Cyclonaias tuberculata

(Rafinesque, 1820)

Purple Wartyback

G5Secure Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Near threatenedIUCN
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.120552
Element CodeIMBIV09010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryInvertebrate Animal
IUCNNear threatened
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumMollusca
ClassBivalvia
OrderUnionoida
FamilyUnionidae
GenusCyclonaias
Other Common Names
Mulette verruqueuse (FR)
Concept Reference
Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Neemuchwala et al. (2023) designated Cyclonaias a monotypic genus consisting of the type species C. tuberculata and resurrected the oldest available generic epithet, Pustulosa, to represent the clade consisting of P. infucata, P. kieneriana, P. kleiniana, P. necki, P. nodulata, P. petrina, P. pustulosa, and P. succissa.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2016-02-10
Change Date1996-11-25
Edition Date2009-01-26
Edition AuthorsCordeiro, J.
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
This is a wide-ranging species occurring in southern Ontario and throughout the upper Mississippi River drainage, south to Arkansas and Missouri and has experienced some declines in certain parts of the northern and outer limits of its range but is still common in others, particularly the southern parts of the range.
Range Extent Comments
This species occurs in the Mississippi River drainage generally. In Canada, it is found in Ontario where it occurs in the Grand and Thames Rivers (Metcalfe-Smith and Cudmore-Vokey 2004). In the United States, it is found in the Lake St. Clair drainage, the Mississippi River basin from southern Minnesota south to Arkansas, and from the Ohio River drainage in western Pennsylvania (historically) west to eastern Oklahoma (Williams et al. 2008). It is widespread in the Cumberland River drainage and is found throughout the Tennessee River drainage in Alabama, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Virginia (Parmalee and Bogan 1998, Williams et al. 2008).
Occurrences Comments
In Minnesota, this species is found in large rivers with populations in the St. Croix River drainage where it is locally common and Mississippi River below St. Anthony Falls where it is rare (Sietman, 2003). In Illinois, it is found sporadically in the Kankakee (Sietman et al., 2001), Vermillion (Wabash), and Ohio Rivers (Cummings and Mayer, 1997) and Rock River (Schanzle et al., 2004); and recently in the Fox River basin in Illinois and Wisconsin only as weathered or subfossil shells (possibly extirpated) (Schanzle et al., 2004). Indiana distribution: East Fork White (Harmon, 1992), Blue (Sietman et al., 1995), Tippecanoe (Cummings and Berlocher, 1990), St. Joseph (Pryor, 2005). In Ohio, it is in the Ohio and western Lake Erie bains (absent from NE), Sandusky and Maumee, Great and Little Miami and Ohio Brush Creek, upper Muskingum and Scioto (Watters, 1992; 1995; Watters et al., 2009). In Kentucky, it is generally distributed to sporadic statewide (Cicerello and Schuster, 2003); including Middle Green and Barren Rivers (Cochran and Layzer, 1993). In Tennessee, it occurs in the main channels of the Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers in middle and east Tennessee and most major tributaries (Parmalee and Bogan, 1998). In Alabama, it is confined to the Tennessee River drainage where it was historically widespread but is now in riverine reaches downstream of dams and in upper reservoir reaches; also Elk, Paint Rock Rivers, Bear Creek (Ahlstedt, 1996; Williams et al., 2008). In Mississippi, it occurs in the Tennessee drainage only (Jones et al., 2005). McGregor and Garner (2004) recently documented this species in the Bear Creek drainage in Alabama/Mississippi. In Wisconsin, it is known from the Chippewa River, St. Croix River down to the Mississippi River confluence in the northwestern part of the state only (Mathiak, 1979). It historically occurred in the Clinton (St. Clair drainage) river in Michigan (Strayer, 1980) and shells were recently found in the Grand River (Badra and Goforth, 2003). This species is widely distributed and common in the Middle and Upper New River drainages in Virginia (Pinder et al., 2002). It is known from the Upper Kanawha (Morris and Taylor, 1992) and New River drainages in West Virginia (Jirka and Neves, 1990). In North Carolina, it is known from the New River in Allegheny Co., only (Bogan, 2002; LeGrand et al., 2006). Branson (1983) cites it as possibly occurring in the Neosho and Illinois River drainages in Oklahoma. This species was recently collected for the first time in White (Christian, 1995) and Cache Rivers, Arkansas (Christian et al., 2005), although Gordon (1982) recorded it in the upper White. In Canada it is found only in Ontario where it occurs in the Sydenham (Metcalfe-Smith et al., 2003), Grand and Thames Rivers (Metcalfe-Smith and Cudmore-Vokey, 2004).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

This species typically inhabits a gravel/mud bottom, usually in areas of current at depths of less than two to up to 20 feet. Different forms inhabit medium-sized to small streams or in the main channel of large rivers (Parmalee and Bogan, 1998).

