Ammocrypta pellucida

(Putnum, 1863)

Eastern Sand Darter

G4Apparently Secure Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
MediumThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.100745
Element CodeAFCQC01060
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderPerciformes
FamilyPercidae
GenusAmmocrypta
COSEWICT
Synonyms
Ammocrypta pellucidumEtheostoma pellucida(Putnam, 1863)Etheostoma pellucidum(Putnam, 1863)
Other Common Names
Dard de sable (FR)
Concept Reference
Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
In a phylogenetic analysis based on morphology, Simons (1991) concluded that Ammocrypta asprella should be included in the genus Crystallaria (generally has been regarded as a subgenus of Ammocrypta) and that the genus Ammocrypta should be regarded as a subgenus of Etheostoma. Page and Burr (1991), Simons (1992), and Wiley (1992) adopted this change, but Etnier and Starnes (1993) and Jenkins and Burkhead (1994) retained Ammocrypta as a distinct genus and treated Crystallaria as a subgenus. Patterns of molecular variation are consistent with the recognition of Ammocrypta species as taxonomically distinct from Etheostoma (Wood and Mayden 1997, Faber and Stepien 1998, Near et al. 2000).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2011-10-19
Change Date2009-08-30
Edition Date2011-10-19
Edition AuthorsLosey, J., C. Fichtel, B. Van Dam, J. Soule, and G. Hammerson
Threat ImpactMedium
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 - 300
Rank Reasons
Discontinuous range in the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada; many populations have been reduced or extirpated as a result of siltation, impoundments, and pollution, but currently populations are believed to be relatively stable in most of the range.
Range Extent Comments
Range encompasses most of the Ohio River basin from western New York and eastern Illinois south to western Kentucky (present downstream to the Wabash drainage on the north side and the Cumberland on the south) (Williams 1975); southern end of Lake Huron, lakes St. Clair and Erie; disjunct population in middle St. Lawrence-Lake Champlain drainage, southern Quebec, Vermont, and New York. It is absent, though historically known, from Lake Ontario drainages (Williams 1975, Lee et al. 1980, Page and Burr 1991). Populations exist in Ontario and Quebec, since 1970 populations in several river systems have been extirpated. (Holm and Mandrak, 1996). In Illinois, it is now restricted to the upper Wabash drainage and is common only in the middle Embarras River and Middle Fork of the Vermilion (Smith 1979). Forbes and Richardson (1920) considered it scarce in Illinois because its habitat was limited. In West Virginia, its distribution is patchy, but it is locally abundant in Middle Island Creek and the Little Kanawha River (Stauffer et al. 1995). In Ohio it was widely distributed in inland streams, the Ohio River, and on Lake Erie beaches. Trautman (1981) detailed its decline with a distribution map. Van Meter and Trautman (1970) reported that although once numerous in Lake Erie, it had been greatly reduced in numbers or extirpated in many sections of the lake and tributaries. In New York, there are records from two tributaries to lake Erie, and it has been recently collected from the Little Salmon and Mettawee rivers (Smith 1985) and the St. Regis (Carlson, personal communication, 1998). In Kentucky, there have been recent collections from the Green, Rolling Fork, Kentucky, Licking, and Little Sandy rivers, and Blaine creek (Burr and Warren 1986). In Pennsylvania, it was reported from the Youghiogheny (Cope 1869) and Monongahela rivers (Evermann and Bollman 1886), but is now known only from French Creek (Criswell 1992) and the Presque Isle area of Lake Erie (Hendricks 1985, Kenyon and Perise 1986); apparently extirpated from the former two rivers by the late 1930s (Raney 1938). In Vermont, there are records from the Lamoille and Poultney Rivers (Smith 1985, Bouton 1986). Many reports attest to its original abundance (Evermann and Bollman 1886, Evermann and Jenkins 1889, Gilbert 1885, Meek 1889, Kirsch 1895, Osburn 1901).
Occurrences Comments
The number of distinct occurrences has not been determined using standardized criteria.

