Hemistena lata

(Rafinesque, 1820)

Cracking Pearlymussel

G1Critically Imperiled Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G1Critically ImperiledGlobal Rank
Critically endangeredIUCN
HighThreat Impact
Cracking pearlymussel (Hemistena lata). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.109635
Element CodeIMBIV20010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryInvertebrate Animal
IUCNCritically endangered
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumMollusca
ClassBivalvia
OrderUnionoida
FamilyUnionidae
GenusHemistena
Synonyms
Lastena lata(Rafinesque, 1820)
Other Common Names
Cracking Pearly Mussel (EN)
Concept Reference
Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
This species is in a monotypic genus closely related to the genus Elliptio.
Conservation Status
Review Date2009-04-29
Change Date1996-11-25
Edition Date2009-04-29
Edition AuthorsCordeiro, J. (2009); Lipford, M. (1991)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent100-250 square km (about 40-100 square miles)
Number of Occurrences1 - 5
Rank Reasons
This species has been severely reduced through habitat degradation in range to only three widely disjunct populations on two rivers, one of which may no longer be viable; and all of which are represented by a small number of individuals.
Range Extent Comments
This species was once widely distributed in the Ohio, Cumberland, and Tennessee river systems. It ranged in the Ohio River from Ohio downstream to Illinois. In Indiana and Illinois, it was historically known from the White, Wabash (Fisher, 2006), and Tippecanoe Rivers (Cummings and Berlocher, 1990). Kentucky records show it once inhabited the Upper Cumberland, Big South Fork, Green, and Kentucky Rivers. It was historically collected in Tennessee from the Tennessee, Cumberland, Powell, Clinch, Holston, Elk, Duck, and Buffalo Rivers. In Alabama it existed in the Tennessee River presumably across the northern part of the state but all museum records are from Muscle Shoals but is reduced to one population on the Elk River (Williams et al., 2008). Portions of the Powell, Clinch, and Holston Rivers in Virginia also once suppported the species (USFWS, 1990). It has been extirpated from most of its former range but some viable populations may persist in the upper Clinch River in Hancock Co., Tennessee (Parmalee and Bogan, 1998), and Scott Co., Virginia; as well as the Elk River in Lincoln Co., Tennessee (USFWS, 1990). A population in the Powell River in Hancock Co., Tennessee, that was barely surviving in 1979 (3 of 78 sites over 98 river miles) likely is no longer extant or if so, viable (USFWS, 1990).
Occurrences Comments
This species has been reduced to possibly 3 reproducing populations in the Tennessee River system in Virginia (Scott Co.) and Tennessee (Hancock Co.) in the upper Clinch River and Elk River (USFWS, 1990). In Tennessee, viable populations survive in the upper Clinch River (Hancock Co.) in east Tennessee (Parmalee and Bogan, 1998). It is also extant in Elk River, Alabama and possibly at the state line in Tennessee, where densities are very low and viability is questionable (Mirarchi et al., 2004; Williams et al., 2008; Hubbs, 2002).
Threat Impact Comments
Impoundments, siltation and pollution leading to water quality and habitat deterioration. Inadequate sewage treatment, coal mining, oil and gas drilling and poor land-use practices. The Powell River watershed was mined extensively for coal, and coal mining impacts are still present, especially in the upper reaches. The lower reaches of the Powell River have large deposits of coal fines and silt. The Clinch River has been adversely affected by pollution and land use practices along the river have contributed to the decline of water quality and loss of mussel populations. It has also experienced some impacts from coal mining. Toxic spills have historically produced mussel kills in the river. Although suitable habitat exists in the Elk River, cold water releases from Tims Ford Reservoir and pollution from unknown sources in the lower Elk River have impacted mussel fauna and reduced density (USFWS, 1990).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

This species is abundant in sand, gravel, and cobble substrates in swift currents or mud and sand in slower currents (Gordon and Layzer, 1989).

