</i>, in southern Rhode Island. Journal of Herpetology 41:87-8.
  29. Graham, T. E. 1995. Habitat use and population parameters of the spotted turtle, <i>Clemmys guttata</i>, a Species of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 1(3):207-214.
  30. Harding, J. H. 1997. Amphibians and reptiles of the Great Lakes region. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. xvi + 378 pp.
  31. Harding, J. H., and J. A. Holman. 1990. Michigan Turtles and Lizards, A Field Guide and Pocket Reference. Michigan State University Museum.
  32. Harding, J. H. Museum, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI. Personal communication.
  33. Haxton, T., and M. Berrill. 1999. Habitat selectivity of <i>Clemmys guttata</i> in central Ontario. Canadian Journal of Zoology 77:593-599.
  34. Haxton, T., and M. Berrill. 2001. Seasonal activity of spotted turtles (<i>Clemmys guttata</i>) at the northern limit of their range. Journal of Herpetology 35:606-614.
  35. Herkert, J. R., editor. 1992. Endangered and threatened species of Illinois: status and distribution. Vol. 2: Animals. Illinois Endangered Species Protection Board. iv + 142 pp.
  36. Holman, J. A., and U. Fritz. 2001. A new emydine species from the Medial Miocene (Barstovian) of Nebraska, USA with a new generic arrangement for the species of <i>Clemmys </i>sensu McDowell (1964) (Reptilia:Testudines:Emydidae). Zoologische Abhandlungen Staatliches Museum fur Tierkunde Dresden 51(19):321-344.
  37. Hunter, M. L., J. Albright, and J. Arbuckle, editors. 1992. The Amphibians and Reptiles of Maine. Maine Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 838. 188 pp.
  38. Hunter, M. L., Jr., A.J.K. Calhoun, and M. McCollough, editors. 1999. Maine amphibians and reptiles. University of Maine Press, Orono.
  39. Iverson, J. B. 1991c. Patterns of survivorship in turtles (order Testudines). Canadian J. Zoology 69:385-391.
  40. Iverson, J. B. 1992. A revised checklist with distribution maps of the turtles of the world. Privately printed. Earlham College, Richmond, Indiana.
  41. Joyal, L. A., M. McCollough, and M. L. Hunter, Jr. 2001. Landscape ecology approaches to wetland species conservation: a case study of two turtle species in southern Maine. Conservation Biology 15:1755-1762.
  42. King, F. W., and R. L. Burke, editors. 1989. Crocodilian, tuatara, and turtle species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Association of Systematics Collections, Washington, D.C. 216 pp.
  43. Klemens, M. W. 1993. Amphibians and reptiles of Connecticut and adjacent regions. State Geological and Natural History Survey of Connecticut, Bulletin 112. xii + 318 pp.
  44. Lewis, T. L., and C. A. Faulhaber. 1999. Home ranges of spotted turtles (<i>Clemmys guttata</i>) in southwestern Ohio. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 3:430-434.
  45. Lewis, T. L., and J. Ritzenthaler. 1997. Characteristics of hibernacula use by spotted turtles, <i>Clemmys guttata</i>, in Ohio. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 2:611-615.
  46. Litzgus, J. D., and R. J. Brooks. 2000. Habitat and temperature selection of <i>Clemmys guttata </i>in a northern population. Journal of Herpetology 34:178-185.
  47. Litzgus, J. D., and T. A. Mousseau. 2004. Home range and seasonal activity of southern spotted turtles (<i>Clemmys guttata</i>): implications for management. Copeia 2004:804-817.
  48. Litzgus, J. D., and T. A. Mousseua. 2003. Multiple clutching in southern spotted turtles, <i>Clemmys guttata</i>. Journal of Herpetology 37:17-23.
  49. Lovich, J. E. 1988. Geographic variation in the seasonal activity cycle of spotted turtles, <i>Clemmys guttata</i>. Journal of Herpetology 22:482-485.