Reproduction

Unpublished studies by Hove (Triannual Unionid Report No. 11, 1997) found successful glochidial metamorphosis occurred on the channel catfish, ICTALURUS PUNCTATUS, the black bullhead, AMEIURUS MELAS, and the flathead catfish, PYLODICTUS OLIVARIS. A disproportionate number of juvenile mussels developed on the channel catfish. Hosts listed by Hove and Kapuscinski (1998) include black bullhead, channel catfish, flathead catfish, and yellow bullhead.
Other Nations (2)
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
MichiganS2Yes
TennesseeS4Yes
IllinoisS2Yes
MississippiS2Yes
PennsylvaniaSHYes
ArkansasS3Yes
KentuckyS4Yes
MinnesotaS1Yes
MissouriS4Yes
WisconsinS2Yes
South DakotaSUYes
AlabamaS5Yes
VirginiaS4Yes
GeorgiaSNRYes
IndianaS4Yes
IowaS2Yes
OhioS3Yes
KansasS1Yes
North CarolinaS1Yes
West VirginiaS2Yes
CanadaN2
ProvinceRankNative
OntarioS2Yes
Roadless Areas (1)
Wisconsin (1)
AreaForestAcres
09159 - ThornappleChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest9,744
References (57)
  1. Ahlstedt, S.A. 1995-1996. Status survey for federally listed endangered freshwater mussel species in the Paint Rock River system, northeastern Alabama, U.S.A. Walkerana 8(19):63-80.
  2. Backlund, D.C. 2000. Summary of current known distribution and status of freshwater mussels (Unionoida) in South Dakota. Central Plains Archaeology, 8(1): 69-77.
  3. Badra, P.J. and R.R. Goforth. 2003. Freshwater mussel surveys of Great Lakes tributary rivers in Michigan. Report Number MNFI 2003-15 to the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Coastal Zone Management Unit, Lansing, Michigan. 40 pp.
  4. Bogan, A.E. 1993a. Workshop on freshwater bivalves of Pennsylvania. Workshop hosted by Aquatic Systems Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, held at Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 6-7 May 1993. 80 pp.
  5. Bogan, A.E. 2002. Workbook and key to the freshwater bivalves of North Carolina. North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences: Raleigh, North Carolina. 101 pp.
  6. Branson, B.A. 1983. The mussels (Unionacea: Bivalvia) of Oklahoma - Part II: the Unioninae, Pleurobemini, and Anodontini. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science, 63: 49-59
  7. Christian, A.D. 1995. Analysis of the commercial mussel beds in the Cache and White Rivers in Arkansas. M.S. Thesis, Arkansas State University. 210 pp.
  8. Christian, A.D., J.L. Harris, W.R. Posey, J.F. Hockmuth, and G.L. Harp. 2005. Freshwater mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae) assemblages of the lower Cache River, Arkansas. Southeastern Naturalist, 4(3): 487-512.
  9. Cicerello, R.R. and G.A. Schuster. 2003. A guide to the freshwater mussels of Kentucky. Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission Scientific and Technical Series 7:1-62.
  10. Clarke, A.H. 1992. Ontario's Sydenham River, an important refugium for native freshwater mussels against competition from the zebra mussel, <i>Dreissena polymorpha</i>. Malacology Data Net, 3(1-4): 43-55.
  11. Cochran, T.G. II and J.B. Layzer. 1993. Effects of commercial harvest on unionid habitat use in the Green and Barren Rivers, Kentucky. Pages 61-65 in K.S. Cummings, A.C. Buchanan, and L.M. Koch (eds.) Conservation and Management of Freshwater Mussels: Proceedings of a UMRCC Symposium, 12-14 October, 1992, St. Louis, Missouri. Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee, Rock Island, Illinois. 189 pp.
