Scaphirhynchus albus

(Forbes and Richardson, 1905)

Pallid Sturgeon

G2Imperiled Found in 39 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
Critically endangeredIUCN
HighThreat Impact
Pallid sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.103033
Element CodeAFCAA02010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNCritically endangered
CITESAppendix II
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderAcipenseriformes
FamilyAcipenseridae
GenusScaphirhynchus
Concept Reference
Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Scaphirhynchus albus formerly was thought to be genetically identical to S. platorhynchus (Phelps and Allendorf 1983).

Data from 5 nuclear DNA microsatellite loci indicate that pallid and shovelnose sturgeon are genetically distinct at three sympatric localities; pallid sturgeon from two northern populations in the upper Missouri River are genetically distinct from a population in the Atchafalaya River in Louisiana, suggesting that northern and southern populations are reproductively isolated (Tranah et al. 2001). Shovelnose sturgeon from the three localities are genetically indistinguishable. Individuals identified morphologically as hybrids are genetically distinct from pallid sturgeon but genetically indistinguishable from shovelnose sturgeon; these results are the converse of the results based on mtDNA published elsewhere (Tranah et al. 2001).

Genetic data (Campton et al. 2000, Tranah et al. 2001, Heist and Schrey 2006) suggest that the pallid sturgeon comprises two distinct groups at the extremes of the species' range with a middle intermediate group representing the lower Missouri and middle Mississippi Rivers. This pattern is suggestive of a pattern of isolation by distance, with gene flow more likely to occur between adjacent groups than among geographically distant groups, and thus, genetic differences increase with geographical distance (USFWS 2007).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodLegacy Rank calculation - Excel v3.1x
Review Date2018-11-21
Change Date2007-11-13
Edition Date2018-11-21
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G. (2011); Schuhmann, A. (2018)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent1000-5000 square km (about 400-2000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences6 - 20
Rank Reasons
Large range and area of occupancy in larger channels of the Mississippi-Missouri river system and Atchafalaya River; range much reduced by dams in the upper Missouri River; habitat changes and barriers have resulted in limited natural recruitment and continuing declines in wild populations in the Missouri River basin; recent increased sampling effort has revealed larger populations than were known at the time of federal listing; ongoing stocking of hatchery-produced sturgeons may eventually lead to increases in the spawning population.
Range Extent Comments
Range includes the Missouri River (from mouth to Fort Benton, Montana), lower Yellowstone River, lower Platte River, Mississippi River downstream from its junction with the Missouri River and upstream at least several kilometers from the Missouri River, and Atchafalaya River in central Louisiana (Reed and Ewing 1993, USFWS 2007). Occasional sightings have occurred near the mouths of various other large tributaries of the Mississippi River (e.g., Big Sunflower River and St. Francis River) and Missouri River (e.g., Kansas River and Platte River), but these instances may reflect fishes utilizing unusual flow conditions (USFWS 1989). The lower Yellowstone River and lower Platte River may be significant spawning tributaries (see USFWS 2007).
Occurrences Comments
USFWS has revised its original 6 priority management areas (USFWS 1993) to 4 based on: genentic information, mophology, biogeography and speciation associated with physiographic provinces, shared threats, and management (USFWS 2014). The various reaches within the species range are considered occurrences.
Threat Impact Comments
Construction and operation of large dams and river channelization have eliminated and degraded preferred sturgeon habitat (Pflieger and Grace 1987). On the main stem of the Missouri River, approximately 36 percent of riverine habitat within the pallid sturgeon's range was eliminated by construction of six massive earthen dams between 1926 and 1952 (USFWS 1993); the dams are believed to block migrations, and the reservoirs probably inundated historical spawning and nursery areas. Another 40 percent has been channelized. The remaining 24 percent has been altered due to changes in water flows caused by dam operations (USFWS 1993). USFWS (2007) concluded that the species is still threatened by habitat loss and inadequate regulatory mechanisms in all or portions of the range. Habitat changes have severely reduced or eliminated successful reproduction. The low level of natural recruitment is a major concern and impediment to recovery.

