Anodonta kennerlyi

I. Lea, 1860

Western Floater

G4Apparently Secure Found in 4 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
LowThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.108233
Element CodeIMBIV04090
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryInvertebrate Animal
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumMollusca
ClassBivalvia
OrderUnionoida
FamilyUnionidae
GenusAnodonta
Other Common Names
Anodonte de l'Ouest (FR)
Concept Reference
Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Considerable taxonomic confusion surrounds this species complex. Williams et al. (2017) retain A. californiensis, A. kennerlyi, A. nuttalliana, and A. oregonensis based on their phylogenetic affinity to Eurasian Anodonta (Mock et al. 2004, Zanatta et al. 2007, Chong et al. 2008).

Zanatta et al. (2007) supported the monophyly of both Pyganodon and Utterbackia using mutation coding of allozyme data, but also resolved the Eurasian Anodonta cygnea to Pyganodon, Utterbackia, and North American Anodonta; indicating further phylogenetic analysis of the Anodontinae is required including both North American and Eurasian species.

Since the time of Call (1884) there has been much confusion regarding the taxonomic status of this and other floaters (Anodonta) of western North America. Isaac Lea (1838) described Anodonta wahlametensis, Anodonta nuttalliana, and Anodonta oregonensis from the same site ("Wahlamet [Willamette River], near its junction with the Columbia River [Oregon]") all in the same publication. Under the Rule of First Revisor (ICZN), Call (1884) considered Anodonta nuttalliana to include, as synonyms, Anodonta wahlametensis, Anodonta oregonensis, and Anodonta californiensis. Call (1884) considered Anodonta nuttalliana to include, as synonyms, Anodonta wahlametensis, Anodonta oregonensis, and Anodonta californiensis.

Other authors (e.g., Burch, 1975, Clarke, 1981; Turgeon et al., 1998), however, have considered A. californiensis, A. nuttalliana, and A. oregonensis to be distinct. Some authors even continue to recognize Anodonta wahlamatensis as a distinct species (Frest and Johannes, 1995; Taylor, 1981; Henderson, 1929) while most place it in the synonymy of A. nuttaliana (Burch, 1975; Turgeon et al., 1998). Whether A. wahlamatensis should be removed from the synonymy of A. nuttalliana will depend on future anatomical and genetic work on western Anodonta. According to T. Frest, Anodonta nuttalliana has been revised to the following; Anodonta nuttalliana nuttalliana and Anodonta nuttalinaa wahlametensis = Anodonta wahlametensis, and, Anodonta nuttalliana idahoensis and Anodonta nuttalliana californiensis = Anodonta californiensis (pers. comm. Amy Stock, WA-NHP, 1996).