A questionnaire was sent to eleven heritage programs in 1996 with seven responding. The following is from that survey, with data on Ontario, Quebec, Pennsylvania and New York from published sources and interviews. The questionnaire results indicated that there were just over 100 recent (since 1970) occurrences reported (over 150 including older records, prior to 1970). Largest numbers remain in Indiana (51 total, 14 since 1970), Kentucky (33 since 1969), and West Virginia (estimated 30). Ohio and Michigan both have about 10 occurrences recently verified (includes 1994 data in Michigan). States with limited numbers of occurrences include Illinois (3), Vermont (4), New York (6), and Pennsylvania (2). In Ontario, before 1970, there were 13 sites on six rivers and documented occurrences on Lake Erie. Since 1970, and following intensive surveys there are 12 sites on three rivers with populations extirpated on the four rivers. In Quebec, there were 11 sites on six rivers, one on the St. Lawrence and one lake population. Since 1970, there are 37 occurrences on seven St. Lawrence tributaries and none on the St. Lawrence or on two of the rivers where pre-1970 populations were identified (Holm and Mandrak 1996). Burr and Warren (1986) mapped about 49 post-1950 collection sites in Kentucky and noted the distribution as sporadic and localized.
Threat Impact Comments
Main threats are (1) loss of habitat (clean sandy substrate) due to siltation, (2) construction of impoundments and regulation of flow resulting in changes in high flow conditions important to creating and maintaining habitat as well as sufficient flow during summer or droughts, and (3) reduction in water quality due to point and nonpoint source pollution (Trautman 1981, Spreitzer 1979, Kuehne and Barbour 1983, Cooper 1983, Smith 1985, Barnes and Carline 1977, Branson 1977, Van Meter and Trautman 1970, Page and Burr 1991, Herkert 1992, Simon 1993, Grandmaison et al. 2004).

Heavy siltation is a problem in highly industrialized and agricultural areas. Siltation can vary with the type of crops and tillage practices. Disturbance of riparian areas, such as levees or wetlands that represent silt traps can be a significant threat. Use of lampricide for management of sea lampreys could affect Lake Erie and Lake Champlain populations.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

The most elongate species of the subgenus Ammocrypta. Adults usually 46-71 mm in total length (TL) (longest 81 mm), young of year 28-53 mm TL in October. Facey (1997) discerned three age classes: Age 0, 18.8-41.2 mm; Age 2, 34.2-52.6 mm; Age 3, 45.5-52.8 mm. Body depth contained 7.0-11.2 times in standard length. Williams (1975) provided ranges based on analyzed specimens. In live specimens, the body is translucent with a yellowish or greenish cast, especially dorsally, with a narrow metallic gold to olive-gold band passing subcutaneously along the line of lateral blotches. The dorsum is marked with 11-19 small olive spots along the dorsal ridge which beomce rows of paired spots along base of dorsal fins, with one row on each side of fin. Along lateral line is a series of 8-15 oblong, dusky-olive spots that may form a faint band posteriorly (Trautman 1981). In alcohol, the dorsum is variously marked by 11-19 dusky to brown blotches, extremely variable in size, shape and position. Where these extend across the dorsum, they are broken along the midline forming rows of paired spots, particularly along the base of the dorsal fins. Laterally, the body is marked with 9-15 dusky to dark brown longitudinal blotches of variable size, shape and horizontal position becoming larger and darker posteriorly. Lateral line is complete with 65-84 scales. Belly, cheek and opercle are unscaled; breast is unscaled except for embedded scales near and on prepectoral area (Williams 1975). Organs, vertebrae, and lateral blotches on opposite side of body are visible through flesh in live fish (Spreitzer 1979). Sexual dimorphism is subtle. Pelvic fins have melanophores concentrated on the basal half to two-thirds in males, while females have no pigmentation or occasional melanophores along margins of pelvic rays (Williams 1975). During spawning season, genital papillae of males (which are smaller than females) remain a distance from anal-fin spine while papillae of female encroach on or touch anal-fin spine base (Spreitzer 1979). Type specimens were documented by Jordan and Evermann (1896), Linder (1959), and Collette & Knapp (1966). Protolarvae are 5.5 mm TL at hatching, and possess a stomodeum, 23-26 (x = 24.4) preanal myomeres, and 18-19 (x = 18.4) postanal myomeres (Simon et al. 1992).

Diagnostic Characteristics

The most elongate of the subgenus Ammocrypta, and the only Etheostoma with both the long axis of the lateral blotches horizontal and 4-7 rows of scales below the lateral line at the caudal peduncle (Williams 1975). Ammocrypta meridiana (southern sand darter) achieves a maximum size of 58 mm and is pale yellow-orange. Ammocrypta vivax (scaly sand darter) is primarily a coastal plain species of the Mississippi embayment (Williams 1975).

Habitat

Generally this sand darter prefers habitats within small creeks to large rivers and lake shores, with slow to medium current, and lakes and lake-like expansions of rivers with fine sandy substrate (0.1-1.0 mm) (Daniels 1993, Trautman 1981, Scott and Crossman 1973, Williams 1975, Adams and Burr 2004, Grandmaison et al. 2004, and many others).

