Pleurobema riddellii

(I. Lea, 1862)

Louisiana Pigtoe

G1Critically Imperiled (G1G2) Found in 3 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G1Critically ImperiledGlobal Rank
Near threatenedIUCN
Very highThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.113470
Element CodeIMBIV35270
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryInvertebrate Animal
IUCNNear threatened
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumMollusca
ClassBivalvia
OrderUnionoida
FamilyUnionidae
GenusPleurobema
Synonyms
Fusconaia friersonii(Wright, 1896)
Concept Reference
Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
This taxon also includes Quadrula (Fusconaia) friersonii (Howells et al., 1996; Neck, 1984). Though there has been taxonomic uncertainty between F. lananensis and F. askewi, P. riddellii is morphologically and genetically distinct from Fusconaia species (Burlakova et al. 2012, Howells et al. 2012).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodLegacy Rank calculation - Excel v3.1x
Review Date2018-12-15
Change Date1998-05-30
Edition Date2018-12-15
Edition AuthorsCordeiro, J. (2018); Howells, R. G. (1998)
Threat ImpactVery high
Range Extent250-1000 square km (about 100-400 square miles)
Number of Occurrences6 - 20
Rank Reasons
This rank reflects historical and current rarity, limited number of reports of living or recently dead specimens in recent years, known extirpations from some previously inhabited areas, and continuing modification and degradation of the aquatic ecosystems where it occurs. Although this species may rate a higher ranking, its rarity in conjunction with distribution in a number or river systems in two states, potential problems with field identifications suggests caution regarding its actual status. Many areas where it could occur have not been examined in recent years in great detail without success.
Range Extent Comments
Historically, this species occurred as far west as the San Jacinto and Trinity rivers, Texas, eastward through the Neches and Sabine systems into the Red River and Bayou Pierre of north-central Louisiana (Howells et al., 1996; 1997; Vidrine, 1993). Currently, it occurs from drainages in eastern Texas (Howells et al., 1996) into Louisiana (Vidrine, 2008) and in the Red River tributaries in Arkansas. In Louisiana, it has been found in Vernon, Rapides, Allen, Natchitoches and Red River Parishes. In Texas, it is known from San Jacinto, Trinity, Neches, Sabine Rivers in Texas River Basin.
Occurrences Comments
Until recently within Texas, only two living and two recently dead shells have been documented in the past ten years (Howells, 1997; Howells et al., 1997). Between 1981 and 1988, two live and one weathered shell were collected in the Little Cypress River in the Cypress Bayou system in northeast Texas (Mather and Bergmann, 1994). During surveys of the Village Creek drainage of Hardin, Tyler, and Polk Cos. in southeast Texas in 2001-2002, this species was found in 5 sites (of 22 surveyed) (11 specimens) (Bordelon and Harrel, 2004). Status in Louisiana in recent years is unknown although Vidrine (1993) reports this species from Bayou Dorcheat, Cane River and Kisatchie Bayou, Bayou Pierre in the arm of the Red River (in 1974), Calcasieu River, Sabine River, and Neches River but no recent specimens have been found with the exception of a potential occurrence in Rapides Co., Louisiana. As of 2012, Ford et al. (2012) cited 38 records (many can be combined into single occurrences); most of which are in the Neches River basin.
Threat Impact Comments
Within Texas, mussel populations in the eastern pinywoods areas were often more environmentally more secure than others elsewhere in the state; however, current timber cutting, gravel and sand removal, and general human modification of the area is now having dramatic negative impacts on unionids within the region. Similar impacts are presumably occurring in Louisiana as well. Loss of habitat as a result of siltation, and impoundments coupled with the addition of pollutants to streams and rivers may also contribute to the decline of this species.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Subquadrate to nearly round and subtriangular; to at least 67 mm shell length; solid; beaks full and elevated; nacre white; epidermis greenish-brown, chestnut, to black (Howells et al. 1996).

Habitat

This species occurs in streams and moderate-size rivers; usually in flowing water and not generally known from impoundments; on substrates of mud, sand, and gravel; to depths of 20 feet but usually less (Howells et al., 1997). In a study of mussel distribution in Anacoco and Toro bayous, within Vernon and Sabine parishes, Louisiana, P. riddellii was only observed in littoral areas with coarse woody debris, gravel or sand substrata, and currents of moderate velocities (Randklev et al., 2013). In a statewide survey of Texas in 2011, it was found in sand, silty sand, and sometimes in a mixture of sand and clay in the Neches River (Burkalova et al., 2012). This species was found exclusively in lotic waters, in relatively shallow areas (at 0.2 - 1.5 m depth) with the most preferable substrate being sand, and combinations of sand with gravel and silt (Burkalova et al., 2012).

