Percina crypta

Freeman, Freeman and Burkhead, 2008

Halloween Darter

G2Imperiled Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
VulnerableIUCN
HighThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.24.32025
Element CodeAFCQC04440
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNVulnerable
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderPerciformes
FamilyPercidae
GenusPercina
Concept Reference
Freeman, M. C., B. J. Freeman, N. M. Burkhead, and C. A. Straight. 2008. A new species of Percina (Perciformes: Percidae) from the Apalachicola River drainage, southeastern United States. Zootaxa 1963: 25-42.
Taxonomic Comments
The validity of this taxon has been questioned by Hayes and Piller (2018).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2012-04-19
Change Date2006-02-08
Edition Date2012-04-19
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent20,000-200,000 square km (about 8000-80,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences6 - 20
Rank Reasons
Small, reduced, and fragmented range in shoal and riffle habitats in the Chattahoochee and Flint River mainstems and a few tributary systems in Alabama and Georgia; known extant range comprises four disjunct areas separated by mainstem impoundments and altered river reaches.
Range Extent Comments
This species is endemic to the Apalachicola River drainage and occurs in the Flint River system, Georgia, and the Chattahoochee River system, Alabama and Georgia (Freeman et al. 2008). Within the Flint River system, the species is known from the Flint River mainstem above and below the Fall Line (the boundary between Piedmont and Coastal Plain physiographic provinces), and in at least four tributary stream systems (Lazer Creek and Potato Creek in the Piedmont province, and Muckalee Creek and the Ichawaynochaway Creek system in the Coastal Plain province). Within the Chattahoochee River system, it is known from two broadly separated areas: (1) the upper portion of the system in Georgia, including the mainstem Chattahoochee River, Chestatee River, and Sautee Creek (all upstream from Lake Lanier and in the Blue Ridge province) and (2) the Uchee Creek system, an Alabama tributary that enters the Chattahoochee River in the Fall Line Hills district of the upper Coastal Plain (Couch et al. 1996, cited by Freeman et al. 2008).
Occurrences Comments
This species is represented by several distinct occurrences (subpopulations) (see map in Freeman et al. 2008). The known extant range comprises four disjunct areas separated by mainstem impoundments and altered river reaches (Freeman et al. 2008).
Threat Impact Comments
Freeman et al. (2008) hypothesized that P. crypta historically occurred more widely in the Chattahoochee River mainstem, prior to the construction of 13 dams on the river beginning in the mid-nineteenth century (Couch et al. 1996), For example, construction of Buford Dam, which began operating in 1959, likely eliminated habitat for P. crypta in the Chattahoochee and Chestatee mainstems in what is now Lake Lanier (Freeman et al. 2008). This dam modified the thermal and hydrologic regime in the Chattahoochee River downstream from the dam (Collier et al. 1996, Couch et al. 1996). Pollutants originating in the Atlanta metropolitan area have also altered water quality in the Chattahoochee downstream from Buford Dam (Couch et al. 1996). Shoal habitat (rocky areas that are relatively shallow with swift velocities at base-flow discharges) exists in this reach of the river, but habitat quality for many species is impaired by altered water quality and hydrologic conditions (Freeman et al. 2008). Removal of rock shoals and reefs from the Chattahoochee and Flint rivers during the late 1800s and early 1900s (to improve river navigability for steamboats) may have removed habitat for P. crypta (Freeman et al. 2008).

Present threats primarily consist of effects of urbanization on stream hydrology and water quality, particularly in the northern Georgia mountains and in the vicinity of the Atlanta metropolitan area (Freeman et al. 2008). The Flint River headwaters originate in Atlanta, and population growth in that region is expected to place increasing demands on the river system for water supply and waste assimilation (Freeman et al. 2008). Similarly, human population growth in the Blue Ridge province of northern Georgia will affect water availability and quality in the Chattahoochee River headwaters (Freeman et al. 2008).

Warren et al. (2000) and Jelks et al. (2008) rated this species as "Vulnerable."
Ecology & Habitat

Diagnostic Characteristics

Percina crypta differs from sympatric Percina nigrofasciata in having narrowly separated dorsal saddles (inter-saddle spaces typically less than or equal to saddle width, compared to frequently wider than saddle width in P. nigrofasciata), in usually possessing a single modified scale between the pelvic bases (compared to two or more in P. nigrofasciata), and in having dark wide bands on pectoral-fin rays (versus pectoral fin clear, or with irregular dark marks or weak tessellations on fin rays in P. nigrofasciata) (Freeman et al. 2008).