Sandy areas are generally depauperate of flora and other fauna so that both competitors and predators may be lacking. Sand particles (0.1-1.0 mm) are deposited at low velocities relative silt and clay (which tend to move as aggregates) or larger stones and cobbles. Unconsolidated silts and clays erode at lower velocities than sand, but remain in suspension unless stream velocity decreases (Morisawa 1985). Sand runs form in depositional areas where current slows on the inside of a bend in the river. Such runs can be stable, though sand particles are eroded and deposited with storm events (Gordon et al. 1992). Burrows into sand bottom. Eggs are buried in the substrate. Simon et al. (1992) reported collecting eggs and larvae from the Tippecanoe River (Indiana) from sand and gravel in slight to moderate current at temperatures of 20-23 C.

Ohio: most abundant in larger, sandy areas of sections of moderate or large-sized streams where silting-over of sand was at a minimum and current was not strong enough to wash away the sand (Trautman 1981). Pennsylvania: taken over sandy riffles (Lachner, Westlake and Handwerk 1950). Kentucky: captured over clean sand along the margins of a Dianthera riffle (Branson and Batch 1974). Quebec: Vladykov (1942) reported unusual captures over limestone with a thin layer of mud, and clay mixed with some sand. Sand at one French Creek site was approximately 2-4 dm deep (Criswell 1992), and Barnes (1979) reported substrate depths of 100-500 cm at a sand darter site on Federal Creek. Water depths ranged from 2 dm (Criswell 1992) to 14.6 m (Scott and Crossman 1973). Minimum stream widths reported were 7-9 m (Barnes and Carline 1977). In the Tippecanoe River, greatest abundance occurred where water was approximately 30 cm deep over a substrate of 80% sand and 20% gravel (Johnston 1989). In general, medium and coarse sand co-dominated the substrate in Salt Creek, with fine sand being third most prevalent by weight, and with some silt also present. The dynamic nature of this habitat was documented by percent composition of various particle sizes changing monthly, and by observations of changes in size, shape, topography, and degree of silt cover at study sites (Spreitzer 1979). Daniels studied habitat within the Mettawee River in (New York) and within an artificial stream environment. Greatest abundance (75%) of observed darters was less than 20 m downstream of channel bend (depositional side of stream), 90% on sand 5 m from shore and in less than 0.5 m depth. Vegetation and debris were greater than 5 m; i.e. Measured water velocity was 10-20 cm/sec water column velocity. Artificial stream data corroborated field data. Sand substrate at the riffle site reported by Lachner et al. (1950) is no longer present in sufficient quantity to support A. pellucidum, although the site is otherwise intact and still supports all other riffle inhabitants reported (Criswell 1992). Maximum water temperature reported for a capture site was 26 C (Johnston 1989). Vladykov (1942) reported pH readings of 8.2 and 8.6 in Quebec. Specific data on other water parameters quality are lacking.

In Lake Erie, A. pellucida occupied clean sandy shores, shallow bays, and the island region of the lake (Van Meter and Trautman 1970). Langlois (1954) reported it from sandy shoals at the narrows of Middle Bass Island, and noted that some were captured by local boys at a bathing beach on South Bass Island in 1952. It occupies unconsolidated, sandy bottom along the shoreline of Presque Isle in waters 1-5 feet in depth. Although there is little specific data on water quality requirements, a report by Beeton (1961) concluded the change in bottom fauna of Lake Erie, which corresponds to reported declines in A. pellucida (Trautman 1981, Van Meter and Trautman 1970), indicated an increase in the organic component of the sediments. In the western basin island area the bacteria load increased threefold between 1913 and 1946, average total nitrogen increased from 0.265 ppm in 1942 to 0.83 ppm in 1958, free ammonia from 0.013 in 1930 to 0.092 in 1958, and total phosphorous increased from 14.4 ppb in 1942 to 36 ppb in 1959.

Ecology

Annulus formation is weak, but discernable. Maximum age in the Salt Creek study was 2+ years. Mean standard lengths for 135 specimens analyzed were: age 0, 33.4 mm (range 18.8-41.2); age I, 44.4 mm (range 34.2-52.6); age II, 48.8 mm (range 45.5-52.8). There was little size difference between males and females, and the sex ratio was 1:1 (Spreitzer 1979).