Past commercial exploitation likely exceeded biological recruitment. Illegal commercial harvest is currently occurring in portions of the lower Missouri River and Mississippi River; pallid sturgeon exhibits lower ages and higher mortality rates in areas where shovelnose sturgeons are commercially harvested (Colombo et al., in press). This threat is likely to increase as caviar sources are reduced world-wide and caviar prices increase (USFWS 2007).

Limited data suggest that contaminants may have some affect on reproduction (USFWS 2007).

Significant hybridization with shovelnose sturgeon has been documented (USFWS 1989, Wills et al. 2002). However, it is unclear whether hybridization is actually a threat (USFWS 2007).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

A large fish (to 186 cm) with a heterocercal tail, a long slender caudal peduncle, a flat shovel-shaped snout, four fringed barbels on the snout, a ventral mouth, and large bony scutes on the head, back, and sides; 37-43 dorsal rays; 24-28 anal rays (Page and Burr 1991).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Similar to the shovelnose sturgeon but has no scalelike scutes on the belly, the bases of the outer barbels usually are posterior to the bases of the inner barbels, the inner barbels are shorter, the head is larger, the mouth is wider, the eye is smaller, and the color usually is paler (gray-white above and on sides) (Page and Burr 1991).

Wills et al. (2002) used meristic and morphometric characteristics to differentiate S. albus and S. platorhynchus at a high confidence level.

Habitat

This species occupies large, turbid, free-flowing riverine habitat; it occurs in strong current over firm gravel or sandy substrate (USFWS 1989); it sometimes occurs in reservoirs (Kallemeyn 1981). Pallid sturgeons tend to select main channel habitats in the Mississippi River (Sheehan et al. 1998) and main channel areas with islands or sand bars in the upper Missouri River (Bramblett 1996). In the lower Platte River, Nebraska, hatchery-reared individuals (age 6-7) usually were downstream of sand bars where currents converge (Snook et al. 2002). Specific characteristics of spawning habitat have not been documented. Larvae drift downstream from the hatching site (Kynard et al. 2002).