Mock et al. (2004; 2005) found a lack of resolution (very little nuclear diversity) in phylogenetic reconstructions of Anodonta (A. californiensis, A. oregonensis, A. wahlamatensis) populations in the Bonneville Basin, Utah, but there was a tendency for the Bonneville Basin Anodonta (tentatively A. californiensis) to cluster with A. oregonensis from the adjacent Lahontan Basin in Nevada. In a phylogenetic analysis of western North American Anodonta using topotypic material as was available, Chong et al. (2008) found three deeply divided lineages: one clade including Anodonta oregonensis and Anodonta kennerlyi, one clade including Anodonta californiensis and Anodonta nuttalliana, and one clade including Anodonta beringiana.
Conservation Status
Review Date2007-05-24
Change Date1997-05-28
Edition Date2007-05-24
Edition AuthorsCordeiro, J.
Threat ImpactLow
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank Reasons
This species has a fairly wide northern range in northwestern North America and despite taxonomic uncertaintly with the genus Anodonta, remains little affected by threats due to its isolation from typical southerly threats of habitat loss, pollution, and introduced species. It is often quite common when found.
Range Extent Comments
In Canada, it is common and often abundant in British Columbia, particularly Vancouver Island and other coastal islands (including Queen Charlotte Islands) and on the mainland from the Columbia to the Fraser and Skeena River systems (Clarke, 1981). It also occurs in Alberta with little precise information (two lakes) (Metcalfe-Smith and Cudmore-Vokey, 2004). Clarke (1981) also cites a few mountain lakes in the uppermost North Saskatchewan (questionable) and Athabasca River systems of Alberta and extends in the Pacific drainage to Oregon. Nedeau et al. (2005) list distribution as the watersheds of Oregon, Washington, British Columbia, Alberta, and northern Saskatchewan. The species also occurs in the southeast panhandle of Alaska (AK NHP, pers. comm., 2007).
Occurrences Comments
Clarke (1981) depicts specimens from Aberdeen, Washington; Queen Charlotte Islands, British Columbia; and Lillouet District, British Columbia. Nedeau et al. (2005) list the Peace River in British Columbia, part of the Arctic watershed as well as coastal islands in British Columbia; and include a photo of Kachess Lake in Washington. In Oregon, several populations of Anodonta were recently confirmed in the Middle Fork John Day River and the lower main stem of the Umatilla River, but due to the taxonomic confusion surrounding the western Anodonta, identification to species level was not attempted (Brim Box et al., 2003; 2006), although preliminary evidence indicates the John Day River population includes A. californiensis/nuttalliana clade and the Umatilla River population include both A. oregonensis/kennerlyi and A. californiensis/nuttalliana clades in sympatry (K. Mock, Utah State University, pers. comm., 2007). In Canada, it is common and often abundant in British Columbia as far north as Prince George and Kootenay Lake in the south, particularly Vancouver Island and other coastal islands (including Queen Charlotte Islands) and also occurs in Alberta with little precise information (two lakes) (Metcalfe-Smith and Cudmore-Vokey, 2004). Clarke (1981) also cites a few mountain lakes in the uppermost North Saskatchewan and Athabasca River systems of Alberta and extends in the Pacific drainage to Oregon). It is sparingly documented in southeast Alaska (AK NHP, pers. comm., 2006). Historically, it has been seen in Quiniault and Sammamish Lakes in western Washington, at Spokane and Yakima on the Columbia River, and in Eugene and just north of Coos Bay, Oregon (Henderson, 1929, 1936; Ingram, 1948; Clarke, 1981). Chong et al. (2007) used specimens from Chilliwack Lake, British Columbia. Museum specimens (UMMZ) exist for Alaska (Heckman Lake in southeast Alaska), Washington (King Green Lake in King Co., Black Lake in Thurston Co., Quiniault Lake in Grays Harbor, Skookumchuck River in Lewis Co., Sammamish Lake in Whatcom, Latah Creek in Spokane, Beaver Lake in Skagit), Oregon (Ten Mile Lake in Coos, Fern Ridge Lake in Lane Co.), Nevada (Humboldt River in Elko), and British Columbia (Fraser River, Nicole Lake; including Texada Island).
Threat Impact Comments
Since the western floater is distributed in less-disturbed northern areas, it has not experienced the full range of stressors experienced by more southern and coastal Anodonta species. Land use, water diversion, pollution, and dams may affect populations in the Columbia River in Washington (Nedeau et al., 2005).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

This species occurs in muddy or sandy substrates in rivers and lakes (Clarke, 1981). Nedeau et al. (2005) state the species inhabits mudy or sandy habitats in rivers and lakes, particularly in mid- to high elevation watersheds.