Reproduction

Most freshwater mussels have a parasitic stage in which the glochidia (larvae) attach to the gills or fins of certain types of fish. The host fish for this species is red shiner (Cyprinella lutrensis) and bullhead minnow (Pimephales vigilax) (Placyk, 2014; Marshall, 2014; Ford and Oliver, 2015; Marshall et al., 2018). Hinkle (2018) also confirmed blacktail shiner (Cyprinella venusta) asa host-fish.
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN1
ProvinceRankNative
TexasS2Yes
ArkansasS1Yes
LouisianaS3Yes
MississippiS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
2 - Agriculture & aquaculturePervasive - largeSerious - slightModerate (short-term)
2.2 - Wood & pulp plantationsRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightLow (long-term)
3 - Energy production & miningRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightModerate (short-term)
3.2 - Mining & quarryingRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightModerate (short-term)
5 - Biological resource useRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightModerate - low
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightModerate - low
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge - restrictedSerious - moderateLow (long-term)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useLarge - restrictedSerious - moderateHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11.2 - DroughtsPervasive (71-100%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (3)
Texas (3)
AreaForestAcres
Big CreekNational Forests in Texas1,447
Big WoodsNational Forests in Texas1,320
Winters BayouNational Forests in Texas730
References (43)
  1. Bordelon, V.L. and R.C. Harrel. 2004. Freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Village Creek drainage basin in southeast Texas. The Texas Journal of Science, 56(1): 63-72.
  2. Burlakova, L.E., and A.Y. Karatayev. 2012. State-wide assessment of unionid diversity in Texas. Final report to Texas Parks and Wildlife, Federal Aid Grant No. T-43.
  3. Burlakova, L. E., D. Campbell, A. Y. Karatayev, and D. Barclay. 2012. Distribution, genetic analysis and conservation priorities for rare Texas freshwater molluscs in the genera <i>Fusconaia </i>and <i>Pleurobema</i> (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Aquatic Biosystems 8:1-15.
  4. Ford, D.F. and A.M. Oliver. 2015. The known and potential hosts of Texas populations: Implications for future research and conservation efforts. Walkerana 18(1):1-14.
  5. Ford, N.B., K. Heffentrager, D.F. Ford, A. D. Walters, and N. Marshall. 2014. Significant recent records of unionid mussels in northeast Texas rivers. Walkerana: The Journal of the Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society 17(1):8-15.
  6. Ford, N.B., L. Williams, and M. Williams. 2012. Surveys for threatened and endangered mussels and fishes in rivers of northeastern Texas. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Section 6 Survey Report.
  7. Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society (FMCS). 2023. The 2023 checklist of freshwater bivalves (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Considered and approved by the Bivalve Names Subcommittee October 2023. Online: https://molluskconservation.org/MServices_Names-Bivalves.html
  8. Graf, D.L. and K.S. Cummings. 2021. A 'big data' approach to global freshwater mussel diversity (Bivalvia: Unionoida), with an updated checklist of genera and species. Journal of Molluscan Studies 87(1):1-36.
  9. Hinkle, E. 2018. Suitable host fish, population structure, and life-history characteristics for the state-listed, Louisiana pigtoe, <i>Pleurobema riddellii</i>. M.S. thesis, The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, Texas. 28 pp.
  10. Howard, A. D. 1915. Some exceptional cases of breeding among the Unionidae. The Nautilus 29:4-11.
  11. Howells, R.G. 1997c. Distributional surveys of freshwater mussels bivalves in Texas: progress report for 1996. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Management Data Series 144: Austin, Texas.
  12. Howells, R.G. 2014. Field Guide to Texas Freshwater Mussels. 2nd edition. Biostudies, Kerrville. 141 pp.
  13. Howells, R.G., C.M. Mather, and J.A.M. Bergmann. 1997. Conservation status of selected freshwater mussels in Texas. Pages 117-126 in K.S. Cummings, A.C. Buchanan, C.A. Mayer, and T.J. Naimo (eds.). Conservation and Management of Freshwater Mussels II: Initiatives for the Future, Proceedings of a UMRCC Symposium, 16-18 October, 1995, St. Louis, Missouri. Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee, Rock Island, Illinois.
  14. Howells, R.G., C.R. Randklev, and N.B. Ford. 2012. Taxonomic status of pigtoe unionids in Texas. Ellipsaria 14:11-15.
  15. Howells, R.G., R.W. Neck, and H.D. Murray. 1996. Freshwater Mussels of Texas. Texas Parks and Wildlife Press: Austin, Texas. 218 pp.
  16. Howells, Robert G. (Texas Parks and Wildlife). 1997b. Review of a draft copy of Critical Watersheds to Conserve U.S. Freshwater Biodiversity. Faxed correspondence with Larry Master dated 20 October 1997.