Reproduction

The glochidial host is not known.
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN1
ProvinceRankNative
PennsylvaniaSXYes
OhioSXYes
KentuckySXYes
AlabamaS1Yes
VirginiaS1Yes
West VirginiaSHYes
TennesseeS1Yes
IndianaSXYes
IllinoisSXYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh - moderate
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh - moderate
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh - moderate
3 - Energy production & miningRestricted (11-30%)Extreme - seriousHigh - moderate
3.2 - Mining & quarryingRestricted (11-30%)Extreme - seriousHigh - moderate
7 - Natural system modificationsRestricted (11-30%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useRestricted (11-30%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionLarge (31-70%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
9.1 - Domestic & urban waste waterLarge - restrictedSerious - moderateHigh (continuing)
9.2 - Industrial & military effluentsRestricted - smallExtreme - seriousLow - insignificant/negligible
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsLarge (31-70%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (1)
Idaho (1)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekCaribou-Targhee National Forest118,582
References (34)
  1. Barr, W.C., S.A. Ahlstedt, G.D. Hickman, and D.M. Hill. 1993-1994. Cumberlandian mollusk conservation program. Activity 8: Analysis of macrofauna factors. Walkerana 7(17/18):159-224.
  2. Biological Resources Division, USGS. 1997. Database of museum records of aquatic species. Compiled by J. Williams (USGS-BRD, Gainesville, FL).
  3. Bogan, A.E. 1993a. Workshop on freshwater bivalves of Pennsylvania. Workshop hosted by Aquatic Systems Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, held at Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 6-7 May 1993. 80 pp.
  4. Bogan, Art (Curator of Aquatic Invertebrates, North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences). 1997. Review and annotation of mussel watershed distribution maps for TN. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  5. Cicerello, Ronald R. (Kentucky State Nature Preserves). 1997b. Review and annotation of mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  6. Cummings, Kevin S. (Illinois Natural History Survey). 1997. Review and annotation of mussel watershed distribution maps. Reviews requested by Christine O'Brien, USGS-BRD. May and July 1997.
  7. Cummings, K.S. and J.M. Berlocher. 1990. The naiades or freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Tippecanoe River, Indiana. Malacological Review 23:83-98.
  8. Fisher, B.E. 2006. Current status of freshwater mussels (Order Unionoida) in the Wabash River drainage of Indiana. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science, 115(2): 103-109.
  9. Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society (FMCS). 2023. The 2023 checklist of freshwater bivalves (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Considered and approved by the Bivalve Names Subcommittee October 2023. Online: https://molluskconservation.org/MServices_Names-Bivalves.html
  10. Gordon, M.E. and J.B. Layzer. 1989. Mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoidea) of the Cumberland River review of life histories and ecological relationships. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report, 89(15): 1-99.
  11. Graf, D.L. and K.S. Cummings. 2021. A 'big data' approach to global freshwater mussel diversity (Bivalvia: Unionoida), with an updated checklist of genera and species. Journal of Molluscan Studies 87(1):1-36.
  12. Howard, A. D. 1915. Some exceptional cases of breeding among the Unionidae. The Nautilus 29:4-11.
  13. Hubbs, D. 2002. Monitoring and management of endangered mussels. 2001-02 Annual Report Project 7365, Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency, Nashville, Tennessee. 3 pp.
  14. Isom, B.G., P. Yokley, Jr., and C.H. Gooch. 1973. Mussels of Elk River Basin in Alabama and Tennessee- 1965-1967. American Midland Naturalist 89(2):437-442.
  15. Lefevre, G. and W. T. Curtis. 1912. Studies on the reproduction and artificial propagation of fresh-water mussels. Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries 30:102-201.
  16. Major, Smoot (Tennessee Division of Natural Heritage). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC on 19 August 1997.
  17. Mirarchi, R.E., J.T. Garner, M.F. Mettee, and P.E. O'Neil. 2004b. Alabama wildlife. Volume 2. Imperiled aquatic mollusks and fishes. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. xii + 255 pp.
  18. MolluscaBase eds. 2024. MolluscaBase. Accessed at https://www.molluscabase.org
  19. Moyle, P., and J. Bacon. 1969. Distribution and abundance of molluscs in a fresh water environment. Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Science 35(2/3):82-85.
  20. Parmalee, P.W. and A.E. Bogan. 1998. The Freshwater Mussels of Tennessee. University of Tennessee Press: Knoxville, Tennessee. 328 pp.
  21. Spoo, A. 2008. The Pearly Mussels of Pennsylvania. Coachwhip Publications: Landisville, Pennsylvania. 210 pp.
  22. Strayer, D. 1983. The effects of surface geology and stream size on freshwater mussel (Bivalvia, Unionidae) distribution in southeastern Michigan, U.S.A. Freshwater Biology 13:253-264.
  23. Strayer, D. L. 1999. Use of flow refuges by unionid mussels in rivers. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18(4):468-476.
  24. Strayer, D. L., and J. Ralley. 1993. Microhabitat use by an assemblage of stream-dwelling unionaceans (Bivalvia) including two rare species of <i>Alasmidonta</i>. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12(3):247-258.
  25. Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
  26. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1990h. Cracking pearlymussel (<i>Hemistena </i>(= <i>Lastena</i>) <i>lata</i>) recovery plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, Georgia. 25 pp.
  27. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2001. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; establishment of nonessential experimental population status for 16 freshwater mussels and 1 freshwater snail (Anthony's Riversnail) in the free-flowing reach of the Tennessee River below the Wilson Dam, Colbert and Lauderdale Counties, Alabama. Federal Register, 66(115): 32250-32264.
  28. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2006. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; establishment of nonessential experimental population status for 15 freshwater mussels, 1 freshwater snail, and 5 fishes in the lower French Broad River and in the lower Holston River, Tennessee; Proposed Rule. Federal Register, 71(113): 34195-34230.
  29. Van der Schalie, H. 1938. The naiad fauna of the Huron River in southeastern Michigan. Miscellaneous Publication of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 40:7-78.
  30. Watters, G. T. 1992. Unionids, fishes, and the species-area curve. Journal of Biogeography 19:481-490.
  31. Watters, G.T., M.A. Hoggarth, and D.H. Stansbery. 2009b. The Freshwater Mussels of Ohio. Ohio State University Press: Columbus, Ohio. 421 pp.
  32. Williams, J.D., A.E. Bogan, and J.T. Garner. 2008. Freshwater Mussels of Alabama & the Mobile Basin in Georgia, Mississippi & Tennessee. University of Alabama Press: Tuscaloosa, Alabama. 908 pp.
  33. Williams, J. D., A. E. Bogan, R. S. Butler, K. S. Cummings, J. T. Garner, J. L. Harris, N. A. Johnson, and G. T. Watters. 2017. A revised list of the freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Freshwater Mollusk Biology and Conservation 20:33-58.
  34. Williams, J. D., M. L. Warren, Jr., K. S. Cummings, J. L. Harris, and R. J. Neves. 1993. Conservation status of freshwater mussels of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 18(9):6-22.