  12. Cummings, K.S. and C.A. Mayer. 1997. Distributional checklist and status of Illinois freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Unionacea). Pages 129-145 in: K.S. Cummings, A.C. Buchanan, C.A. Mayer, and T.J. Naimo (eds.) Conservation and management of freshwater mussels II: initiatives for the future. Proceedings of a UMRCC Symposium, October 1995, St. Louis, Missouri. Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee, Rock Island, Illinois.
  13. Cummings, K.S. and J.M. Berlocher. 1990. The naiades or freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Tippecanoe River, Indiana. Malacological Review 23:83-98.
  14. Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society (FMCS). 2023. The 2023 checklist of freshwater bivalves (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Considered and approved by the Bivalve Names Subcommittee October 2023. Online: https://molluskconservation.org/MServices_Names-Bivalves.html
  15. Gordon, M.E. 1982. Mollusca of the White River, Arkansas and Missouri. The Southwestern Naturalist, 27(3): 347-352.
  16. Graf, D.L. 2002. Historical biogeography and late glacial origin of the freshwater pearly mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae) faunas of Lake Erie, North America. Occasional Papers on Mollusks 6(82):175-211.
  17. Graf, D.L. and K.S. Cummings. 2021. A 'big data' approach to global freshwater mussel diversity (Bivalvia: Unionoida), with an updated checklist of genera and species. Journal of Molluscan Studies 87(1):1-36.
  18. Haag, W. R. 2019. Reassessing enigmatic mussel declines in the United States. Freshwater Mollusk Biology and Conservation 22(2):43-60.
  19. Harmon, J.L. 1992. Naiades (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of Sugar Creek, east fork White River drainage, in central Indiana. Malacology Data Net 3(1-4):31-42.
  20. Hove, M. and A.R. Kapuscinski. 1998. Ecological relationships between six rare Minnesota mussels and their host fishes. Final Report to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program, St. Paul, Minnesota. 17 pp.
  21. Howard, A. D. 1915. Some exceptional cases of breeding among the Unionidae. The Nautilus 29:4-11.
  22. Jirka, K.J. and R.J. Neves. 1990. Freshwater mussel fauna (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the New River Gorge National River, West Virginia. The Nautilus, 103(4): 136-139.
  23. Jones, R.L., W.T. Slack, and P.D. Hartfield. 2005. The freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionidae) of Mississippi. Southeastern Naturalist, 4(1): 77-92.
  24. Lefevre, G. and W. T. Curtis. 1912. Studies on the reproduction and artificial propagation of fresh-water mussels. Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries 30:102-201.
  25. LeGrand, H.E., Jr., S.P. Hall, S.E. McRae, and J.T. Finnegan. 2006. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Animal Species of North Carolina. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, North Carolina. 104 pp.
  26. Mathiak, H.A. 1979. A river survey of the unionid mussels of Wisconsin, 1973-1977. Sand Shell Press: Horicon, Wisconsin. 75 pp.
  27. McGregor, S.W. and J.T. Garner. 2004. Changes in the freshwater mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae) fauna of the Bear Creek system of northwest Alabama and northeast Mississippi. American Malacological Bulletin, 18(1/2): 61-70.
  28. Metcalfe-Smith, J.L. and B. Cudmore-Vokey. 2004. National general status assessment of freshwater mussels (Unionacea). National Water Research Institute / NWRI Contribution No. 04-027. Environment Canada, March 2004. Paginated separately.
  29. Metcalfe-Smith, J.L., J. Di Maio, S.K. Staton, and S.R. De Solla. 2003. Status of the freshwater mussel communities of the Sydenham River, Ontario, Canada. American Midland Naturalist 150:37-50.
  30. MolluscaBase eds. 2024. MolluscaBase. Accessed at https://www.molluscabase.org
  31. Morris, J.S. and R.W. Taylor. 1992. A survey of the freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Kanawha River of West Virginia. The Nautilus 92(4):153-155.
  32. Moyle, P., and J. Bacon. 1969. Distribution and abundance of molluscs in a fresh water environment. Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Science 35(2/3):82-85.
  33. Neemuchwala, S., N. A. Johnson, J. M. Pfeiffer, M. Lopes-Lima, A. Gomes-dos-Santos, E. Froufe, D. M. Hillis, and C. H. Smith. 2023. Coevolution with host fishes shapes parasitic life histories in a group of freshwater mussels (Unionidae: Quadrulini). Bulletin of the Society of Systematic Biologists 2(1):1-25.