  50. Lovich, J. E., et al. 1991. Relationships among turtles of the genus <i>Clemmys</i> (Reptilia, Testudines, Emydidae) as suggested by plastron scute morphology. Zoologica Scripta 20:425-429.
  51. MacCulloch, R. D. 2002. The ROM field guide to amphibians and reptiles of Ontario. Royal Ontario Museum and McClelland and Stewart Ltd., Toronto, Ontario. 168 pp.
  52. McCollough, M. 1991. Spotted turtle assessment. Maine Endangered and Nongame Wildlife Project, Resource Assessment Section, Wildlife Division, Department of Inland Fish and Wildlife.
  53. McDowell, S. B. 1964. Partition of the genus <i>Clemmys</i> and related problems in the taxonomy of the aquatic testudinidae. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 143:239-279.
  54. Merkle, D. A. 1975. A taxonomic analysis of the <i>Clemmys</i> complex (Reptilia: Testudines) utilizing starch gel electrophoresis. Herpetologica 31:162-166.
  55. Milam, J. C., and S. M. Melvin. 2001. Density, habitat use, movements, and conservation of spotted turtles (Clemmys guttata) in Massachusetts. Journal of Herpetology 35:418-427.
  56. Minton, S. A., Jr. 1972. Amphibians and reptiles of Indiana. Indiana Academy Science Monographs 3. v + 346 pp.
  57. Netting, M. G. 1936. Hibernation and migration of the spotted turtle, <i>Clemmys guttata</i> (Schneider). Copeia 1936:112.
  58. Palmer, W. M., and A. L. Braswell. 1995. Reptiles of North Carolina. North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  59. Pope, C.H. 1939. Turtles of the United States and Canada. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 343 pp.
  60. Seidel, M. E. 2002. Taxonomic observations on extant species and subspecies of slider turtles, genus <i>Trachemys</i>. Journal of Herpetology 36:282-292.
  61. Smith, P. W. 1961. The amphibians and reptiles of Illinois. Illinois Natural History Survey 28(1):1-298.
  62. Stephens, P. R., and J. J. Wiens. 2003. Ecological diversification and phylogeny of emydid turtles. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 79:577-610.
  63. Turtle Taxonomy Working Group (TTWG) [Rhodin, A. G. J., J. B. Iverson, R. Bour, U. Fritz, A. Georges, H. B. Shaffer, and P. P. van Dijk]. 2021. Turtles of the World: Annotated Checklist and Atlas of Taxonomy, Synonymy, Distribution, and Conservation Status (9th Ed.). In: Rhodin, A. G. J., J. B. Iverson , P. P. van Dijk, C. B. Stanford, E. V. Goode, K. A. Buhlmann, and R. A. Mittermeier (Eds.). Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation Project of the IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group. Chelonian Research Monographs 8:1–472. doi: 10.3854/crm.8.checklist.atlas.v9.2021.
  64. Turtle Taxonomy Working Group [van Dijk, P.P., Iverson, J.B., Shaffer, H.B., Bour, R., and Rhodin, A.G.J.]. 2012. Turtles of the world, 2012 update: annotated checklist of taxonomy, synonymy, distribution, and conservation status. In: Rhodin, A.G.J., Pritchard, P.C.H., van Dijk, P.P., Saumure, R.A., Buhlmann, K.A., Iverson, J.B., and Mittermeier, R.A. (Eds.). Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation Project of the IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group. Chelonian Research Monographs No. 5:000.243-000.328. Online. Available: www.iucn-tftsg.org/cbftt/.
  65. Tyning, T. F. 1990. A guide to amphibians and reptiles. Strokes Nature Guides. Little, Brown and Company, Boston, Massachusetts.
  66. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2015. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Findings on 31 Petitions. Federal Register 80(126):37568-37579.
  67. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2023. National Listing Workplan. Online. Available: https://www.fws.gov/project/national-listing-workplan
  68. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2025. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Five Species Not Warranted for Listing as Endangered or Threatened Species. Federal Register 90(169):42725-42734.