Lampsilis powellii

(I. Lea, 1852)

Arkansas Fatmucket

G2Imperiled Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
EndangeredIUCN
HighThreat Impact
Arkansas fatmucket (Lampsilis powellii). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.119787
Element CodeIMBIV21150
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryInvertebrate Animal
IUCNEndangered
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumMollusca
ClassBivalvia
OrderUnionoida
FamilyUnionidae
GenusLampsilis
Concept Reference
Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Specific name spelling follows that used in the original description (Turgeon et al., 1998).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodLegacy Rank calculation - Excel v3.1x
Review Date2018-10-22
Change Date2007-01-29
Edition Date2018-10-22
Edition AuthorsStagliano, D. (2018), Cordeiro, J. (2007); Morrison, M. (1997)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent250-1000 square km (about 100-400 square miles)
Number of Occurrences6 - 20
Rank Reasons
This species maintains a restricted distribution within Arkansas; suitable habitat has been significantly reduced and continues to be threatened by further habitat alteration and or diminishment of water quality. Probable historical range has been reduced by over 40%, and suitable habitat has been reduced to less than 20% of original; with fewer than 10 viable occurrences remaining.
Range Extent Comments
Range extent used to be >6,000 km2 and now is less than 1,000 km2 based on the current mapped extant populations. Currently, this species is known from the headwaters of the Saline, Ouachita, and Caddo rivers in the Ouachita Mountains of Arkansas. The historical range of this species is not well documented, however based on historical records of other Ozarkian mussels, it is thought that this species could have occurred throughout the entire drainage of these three rivers (USFWS, 1992). Reported collections from Oklahoma and Kansas are thought to be misidentifications.
Occurrences Comments
There are likely no more than ten occurrences globally. In Arkansas, it occurs in Caddo River upstream and downstream of DeGray Lake, upper Ouachita River and South Fork Ouachita River upstream of Lake Ouachita, and the Alum, Middle, North and South forks of the Saline River, as well as the mainstem Saline River downstream to the boundary of the Interior Highlands and Gulf Coastal Plain (Harris et al., 1997; Harris and Gordon, 1987).
Threat Impact Comments
Lampsilis powellii has lost much of its habitat to impoundments, channelization, and dredging in many locations on the rivers it inhabits. Many of these rivers have also undergone increased sedimentation from farming and logging and lowered water flow from impoundments and water withdrawal. Water quality degredation by runoff from pesticides, fertilizers, mining, and other anthropogenic sources is responsible for the absence of Lampsilis powellii in much of its historic range. In the Ouachita River, the range has been reduced by the construction of Lakes Ouachita, Hamilton, and Catherine and the hypolimnetic water releases from these impoundments. In the Caddo River, the impoundment of DeGray Reservoir and resulting hypolimnetic water releases have impacted what was probably the uppermost historic habitat for the species in this system. In the Ouachita River, the range has been reduced by the construction of Lakes Ouachita, Hamilton, and Catherine and the hypolimnetic water releases from these impoundments. In the Caddo River, the impoundment of DeGray Reservoir and resulting hypolimnetic water releases have impacted what was probably the uppermost historic habitat for the species in this system. Habitat below DeGray Reservoir is limited in extent. Harris and Gordon (1988) list 16 existing impoundments, one under construction, and one planned within the known range. Harris et al. (1997) cite siltation and sedimentation and a lack of recruitment as threats.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Shell is generally of medium size, but occasionally exceeds 100 mm in length. It is elliptical to long obovate with subinflated valves. The umbos are moderately full and project slightly above the hinge line. The shell surface is smooth with a shiny olive brown to tawny periostracum and lacks rays. There are lines of tiny pits running down the shell that sometimes appear to be rays. The nacre is bluish-white and iridescent. Both pseudocardinal and lateral teeth are thin but well developed. There is sexual dimorphism in the shape of the shell. The shell of males is pointed posteriorly and that of females is rounded (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1992).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Sometimes confused with Lampsilis siliquoidea but that species usually bears rays on the valves (Branson, 1984)

Habitat

This species is currently known to inhabit the mainstems of three small to medium sized rivers where it is found in deep pools, backwater areas with sand, sand-gravel, sand-cobble, or sand-rock substrates. It does not appear to persist in the areas of the river with strong current or in impounded areas (Robison and Allen, 1995; USFWS, 1992).

