Cyprinodon pecosensis

Echelle and Echelle, 1978

Pecos Pupfish

G2Imperiled Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
VulnerableIUCN
Pecos pupfish (Cyprinodon pecosensis). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.104698
Element CodeAFCNB02080
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNVulnerable
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderCyprinodontiformes
FamilyCyprinodontidae
GenusCyprinodon
Concept Reference
Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Allozyme data are consistent with the hypothesis that C. variegatus was ancestral to four recognized species (C. bovinus, C. pecosensis, C. rubrofluviatilis, and C. tularosa) from inland drainages associated with the western Gulf of Mexico (Echelle and Echelle 1992). Biogeography indicates that the C. pecosensis-C. bovinus clade may have evolved via vicariant peripheral isolation from C. variegatus (Echelle and Echelle 1992).

Cyprinodon variegatus was introduced into the Pecos River in Texas apparently in the early 1980s; interbreeding with C. pecosensis has led to the occurrence of a hybrid swarm, which by the early 1990s occupied about half the original range of C. pecosensis (Echelle and Connor 1989, Echelle 1991, Childs et al. 1996). High allozymic heterogeneity is associated with the relative isolation of subpopulations (see Sublette et al. 1990).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2011-11-22
Change Date2011-11-22
Edition Date2012-06-07
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Range Extent250-1000 square km (about 100-400 square miles)
Number of Occurrences1 - 5
Rank Reasons
Restricted to small areas in New Mexico and Texas; current range is much less than historical range; recent management and a conservation agreement have reduced threats (security of exisiting populations, hybridization with introduced Cyprinodon variegatus) and stopped a severe population decline.
Range Extent Comments
Historical range included the Pecos River system and nearby lakes, sinkholes, and saline springs, from the mouth of Independence Creek, 42 km SE Sheffield, Terrell County, Texas, to Roswell, Chaves County, New Mexico. As of the late 1990s, pure populations occurred in small reaches of the Pecos River and tributaries in Chaves and Eddy counties, New Mexico; in scattered sinkholes, lakes, and saline springs in New Mexico; and in the upper reaches of the Salt Creek drainage, Culberson and Reeves counties, Texas (populations in abandoned gravel pits near Grandfalls, Texas, are hybrid) (USFWS 2000).
Occurrences Comments
This species is represented by several unhybridized populations.
Threat Impact Comments
In the late 1990s, the main threats to the Pecos pupfish were habitat loss caused by damming and dewatering of the Pecos River, excessive pumping of groundwater, and, since the early 1980s, hybridization with the sheepshead minnow (Cyprinodon variegatus). Subsequently, USFWS, BLM, New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, New Mexico Department of Agriculture, New Mexico Division of State Parks, and Texas Parks and Wildlife Department signed a conservation agreement that addressed the significant threats facing this species; the agencies made commitments to protect known extant populations, establish new populations, and prohibit the use of sheepshead minnow as bait (Federal Register, 28 December 1998; USFWS 2000).

Introduced Cyprinodon variegatus has negatively impacted the native gene pool of C. pecosensis. Apparently between 1980 and 1984, C. variegatus was introduced into Pecos River in Texas. By 1985, a hybrid swarm of C. pecosensis and C. variegatus occupied roughly one-half of historical range of C. pecosensis (Echelle and Connor 1989). Hybridization with C. variegatus in Red Bluff Reservoir on the Texas-New Mexico line raised concerns that New Mexico populations soon would be jeopardized by hybridization (Sublette et al. 1990). "The early history of the hybrid swarm is explained by genetic swamping, possibly mediated by selection for C. variegatus or C. variegatus x C. pecosensis, at a time when the normally abundant endemic species had been catastrophically depleted" (Childs et al. 1996).

Sinkhole populations are vulnerable to introduction of C. variegatus by anglers. Also, anglers may introduce toxins into sinkholes to eliminate unwanted fishes, including Pecos pupfish, prior to stocking them with sport fishes.

Populations have been depleted primarily as a result dewatering of habitat due to damming and excessive groundwater pumping, though many forms of habitat degradation have occurred. Lowered water tables have eliminated water flow between sinkholes, isolating these populations. Oil spills from pipelines into Salt Creek, Texas, have occurred and represent an ongoing threat to water quality and pupfish habitat.

River flooding may allow access of exotic fishes to sinkhole habitats. Sinkholes with introduced predatory fishes have smaller populations of Pecos pupfish than do sinkholes lacking game fish; predation could become a significant threat should the pupfish population continue to decline.

Algal blooms and large-scale fish kills have occurred in the Pecos River, Texas, and may threaten Pecos pupfish.
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Habitat includes saline springs, gypsum sinkholes, and desert streams. Sometimes this species occurs in low salinity waters, but it is most typical and abundant in highly saline habitats that support relatively few species. It can survive in water among gravel where there is no surface water (Sublette et al. 1990).

Males establish breeding territories over substrates such as rocky outcrops, mats of submerged vegetation, or scattered rocks and silt; females prefer rock outcrops for spawning (Sublette et al. 1990).

