Percina pantherina

(Moore and Reeves, 1955)

Leopard Darter

G2Imperiled Found in 2 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
EndangeredIUCN
Leopard darter (Percina pantherina). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.106091
Element CodeAFCQC04210
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNEndangered
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderPerciformes
FamilyPercidae
GenusPercina
Concept Reference
Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Analysis of allozyme variation revealed three primary clades: (1) populations in Little and Glover rivers, (2) populations in the Mountain Fork River drainage, and (3) populations in Robinson Fork and Cossatot rivers; this pattern of variation should be considered in future management of the species (Echelle et al. 1999).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2012-03-05
Change Date2012-03-05
Edition Date2012-03-05
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G., and J. Jefferson
Range Extent1000-20,000 square km (about 400-8000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 80
Rank Reasons
Occurs in the Little River system of Oklahoma and Arkansas; several reservoirs have destroyed habitat, leaving small, fragmented populations; pine monocultures have increased siltation of stream bottoms.
Range Extent Comments
Range includes the Little River system (Red River drainage) of southeastern Oklahoma and southwestern Arkansas; upper Little River (above Pine Creek Reservoir), Glover River, Mountain Fork River (above Broken Bow Reservoir), Cossatot River (above Gillham Reservoir), and Robinson Fork of the Rolling Fork River (James and Maughan 1989, Williams et al. 1999).
Occurrences Comments
This species is restricted to 5 river drainages (Echelle et al. 1999, Williams et al. 1999). Within the upper Little River, Glover, and Mountain Fork river drainages, the species is represented by multiple locations in the mainstem and several tributaries; the Robinson Fork and Cassatot drainages each are represented by only a few sites within relatively short sections of stream (see maps in Zale et al. 1994 and Williams et al. 1999).
Threat Impact Comments
Factors limiting the recovery of the leopard darter include water quality degradation caused by timber and agricultural industries, drought, poorly constructed road crossings, and impoundments.

"Except in the Glover River, the current distribution consists of constricted populations in upper reaches of the former range isolated by impoundments. Whereas populations in the upper Little River and Mountain Fork are widely distributed and relatively secure, those in the Cossatot and Robinson Fork are precariously vulnerable to extirpation because they consist of few individuals, are geographically localized, and occupy no tributary refugia. Impoundment of the Glover River would place headwater populations there in similar jeopardy and eliminate populations and habitat within and below the reservoir. " (Zale et al. 1994).

Hypolimnetic water release has led to losses of populations downstream from reservoirs. Expanding pine monoculture has resulted in increased siltation of stream bottoms (W. Matthews, pers. comm., 1995). Potential threats include further loss of habitat due to dam/reservoir construction. Water pollution deriving from a lumber treatment waste pond has caused fish kills in the Cossatot River (Matthews and Moseley 1990). Heavy recreational use of habitat also is a potential threat.
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Clear, upland small to medium rivers, usually in pools 20-80 cm deep over gravel, rubble or boulders in current less than 20 cm/s (Jones et al. 1984, Page and Burr 1991). In Glover River, lived in pools in summer, fall, and winter, usually at water depths of 25-75 cm, over substrates of cobble and boulder where no current was detectable; began moving into riffles in late February (James and Maughan 1989, James et al. 1991). Apparently not in smaller headwater tributaries (Matthews and Moseley 1990). In Glover River, spawned in riffles at depths of 30-90 cm over predominantly gravel substrates where current was 0-50 cm/s; eggs buried in deposits of fine gravel between coarse gravel and rubble (James and Maughan 1989).

Ecology

Jones et al. (1984) recorded population densities of up to 0.017/sq. m, but James et al. (1991) found higher densities using more effective methods. PERCINA COPELANDI has been observed preying on eggs (James and Maughan 1989).