  17. Howells, Robert G. (Texas Parks and Wildlife Department). 1997a. Review and annotation of mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Christine O'Brien, USGS-BRD. June 1997.
  18. Lefevre, G. and W. T. Curtis. 1912. Studies on the reproduction and artificial propagation of fresh-water mussels. Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries 30:102-201.
  19. Marshall, N.T. 2014. Identification of potential fish hosts from wild populations of state-threatened east Texas freshwater mussels using a molecular identification dataset. Master's thesis, The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, Texas. 112 pp.
  20. Marshall, N. T., J. A. Banta, L. R. Williams, M. G. Williams and J. S. Placyk, Jr. 2018. DNA Barcoding permits identification of potential fish hosts of unionid freshwater mussels. American Malacological Bulletin, 36(1):42-56.
  21. Mather, C.M., and J.A M. Bergmann. 1994. Freshwater mussels of the Cypress Bayou system, northeast Texas. Malacology Data Net, 3(5/6): 139-145.
  22. MolluscaBase eds. 2024. MolluscaBase. Accessed at https://www.molluscabase.org
  23. Moyle, P., and J. Bacon. 1969. Distribution and abundance of molluscs in a fresh water environment. Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Science 35(2/3):82-85.
  24. Neck, R.W. 1984. Restricted and declining non-marine mollusks of Texas. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Technical Series, 34: 1-17.
  25. Placyk, J. 2014. Identification of important fish hosts for East Texas freshwater mussels using genetic and ecological niche-modeling methods. Final performance report to Texas Endangered and Threatened Species Program TX E-147-R. 49 pp.
  26. Plants-Paris, E. 2016. Population dynamics and genetic differentiation of the threatened freshwater mussel species <i>Fusconaia askewi, Fusconaia lananensis</i>, and <i>Pleurobema riddelli</i>. M.S. thesis, Department of Biology, University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, Texas. 91 pp.
  27. Randklev, C., J. Skoropski, B. Lundeen, and E.T. Tsakiris. 2013. New distributional records for four rare species of freshwater mussels (Family: Unionidae) in southwestern Louisiana. Southwestern Naturalist 58(2):268-273.
  28. Reimer, M.M. and L.A. Linam. 2005. Texas mussel watch, a citizen based volunteer monitoring program. Ellipsaria, 7(3): 5-6.
  29. Robertson, S., M. Parker, G. Linam, C. Robertson, A. Grubh and M. Casarez. 2016. Village Creek Watershed Bioassessment. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) River Studies Report 25. 35 pp.
  30. Strayer, D. 1983. The effects of surface geology and stream size on freshwater mussel (Bivalvia, Unionidae) distribution in southeastern Michigan, U.S.A. Freshwater Biology 13:253-264.
  31. Strayer, D. L. 1999. Use of flow refuges by unionid mussels in rivers. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18(4):468-476.
  32. Strayer, D. L., and J. Ralley. 1993. Microhabitat use by an assemblage of stream-dwelling unionaceans (Bivalvia) including two rare species of <i>Alasmidonta</i>. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12(3):247-258.
  33. Strecker, J.K. 1931. The naiades or pearly fresh-water mussels of Texas. Baylor University Museum Special Bulletin, 2: 1-71.
  34. Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
  35. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2009. Partial 90-Day Finding on a Petition to List 475 Species in the Southwestern United States as Threatened or Endangered With Critical Habitat. Proposed Rule. Federal Register 74(240): 66866-66905.
  36. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2023. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status With Critical Habitat for Texas Heelsplitter, and Threatened Status With Section 4(d) Rule and Critical Habitat for Louisiana Pigtoe. Proposed rule. Federal Register 88(53):16776-16832.
  37. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2025. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notification of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions. Candidate notice of review (CNOR). Federal Register 90(209):48912-48937.
  38. Van der Schalie, H. 1938. The naiad fauna of the Huron River in southeastern Michigan. Miscellaneous Publication of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 40:7-78.
  39. Vaughn, C.C., and C.M. Taylor. 1999. Impoundments and the decline of freshwater mussels: a case study of an extinction gradient. Conservation Biology 13(4):912-920.
  40. Vidrine, M.F. 1993. The Historical Distributions of Freshwater Mussels in Louisiana. Gail Q. Vidrine Collectibles: Eunice, Louisiana. xii + 225 pp. + 20 plates.
  41. Watters, G. T. 1992. Unionids, fishes, and the species-area curve. Journal of Biogeography 19:481-490.
  42. Williams, J. D., A. E. Bogan, R. S. Butler, K. S. Cummings, J. T. Garner, J. L. Harris, N. A. Johnson, and G. T. Watters. 2017. A revised list of the freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Freshwater Mollusk Biology and Conservation 20:33-58.
  43. Williams, J. D., M. L. Warren, Jr., K. S. Cummings, J. L. Harris, and R. J. Neves. 1993. Conservation status of freshwater mussels of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 18(9):6-22.