Dipodomys spectabilis

Merriam, 1890

Banner-tailed Kangaroo Rat

G4Apparently Secure Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
Near threatenedIUCN
MediumThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.103225
Element CodeAMAFD03110
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNNear threatened
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassMammalia
OrderRodentia
FamilyHeteromyidae
GenusDipodomys
Other Common Names
banner-tailed kangaroo rat (EN)
Concept Reference
Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 1993. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Second edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. xviii + 1206 pp. Available online at: http://www.nmnh.si.edu/msw/.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-04-16
Change Date2025-04-16
Edition Date2025-04-16
Edition AuthorsGundy, R. L. (2025)
Threat ImpactMedium
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
This species is widespread in the deserts of the southwestern United States and northern México. The population has suffered historical declines, and continues to be threatened, due to habitat degradation from encroaching shrubs in desert grasslands. It is also threatened increasing temperatures due to climate change.
Range Extent Comments
This species is found in southwestern North America (Best 1988, Oliver and Wright 2010). In the United States, it is found in southern Utah, southern and northeastern Arizona, southeastern and western New Mexico, and western Texas. The range extends south into México to northern Sonora and southern Chihuahua with a disjunct population in Zacatecas, San Luis Potosí, and Aguascalientes. Using Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) (2025) records, range extent is estimated to be 1,197,564 km² (RARECAT 2025).
Occurrences Comments
There are several hundred occurrences throughout the range.
Threat Impact Comments
This species is threatened by habitat degradation due to invasive plant species, by increasing temperatures due to climate change, and by intense local rains. Populations are often smaller or less dense where encroachment of shrubby plants increased groundcover of desert grasslands (Waser and Ayers 2003, Cosentino 2013, Christensen et al. 2018). Increasing temperatures are expected to reduce overall survival of this species as above-ground and below-ground temperatures exceed what the species can tolerate (Moses et al. 2012). Heavy rains associated with tropical storms caused at least one local extinction by destroying food caches (Valone et al. 1995, Brown et al. 2001).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Prefers dry, gravelly soil of arid or semi-arid grasslands and foothill slopes with scattered mesquite, junipers, or mixed stands of creosote-bush and acacias. When inactive, occupies underground burrow (in open or at base of shrub) in large mound. Young are born in one of several burrow chambers; young share natal burrow with mother for 2-6 months after weaning.

Ecology

Solitary males and females defend territories throughout the year. Home range averaged about 400-700 sq m in New Mexico; usually stayed within 160 m of burrow mound. Density of active mounds was 1.7/ha in central New Mexico (Best 1988). Usually 1 individual/mound except when young present. Mounds usually are rather uniformly spaced. In southeastern Arizona, maximum density (six-month average) was 9-10/ha; up to 26/ha on a monthly basis; a catastrophic population decline occurred after the heavy rains of a tropical storm, which possibly affected seed stores (Valone et al. 1995).

Dispersal distances generally are very short; most individuals breed within one home range diameter of natal site.

Has a strong effect on microhabitat selection by local desert rodent communities (Bowers and Brown 1992) and may impact populations of other rodents (Valone et al. 1995). With other kangaroo rats, affects vegetation structure and plant species diversity in the Chihuahuan Desert (Heske et al. 1993).