  34. Oesch, R.D. 1995. Missouri Naiades. A Guide to the Mussels of Missouri. Second edition. Missouri Department of Conservation: Jefferson City, Missouri. viii + 271 pp.
  35. Over, W.H. 1942. Mollusca of South Dakota. University of South Dakota. Natural History Studies 5.
  36. Parmalee, P.W. and A.E. Bogan. 1998. The Freshwater Mussels of Tennessee. University of Tennessee Press: Knoxville, Tennessee. 328 pp.
  37. Pinder, M.J., E.S. Wilhelm, and J.W. Jones. 2002. Status survey of the freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in the New River drainage, Virginia. Walkerana, 13(29/30): 189-223.
  38. Pryor, W.W. 2005. Distribution of the native freshwater mussels in the rivers of Allen County, Indiana. Report to the St. Joseph River Watershed Initiative, Fort Wayne, Indiana. 71 pp.
  39. Schanzle, R.W., G.W. Kruse, J.A. Kath, R.A. Klocek, and K.S. Cummings. 2004. The freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Fox River basin, Illinois and Wisconsin. Illinois Natural History Biological Notes, 141: 1-35.
  40. Sietman, B.E. 2003. Field Guide to the Freshwater Mussels of Minnesota. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources: St. Paul, Minnesota. 144 pp.
  41. Sietman,. B.E., M.A. Furman, and F.A. Pursell. 1995. A qualitative unionid mussel survey of the Blue River, Indiana. Triannual Unionid Report, 8: 16-17.
  42. Sietman, B.E., S.D. Whitney, D.E. Kelner, K.D. Blodgett, and H.L. Dunn. 2001. Post-extirpation recovery of the freshwater mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae) fauna in the Upper Illinois River. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 16(2): 273-281.
  43. Skadsen, D.R. and K. Perkins III. 2000. Unionid mussels of the Big Sioux River and tributaries: Moody, Minnehaha, Lincoln, and Union Counties, South Dakota. GFP Report 2000-9 to the South Dakota Department of Game, Fish, and Parks, Pierre, South Dakota. 52 pp.
  44. Spoo, A. 2008. The Pearly Mussels of Pennsylvania. Coachwhip Publications: Landisville, Pennsylvania. 210 pp.
  45. Strayer, D. 1980. The freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Clinton River, Michigan, with comments on man's impact on the fauna, 1870-1978. The Nautilus 94(4):142-149.
  46. Strayer, D. 1983. The effects of surface geology and stream size on freshwater mussel (Bivalvia, Unionidae) distribution in southeastern Michigan, U.S.A. Freshwater Biology 13:253-264.
  47. Strayer, D. L. 1999. Use of flow refuges by unionid mussels in rivers. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18(4):468-476.
  48. Strayer, D. L., and J. Ralley. 1993. Microhabitat use by an assemblage of stream-dwelling unionaceans (Bivalvia) including two rare species of <i>Alasmidonta</i>. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12(3):247-258.
  49. Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
  50. Van der Schalie, H. 1938. The naiad fauna of the Huron River in southeastern Michigan. Miscellaneous Publication of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 40:7-78.
  51. Watters, G.T. 1992b. Distribution of the Unionidae in south central Ohio. Malacology Data Net 3(1-4):56-90.
  52. Watters, G. T. 1992. Unionids, fishes, and the species-area curve. Journal of Biogeography 19:481-490.
  53. Watters, G.T. 1995a. A field guide to the freshwater mussels of Ohio. revised 3rd edition. Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife, Columbus, Ohio. 122 pp.
  54. Watters, G.T., M.A. Hoggarth, and D.H. Stansbery. 2009b. The Freshwater Mussels of Ohio. Ohio State University Press: Columbus, Ohio. 421 pp.
  55. Williams, J.D., A.E. Bogan, and J.T. Garner. 2008. Freshwater Mussels of Alabama & the Mobile Basin in Georgia, Mississippi & Tennessee. University of Alabama Press: Tuscaloosa, Alabama. 908 pp.
  56. Williams, J. D., A. E. Bogan, R. S. Butler, K. S. Cummings, J. T. Garner, J. L. Harris, N. A. Johnson, and G. T. Watters. 2017. A revised list of the freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Freshwater Mollusk Biology and Conservation 20:33-58.
  57. Williams, J. D., M. L. Warren, Jr., K. S. Cummings, J. L. Harris, and R. J. Neves. 1993. Conservation status of freshwater mussels of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 18(9):6-22.