Reproduction

Spawns from June to August (Kallemeyn 1981, USFWS 2007). Males are sexually mature in 3-4 years (Kallemeyn 1981). Females likely take at least several years to mature, and individuals probably spawn at intervals of several years. A 41-year-old 17-kg female contained an estimated 170,000 eggs; this is the oldest reported individual of this species (Keenlyne et al. 1992, Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 121:139-140).
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN2
ProvinceRankNative
MontanaS1Yes
MississippiS1Yes
TennesseeS1Yes
NebraskaS1Yes
North DakotaS1Yes
IowaS1Yes
ArkansasS1Yes
South DakotaS2Yes
LouisianaS1Yes
MissouriS1Yes
KansasS1Yes
KentuckyS1Yes
IllinoisS2Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentHigh (continuing)
1.2 - Commercial & industrial areasHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureHigh (continuing)
3 - Energy production & miningHigh (continuing)
3.2 - Mining & quarryingHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsPervasive - restrictedUnknownHigh - low
4.3 - Shipping lanesPervasive - restrictedUnknownHigh - low
5 - Biological resource useLarge - restrictedUnknownHigh (continuing)
5.4 - Fishing & harvesting aquatic resourcesLarge - restrictedUnknownHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsPervasive - largeExtreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useLarge (31-70%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionPervasive - largeUnknownHigh (continuing)
9.1 - Domestic & urban waste waterHigh (continuing)
9.2 - Industrial & military effluentsHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsHigh (continuing)
9.4 - Garbage & solid wasteHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (39)
Colorado (5)
AreaForestAcres
Comanche Peak Adjacent AreaArapaho & Roosevelt NFs44,158
Dome PeakRoutt NF35,716
Long ParkRoutt NF42,100
Troublesome SouthRoutt NF47,359
Williams Fork Ptarmingan AdjacentArapaho & Roosevelt NFs36,351
Idaho (1)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekCaribou-Targhee National Forest118,582
Illinois (1)
AreaForestAcres
Ripple HollowShawnee National Forest3,788
Montana (4)
AreaForestAcres
Bear - Marshall - Scapegoat - SwanLewis and Clark National Forest344,022
Big LogHelena National Forest8,954
Devils TowerHelena National Forest7,144
HolterHelena National Forest1,965
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
Texas (1)
AreaForestAcres
Big CreekNational Forests in Texas1,447
Wyoming (26)
AreaForestAcres
Bear MountainMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest9,440
Bridger PeakMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest6,697
Buffalo PeakMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest17,560
Campbell LakeMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest7,088
Cow Creek MountainMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest8,276
Deep CreekMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest6,411
East Fork EncampmentMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest7,445
Encampment River AdditionMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest4,996
French CreekMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest5,928
GunnysackMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest12,890
Illinois CreekMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest6,711
Labonte CanyonMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest16,281
Laramie PeakMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest28,608
Libby FlatsMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest11,107
Middle ForkShoshone National Forest51,772
Middle ForkMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest13,238
Mowry PeakMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest6,244
Pass CreekShoshone National Forest6,172
Pennock MountainMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest9,599
Platte River AdditionMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest7,962
Rock CreekMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest18,874
Savage Run AdditionMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest2,368
Sheep MountainMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest17,626
Snowy RangeMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest29,660
Soldier CreekMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest5,997
West Slope WindsBridger-Teton National Forest143,252
References (65)
  1. Backlund, Douglas (South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks) and George Cunningham (Eco~Centrics). 1997. Overlapping review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Reviews requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. March 1997.
  2. Bart, Henry L. (Tulane Museum of Natural History, Tulane University) 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  3. Binkowski, F. P., and S. I. Doroshov (editors). 1985. North American Sturgeons: Biology and Aquaculture Potential. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands. 163 pp.
  4. Birstein, V. J., J. R. Waldman, and W. E. Bemis. 1997. Sturgeon biodiversity and conservation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. Reprinted from Environmental Biology of Fishes 48(1-4).
  5. Bramblett, R. G. 1996. Habitats and movements of pallid and shovelnose sturgeon in the Yellowstone and Missouri rivers, Montana and North Dakota. Doctoral dissertation. Montana State University, Bozeman.
  6. Buchanan, Thomas M. (Department of Biology. Westark College AR). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. June 1997.
  7. Burr, Brooks M. (Department of Zoology, Southern Illinois University). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. June 1997.
  8. Burton, K. 2000. New hope for the pallid sturgeon. Endangered Species Bulletin 25:4-5.