Information on population structure, density and age composition information is lacking. Studies of other darter species indicate near constant mortality rate throughout life (beyond the larval stage) or a relatively high death rate at advanced age, as opposed to high juvenile and low adult mortality found in most fish species (Page 1983). At one French Creek Station, 34 specimens were captured in a 510 square meter area in good habitat in 24 minutes with electro-fishing gear (Criswell 1992). Bouton (1986) reported capturing 45 individuals in a 4-mile section of the Poultney River, 95% of which had clean sand bottom, and considered this a healthy population.

Parasites identified from Lake Erie specimens included the nematodes: Camallanus oxycephalus and Agamonema sp.; and trematodes: Neascus sp., Tetracotyle sp., and Lebouria cooperi (Bangham and Hunter 1939). Those from Salt Creek and incidence of infestation were: C. oxycepahlus 9.2%; the trematode Uvulifera ambloplitis 79.8%; the copepod Lernaea cyprinaceae 5%; and the cestode Protocephalus ambloplitis 80%. The infected Salt Creek specimens showed no evidence of decline in physical condition (Spreitzer 1979).

Burying Behavior: A. pellucida was reported to bury itself in sand substrate by several authors. Clay (1975) and Trautman (1981) reported a tail-first burying sequence, which no longer appears credible. Jordan and Copeland (1877) first reported a head-first burying sequence in aquarium fish. Spreitzer (1979) and Daniels (1989) reported detailed accounts of head-first burying behavior. The darter swims slightly above stream bottom for 0.3-2 mm, then plunges into the substrate at an angle of 20-60 degrees, then travels through the sand in a shallow V-shaped path. Elapsed time from first contact with sand to final resting position was 0.12-0.75 sec. Spreitzer (1979) reported two types of burying behavior. The more common "casual" behavior resulted in the snout and eyes being exposed at termination of the sequence, while the less common "avoidance" behavior left the fish completely buried. Daniels (1989) tested three hypotheses (predator avoidance, prey ambush, and maintaining position) to explain burying behavior and concluded that predator avoidance or presence of prey in the water column (larval food items) did stimulate burying. Darters may actively uncover within the sand (Daniels, personal communication). The ability of the darter to maintain itself in an apparently homogeneous microhabitat (by burying) during high or low flows was important, though low oxygen levels in substrate may limit such behavior. Some fish remained buried for at least 18 hours. The temperature at the bottom of the water column was found to be approximately 10 C higher than at 2 cm into the substrate, illustrating the potential advantage for thermoregulation during low flows and hot weather. Simon (1991) concluded that burying behavior appears to be a resting response used during occupation of homogeneous sand habitats, and that incidences of complete burial and, burial with head and snout exposed, corresponded to long and short resting periods, respectively. Individuals that remained in the sediment longer than one hour were usually completely buried.

Associates: In Salt Creek (Spreitzer 1979), fish species considered associated with A. pellucida were Etheostoma nigrum in the transition zone between silt and sand, (where both were observed feeding non-aggressively), Notropis stramineus and Ericymba buccata (which may compete with the sand darter for food), and Noturus miurus (where cover exists). In French Creek, western Pennsylvania, E. blennoides, E. zonale, Percina maculata, Hypentilium nigricans, Ichthyomyzon sp. (ammocetes), Notropis stramineus, N. volucellus, and Noturus miurus were taken with A. pellucida (Criswell 1992). In the Mettawee in New York, Daniels found only E. olmstedi abundance positively correlated in darter sampling stations (p=0.25). He attributed co-occurrence of other species to their wide-spread distribution rather than because they shared habitat (Daniels 1993.

Predation: Definitive information on predation is lacking. Because A. pellucida is apparently somewhat active during periods of darkness (Daniels 1989, Johnston 1989) the possibility of losses to predatory fishes exists. Species that overlap with the sand darter in habitat and range (Trautman 1981) and should be considered potential predators are Lepisosteus osseus, Micropterus dolomieu, M. punctulatus, Stizostedion vitreum, and S. canadense. Daniels (1989) concluded that even if a darter buried, a wading bird could pick the fish from the substrate if it observed the point of entry. Field observations in French Creek (Criswell 1992) during low flows and bright sunlight, when the darters were quite visible, indicated they were reluctant to bury immediately when pursued by investigators, preferring to dart at least 2 m before plunging. One specimen was chased 10 m before burying. This behavior would tend to make the fish susceptible to avian predators such as the belted kingfisher (Megaceryle alcyon), which nest along streams.