Reproduction

Spawning peaks in May-June; males vigorously defend territory or, at low population density or small population size, form dominance hierarchy; male may mate with several females (Sublette et al. 1990).
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN2
ProvinceRankNative
TexasS1Yes
New MexicoS1Yes
Roadless Areas (1)
New Mexico (1)
AreaForestAcres
Pecos WS RiverSanta Fe National Forest5,396
References (30)
  1. Childs, M. R., A. A. Echelle,, and T. E. Dowling. 1996. Development of the hybrid swarm between Pecos pupfish (Cyprinodontidae: <i>Cyprinodon pecosensis</i>) and sheepshead minnow (<i>Cyprinodon variegatus</i>): a perspective from allozymes and mtDNA. Evolution 50:2014-2022.
  2. Echelle, A. A. 1991. Conservation genetics and genic diversity in freshwater fishes of western North America. Pages 141-153 in W. L. Minckley and J. E. Deacon, eds. Battle against extinction: native fish management in the American West. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
  3. Echelle, A. A., and A. F. Echelle. 1978. The Pecos River pupfish, Cyprinodon pecosensis n. sp. (Cyprinodontidae), with comments on its evolutionary origin. Copeia 1978:569- 582.
  4. Echelle, A. A., and A. F. Echelle. 1992. Mode and pattern of speciation in the evolution of inland pupfishes in the <i>Cyprinodon variegatus</i> complex (Teleostei: Cyprinodontidae): an ancestor-descendant hypothesis. Pages 691-709 in R. L. Mayden, editor. Systematics, historical ecology, and North American freshwater fishes. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. xxvi + 969 pp.
  5. Echelle, A. A., and P. J. Connor. 1989. Rapid, geographically extensive genetic introgression after secondary contact between two pupfish species (<i>Cyprinodon</i>, Cyprinodontidae). Evolution 43:717-727.
  6. Echelle, A. F., A. A. Echelle, and D. R. Edds. 1989. Conservation genetics of a spring-dwelling desert fish, the Pecos gambusia (<i>Gambusia nobilis</i>, Poeciliidae). Conservation Biology 3(2):159-169.
  7. Hubbs, Clark (Department of Zoology, University of Texas-Austin). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. April 1997.
  8. Jelks, H. L., S. J. Walsh, N. M. Burkhead, S. Contreras-Balderas, E. Díaz-Pardo, D. A. Hendrickson, J. Lyons, N. E. Mandrak, F. McCormick, J. S. Nelson, S. P. Platania, B. A. Porter, C. B. Renaud, J. Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, E. B. Taylor, and M.L. Warren, Jr. 2008. Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33(8):372-407.
  9. Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, North Carolina. i-x + 854 pp.
  10. Meffe, G. K., and R. C. Vrijenhoek. 1988. Conservation genetics in the management of desert fishes. Conservation Biology 2:157-169.
  11. Miller, R. R., J. D. Williams, and J. E. Williams. 1989. Extinctions of North American fishes during the past century. Fisheries 14(6):22-38.
  12. Minckley, W. L., and J. E. Deacon. 1991. Battle Against Extinction: Native Fish Management in the American West. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. xviii + 517 pp.
  13. Nelson, J. S., E. J. Crossman, H. Espinosa-Perez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, and J. D. Williams. 2004. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 29, Bethesda, Maryland. 386 pp.
  14. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 1991. A field guide to freshwater fishes: North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. 432 pp.
  15. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston. xix + 663 pp.
  16. Page, L. M., H. Espinosa-Pérez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, R. L. Mayden, and J. S. Nelson. 2013. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Seventh edition. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 34, Bethesda, Maryland.
  17. Page, L. M., K. E. Bemis, T. E. Dowling, H.S. Espinosa-Pérez, L.T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, K. E. Hartel, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, M. A. Neigbors, J. J. Schmitter-Soto, and H. J. Walker, Jr. 2023. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Eighth edition. American Fisheries Society (AFS), Special Publication 37, Bethesda, Maryland, 439 pp.
  18. Propst, David. L. 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Endangered Species Biologist. New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Sante Fe, NM.
  19. Rhodes, K., and C. Hubbs. 1992. Recovery of Pecos River fishes from a red tide fish kill. Southwestern Naturalist 37:178-187.
  20. Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
  21. State Natural Heritage Data Centers. 1996a. Aggregated element occurrence data from all U.S. state natural heritage programs, including the Tennessee Valley Authority, Navajo Nation and the District of Columbia. Science Division, The Nature Conservancy.
  22. State Natural Heritage Data Centers. 1996b. Aggregated element occurrence data from all U.S. state natural heritage programs, including the Tennessee Valley Authority, Navajo Nation and the District of Columbia: Export of freshwater fish and mussel records west of the Mississippi River in 1997. Science Division, The Nature Conservancy.
  23. Sublette, J. E., M. D Hatch, and M. Sublette. 1990. The fishes of New Mexico. University New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, New Mexico. 393 pp.
  24. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 17 March 2000. Withdrawal of proposed rule to list the Pecos pupfish (<i>Cyprinodon pecosensis</i>) as endangered. Federal Register 65(53):14513-14518.
  25. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2009. Partial 90-Day Finding on a Petition to List 475 Species in the Southwestern United States as Threatened or Endangered With Critical Habitat. Proposed Rule. Federal Register 74(240): 66866-66905.
  26. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2023. National Listing Workplan. Online. Available: https://www.fws.gov/project/national-listing-workplan
  27. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2024. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Threatened Species Status With Section 4(d) Rule for Pecos Pupfish and Designation of Critical Habitat. Proposed rule. Federal Register 89(226):92744-92785.
  28. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 30 January 1998. Proposal to determine the Pecos pupfish (Cyprinodon pecosensis) to be an endangered species. Federal Register 63(20):4608-4613.
  29. Wilde, G. R., and A. A. Echelle. 1992. Genetic status of Pecos pupfish populations after establishment of a hybrid swarm involving an introduced congener. Transactions of American Fisheries Society 121:277-286.
  30. Williams, J.E, J.E. Johnson, D.A. Hendrickson, S. Contreras-Balderas, J.D. Williams, M. Navarro-Mendoza, D.E. McAllister, and J.E. Deacon. 1989b. Fishes of North America endangered, threatened or of special concern: 1989. Fisheries 14(6):2-20.