Reproduction

Host fish found to be Cottus asper (prickly sculpin), Gasterosteus aculeatus (threespine stickleback), Salvelinus malma (Dolly Varden), and Oncorhynchus clarkii (cutthroat trout) (Martel and Lauzon-Guay, 2005).
Other Nations (2)
United StatesN4
ProvinceRankNative
WashingtonS4Yes
OregonS4Yes
AlaskaSNRYes
CanadaN2
ProvinceRankNative
British ColumbiaSNRYes
AlbertaS2Yes
Roadless Areas (4)
Alaska (3)
AreaForestAcres
Freshwater BayTongass National Forest44,933
Game CreekTongass National Forest54,469
Tenakee RidgeTongass National Forest20,527
Washington (1)
AreaForestAcres
Thorp Mtn.Wenatchee National Forest22,717
References (31)
  1. Alaska Natural Heritage Program. 2006. Personal communication with Jay Cordeiro (NatureServe) about the distribution of <i>Anodonta kennerlyi</i> in Alaska.
  2. Brim Box, J., D. Wolf, J. Howard, C. O'Brien, D. Nez, and D. Close. 2003. The distribution and status of freshwater mussels in the Umatilla River system. Report project no. 2002-037-00 prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration, Division of Fish and Wildlife, Portland, Oregon. 72 pp.
  3. Brim Box, J., J. Howard, D. Wolf, C. O'Brien, D. Nez, and D. Close. 2006. Freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida) of the Umatilla and Middle Fork John Day Rivers in eastern Oregon. Northwest Science, 80(2): 95-107.
  4. Chong, J.P., J.C. Brim Box, J.K. Howard, D. Wolf, T.L. Myers, and K.E. Mock. 2008. Three deeply divided lineages of the freshwater mussel genus <i>Anodonta </i>in western North America. Conservation Genetics, 9(5): 1572-1578.
  5. Clarke, A.H. 1981a. The Freshwater Molluscs of Canada. National Museum of Natural Sciences, National Museums of Canada, D.W. Friesen and Sons, Ltd.: Ottawa, Canada. 446 pp.
  6. Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society (FMCS). 2021. The 2021 checklist of freshwater bivalves (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Considered and approved by the Bivalve Names Subcommittee December 2020. Online: https://molluskconservation.org/MServices_Names-Bivalves.html
  7. Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society (FMCS). 2023. The 2023 checklist of freshwater bivalves (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Considered and approved by the Bivalve Names Subcommittee October 2023. Online: https://molluskconservation.org/MServices_Names-Bivalves.html
  8. Graf, D.L. and K.S. Cummings. 2021. A 'big data' approach to global freshwater mussel diversity (Bivalvia: Unionoida), with an updated checklist of genera and species. Journal of Molluscan Studies 87(1):1-36.
  9. Henderson, J. 1936. The non-marine Mollusca of Oregon and Washington- supplement. University of Colorado Studies, 23(4): 251-280.
  10. Henderson, J.B. 1929a. Non-marine mollusca of Oregon and Washington. University of Colorado Studies 17(2): 47-190.
  11. Howard, A. D. 1915. Some exceptional cases of breeding among the Unionidae. The Nautilus 29:4-11.
  12. Ingram, W.M. 1948. The larger freshwater clams of California, Oregon and Washington. Journal of Entomology and Zoology 40:72-92.
  13. Lefevre, G. and W. T. Curtis. 1912. Studies on the reproduction and artificial propagation of fresh-water mussels. Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries 30:102-201.
  14. Martel, A.L. and J.-S. Lauzon-Guay. 2005. Distribution and density of glochidia of the freshwater mussel <i>Anodonta kennerlyi</i> on fish hosts in lakes of the temperate rain forest of Vancouver Island. Canadian Journal of Zoology 83: 419-431.
  15. Metcalfe-Smith, J.L. and B. Cudmore-Vokey. 2004. National general status assessment of freshwater mussels (Unionacea). National Water Research Institute / NWRI Contribution No. 04-027. Environment Canada, March 2004. Paginated separately.
  16. Mock, Karen E. (Associate Professor, Utah State University). 2007. Personal communication with Jay Cordeiro (NatureServe) about freshwater mussel distribution in the Pacific Northwest and Great Basin.
  17. Mock, K.E., J.C. Brim-Box, M.P. Miller, M.E. Downing, and W.R. Hoeh. 2004. Genetic diversity and divergence among freshwater mussel (<i>Anodonta</i>) populations in the Bonneville Basin of Utah. Molecular Ecology, 13: 1085-1098.
  18. Mock, K.E., J.C. Brim-Box, M.P. Miller, M.E. Downing, and W.R. Hoeh. 2005. Genetic diversity and divergence among freshwater mussel (<i>Anodonta</i>) populations in the Bonneville Basin of Utah. Ellipsaria, 7(1): 5-6.
  19. MolluscaBase eds. 2024. MolluscaBase. Accessed at https://www.molluscabase.org
  20. Moyle, P., and J. Bacon. 1969. Distribution and abundance of molluscs in a fresh water environment. Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Science 35(2/3):82-85.
  21. Nedeau, E., A.K. Smith, and J. Stone. [2005]. Freshwater Mussels of the Pacific Northwest. Pacific Northwest Native Freshwater Mussel Workgroup, Vancouver, Washington. 45 pp.
  22. Strayer, D. 1983. The effects of surface geology and stream size on freshwater mussel (Bivalvia, Unionidae) distribution in southeastern Michigan, U.S.A. Freshwater Biology 13:253-264.
  23. Strayer, D. L. 1999. Use of flow refuges by unionid mussels in rivers. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18(4):468-476.
  24. Strayer, D. L., and J. Ralley. 1993. Microhabitat use by an assemblage of stream-dwelling unionaceans (Bivalvia) including two rare species of <i>Alasmidonta</i>. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12(3):247-258.
  25. Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
  26. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology (UMMZ) Mollusks Department collections. Ann Arbor, MI.
  27. Van der Schalie, H. 1938. The naiad fauna of the Huron River in southeastern Michigan. Miscellaneous Publication of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 40:7-78.
  28. Watters, G. T. 1992. Unionids, fishes, and the species-area curve. Journal of Biogeography 19:481-490.
  29. Williams, J. D., A. E. Bogan, R. S. Butler, K. S. Cummings, J. T. Garner, J. L. Harris, N. A. Johnson, and G. T. Watters. 2017. A revised list of the freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Freshwater Mollusk Biology and Conservation 20:33-58.
  30. Williams, J. D., M. L. Warren, Jr., K. S. Cummings, J. L. Harris, and R. J. Neves. 1993. Conservation status of freshwater mussels of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 18(9):6-22.
  31. Zanatta, D.T., A. Ngo, and J. Lindell. 2007a. Reassessment of the phylogenetic relationships among <i>Anodonta</i>, <i>Pyganodon</i>, and <i>Utterbackia </i>(Bivalvia: Unionoida) using mutation coding of allozyme data. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 156: 211-216.