Reproduction

Spawns in June and July in Ohio basin, 2-3 weeks later in Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River populations (Kuehne and Barbour 1983. In Vermont, spawning apparently began in mid-June in 1995 (Facey 1995). Spreitzer (1979) reported the spawning period as extending from May through mid-August, based on female fecundity, with most spawning occurring in June and July; eggs hatch in less than 7 days; fry begin to feed about 9 days after hatching

The only description of spawning behavior is based on observations of captive specimens in aquaria that were captured from the Tippecanoe River (Johnson 1989). During sampling in July, 23 males and 4 females were captured, suggesting males had congregated in that area. In captivity, 11 A. pellucida were monitored in a 37.8 liter tank with water 30 cm in depth and 5 cm substrate (gravel to fine sand). Four males pursued one female around the tank, often resting their pelvic fins and chins on her back. The female was mounted by a male in a position directly on top of her. Egg deposition occurred when the pair vibrated, with their tails and caudal peduncles buried in the substrate. In 3 of 12 episodes, a second "sneaker" male joined the pair, positioned himself on one side of the female, and vibrated with the pair. Eggs were buried singly in the substrate. Spawning occurred both day and night at water temperatures of 20.5-23 C. Small tubercles on the ventral surface of the first few outer pelvic rays of the male apparently hold or stimulate the female during spawning. Eggs are translucent, sperical, and slightly adhesive. Spreitzer (1979) found that the diameter of mature ova varied greatly (mean 1 mm, range 0.74-1.2 mm), larger females produced more ova than smaller specimens, and females having more ova produced more mature ova, the mature ova compliments per female being quite low (mean 71; range 30-170) which is similar to A. BEANI (22-71) and A. BIFASCIA (12-69) (Williams 1975). It appeared that yearling females that had not attained a standard length of 36 mm by May did not spawn in that year. In Salt Creek, the lowest silt levels in the habitat occurred in June and July, coinciding with peak spawning activity and raising the possibility of a relationship, perhaps to ensure greater egg survivability. Maximum longevity apparently is only a few years (Facey 1995).
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN2
ProvinceRankNative
QuebecS2Yes
OntarioS2Yes
United StatesN4
ProvinceRankNative
West VirginiaS3Yes
MichiganS1Yes
IndianaS4Yes
VermontS1Yes
IllinoisS3Yes
KentuckyS4Yes
New YorkS2Yes
OhioS4Yes
PennsylvaniaS1Yes
Roadless Areas (1)
Kentucky (1)
AreaForestAcres
WolfpenDaniel Boone National Forest2,835
References (89)
  1. Adams, G. L., and B. M. Burr. 2004. Conservation assessment for the eastern sand darter, <i>Ammocrypta pellucida</i>. Report prepared for: Hoosier National Forest, USDA Forest Service, 811 Constitution Ave., Bedford, IN 47421.
  2. Barnes, M.D. 1979. Eastern sand darter, <i>Ammocrypta pellucida</i>, and other fishes from the streams of the Wayne National Forest. Ohio Journal of Science 79:351-364.
  3. Barnes, M.D. and R.F. Carline. 1977. A survey of the eastern sand darter, <i>Ammocrypta pellucida</i> (Putnam) and other fishes in streams of the Wayne National Forest, Ohio. Final Project Report, National Forest Service, Bedford, IN.
  4. Beeton, A. M. 1961. Environmental changes in Lake Erie. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 90:153-9.
  5. Bouton, D. M. 1986. A survey for the eastern sand darter, <i>Ammocrypta pellucida</i>, and other rare fishes in thirty tributaries and five inlake deltas of Lake Champlain. Report to the New York Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY. 55 pp.
  6. Bouton, D.M. 1989. New York State recovery plan: eastern sand darter (<i>Etheostoma pellucidum</i>). NYSDEC Endangered Species Unit, Delmar, NY.
  7. Bouton, D. M. 1991. A summary of 1987-91 survey data collected on the eastern sand darter (<i>Ammocrypta pellucida</i>) in the Mettawee River, Poultney River and Little Salmon - Salmon River systems. NYSDEC Endangered Species Unit report, Delmar, NY.
  8. Branson, B.A. 1977. Threatened fishes of the Daniel Boone National Forest, Kentucky. Trans. Ky. Acad. Sci. 38 (1-2): 69-73.
  9. Branson, B. A. and D. L. Batch. 1974. Fishes of the Red River drainage, eastern Kentucky. University of Kentucky Press, Lexington, Kentucky.
  10. Burr, B. M., and M. L. Warren, Jr. 1986a. Distributional atlas of Kentucky fishes. Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Scientific and Technical Series No. 4, Frankfort, Kentucky. 398 pp.