Reproduction

In Glover River, spawning occurred mid-March to mid-May at water temperatures of 12-20 C; young reached adult size by mid-August; longevity was about 18 months (James and Maughan 1989, James et al. 1991). Individuals have only one reproductive opportunity (Williams et al. 1999).
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN2
ProvinceRankNative
ArkansasS1Yes
OklahomaS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
6 - Human intrusions & disturbancePervasive - largeModerate - slightHigh - low
6.1 - Recreational activitiesPervasive - largeModerate - slightHigh - low
7 - Natural system modificationsPervasive - largeExtreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/usePervasive - largeExtreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionPervasive - restrictedExtreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
9.2 - Industrial & military effluentsRestricted - smallExtreme - moderateHigh - low
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsPervasive - restrictedExtreme - moderateHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (2)
Oklahoma (2)
AreaForestAcres
Beech CreekOuachita National Forest8,303
Beech CreekOuachita National Forest8,303
References (25)
  1. Echelle, Anthony A. (University of Oklahoma). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC.
  2. Echellle, A. F., A. A. Echelle, L. R. Williams, C. S. Toepfer, and W. L. Fisher. 1999. Allozyme perspective on genetic variation in a threatened percid fish, the leopard darter (<i>Percina pantherina</i>). American Midland Naturalist 142:393-400.
  3. Eleyy, R. L., J. C. Randolph, and R. J. Miller. 1975. Current status of the leopard darter, <i>Percina pantherina</i>. Southwestern Naturalist 20:343-354.
  4. James, P. W. 1989. Reproductive ecology and habitat preference of the leopard darter, <i>Percina pantherina</i>. Ph.D. dissertation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater.
  5. James, P. W., and O. E. Maughan. 1989. Spawning behavior and habitat of the threatened leopard darter, <i>Percina pantherina</i>. Southwestern Naturalist 34:298-301.
  6. James, P. W., O. E. Maughan, and A. V. Zale. 1991. Life history of the leopard darter <i>Percina pantherina</i> in Glover River, Oklahoma. American Midland Naturalist 125:173-9.
  7. Jelks, H. L., S. J. Walsh, N. M. Burkhead, S. Contreras-Balderas, E. Díaz-Pardo, D. A. Hendrickson, J. Lyons, N. E. Mandrak, F. McCormick, J. S. Nelson, S. P. Platania, B. A. Porter, C. B. Renaud, J. Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, E. B. Taylor, and M.L. Warren, Jr. 2008. Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33(8):372-407.
  8. Jones, R. N., D. J. Orth, and O. E. Maughan. 1984. Abundance and preferred habitat of the leopard darter, <i>Percina pantherina</i>, in Glover Creek, Oklahoma. Copeia 1984:378-84.
  9. Kuehne, R. A., and R. W. Barbour. 1983. The American Darters. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky. 177 pp.
  10. Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, North Carolina. i-x + 854 pp.
  11. Matthews, J.R. and C.J. Moseley (eds.). 1990. The Official World Wildlife Fund Guide to Endangered Species of North America. Volume 1. Plants, Mammals. xxiii + pp 1-560 + 33 pp. appendix + 6 pp. glossary + 16 pp. index. Volume 2. Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians, Fishes, Mussels, Crustaceans, Snails, Insects, and Arachnids. xiii + pp. 561-1180. Beacham Publications, Inc., Washington, D.C.
  12. Nelson, J. S., E. J. Crossman, H. Espinosa-Perez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, and J. D. Williams. 2004. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 29, Bethesda, Maryland. 386 pp.
  13. Ono, R.D., J.D. Williams, and A. Wagner. 1983. Vanishing Fishes of North America. Stone Wall Press, Washington, DC. 257 pp
  14. Page, L. M. 1983a. Handbook of Darters. T. F. H. Publications, Inc., Neptune City, New Jersey. 271 pp.
  15. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 1991. A field guide to freshwater fishes: North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. 432 pp.
  16. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston. xix + 663 pp.
  17. Page, L. M., H. Espinosa-Pérez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, R. L. Mayden, and J. S. Nelson. 2013. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Seventh edition. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 34, Bethesda, Maryland.
  18. Page, L. M., K. E. Bemis, T. E. Dowling, H.S. Espinosa-Pérez, L.T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, K. E. Hartel, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, M. A. Neigbors, J. J. Schmitter-Soto, and H. J. Walker, Jr. 2023. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Eighth edition. American Fisheries Society (AFS), Special Publication 37, Bethesda, Maryland, 439 pp.
  19. Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
  20. Robison, H. W. 1978. Status of the leopard darter. Endangered species report 3, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque. 28 pp.
  21. State Natural Heritage Data Centers. 1996a. Aggregated element occurrence data from all U.S. state natural heritage programs, including the Tennessee Valley Authority, Navajo Nation and the District of Columbia. Science Division, The Nature Conservancy.
  22. State Natural Heritage Data Centers. 1996b. Aggregated element occurrence data from all U.S. state natural heritage programs, including the Tennessee Valley Authority, Navajo Nation and the District of Columbia: Export of freshwater fish and mussel records west of the Mississippi River in 1997. Science Division, The Nature Conservancy.
  23. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1990. Endangered and threatened species recovery program: report to Congress. 406 pp.
  24. Williams, L. R., A. A. Echelle, C. S. Toepfer, M. G. Williams, and W. L. Fisher. 1999. Simulation modeling of population viability for the leopard darter (Percidae: <i>Percina pantherina</i>). Southwestern Naturalist 44:470-477.
  25. Zale, A. V., S. C. Leon, M . Lechner, O. E. Maughan, M. T. Ferguson, S. O'Donnell, B. James, and P. W. James. 1994. Distribution of the threatened leopard darter, <i>Percina pantherina</i> (Osteichthyes: Percidae). Southwestern Naturalist 39:11-20.