Habitat

Habitat includes relatively swiftly flowing areas over bedrock or a mixture of coarse (boulder to gravel) bed sediments (Hill 1996, Marcinek 2003). The species is frequently associated with the aquatic macrophyte Podostemum ceratophyllum (Marcinek 2003). Freeman et al. (2008) always observed this species in shoal habitats. Boschung and Mayden characterized the habitats as deep, fast sections of riffles.

Reproduction

In the upper Flint River system, spawning occurred during April and May (Hill 1996). Individuals reached sexual maturity at age one or two; maximum observed age was estimated at three years (Hill 1996).
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN2
ProvinceRankNative
GeorgiaS2Yes
AlabamaS1Yes
Roadless Areas (1)
Georgia (1)
AreaForestAcres
Helton CreekChattahoochee National Forest2,348
References (13)
  1. Boschung, H. T., and R. L. Mayden. 2004. Fishes of Alabama. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. 960 pp.
  2. Couch, C. A., E. H. Hopkins, and P. S. Hardy. 1996. Influences of environmental settings on aquatic ecosystems in the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint river basin. Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-4278, U.S. Geological Survey, National Water-Quality Assessment Program, Atlanta, Georgia.
  3. Freeman, M. C., B. J. Freeman, N. M. Burkhead, and C. A. Straight. 2008. A new species of <i>Percina </i>(Perciformes: Percidae) from the Apalachicola River drainage, southeastern United States. Zootaxa 1963: 25-42.
  4. Hayes, M. M., and K. R. Piller. 2018. Patterns of diversification in a North American endemic fish, the Blackbanded Darter (Perciformes, Percidae). Zoologica Scripta 47(4):477-485.
  5. Hill, P. L. 1996. Habitat use and life history of the Halloween darter, <i>Percina </i>sp., in the upper Flint River system, Georgia. M.S. thesis, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama. 45 pp.
  6. Jelks, H. L., S. J. Walsh, N. M. Burkhead, S. Contreras-Balderas, E. Díaz-Pardo, D. A. Hendrickson, J. Lyons, N. E. Mandrak, F. McCormick, J. S. Nelson, S. P. Platania, B. A. Porter, C. B. Renaud, J. Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, E. B. Taylor, and M.L. Warren, Jr. 2008. Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33(8):372-407.
  7. Johnston, C. E., and B. R. Kuhajda. 2002. Halloween darter <i>Percina </i>sp. Pages 201-202 in R.E. Mirachi, J.T. Garner, M.F. Mettee and P.E. O'Neil (Editors). Alabama Wildlife. Vol. 2. Imperiled Aquatic Mollusks and Fishes. The University of Alabama,Tuscaloosa, Alabama.
  8. Marcinek, P. A. 2003. Variation of fish assemblages and species abundances in the upper Flint River shoals, Georgia. M.S. thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 75 pp.
  9. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston. xix + 663 pp.
  10. Page, L. M., H. Espinosa-Pérez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, R. L. Mayden, and J. S. Nelson. 2013. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Seventh edition. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 34, Bethesda, Maryland.
  11. Page, L. M., K. E. Bemis, T. E. Dowling, H.S. Espinosa-Pérez, L.T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, K. E. Hartel, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, M. A. Neigbors, J. J. Schmitter-Soto, and H. J. Walker, Jr. 2023. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Eighth edition. American Fisheries Society (AFS), Special Publication 37, Bethesda, Maryland, 439 pp.
  12. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2011. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; partial 90-day finding on a petition to list 404 species in the southeastern United States as threatened or endangered with critical habitat. Federal Register 76(187):59836-59862.
  13. Warren, M. L., Jr., B. M. Burr, S. J. Walsh, H. L. Bart, Jr., R. C. Cashner, D. A. Etnier, B. J. Freeman, B. R. Kuhajda, R. L. Mayden, H. W. Robison, S. T. Ross, and W. C. Starnes. 2000. Diversity, distribution, and conservation status of the native freshwater fishes of the southern United States. Fisheries 25(10):7-31.