  11. Burr, Brooks M. (Department of Zoology, Southern Illinois University) and Donovan B. Henry. 2000. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Anthony E. Zammit, ABI. June 2000.
  12. Cicerello, Ronald R. (Kentucky State Nature Preserves). 1997a. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. June 1997.
  13. Collette, B. B., and L. W. Knapp. 1966. Catalogue of type specimen of the darters (Pisces, Percidae, Etheostomatini). Proceedings of the United States National Museum 119(3550):60.
  14. Cooper, E. L. 1983. Fishes of Pennsylvania and the northeastern United States. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park. 243 pp.
  15. Cope, E. D. 1869. Synopsis of the Cyprinidae of Pennsylvania. With supplement on some new species of American and African fishes. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, New Series 13(3):351-410.
  16. Cox, Kenneth M. (District Fisheries Biologist, VT Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2000. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Anthony E. Zammit, ABI. March 2000.
  17. Criswell, R.W. 1992. Report on field investigations in the Allegheny River drainage, 1992. Unpublished report to PA Fish Commission, Bellefonte.
  18. Daniels, R. A. 1989. Significance of burying in <i>Ammocrypta pellucida</i>. Copeia 1989(1):29-34.
  19. Daniels, R. A. 1993. Habitat of the eastern sand darter, <i>Ammocrypta pellucida</i>. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 8(4):287-295.
  20. Daniels, Robert (Biological Survey, New York State Museum). 2000. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Anthony E. Zammit, ABI. June 2000.
  21. Denoncourt, C.E. and J.R. Stauffer, Jr. 1986. Threatened &amp; Endangered Fishes of PA in Endangered Threatened Species Programs in PA &amp; other States: Causes, Issues, &amp; Management. (Majumdar, S.K., F.J. Brenner, &amp; A.F. Rhoads - editors) The PA Acad. Sci.
  22. Etnier, D. A., and W. C. Starnes. 1993. The fishes of Tennessee. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, Tennessee. xiv + 681 pp.
  23. Evermann, B.W. and Bollman, C.H. 1886. Notes on a collection of fishes from the Monongahela River. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 3 (1):335-340.
  24. Evermann, B.W. and Jenkins, O.P. 1889. Notes on Indiana fishes. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 11(681): 43-57.
  25. Faber, J. E., and C. A. Stepien. 1998. Tandemly repeated sequences in the mitochondrial DNA control region and phylogeography of the pike-perches <i>Stizostedion</i>. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 10:310-322.
  26. Facey, D. E. 1995. Status of the eastern sand darter (<i>Ammocrypta pellucida</i>) in Vermont. Unpublished report, August 1995.
  27. Facey, D. E. 1998. The status of the eastern sand darter, <i>Ammocrypta pellucida</i>, in Vermont. Canadian Field-Naturalist 112(4):596-601.
  28. Ferguson, Mark (Nongame and Natural Heritage Program, Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  29. Forbes, S. A. 1880. The food of fishes: Acanthopteri. Bulletin of the Illinois State Laboratory of Natural History 1(3):19-65.
  30. Forbes, S. A., and R. E. Richardson. 1920. The fishes of Illinois. Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin No. 3. 357 p.
  31. Gilbert, C.H. 1885. A list of fishes collected in the East Fork of White River, Indiana, with descriptions of two new species. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 7(423):199-205.
  32. Gordon, N. A., T. A. McMahon, and B. L. Finlayson. 1992. Stream hydrology: an introduction for ecologists. John Wiley, New York. 526 pp.
  33. Grandmaison, D., J. Mayasich, and D. Etnier. 2004. Eastern sand darter status assessment. Report prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 3, 1 Federal Drive, Fort Snelling, MN 55111. NRRI Technical Report No. NRRI/TR-2003/40.
  34. Hendricks, M.L. 1985. Eastern Sand Darter, <i>Ammocrypta pellucida</i> (Putnam) in H.H. Genoways and F.J. Brenner, editors. Species of special concern in Pennsylvania. Special Publication of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History. No. 11.
  35. Herkert, J. R., editor. 1992. Endangered and threatened species of Illinois: status and distribution. Vol. 2: Animals. Illinois Endangered Species Protection Board. iv + 142 pp.
  36. Holm, E., and N. E. Mandrak. 1996. The status of the eastern sand darter, <i>Ammocrypta pellucida</i>, in Canada. Canadian Field-Naturalist 110(3):462-469.
  37. Jelks, H. L., S. J. Walsh, N. M. Burkhead, S. Contreras-Balderas, E. Díaz-Pardo, D. A. Hendrickson, J. Lyons, N. E. Mandrak, F. McCormick, J. S. Nelson, S. P. Platania, B. A. Porter, C. B. Renaud, J. Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, E. B. Taylor, and M.L. Warren, Jr. 2008. Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33(8):372-407.