Reproduction

Pregnancies have been recorded January-September in north (peak in April), December-August in south (peaks in December, June-July). Litter size is 1-3. Up to 4 litters/year. Gestation lasts about 3-4 weeks. Young in mid-August may be offspring of females born in mid-winter or second litter of year. In southeastern Arizona, juveniles become active above ground mainly March-August, reside in maternal mound for 1-6 months after weaning, mature in 300 days. Reproductive output is highest following summers of heavy rainfall.
Terrestrial Habitats
Shrubland/chaparralGrassland/herbaceousDesert
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
Navajo NationS3Yes
New MexicoS4Yes
ArizonaS5Yes
TexasS4Yes
UtahS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
11.3 - Temperature extremesPervasive (71-100%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11.4 - Storms & floodingRestricted (11-30%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (1)
New Mexico (1)
AreaForestAcres
Peloncillo (NM)Coronado National Forest43,339
References (50)
  1. American Society of Mammalogists (ASM). 2024. The Mammal Diversity Database (MDD). Online. Available: www.mammaldiversity.org
  2. Bartholomew, G. A., and H. H. Caswell. 1951. Locomotion in kangaroo rats and its adaptive significance. Journal of Mammalogy 32:155-169.
  3. Baumgardner, G. D., and M. L. Kennedy. 1993. Morphometric variation in kangaroo rats (genus <i>Dipodomys</i>) and its relationship to selected abiotic variables. Journal of Mammalogy 74:69-85.
  4. Baumgardner, G. D., and M. L. Kennedy. 1994. Patterns of interspecific morphometric variation in kangaroo rats (genus <i>Dipodomys</i>). Journal of Mammalogy 75:203-211.
  5. Best, T. L. 1988. <i>Dipodomys spectabilis</i>. Am. Soc. Mamm., Mammalian Species 311:1-10.
  6. Blair, W. F. 1943. Populations of the deer mouse and associated small mammals in the mesquite associations of southern New Mexico. Contributions of the Laboratory of Vertebrate Biology, University of Michigan, No. 21. 40 pp.
  7. Bleich, V. C. 1977. <i>Dipodomys stephensi</i>. Mammalian Species No. 73:1-3.
  8. Bowers, M. A., and J. H. Brown. 1992. Structure in a desert rodent community: use of space around <i>Dipodomys spectabilis</i> mounds. Oecologia 92:242-249.
  9. Bradford, D. F. 1976. Space utilization by rodents in <i>Adenostoma </i>chaparral. Journal of Mammalogy 57:576-579.
  10. Brown, J. H., T. G. Whitham, S. K. M. Ernest, and C. A. Gehring. 2001. Complex species interactions and the dynamics of ecological systems: long-term experiments. Science 293: 643–650.
  11. Burt, W. H. and R. P. Grossenheider. 1964. A field guide to the mammals. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
  12. Busch, J. D., P. M. Waser, and J. A. DeWoody. 2007. Recent demographic bottlenecks are not accompanied by a genetic signature in banner-tailed kangaroo rats (<i>Dipodomys spectabilis</i>). Molecular Ecology 16(12):2450-2462.
  13. Chew, R. M., and B. B. Butterworth. 1964. Ecology of rodents in Indian Cove (Mojave Desert), Joshua Tree National Monument, California. Journal of Mammalogy 45:203-225.
  14. Christensen, E. M., D. J. Harris, and S. K. M. Ernest. 2018. Long-term community change through multiple rapid transitions in a desert rodent community. Ecology, 99(7): 1523–1529.
  15. Cosentino, B. J., R. L. Schooley, B. T. Bestelmeyer, and J. M. Coffman. 2013. Response of lizard community structure to desert grassland restoration mediated by a keystone rodent. Biodiversity Conservation 22: 921-935. doi: 10.1007/s10531-013-0459-7
  16. Cosentino, B. J., R. L. Schooley, B. T. Bestelmeyer, J. F. Kelly, J. M. Coffman. 2014. Constraints and time lags for recovery of a keystone species (<i>Dipodomys spectabilis</i>) after landscape restoration. Landscape Ecology 29: 665-675.
  17. Dalquest, W. W., J. V. Grimes, and F. B. Stangl, Jr. 1992. Characters of the upper premolar of five species of <i>Dipodomys </i>and evidence for diphyly in the genus. Southwestern Naturalist 37:231-246.
  18. Fitch, H. S. 1948. Habits and economic relationships of the Tulare kangaroo rat. Journal of Mammalogy 29:5-35.
  19. Garland, T., Jr. and W. G. Bradley. 1984. Effects of a highway on Mojave Desert rodent populations. American Midland Naturalist 111:47-56.
  20. Genoways, H. H., and J. H. Brown, editors. 1993. Biology of the Heteromyidae. American Society of Mammalogists Special Publication No. 10. 719 pp.
  21. Ghiselin, J. 1970. Edaphic control of habitat selection by kangaroo mice (<i>Microdipodops</i>) in three Nevada populations. Oecologia 4:248-261.
  22. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). 2025. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) data portal. Online. Available: https://www.gbif.org/ (accessed 2025).