Reproduction

Gravid females have been observed in January, February, and April (Harris and Gordon, 1990). Females observed to be gravid from March to October 2003 and in April 2004. The most successful fish hosts were Micropterus punctulatus (spotted bass) and Micropterus salmoides (largemouth bass) (Scott et al., 2004).
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN2
ProvinceRankNative
ArkansasS2Yes
OklahomaSNRYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineModerate (short-term)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineModerate (short-term)

Roadless Areas (1)
Arkansas (1)
AreaForestAcres
Blue MountainOuachita National Forest9,755
References (25)
  1. Branson, B.A. 1984. The mussels (Unionacea: Bivalvia) of Oklahoma- Part 3: Lampsilini. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science, 64: 20-36.
  2. Fowler, A., and J. Anderson (Eds). 2015. Arkansas Wildlife Action Plan. Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, Little Rock, Arkansas. 1678 pp.
  3. Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society (FMCS). 2023. The 2023 checklist of freshwater bivalves (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Considered and approved by the Bivalve Names Subcommittee October 2023. Online: https://molluskconservation.org/MServices_Names-Bivalves.html
  4. Gordon, M.E., and J.L. Harris. 1985. Distribution of <i>Lampsilis powelli</i> (Lea) (Bivalvia: Unionacea). The Nautilus, 99(4): 142-143.
  5. Graf, D.L. and K.S. Cummings. 2021. A 'big data' approach to global freshwater mussel diversity (Bivalvia: Unionoida), with an updated checklist of genera and species. Journal of Molluscan Studies 87(1):1-36.
  6. Harris, J.L. and M.E. Gordon. 1987. Distribution and status of rare and endangered mussels (Mollusca: Margaritiferidae, Unionidae) in Arkansas. Proceedings of the Arkansas Academy of Science, 41: 49-56.
  7. Harris, J. L., and M. E. Gordon. 1990. Arkansas Mussels. Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, Little Rock, Arkansas.
  8. Harris, J.L., P.J. Rust, A.C. Christian, W.R. Posey II, C.L. Davidson, and G.L. Harp. 1997. Revised status of rare and endangered Unionacea (Mollusca: Margaritiferidae, Unionidae) in Arkansas. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, 51: 66-89.
  9. Howard, A. D. 1915. Some exceptional cases of breeding among the Unionidae. The Nautilus 29:4-11.
  10. Lefevre, G. and W. T. Curtis. 1912. Studies on the reproduction and artificial propagation of fresh-water mussels. Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries 30:102-201.
  11. MolluscaBase eds. 2024. MolluscaBase. Accessed at https://www.molluscabase.org
  12. Moyle, P., and J. Bacon. 1969. Distribution and abundance of molluscs in a fresh water environment. Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Science 35(2/3):82-85.
  13. Robison, H.W. and R.T. Allen. 1995. Only in Arkansas: A Study of the Endemic Plants and Animals of the State. University of Arkansas Press, Fayetteville, Arkansas.
  14. Scott, M.C., J.L. Farris, J.L. Harris, and A.D. Christian. 2004. Life history of the Arkansas fatmucket, <i>Lampsilis powellii </i>(Lea, 1852). Ellipsaria, 6(3): 9.
  15. Strayer, D. 1983. The effects of surface geology and stream size on freshwater mussel (Bivalvia, Unionidae) distribution in southeastern Michigan, U.S.A. Freshwater Biology 13:253-264.
  16. Strayer, D. L. 1999. Use of flow refuges by unionid mussels in rivers. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18(4):468-476.
  17. Strayer, D. L., and J. Ralley. 1993. Microhabitat use by an assemblage of stream-dwelling unionaceans (Bivalvia) including two rare species of <i>Alasmidonta</i>. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12(3):247-258.
  18. Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
  19. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1990i. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; threatened status determined for the Arkansas fatmucket, <i>Lampsilis powelli</i>. Federal Register, 55(66): 12797-12801.
  20. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1992. Arkansas fatmucket mussel (<i>Lampsilis powelli</i>) recovery plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: Atlanta, Georgia. 18 pp.
  21. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2018. Species Profile for Arkansas Fatmucket (<i>Lampsilis powellii</i>). Listed Species Count by Year. Available at: ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/profile/speciesProfile?sId=2213.
  22. Van der Schalie, H. 1938. The naiad fauna of the Huron River in southeastern Michigan. Miscellaneous Publication of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 40:7-78.
  23. Watters, G. T. 1992. Unionids, fishes, and the species-area curve. Journal of Biogeography 19:481-490.
  24. Williams, J. D., A. E. Bogan, R. S. Butler, K. S. Cummings, J. T. Garner, J. L. Harris, N. A. Johnson, and G. T. Watters. 2017. A revised list of the freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Freshwater Mollusk Biology and Conservation 20:33-58.
  25. Williams, J. D., M. L. Warren, Jr., K. S. Cummings, J. L. Harris, and R. J. Neves. 1993. Conservation status of freshwater mussels of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 18(9):6-22.