  38. Jenkins, R. E., and N. M. Burkhead. 1994. Freshwater fishes of Virginia. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. xxiii + 1079 pp.
  39. Johnston, C.E. 1989. Spawning in the eastern sand darter, <i>Ammocrypta pellucida</i> (Pisces:Percidae), with comments on the phylogeny of Ammocrypta and related taxa. Trans. Ill. Acad. Sci. 82 (3 &amp; 4): 163-168.
  40. Jordan, D. S., and B. W. Evermann. 1896. The fishes of North and Middle America: A descriptive catalogue of species of fish-like vertebrates found in the waters of North America, north of the Isthmus of Panama. Bulletin of the U.S. National Museum No. 47 Pt. 1.
  41. Kenyon, R. and F. Perise. 1986. Fishes of Presque Isle State Park and Surrounding Waters, May 1986.
  42. Kirsch, P.H. 1895. A report upon investigation in the Maumee River basin during the summer of 1893. Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission 14 (1): 315-337.
  43. Kuehne, R. A., and R. W. Barbour. 1983. The American Darters. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky. 177 pp.
  44. Lachner, E.A., E. F. Westlake and P.S. Handwerk. 1950. Studies on the biology of some percid fishes from western Pennsylvania. Amer. Mid. Nat. 43: 92-111.
  45. Lammert, M., J. Higgins, D. Grossman, M. Bryer. 1997. A classification framework for freshwater communities. The Nature Conservancy. Arlington, Virginia.
  46. Langlois, T.H. 1954. The western end of Lake Erie and its ecology. J.W. Edwards, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 479 pp.
  47. Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, North Carolina. i-x + 854 pp.
  48. Linder, A. D. 1959. The American percid fishes <i>Ammocrypta clara </i>Jordan and Meek and <i>Ammocrypta pellucida </i>(Baird). Southwestern Naturalist 4(4):176-184.
  49. Master, L. L. 1996. Synoptic national assessment of comparative risks to biological diversity and landscape types: species distributions. Summary Progress Report submitted to Environmental Protection Agency. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia. 60 pp.
  50. Master, L. L. and A. L. Stock. 1998. Synoptic national assessment of comparative risks to biological diversity and landscape types: species distributions. Summary Report submitted to Environmental Protection Agency. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA. 36 pp.
  51. Meek, S.E. 1889. Notes on a collection of fishes from the Maumee Valley, Ohio. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 11(737):435-440.
  52. Minckley, W. L. and J. E. Deacon. 1959. Biology of the flathead catfish in Kansas. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 88(4):344-353.
  53. Morisawa, M. E. 1985. Streams, their dynamics and morphology. McGraw-Hill, New York. 175 pp.
  54. Near, T. J., J. C. Porterfield, and L. M. Page. 2000. Evolution of cytochrome b and the molecular systematics of <i>Ammocrypta</i> (Percidae: Etheostomatinae). Copeia 2000:701-711.
  55. Nelson, J. S., E. J. Crossman, H. Espinosa-Perez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, and J. D. Williams. 2004. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 29, Bethesda, Maryland. 386 pp.
  56. Osburn, R.C. 1901. The fishes of Ohio. Ohio Academy of Science Special Paper No. 4. 105 pp.
  57. Page, Lawrence M. (Illinois Natural History Survey). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps for Illinois. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC.
  58. Page, L. M. 1983a. Handbook of Darters. T. F. H. Publications, Inc., Neptune City, New Jersey. 271 pp.
  59. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 1991. A field guide to freshwater fishes: North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. 432 pp.
  60. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston. xix + 663 pp.
  61. Page, L. M., H. Espinosa-Pérez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, R. L. Mayden, and J. S. Nelson. 2013. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Seventh edition. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 34, Bethesda, Maryland.
  62. Page, L. M., K. E. Bemis, T. E. Dowling, H.S. Espinosa-Pérez, L.T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, K. E. Hartel, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, M. A. Neigbors, J. J. Schmitter-Soto, and H. J. Walker, Jr. 2023. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Eighth edition. American Fisheries Society (AFS), Special Publication 37, Bethesda, Maryland, 439 pp.