  23. Hall, E. R. 1981a. The Mammals of North America, second edition. Vols. I &amp; II. John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, New York. 1181 pp.
  24. Heske, E. J., J. H. Brown, and Q. Guo. 1993. Effects of kangaroo rat exclusion on vegetation structure and plant species divrsity in the Chihuahuan Desert. Oecologia 95:520-524.
  25. Hoffmeister, D. F. 1986. Mammals of Arizona. University of Arizona Press and Arizona Game and Fish Department. 602 pp.
  26. Iverson, S. L. 1967. Adaptations to arid environments in <i>Perognathus parvus</i> (Peale). Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. British Columbia, Vancouver. 130pp.
  27. Jones, J. K., Jr., R. S. Hoffman, D. W. Rice, C. Jones, R. J. Baker, and M. D. Engstrom. 1992a. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 1991. Occasional Papers, The Museum, Texas Tech University, 146:1-23.
  28. Jorgensen, C. D., and C. L. Hayward. 1965. Mammals of the Nevada test site. Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biol. Ser. No. 7. 81pp.
  29. MacMillen, R. E. 1964. Population ecology, water relations and social behavior of a southern California semidesert rodent fauna. University of California Publications in Zoology 71:1-59.
  30. Mammalian Species, nos. 1-604. Published by the American Society of Mammalogists.
  31. Maza, B. G., N. R. French, and A. P. Aschwanden. 1973. Home range dynamics in a population of heteromyid rodents. Journal of Mammalogy 54:405-425.
  32. Moses, M. R., J. K. Frey, and G. W. Roemer. 2012. Elevated surface temperature depresses survival of banner-tailed kangaroo rats: will climate change cook a desert icon? Oecologia 168: 257–268.
  33. O'Farrell, M. J. 1978. Home range dynamics of rodents in a sagebrush community. Journal of Mammalogy 59:657-68.
  34. O'Farrell, M.J. and A.R. Blaustein. 1974b. <i>Microdipodops megacephalus</i>. Mammalian Species 46:1-3.
  35. O'Farrell, T. P., R. J. Olson, R. O. Gilbert, and J. D. Hedlund. 1975. A population of Great Basin pocket mice, <i>Perognathus parvus</i>, in the shrub-steppe of south-central Washington. Ecological Monographs 45:1-28.
  36. Oliver, G. W., and A. L. Wright. 2010. The banner-tailed kangaroo rat, <i>Dipodomys spectabilis</i> (Rodentia: Heteromyidae), in Utah. Western North American Naturalist 70(4): 562–566.
  37. Oxley, D. J., M. B. Fenton and G. R. Carmody. 1974. The effects of roads on populations of small mammals. Journal of Applied Ecology 11: 51-59.
  38. <p>NatureServe's Rapid Analysis of Rarity and Endangerment Conservation Assessment Tool (RARECAT). 2025. Version: 2.1.1 (released April 04, 2025).</p>
  39. Reichman, O. J., D. T. Wicklow, and C. Rebar. 1985. Ecological and mycological characteristics of caches in the mounds of <i>Dipodomys spectabilis</i>. J. Mamm. 66:643-651.
  40. Reynolds, H. G., and H. S. Haskell. 1949. Life history notes on Price and Bailey pocket mice of southern Arizona. Journal of Mammalogy 30:150-156.
  41. Ryan, J. M. 1989. Comparative myology and phylogenetic systematics of the Heteromyidae (Mammalia, Rodentia). Univ. Michigan Museum Zoology Miscellaneous Publication (176):1-103.
  42. Schmidly, D. J. 1977. The mammals of Trans-Pecos Texas including Big Bend National Park and Guadalupe Mountains National Park. Texas A & M University Press, College Station.
  43. Thomas, J. R., Jr. 1975. Distribution, population densities, and home range requirements of the Stephens' kangaroo rat (<i>Dipodomys stephensi</i>). M.S. Thesis, California State Polytechnic University, Ponoma. 64pp.
  44. Valone, T. J., J. H. Brown, and C. L. Jacobi. 1995. Catastrophic decline of a desert rodent, <i>Dipodomys spectabilis</i>: insights from a long-term study. Journal of Mammalogy 76:428-436.
  45. Vorhis, C.T. and W.T. Taylor. 1922. Life history of the kangaroo rat, <i>Dipodomys spectabilis</i> Merriam. U.S. Dept. Agric., Bull no. 1091. 40 pp.
  46. Waser, P. M., and J. M. Ayers. 2003. Microhabitat use and population decline in banner-tailed kangaroo rats. Journal of Mammalogy 84:1031-1043.
  47. Waser, P. M., and L. F. Elliot. 1991. Dispersal and genetic structure in kangaroo rats. Evolution 45:935-943.
  48. Wilkins, K. T. 1982. Highways as barriers to rodent dispersal. Southwestern Naturalist 27: 459-460.
  49. Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 1993. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Second edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. xviii + 1206 pp. Available online at: http://www.nmnh.si.edu/msw/.
  50. Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 2005. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Third edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Two volumes. 2,142 pp. [As modified by ASM the Mammal Diversity Database (MDD) at https://www.mammaldiversity.org/index.html]