  9. Campton, D. E., A. L. Bass, F. A. Chapman, and B. W. Bowen. 2000. Genetic distinction of pallid, shovelnose, and Alabama sturgeon:emerging species and the US Endangered Species Act. Conservation Genetics 1:17-32.
  10. Colombo, R. E., J. E. Garvey, N. D. Jackson, B. T. Koch, R. Brooks, D. P. Herzog, R. A. Hrabik, and T. W. Spier. 2007. Harvest of Mississippi River sturgeon drives abundance and reproductive success: a harbinger of collapse? Journal of Applied Ichthyology 23(4): 444-451.
  11. Cross, Frank B. (Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC.
  12. Cunningham, George R. (Eco~Centrics, Nebraska). 1997a. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. April 1997.
  13. Decker-Hess, Janet (Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks).1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. May 1997.
  14. Drobish, M. R. 2006. Pallid sturgeon assessment program, Volume 1.1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District, Yankton, South Dakota.
  15. Duffy, W. G., C. R. Berry, and K. D. Keenlyne. 1996. Biology of the pallid sturgeon with an annotated bibliography through 1994. Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Technical Bulletin 5. South Dakota State University, Brookings.
  16. Figg, D. E. 1993. Missouri Department of Conservation wildlife diversity report, July 1992-June 1993. 75 pp.
  17. Fritz, Michael (Nebraska Natural Heritage Program, Nebraska Game and Parks Commission). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  18. Garvey, J. E., E. J. Heist, R. C. Brooks, D. P. Herzog, R. A. Hrabik, K. J. Killgore, J. Hoover, and C. Murphy. 2009. Current status of the pallid sturgeon in the Middle Mississippi River: habitat, movement, and demographics. Unpublished report to Saint Louis District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. Carbondale, Illinois.
  19. Gould, Dr. William (Montana Cooperative Fisheries Research Unit. Montana State University). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC.
  20. Hartfield, P. 2003. Sturgeon surveys in the lower Mississippi River. Endangered Species Bulletin 28(2):27.
  21. Heist, E. J., and A. Schrey. 2006. Microsatellite tools for genetic identification of <i>Scaphirhynchus</i>. Interim Report. Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.
  22. Herkert, J. R., editor. 1992. Endangered and threatened species of Illinois: status and distribution. Vol. 2: Animals. Illinois Endangered Species Protection Board. iv + 142 pp.
  23. Howell, Daryl (Iowa Natural Areas Inventory, Department of Natural Resources). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. August 1997.
  24. Jaeger, M., A. Ankrum, T. Watson, G. Hadley, J. Rotella, G. Jordan, R. Wilson, S. Camp, T. Thatcher, and K. Boyd. 2009. Pallid sturgeon management and recovery in the Yellowstone River. Unpublished report. Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks. Glendive, Montana.
  25. Jelks, H. L., S. J. Walsh, N. M. Burkhead, S. Contreras-Balderas, E. Díaz-Pardo, D. A. Hendrickson, J. Lyons, N. E. Mandrak, F. McCormick, J. S. Nelson, S. P. Platania, B. A. Porter, C. B. Renaud, J. Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, E. B. Taylor, and M.L. Warren, Jr. 2008. Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33(8):372-407.
  26. Kallemeyn, L. 1981. A status report on the pallid sturgeon, <i>Scaphirhynchus albus</i>. Draft.
  27. Krieger, J., P. A. Fuerst, and T. M. Cavender. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of the North American sturgeons (Order Acipenseriformes) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 16:64-72.
  28. Kynard, B., E. Henyey, and M. Horgan. 2002. Ontogenetic behavior, migration, and social behavior of pallid sturgeon, <i>Scaphirhynchus albus</i>, and shovelnose sturgeon, <i>S. platorynchus</i>, with notes on the adaptive significance of body color. Environmental Biology of Fishes 63:389-403.
  29. Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, North Carolina. i-x + 854 pp.
  30. Major, Smoot (Tennessee Division of Natural Heritage). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC on 19 August 1997.
  31. Mann, Tom. (Mississippi Natural Heritage Program. Mississippi Museum of Natural Science). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC.
  32. Matthews, W. J., and D. C. Heins, editors. 1987. Community and evolutionary ecology of North American stream fishes. Univ. Oklahoma Press, Norman. viii + 310 pp.
  33. Nelson, J. S., E. J. Crossman, H. Espinosa-Perez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, and J. D. Williams. 2004. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 29, Bethesda, Maryland. 386 pp.
  34. Olson, John R. (Iowa Department of Natural Resources, Water Quality Bureau). 1997a. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC, May 8, 1997.
  35. Osborne, Cindy (Arkansas Natural Heritage Program). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  36. Page, Lawrence M. (Illinois Natural History Survey). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps for Illinois. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC.
  37. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 1991. A field guide to freshwater fishes: North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. 432 pp.
  38. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston. xix + 663 pp.
  39. Page, L. M., H. Espinosa-Pérez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, R. L. Mayden, and J. S. Nelson. 2013. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Seventh edition. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 34, Bethesda, Maryland.