  63. Patrick, R. 1995. Rivers of the United States. Volume II. Chemical and physical characteristics. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 237 pp.
  64. Raney, E.C. 1938. The distribution of fishes of the Ohio drainage basin of western Pennsylvania. Unpub. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
  65. Rice, Daniel (Ohio Department of Natural Resources). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. July 1997.
  66. Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
  67. Schneider, Kathryn (New York Natural Heritage Program). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Larry Master and Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  68. Scott, W. B., and E. J. Crossman. 1973. Freshwater fishes of Canada. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Bulletin 184. 966 pp.
  69. Scrimger, Lyn J. (Michigan Natural Features Inventory). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Larry Master, TNC. June 1997.
  70. Simons, A. M. 1991. Phylogenetic relationships of the crystal darter, <i>Crystallaria asprella</i> (Teleostei: Percidae). Copeia 1991:927-936.
  71. Simons, A. M. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of the <i>Boleosoma</i> species group (Percidae: <i>Etheostoma</i>). Pages 268-292 in R.L. Mayden, editor. Systematics, historical ecology, and North American freshwater fishes. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. xxvi + 969 pp.
  72. Simon, Thomas P. (USFWS, Bloomington, IN). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. April 1997.
  73. Simon, T. P. 1991. Startle response and causes of burying behavior in captive eastern sand darters, <i>Ammocrypta pellucida</i> (Putnam). Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 100:155-60.
  74. Simon, T.P. 1993. Assessment of the range of the threatened darter, <i>Ammocrypta pellucida</i> (Putnam), from the Maumee River basin, Indiana. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 102: 139-145.
  75. Simon, T.P., E.J. Tyberghein, K.J. Scheidegger, and C.E. Johnson. 1992. Descriptions of Protolarvae of the Sand Darters (Percidae: Ammocrypta and Crystallaria) with comments on Systematic Relationships. Ichthyol. Explor. Freshwaters 3 (4): 347-358.
  76. Smith, C. L. 1985. The inland fishes of New York State. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Albany, New York, xi + 522 pp.
  77. Smith, P. W. 1979. The fishes of Illinois. University of Illinois Press, Urbana. 314 pp.
  78. Spreitzer, A.E. 1979. The life history, external morphology, and osteology of the eastern sand darter, <i>Ammocrypta pellucida</i> (Putnam, 1863), an endangered Ohio species (Pisces: Percidae), Unpubl. M.S. thesis, Ohio State Univ., Columbus, Ohio.
  79. State Natural Heritage Data Centers. 1996a. Aggregated element occurrence data from all U.S. state natural heritage programs, including the Tennessee Valley Authority, Navajo Nation and the District of Columbia. Science Division, The Nature Conservancy.
  80. Stauffer, J. R., Jr., J. M. Boltz, and L. R. White. 1995. The fishes of West Virginia. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 146:1-389.
  81. Stauffer, J. R., Jr. (Pennsylvania State University, School of Forest Resources). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. August 1997.
  82. Trautman, M. B. 1981. The fishes of Ohio. Second edition. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, Ohio. 782 pp.
  83. Turner, C.L. 1921. Food of the common Ohio darters. Ohio J. Sci., 22: 41-62.
  84. Van Meter, H.D. and M.B. Trautman. 1970. An annotated list of the fishes of Lake Erie and it's tributary waters exclusive of the Detroit River. Ohio J. Sci. 70(2):65-78.
  85. Vladykov, V. D. 1942. Two fresh-water fishes new for Quebec. Copeia 1942:193-4.
  86. Wiley, E. O. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of the Percidae (Teleostei: Perciformes): a preliminary hypothesis. Pages 247-267 in R.L. Mayden, editor. Systematics, historical ecology, and North American freshwater fishes. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. xxvi + 969 pp.
  87. Wiley, E. O., III, and D. D. Hall. 1975. <i>Fundulus blairae</i>,a new species of the <i>Fundulus nottii </i>complex (Teleostei, Cyprinodontidae). American Museum Novitates No. 2577. 13 pp. + 5 figs., 9 tables.
  88. Williams, J.D. 1975. Systematics of the percid fishes of the subgenus <i>Ammocrypta</i>, genus <i>Ammocrypta</i>, with descriptions of two new species. Bulletin of the Alabama Museum of Natural History, No.1:1-56.
  89. Wood, R. M., and R. L. Mayden. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships among selected darter subgenera (Teleostei: Percidae) as inferred from analysis of allozymes. Copeia 1997:265-274.