  40. Page, L. M., K. E. Bemis, T. E. Dowling, H.S. Espinosa-Pérez, L.T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, K. E. Hartel, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, M. A. Neigbors, J. J. Schmitter-Soto, and H. J. Walker, Jr. 2023. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Eighth edition. American Fisheries Society (AFS), Special Publication 37, Bethesda, Maryland, 439 pp.
  41. Pflieger, William L. (Missouri Department of Conservation). 1997b. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. April 1997.
  42. Pflieger, W. L. and T. B. Grace. 1987. Changes in the fish fauna of the lower Missouri River, 1940-1983. Pages 166-181 in W. J. Matthews and D. C Heins (editors). Community and Evolutionary Ecology of North American Stream Fishes. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, Oklahoma.
  43. Phelps, S. R., and F. W. Allendorf. 1983. Genetic identityof pallid and shovelnose sturgeon (<i>Scaphirhynchus albus</i> and <i>S. platorynchus</i>). Copeia 1983:696-700.
  44. Power, Greg (Fisheries Division, North Dakota Game and Fish Department). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. April 1997.
  45. Reed, B.C. and M.S. Ewing. 1993. Status and distribution of pallid sturgeon at the Old River Control Complex, Louisiana. Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. Report 514-0009 Lake Charles, Louisiana.
  46. Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
  47. Ross, Stephen T. (University of Southern Mississippi, Department of Biological Sciences). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. June 1997.
  48. Sheehan, R. J., R. C. Heidinger, K. L. Hurley, P. S. Wills, and M. A. Schmidt. 1998. Middle Mississippi River pallid sturgeon habitat use project. Annual progress report (year 3). Fisheries Research Laboratory and Department of Zoology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.
  49. Shute, Peggy (Aquatic Zoologist, Tennessee Valley Authority Regional Heritage). 2000. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Anthony E. Zammit, ABI. February 2000.
  50. Smith, P. W. 1979. The fishes of Illinois. University of Illinois Press, Urbana. 314 pp.
  51. Snook, V. A., E. J. Peters, and L. J. Young. 2002. Movements and habitat use by hatchery-reared pallid sturgeon in the lower Platte River, Nebraska. American Fisheries Society Symposium 28:161-174.
  52. State Natural Heritage Data Centers. 1996a. Aggregated element occurrence data from all U.S. state natural heritage programs, including the Tennessee Valley Authority, Navajo Nation and the District of Columbia. Science Division, The Nature Conservancy.
  53. State Natural Heritage Data Centers. 1996b. Aggregated element occurrence data from all U.S. state natural heritage programs, including the Tennessee Valley Authority, Navajo Nation and the District of Columbia: Export of freshwater fish and mussel records west of the Mississippi River in 1997. Science Division, The Nature Conservancy.
  54. State Natural Heritage Data Centers. 1996c. Aggregated element occurrence data from all U.S. state natural heritage programs, including the Tennessee Valley Authority, Navajo Nation and the District of Columbia: Export of freshwater fish and mussel records from the Tennessee Valley Authority in 1997. Science Division, The Nature Conservancy.
  55. Steffensen, K. D. 2012. Population characteristics, development of a predictive population viability model, and catch dynamics for pallid sturgeon in the lower Missouri River. Master's thesis. University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
  56. Steffensen, K. D., M. A. Pegg, and G. Mestl. 2013. Population prediction and viability model for pallid sturgeon (<i>Scaphirhynchus albus</i>, Fornes and Richardson, 1905) in the lower Missouri River. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 29:984-989.
  57. Swingle, B. S. 2003. Movements and habitat use by shovelnose and pallid sturgeon in the lower Platte River. Master's thesis. University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
  58. Tranah, G. J., H. L. Kincaid, C. C. Krueger, D. E. Campton, and B. May. 2001. Reproductive isolation in sympatric populations of pallid and shovelnose sturgeon. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21:367-373.
  59. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1990. Endangered and threatened species recovery program: report to Congress. 406 pp.
  60. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1993. Recovery plan for the pallid sturgeon (<i>Scaphirhynchus albus</i>). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bismark, North Dakota.
  61. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2006. Pallid sturgeon range-wide stocking and augmentation plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 6, Denver, Colorado.
  62. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). [2007]. Pallid sturgeon (<i>Scaphirhynchus albus</i>) 5-year review summary and evaluation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pallid Sturgeon Recovery Coordinator, Billings, Montana.
  63. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2014. Revised Recovery Plan for the Pallid Sturgeon (<i>Scaphirhynchus albus</i>). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Montana Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office, Billings, Montana. Online. Available at: https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plan/Pallid%20Sturgeon%20Recovery%20Plan%20First%20Revision%20signed%20version%20012914_3.pdf (Accessed 2018).
  64. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 30 August 1989. Porposed rule to determine the pallid sturgeon to be an endangered species. Federal Register 54:35901-35904.
  65. Wills, P. S., R. J. Sheehan, R. Heidinger, and B. L. Sloss. 2002. Differentiation of pallid sturgeon and shovelnose sturgeon using an index based on meristics and morphometrics. American Fisheries Society Symposium 28:249-258.